Sorry people, but David K is right. Calling him names is the liberal way of arguing when you have no argument.
Let's be clear; there is no ground or satellite data that's been taken in any of our lifetimes that shows the earth or the oceans are heating or
cooling that doesn't fall into the instruments percentage of uncertainty.
absolutely incorrect, please get your facts straight before just spewing made up nonsence!
That means that, with certainty, your argument is solely based on political talking points.
since your original statement is compoletely wrong - that makes this a clear example of you trying to make political talking
points - based on demonstrably incorrect "facts" nice try!
Unlike us, politicians are legally able to lie about anything they want for financial gains and power. If there wasn't both involved in GW, or
Climate Change, or whatever they need to call it this year to keep the money flowing, they wouldn't be involved in it either.
rightwing clap trap - no data no facts, just a bunch of blogging parrots sitting in an echo chamber trying to make enough
noise to obtusificate the truth!
In addition, all the temperature data that was used by all the contractors who worked on the government contracts to develop the climate models used
forged data to predict climate change. The original data that was collected was both incomplete and didn't meet the QA/QC standards, so it was
manipulated to get the numbers they wanted. Then, ALL the original data was destroyed. Every bit of data is gone so the original data can't be
checked or verified. That's why NOTHING has happened that was predicted 25+ years ago. Polar ice caps are still there, polar bears are more
prolific than before, Florida sea level hasn't moved a cm much less the state being under 3' of water. It's a lie.
again a completely made up story repeated ad infinitum by political hacks witrh no knowledge or understanding of datsa
collection, analysis etc - would you care to cite a source for All of the original data destroyed? and if that were the case - where is your data
coming from? and go do a bit of historical research on those predictions bucko - no scientific predictions predicted Fla underwater in 25 years -
regardless of what your blogsites spew! where are you getting polar bear reproductive and populations numbers from , i would be very interested in
those data, and are you saying polar icecaps are binary? either they are present, or gone?
thats a very convienient way to ignore the overwhelming amounts of data from both poles showing rapid loss if ice, but I guess in your mind an ice
cube floating on the arctic ocean would be the ice cap - so obviuously no global warming?
More records are being broken because they measure everything at more places. Speaking of measuring data. Anybody know of a meteorological station
that's had no change in the topography around it for the last 100 years? It's kind of no win question, but that's the problem with trying to measure
temperature over time with absolute precision. It can't be done. Everything that can absorb, reflect or re-radiate light/temperature has to stay
constant. And it doesn't. It can't. Plants and trees grow, areas are deforested, crops changes, asphalt and cement happens, etc. Any roads,
fields, buildings, etc been built in the last 100 years? Every time they do, it changes the areas temperature a bit. It doesn't make it hotter, it
just makes it impossible to measure 1/10 of degree change over time. That's the kicker.
So, David K is more right than he even knows. You were and are being lied to to separate you from more of your money and freedoms. Since you have no
argument that can be backed up with scientific data, you are just regurgitating political lies. Any yes, I am an Atmospheric Scientist.
care to state where you degrees are from - and who you work for?
[Edited on 8-6-2018 by Timinator] |
o
