[20:10:14]
GUPTA: You know, when it comes to the mandates through the Department of Labor and companies that have a hundred or more employees, my understanding
of what the President was saying, Dr. Fauci, was that either you get a vaccine, or you have to be tested regularly. And oftentimes, it seems like
these two things are commingled, like, do one or the other.
But in one case, you're preventing it, and in the other case, you're diagnosing it. Why not just do the vaccine mandate and not say that the testing
can be sort of this off ramp?
FAUCI: Well, I think the President is, you know, being somewhat moderate in his demand, if you want to call it that. And that there are some people
who really don't want to get vaccinated, but they don't want to lose their job, you've got to give them an off lane. And the off lane is if you get
tested frequently enough, and find out you're positive, you won't come to work, and you won't infect other people. So, it really is somewhat of a
compromise there.
Myself, I would make it just vaccinate or not. But he was trying to be moderate in what his pronouncement was.
GUPTA: And just real quickly, there was a study that came out of Israel about natural immunity, and basically, the headline was that natural immunity
provides a lot of protection, even better than the vaccines alone.
What do people make of that? So as we talk about vaccine mandates, I get calls all the time, people say, I've already had COVID, I'm protected. And
now the study says maybe even more protected than the vaccine alone. Should they also get the vaccine? How do you make the case to them?
FAUCI: You know, that's a really good point, Sanjay. I don't have a really firm answer for you on that. That's something that we're going to have to
discuss regarding the durability of the response. The one thing that paper from Israel didn't tell you is whether or not
as high as the protection is with natural infection, what's the durability compared to the durability of a vaccine? So it is conceivable that you got
infected, you're protected, but you may not be protected for an indefinite period of time.
So, I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously, because you very appropriately pointed out, it is an issue, and there
could be an argument for saying what you said. |