MrBillM
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 21656
Registered: 8-20-2003
Location: Out and About
Member Is Offline
Mood: It's a Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah Day
|
|
Atmospheric Phenomenon
This last week I encountered a phenomenon that I had forgotten about for many years and I realized I still don't know the scientific reason.
Back in the old days (pre 1985) before my first C-band satellite dish in Baja, we would watch "skip" TV out of Yuma-El Centro. The signal was always
better when the wind was out of the South and almost non-existent when the wind was strong from the North. The same was (is) true for the Marine VHF
Weather channel from Yuma. I had always wondered what the scientific explanation was.
Back in August of last year, I setup my XM radio to use here in Baja. Since the FM band is mostly clear here, I placed AM/FM receivers on the patio,
the casita and the garage. No problem until this last week when we had some significant winds from the SouthEast. Suddenly, the entire FM band in
the 88s was filled with broadcasts coming in from the States and creating interference with my XM reception. The wind has now stopped and the
stations are gone again. The same phenomenon as before.
Although I have a lot of past experience in various Electronics fields, I have never had occasion to delve much into RF wave propagation. Since Baja
is overflowing with experts in all fields of study, what the heck is the answer ?
|
|
|
bajalou
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 4459
Registered: 3-11-2004
Location: South of the broder
Member Is Offline
|
|
I always figured my cell phone conects at Yuma and Black Mtn without roaming is because of Tropospheric Ducting. Works better in the warm months and
better in the evening and morning than midday. Wind in San Felipe doesn't seem to bother it but storms/winds between here and Yuma does. Havent had
any problems with XM though.
I re-read your post and the problem wasn't with XM reception, but with the rebroadcast to FM receivers.
[Edited on 5-31-2006 by bajalou]
No Bad Days
\"Never argue with an idiot. People watching may not be able to tell the difference\"
\"The trouble with doing nothing is - how do I know when I\'m done?\"
Nomad Baja Interactive map
And in the San Felipe area - check out Valle Chico area |
|
|
Bajalero
Nomad
Posts: 316
Registered: 11-24-2003
Location: todos santos/ rcho san diego
Member Is Offline
|
|
Bill , I believe electron density in the upper atmosphere affects radio transmission and thus the "skip" you get . I would imagine a drier north wind
would increase the density and a more humid southerly wind would decrease it.
Best ask a amateur radio opperator though , blood and guts is more my forte.
Lero
|
|
|
Bruce R Leech
Elite Nomad
Posts: 6796
Registered: 9-20-2004
Location: Ensenada formerly Mulege
Member Is Offline
Mood: A lot cooler than Mulege
|
|
Bill this is kind of a complicated issue but maybe this can simplify it a little . it is a very interesting subject
FM DX
FM DX refer to long-distance reception of
TV and FM radio stations, respectively. The term DX is an old telegraph term meaning "long
distance." These terms refer to the active search for distant radio or television stations
received during unusual tropospheric lower atmospheric weather-related, or E-layer and F2-
layer upper atmospheric ionospheric conditions.
VHF/UHF television and radio signals are normally limited to a maximum "deep fringe"
reception service area of approximately 40-100 miles. However, providing favourable
atmospheric conditions are present, television and radio signals can sometimes be received at
hundreds or even thousands of miles outside their intended coverage area. These signals are
received using a large outdoor antenna system connected to a sensitive TV or FM tuner and/or
receiver.
While only a limited number of local stations can be normally received at satisfactory signal
strengths in any given area, tuning into other channels may reveal weaker signals from
adjacent areas. More consistently strong signals, especially those accentuated by unusual
atmospheric conditions, can be achieved by improving the antenna system. The development
of interest in TV-FM DX as a hobby can arise after more distant signals are either
intentionally or accidentally discovered, leading to a serious interest in improving the aerial
and receiving installation for the purpose of actively seeking long-range television and radio
reception. The TV-FM DX hobby is somewhat similar in scope to other radio/electronic
related hobbies such as amateur radio or short-wave radio, and organizations such as the
Worldwide TV-FM DX Association have developed to coordinate and foster the further
study, and enjoyment of VHF/UHF television and FM broadcast DX.http://anarc.org/wtfda
History
After the introduction of the Alexandra Palace, London 405-line BBC channel B1 TV service
in 1936, it soon became apparent that television reception was also possible well outside the
original intended service area. For example, in February 1938, engineers at the RCA Research
Station, Riverhead, Long Island, New York, accidentally received 3,000-mile trans-Atlantic
F2 reception of the London 45.0 MHz 405-line channel B1 TV service. The flickering black-
and-white footage, which is characteristic of F2 propagation, includes Jasmine Bligh, one of
the original BBC announcers, and a brief shot of Elizabeth Cowell, who also shared
announcing duties with Jasmine, an excerpt from an unknown period costume drama and the
BBC's station identification logo transmitted at the beginning and end of the day's programs.
This reception was coincidentally recorded on 16mm movie film, and is now considered to be
the only surviving example of pre-war live high-definition British television.
http://www.apts.org.uk/recording.htm
The BBC temporarily ceased transmissions on 1 September 1939, as World War II began.
After the BBC channel B1 television service re-commenced in 1946, distant reception reports
were received from various parts of the world, including Italy, South Africa, India, Middle
East, North America and the Caribbean.
In May 1940, the Federal Communications Commission formally allocated the 42-49 MHz
band for FM radio broadcasting. It was soon apparent that distant FM signals from up to
1,400 miles distance would often interfere with local stations during the summer months.
Because the 42-49 MHz FM signals were originally intended to only cover a relatively
confined service area, the sporadic long-distance signal propagation was seen as a nuisance,
especially by station management.
On February 1942, the first known published long-distance reception report of a FM
broadcast station on 41.5 MHz was reported by FM magazine: "Zenith Radio Corporation,
operating W51C, has received a letter from a listener in Monterey, Mexico, telling of daily
reception of this station between 3:00 P. M. and 6:00 P. M. This is the greatest distance, 1,100
airline miles, from which consistent reception of the 50 kw. transmitter has been reported."
http://members.aol.com/jeff560/chronofm.html
In June 1945, the FCC decided that FM would have to move from the established 42-49 MHz
pre-war band to a new band at 88-108 MHz. According to 1945 and 1946 FCC documents,
the three major factors which the commission considered in its decision to place FM in the
88-108 MHz band were sporadic E co-channel interference, F2 layer interference, and extent
of coverage. http://ieee.cincinnati.fuse.net/reiman/09_1994.html During the 1950s to early
1960s, long-distance television reports started to circulate via popular U.S. electronics
hobbyist periodicals such as DXing Horizons, Popular Electronics, Television Horizons,
Radio Horizons, and Radio-Electronics. In January 1960, the TV DX interest was further
promoted via Robert B. Cooper's regular DXing Horizons column.
In 1957, the world record for TV DX was extended to 10,800 miles with the reception of
England's BBC channel 1 in various parts of Australia. Most notably, George Palmer in
Melbourne, Victoria, received viewable pictures from the BBC London channel B1 station.
This BBC F2 reception was recorded on to movie film.
http://www.geocities.com/toddemslie/George_Palmer_TVDX.html
In the early 1960s, the U.K. magazine Practical Television first published a regular TV DX
column edited by Charles Rafarel. By 1970, Charles' DX TV column had attracted
considerable interest from TV DXers worldwide. After Charles' death in 1971, U.K. TV DXer
Roger Bunney continued the monthly long distance television column, which is still in current
publication.
Roger Bunney also published several TV DX books, including Long Distance Television
Reception (TV-DX) for the Enthusiast 1981 ISBN 0900162716, and A TV DXer's Handbook
1986 ISBN 0-85934-150-X.
Tropospheric propagation
The service area from a TV or FM radio transmitter extends to just beyond the optical
horizon, at which point signals start to rapidly reduce in strength. Viewers living in such a
"deep fringe" reception area will notice that during certain conditions weak signals normally
masked by noise, increase in signal strength to allow quality reception. Such conditions are
related to the current state of the troposphere.
Tropospheric propagated signals travel in the part of the atmosphere adjacent to the surface
and extending to some 25,000 feet. Such signals are thus directly affected by weather
conditions extending over some hundreds of miles. During very settled, warm, anti-cyclonic
weather (i.e., high pressure), usually weak snowy TV signals from distant transmitters
improve in signal strength. Another symptom during such conditions may be interference to
the local transmitter, resulting in co-channel interference, which may be in the form of
horizontal lines or an extra floating picture. A settled high-pressure system gives the classic
conditions for enhanced tropospheric propagation, in particular favouring signals which travel
along the prevailing isobar pattern rather than across it. Such weather conditions can occur at
any time, but generally the summer and autumn months are the best periods. In certain
favourable locations, enhanced tropospheric propagation may enable reception of UHF TV
signals up to 1,000 miles or more.
The observable characteristics of such high-pressure systems are usually clear, cloudless days
with little or no wind. At sunset the upper air cools, as does the surface temperature, but at
different rates. This produces a boundary or temperature gradient, which allows an inversion
level to form - a similar effect occurs at sunrise. The inversion is capable of allowing VHF
and UHF signal propagation well beyond the normal radio horizon distance.
The inversion effectively reduces sky wave radiation from a transmitter - normally VHF and
UHF signals travel on into space when they reach the horizon, the refractive index of the
ionosphere preventing signal return. With temperature inversion, however, the signal is to a
large extent refracted over the horizon rather than continuing along a direct path into outer
space.
Fog also produces good tropospheric results, again due to inversion effects. Fog occurs during
high pressure weather, and if such conditions result in a large belt of fog with clear sky above,
there will be heating of the upper fog level and thus an inversion. This situation often arises
towards night fall, continues overnight and clears with the sunrise over a period of around 4-5
hours.
Bruce R Leech
Ensenada
 |
|
|
MrBillM
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 21656
Registered: 8-20-2003
Location: Out and About
Member Is Offline
Mood: It's a Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah Day
|
|
Still Wondering
Whether there is a direct correlation between the surface winds and the reception phenomenon. That there are influencing factors produced by
atmospheric changes is a given. Those influences will vary depending on the frequency range of the device in question, generally having a greater
effect as the frequency increases.
Since we have no effective way to sample the winds aloft and the exact location of High/Low pressure systems over Baja, it is possible that the
surface wind direction is merely an incidental indicator.
Still researching.
[Edited on 5-31-2006 by MrBillM]
|
|
|
Roberto
Banned
Posts: 2162
Registered: 9-5-2003
Member Is Offline
|
|
Bill, I think you know that TV signals are VHF and UHF. Marine radio is also VHF, as is two meter ham radio. What you describe is a well-known
phenomenon known as "Troposhperic Propagation".
I won't go into excruciating detail, but I will point you to a website that has a short explanation: http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14182/css/14182_96.htm , and let you research the subject yourself if you are interested. I will add this.
From your posts, you seem to have some experience with marine radio. Aside from the (local) range of VHF radio, long-range marine radio is in the HF
range. This long-range depends on the ability to bounce radio signals off of different (depending on frequency) layers of the ionosphere. Basically,
the signals go out toward space, are reflected by the appropriate ionospheric layer go back to ground, and are sometimes reflected again ... and again
... and again. The number of bounces are dependent on wavelength, ionosperic conditions, solar cycle (sunspots), and many other things. One of the
factors making ham radio so interesting. Talking to someone on the other side of the world, once you understand the physics involved, is an amazing
phenomenon we have (more or less) managed to harness. UHF/VHF signals are different, and they are not reflected by the ionosphere, and go straight out
into space. But, under very specific conditions, a similar effect occurs, involving cloud cover, humidity, wind and other things. I have talked to
people on marine VHF that were over 400 miles away many time from my boat - usually in the hours before sunrise and in the spring/early summer.
Reports of QSOs between California and Hawaii are not uncommon. Anyway, there is the short version - this subject is as deep as you are interested in
exploring.
|
|
|
bajaguy
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9247
Registered: 9-16-2003
Location: Carson City, NV/Ensenada - Baja Country Club
Member Is Offline
Mood: must be 5 O'clock somewhere in Baja
|
|
Just to add my 2 cents worth, many years ago my Army unit was co-located with an Army Tropospheric (sp) radio unit. Despite their explainations and
drawings, about the only thing I learned was they bounced radio (and other types) of signals off of the troposphere. Can't remember if they were VHF,
UHF or HF.
|
|
|
MrBillM
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 21656
Registered: 8-20-2003
Location: Out and About
Member Is Offline
Mood: It's a Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah Day
|
|
Thanks, Roberto, I'll Check it out.
This is one of those esoteric issues that just begs to be answered. I hadn't thought about it for many years since the mid 80s when we were watching
a lot of "skip" TV in Baja and checking Yuma Marine Weather. Until, of course, this last weekend when it affected my FM reception from my XM radio
receiver. Since the FM radio band, VHF Broadcast TV band and Marine Radio band are in the same general area (55 - 212 MHz ?) I would expect nearly
the same result. I simply haven't read anything that specifically addresses wind effect. Midday today I dusted off my Radio Technician textbook
(nothing there) and started wading through my ITT "Reference Data for Radio Engineers". So far no luck. I'll check out your link.
The phenomenon is directly related to wind strength and direction. I have laid here many nights in the past watching the reception change as the wind
did.
Thanks Again.
|
|
|
MrBillM
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 21656
Registered: 8-20-2003
Location: Out and About
Member Is Offline
Mood: It's a Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah Day
|
|
OK, I'll Buy That !
Tropospheric Scattering.
It explains WHY strong winds blowing TOWARDS the Transmitted signal will improve the reception and wind blowing AWAY from the transmitter has the
opposite effect.
Today is already on the plus side of the educational ledger.
|
|
|
Roberto
Banned
Posts: 2162
Registered: 9-5-2003
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by MrBillM
Today is already on the plus side of the educational ledger. |
Experience would then say "quit while you're ahead"  , and kick back
for the rest of the day.
|
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xmbforum/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
