Osprey
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3694
Registered: 5-23-2004
Location: Baja Ca. Sur
Member Is Offline
|
|
New Marina
More Unintended Consequences
There are many reasons the Cabo Rivera Marina and Golf Course project is at a long stand-still. They failed to comply with several provisions of the
permit requirements and market forces didn’t help their cause a bit. So, right now, no condos, golf courses or hotels --- that means they are using
very little water. The marina home lots are hooked up to city water but there is no service (only one house stands out as a stark reminder of their
failure – hundreds of lots were sold and their ownership is murky indeed).
While all that happened, over the last 6 years, Cabo Dorado, near Cabo Pulmo lost their permits and is in suspension too. Part of the reason there was
they said they would need 4.5 million cubic meters of water and all of the 8 local aquifers had only a total of 2.5 million cubic meters.
For the last several thousand years natural rain water falling on the Laguna Mountains caused the arroyo San Dionysio to flow above ground ALL YEAR
ROUND. Four years ago the housing project at Spa Buena Vista, La Mission, began pumping water to their project directly from the arroyo that feeds
several villages (including ours) and since that very day not a drop of water appears now in the arroyo.
Comes now a new project 12 miles to the west: marina, golf courses, hotels, homes and condos known as Anhelo. Too late to argue because they have
their permits in place. They say they will have a desal plant but they’ll need a little more water from local aquifers: just under ONE MILLION GALLONS
A DAY! That’s about one year’s water use for my little village of 450 homes. I think it’s a given that they’ll simply tap into the pipe that serves
the nearby La Mission and shortly thereafter we’ll go on water rationing here.
I think it is safe to extrapolate this chain of events – the water wars have already been lost down here. Each new project will promise new dollars,
new jobs while laying waste to all local agriculture and domestic habitation.
Maybe I’m behind the curve on this one – does everybody already know this? Is that the reason nobody’s buying land, homes down here; is that what’s
causing the ruinous drop in realty prices here? Can’t blame the business people --- it works in Mazatlan, Cancun, why not here? Because we can’t live
with these new improvements when the sky only gives us 7.5 inches a year rainfall, about enough to fill a nice plastic tumbler.
After these developments de-Mexify this little desert, Central America will be the next stop for the developers because it has 45,000 cubic meters per
person per year in reserve and a lot more to come from rainy skies.
|
|
|
Whale-ista
Super Nomad
Posts: 2009
Registered: 2-18-2013
Location: San Diego
Member Is Offline
Mood: Sunny with chance of whales
|
|
Agreed. Availability of water and less rain will be a limiting factor in development in many places, and not just in Baja.
On the other hand we may see more hurricanes dumping a lot of water, but not in a very useful timeline.
(At least you haven't had any tropical storms yet, correct?)
Thank you for the update.
\"Probably the airplanes will bring week-enders from Los Angeles before long, and the beautiful poor bedraggled old town will bloom with a
Floridian ugliness.\" (John Steinbeck, 1940, discussing the future of La Paz, BCS, Mexico)
|
|
|
grizzlyfsh95
Nomad
Posts: 226
Registered: 1-8-2010
Location: East Cape
Member Is Offline
|
|
When will the Mexican government learn that if you store water when it comes in torrents you can use it when it doesn't. Pumping from underground
water sources is not the most efficient way to get it. Why have they not built a reservoir in those mountains to capture the water when it is there?
The entire world uses dams and reservoirs to capture water, and I am not aware of any in Baja Sur. The mountains get water dumped on them frequently,
but with the sandy arroyos and low humidity it disappears quickly. I have often wondered why there is no dam above the Santiago arroyo..
wait...4,3,2,1....evil dams etc etc
The harder I work, the luckier I get
|
|
|
elgatoloco
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 4323
Registered: 11-19-2002
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
|
|
Stuck on stupid. 
Viva Mexico?
MAGA
Making Attorneys Get Attorneys
|
|
|
Alm
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 2716
Registered: 5-10-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
Stupid - no. Irresponsible, indifferent - yes. Eventually, stupid too, because environmental damage can't be measured in dollars made (and you can't
take this money to the "other side").
|
|
|
Osprey
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3694
Registered: 5-23-2004
Location: Baja Ca. Sur
Member Is Offline
|
|
Mexican developers are not stupid and neither are the regulators. Avaricious, complicit, they have, over the centuries laid down a system rife for
moving big money around to many pockets; the game hides the crimes until it all unravels and the players are long gone, merely ghosts in haunted
places up and down the beach.
|
|
|
Von
Senior Nomad
Posts: 961
Registered: 10-1-2006
Location: Poway-Rosarito
Member Is Offline
Mood: getting ready!
|
|
thanks for reminding me. Ill be building a Huge Pila at my place in Rosarito~ soon 
READY SET.....................
|
|
|
Udo
Elite Nomad
Posts: 6323
Registered: 4-26-2008
Location: Black Hills, SD/Ensenada/San Felipe
Member Is Offline
Mood: TEQUILA!
|
|
Put in about a 1000 gallon pila.
Udo
Youth is wasted on the young!
|
|
|
Alm
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 2716
Registered: 5-10-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
I doubt that Central and South America will be the next stop. Not for the reasons of water resources. Developers and speculators are already there.
Coastal Panama or Equador, even though mostly developed, are not that attractive. Too much water. Rain every day during rainy season, rain every other
day for the rest of the year, and horrible humidity and heat all the time, whether it rains or not. Sure, sure, beautiful rain forest with everything
that comes with it - bugs, snakes, tropical diseases. I'll pass.
|
|
|
4Cata
Nomad
Posts: 115
Registered: 10-28-2008
Location: Yosemite area
Member Is Offline
Mood: Siempre alegre!
|
|
1, speaking of failed or failing developments, how would you find out if permits had been issued or even filed for? How do you sort out the
unscrupulous from the above board ones? 2. In the case of campos, what protection does an owner have from it being sold out from under them? Also,
if there are major infrastructure problems such as water or septic, is there a solution?
Thanks for any advice.
Agaveros, silk in a bottle, a beautiful bottle!
|
|
|
David K
Honored Nomad
Posts: 64492
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Online
Mood: Have Baja Fever
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by grizzlyfsh95  | | When will the Mexican government learn that if you store water when it comes in torrents you can use it when it doesn't. Pumping from underground
water sources is not the most efficient way to get it. Why have they not built a reservoir in those mountains to capture the water when it is there?
The entire world uses dams and reservoirs to capture water, and I am not aware of any in Baja Sur. The mountains get water dumped on them frequently,
but with the sandy arroyos and low humidity it disappears quickly. I have often wondered why there is no dam above the Santiago arroyo..
wait...4,3,2,1....evil dams etc etc |
I agree the natural way to have water year round, and not use wells, is through building reservoirs... the dams also provide flood disaster protection
saving lives.
There are dams in Baja Sur, but I only am aware of three modern ones other than the small ones built at the Spanish missions:
1) Between Ciudad Constitucion and Mision San Luis Gonzaga (El Inaugal)
2) Near Todos Santos (Santa Inez)
3) Outside of La Paz (La Buena Mujer)
#3: http://ibc.lynxeds.com/locality/nearctic/mexico-northern/baj...
|
|
|
monoloco
Elite Nomad
Posts: 6667
Registered: 7-13-2009
Location: Pescadero BCS
Member Is Offline
|
|
The dam at Santa Inez was an engineering failure. The ground behind it is too porous and it doesn't hold water.
"The future ain't what it used to be"
|
|
|
David K
Honored Nomad
Posts: 64492
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Online
Mood: Have Baja Fever
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by monoloco | | The dam at Santa Inez was an engineering failure. The ground behind it is too porous and it doesn't hold water. |
That's sad! Is there any other attempt in the region?
|
|
|
Osprey
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3694
Registered: 5-23-2004
Location: Baja Ca. Sur
Member Is Offline
|
|
There is a large res above San Jose del Cabo (pressa San Lazaro) but it has many problems.
Not easy to build water storage facilities near or in the mountains. The one at Boca de la Sierra fills up with silt after big storms --- they have to
empty it, let it dry up (?) and then, only then, dig it out again with heavy equipment. Very costly and difficult for everyone involved.
|
|
|
David K
Honored Nomad
Posts: 64492
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Online
Mood: Have Baja Fever
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Osprey | There is a large res above San Jose del Cabo (pressa San Lazaro) but it has many problems.
Not easy to build water storage facilities near or in the mountains. The one at Boca de la Sierra fills up with silt after big storms --- they have to
empty it, let it dry up (?) and then, only then, dig it out again with heavy equipment. Very costly and difficult for everyone involved.
|
Thank you... !!
|
|
|
Whale-ista
Super Nomad
Posts: 2009
Registered: 2-18-2013
Location: San Diego
Member Is Offline
Mood: Sunny with chance of whales
|
|
"More Unintended Consequences"
Osprey began with this comment. "More Unintended Consequences"
Marinas often disrupt wetlands and marshes, which are nursery grounds for fisheries. So more boats, less fishing opportunities.
Related: yes- Blocking runoff behind dams will create more long term water supply. It will also gradually destroy Baja's beaches & fisheries.
The silt and sediment transport needed to create sand bars comes from streams and rivers, so...block these flows, and no more Sandy shores for future
Baja visitors.
Likewise fewer shallow marshes/wetlands, fewer nurseries & nutrients for fisheries, so less fishing opportunities.
Finally, as noted above, poorly designed dams fill with silt and limit storage capacity. And if/when they fail and collapse, the results can de
deadly.
Underground pilas are a better, tho smaller, solution. Decentralized, so less costly. Keep some water on site, but still allow runoff to carry
nutrients/sand to the sea. Safer in case of collapse/leaks- no downstream flood of water and debris.
Smarter, safer, more sustainable. (I have 400 gallons of rainwater storage in my San Diego yard, and a filter to use it for drinking in case of
emergencies.)
\"Probably the airplanes will bring week-enders from Los Angeles before long, and the beautiful poor bedraggled old town will bloom with a
Floridian ugliness.\" (John Steinbeck, 1940, discussing the future of La Paz, BCS, Mexico)
|
|
|
Udo
Elite Nomad
Posts: 6323
Registered: 4-26-2008
Location: Black Hills, SD/Ensenada/San Felipe
Member Is Offline
Mood: TEQUILA!
|
|
Coincidentally, that is about the amount of rain that Los Angeles has gotten on the average per year, and I think LA has several million residents.
Note: I am not trying to compare Los Angeles to any part of Baja as far as usage is concerned, only the amount of rainfall per year.
I also think that it is stupid of the Mexican government to issue permits for developments, when so many other similar developments have failed in the
past, and Jorge so wisely makes a note of.
| Quote: Originally posted by Osprey | More Unintended Consequences
Because we can’t live with these new improvements when the sky only gives us 7.5 inches a year rainfall, about enough to fill a nice plastic
tumbler.
|
[Edited on 5-22-2015 by Udo]
Udo
Youth is wasted on the young!
|
|
|
monoloco
Elite Nomad
Posts: 6667
Registered: 7-13-2009
Location: Pescadero BCS
Member Is Offline
|
|
There has been a lot of work in the sierras building smaller gabion basket type retention dams to slow runoff so it can filter down into the aquifers.
https://www.google.com/search?q=gabion+basket+type+dam&c...
[Edited on 5-22-2015 by monoloco]
"The future ain't what it used to be"
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xmbforum/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
