BajaNomad
Not logged in [Login - Register]

Go To Bottom
Printable Version  
Author: Subject: The future of Mexico is entwined with energy reforms
Anonymous
Unregistered




Posts: N/A
Registered: N/A
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 2-21-2004 at 08:59 PM
The future of Mexico is entwined with energy reforms


http://www.mexidata.info/id130.html

Monday, February 9, 2004
By Barnard R. Thompson

One would hope its yet premature, but Vicente Fox might mull over what John Ardagh wrote about fellow Irishman and onetime prime minister Garrett Fitzgerald: ?Perhaps history?s verdict on him will be that he pointed the Irish down the path, but failed to take them very far along it.?

All the same, the jury is still out as to how Fox will be remembered ? and this in spite of an amelioration of democracy in Mexico leading up to his winning the presidency.

Yet if substantive, needed and promised reforms continue to be blocked by an opposition controlled congress, history may record 2000 as a simple blip, an asterisk noting that Fox, his ?Amigos de Fox? and the National Action Party brought a 71 year autocratic reign by the Institutional Revolutionary Party to an end (or maybe just an interlude), and little more.

Now, into the fourth year of Fox?s six-year presidency ? and in what could be his closing chance to get meaningful legislation through congress, the partisan strife is yet again underway.

Energy proposals are once more at the top of the list of reform packages sent to congress, which complicates matters even further. The latter because the energy sector as a whole, plus each of its key facets, all carry added baggage.

To jump-start support for an affirmative vote on energy issues in the forthcoming session of congress, administration officials have been meeting with legislative and entrepreneurial leaders since the beginning of the year.

According to sources interviewed by the financial daily El Economista, in its February 4 edition, during one such meeting with representatives of the private sector energy secretary Felipe Calder?n Hinojosa called for a diversification of fuels in order to reduce the industrial use of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Energy officials said that Pemex, Mexico?s oil and gas monopoly, does not have enough LNG to keep the ?national electric system? operating, or to meet industrial demands that are expected to increase by 27 percent this year.

The entrepreneurs and industrialists reacted negatively to the proposal, pointing out that Mexico?s industrial base would have to go through a complete conversion in order to use alternative fuels. Those interviewed also claimed that the government?s proposals are little more than short-term efforts to sidestep the legislative process in order to alter rules and regulations.

Another plan that is moving forward is to involve Mexico?s Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) in the LNG market, in direct competition with Pemex. The proposal is for the CFE to import LNG from the U.S., Australia, Bolivia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Peru and Russia to meet its demand, and to sell the surplus to business and industrial users in western Mexico.

To bring this LNG into the country, the CFE is planning a storage terminal and regasification plant on Mexico?s west coast, near Manzanillo, Colima, or L?zaro C?rdenas, Michoac?n. Tender bid requisites for the estimated US$350 million facility should be advertised within the next two to three months.

At the same time, LNG plant and receiving terminal plans for several facilities on the northern Pacific coast of Baja California are running into obstacles. Of an originally announced five projects, at a combined investment value of nearly US$3 billion, the number has dwindled to three ? and all three are facing problems that range from public opposition to environmental permitting questions to newly aroused safety concerns due to a deadly January 20 explosion at an Algerian LNG complex.

While the three Baja California receiving terminals for imported LNG and the regasification plants are to supply growing local needs, a major goal (maybe the real goal) is to also export gas to Southern California.

Marathon Oil Company has a site south of Playas de Tijuana, however many area residents are opposed to such a complex in their backyard. And while Marathon has a go-ahead permit from Mexico?s federal Energy Regulatory Commission, it still does not have all of the environmental permits or its requisite land use authorizations.

Chevron-Texaco is advancing through the application process for an offshore facility near the Coronado Islands, west of Tijuana. However it too will need environmental and land use permits, especially as it will have to interconnect with a planned (and yet to be authorized) transmission pipeline that is to run from north of Ensenada to east of Tijuana.

A Shell-Sempra Energy terminal is planned for a more isolated location north of Ensenada and south of the Bajamar resort development. But here again some permits are pending for the estimated US$600 million joint venture.
JESSE
Ultra Nomad
*****




Posts: 3370
Registered: 11-5-2002
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 2-22-2004 at 08:13 PM


Fox sucks, even hes wife is making a fool of him, definately the weakest president in 50 yrs, i can't believe i voted for him.



View user's profile
Anonymous
Unregistered




Posts: N/A
Registered: N/A
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 3-4-2004 at 07:48 PM
Mexico's Fox approval drops on economy, leadership


Quote:
Originally posted by JESSE
Fox sucks, even hes wife is making a fool of him, definately the weakest president in 50 yrs, i can't believe i voted for him.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/mexico/20040301-0908-mexi...

REUTERS
March 1, 2004

MEXICO CITY ? Mexican President Vicente Fox's popularity rating has dropped in recent months due to weak economic growth and a perception that he lacks leadership, opinion polls published Monday showed. Fifty-five percent of those interviewed in surveys in the Reforma daily said they approved of the way Fox was running the country, two percentage points lower than in a similar Reforma poll last September.

Another survey in the El Universal paper also gave Fox a 55 percent approval rating, three percentage points lower than its previous poll last November.

Fox has failed to bring about the stellar economic growth he promised when he ousted the long-ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party in elections in 2000.

The economy grew a weak 1.3 percent last year, although growth is forecast to recover to beyond 3 percent in 2004.

Congress blocked attempts by Fox to pass energy and fiscal reforms, casting doubts on the former Coca-Cola executive's leadership skills.

Nevertheless, Fox's popularity is still relatively high by Latin American standards, and Mexico has avoided some of the economic and political upheavals that have hit other countries in the region like Argentina and Venezuela...

  Go To Top

 






All Content Copyright 1997- Q87 International; All Rights Reserved.
Powered by XMB; XMB Forum Software © 2001-2014 The XMB Group






"If it were lush and rich, one could understand the pull, but it is fierce and hostile and sullen. The stone mountains pile up to the sky and there is little fresh water. But we know we must go back if we live, and we don't know why." - Steinbeck, Log from the Sea of Cortez

 

"People don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care." - Theodore Roosevelt

 

"You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them or to them." - Malcolm Forbes

 

"Let others lead small lives, but not you. Let others argue over small things, but not you. Let others cry over small hurts, but not you. Let others leave their future in someone else's hands, but not you." - Jim Rohn

 

"The best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer." - Cunningham's Law







Thank you to Baja Bound Mexico Insurance Services for your long-term support of the BajaNomad.com Forums site.







Emergency Baja Contacts Include:

Desert Hawks; El Rosario-based ambulance transport; Emergency #: (616) 103-0262