Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: The Mexican Art Tax

Posts: 449
Registered: 4-9-2005
Member Is Offline

[*] posted on 5-16-2017 at 07:10 AM
The Mexican Art Tax

The Mexican Art Tax

The economy of high-end art is a strange one. If you’re a moderately successful professional artist, maybe you sell five paintings a year — does that bring in enough money to pay the bills? And even if it does, those works are going into private collections, meaning that museums end up without much contemporary art. And there’s another problem, too: the government is going to want its cut from your earnings, in the form of taxes — a tough burden for an artist who is already struggling to make ends meet.

The callous solution to all of this — minus the museum part, at least — is for the would-be Michelangelo to get a so-called “real job.” But Mexico takes another approach, and it’s one that solves the museum’s problems, too. In Mexico, if you’re an artist, you can pay your taxes with your art instead of cash.

The system, called “Pago en Especie” or “in-kind payment” is pretty simple. To participate, one needs to provide Mexico’s Tax Administration Service (for American readers, that’s the equivalent of the IRS) with a sample of one’s work to be juried, and evidence that you’ve sold works in the past. (José San Cristóbal Larrea, director of the government’s Cultural Promotion and National Heritage Office, told the U.S. press that “a 10-member jury of artists ensures that no one tries to unload junk.”) If accepted into the program — and somewhere between 500 and 1,000 artists registered, as of 2014 — these taxpayers now have the option of forfeiting some of their artwork in lieu of paying taxes. Dollars and pesos never even enter into the equation; if an artist sells five or fewer pieces in a given year, he or she needs to “pay” an additional one to the government or to a museum; for more than five sold, how many pieces an artist has to give up is determined by a sliding scale which caps at six pieces per year.

This unique tax program began in 1957 or thereabouts; because it did not become official until 1975, the actual origins are somewhat unclear. The accepted story: In 1957, David Alfaro Siqueiros, who Fusion calls a “famous muralist and Stalinist radical who attempted to assassinate communist revolutionary Leon Trotsky,” got into an argument with the taxing administration. A friend of Siqueiros’ was about to go to prison for failing to pay taxes, and Siqueiros argued that “the government should find a way of reaching an agreement with creative minds who lacked cash,” again per Fusion. The Christian Science Monitor reports that it was Siqueiros who proposed that artists be able to pay their taxes in art, not pesos.

And at least one local taxing agency agreed. For the next 18 years, many artists took advantage of this informal program, including famed muralist Diego Rivera; the CS Monitor reports that the works obtained through Pago en Especie contain three of his paintings, “an accomplishment, given that he was on his deathbed the year the program was founded.” In 1975, though, the program became a formal one and is now part of the tax code.

Artist can’t just give up any piece of work, either; only visual art — paintings, photographs, etc. — are allowed, and each piece is juried to make sure it is worth about the same as the other ones sold. At times, this causes a problem; as USA Today reported in 2010, “a few well-known artists have had their contributions rejected in recent years.” But in general, it’s not a problem. Per the Atlantic, as of 2014, Pago en Especie has resulted in a “public collection of nearly 7,000 paintings, sculptures, and graphics accepted as tax payments from some of Mexico’s best-known artists.”

Bonus fact: The United Kingdom has a similar program as the above, but it’s even more lax — you can donate art instead of paying your taxes, and you don’t even need to be an artist. Per Arts Council England, the scheme, called Acceptance in Lieu, any taxpayer can “transfer important works of art and heritage objects into public ownership” as a way to avoid inheritance tax. The taxpayer is given tax relief equal to the full value of the item while the state gets some pretty cool artifacts. As Forbes notes, “all sorts of things have followed this path, including original manuscripts handwritten by John Lennon.”

From the Archives: The Art of War: Why American Cold War-era art was of national importance.

Related: Modern Art, the board game.

The Mexican Art Tax

Not one shred of evidence supports the notion that life is serious.
View user's profile
Select Nomad

Posts: 10330
Registered: 10-28-2008
Location: La Bocana, BCS
Member Is Offline

[*] posted on 5-16-2017 at 12:58 PM

wow. very interesting. Thanks for sharing!

Blanca and Les
Come visit us
View user's profile Visit user's homepage

  Go To Top


All Content Copyright � 1997- Q87 International; All Rights Reserved.
Powered by XMB; XMB Forum Software © 2001-2014 The XMB Group�

"If it were lush and rich, one could understand the pull, but it is fierce and hostile and sullen. The stone mountains pile up to the sky and there is little fresh water. But we know we must go back if we live, and we don't know why." - Steinbeck, Log from the Sea of Cortez

"People don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care." - Ivan R. Misner, Ph.D

"You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them or to them." - Malcolm Forbes

"Let others lead small lives, but not you. Let others argue over small things, but not you. Let others cry over small hurts, but not you. Let others leave their future in someone else's hands, but not you." - Jim Rohn

Thank you to Baja Bound Mexico Insurance Services for your long-term support of the Forums site.

Emergency Baja Contacts Include:

Desert Hawks; El Rosario-based ambulance transport; Emergency #: (616) 103-0262