BajaNomad
Not logged in [Login - Register]

Go To Bottom
Printable Version  
Author: Subject: ICE Agents Are Losing Patience
Santiago
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 3250
Registered: 8-27-2003
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 12:51 PM
ICE Agents Are Losing Patience


ICE Agents Are Losing Patience with Trump’s Chaotic Immigration Policy

By Jonathan Blitzer
June 24, 2019

Last Monday, when President Trump tweeted that his Administration would stage nationwide immigration raids the following week, with the goal of deporting “millions of illegal aliens,” agents at Immigration and Customs Enforcement were suddenly forced to scramble. The agency was not ready to carry out such a large operation. Preparations that would typically take field officers six to eight weeks were compressed into a few days, and, because of Trump’s tweet, the officers would be entering communities that now knew they were coming. “It was a dumb-chit political move that will only hurt the agents,” John Amaya, a former deputy chief of staff at ICE, told me. On Saturday, hours before the operation was supposed to start in ten major cities across the country, the President changed course, delaying it for another two weeks.

On Sunday, I spoke to an ICE officer about the week’s events. “Almost nobody was looking forward to this operation,” the officer said. “It was a boondoggle, a nightmare.” Even on the eve of the operation, many of the most important details remained unresolved. “This was a family op. So where are we going to put the families? There’s no room to detain them, so are we going to put them in hotels?” the officer said. On Friday, an answer came down from ICE leadership: the families would be placed in hotels while ICE figured out what to do with them. That, in turn, raised other questions. “So the families are in hotels, but who’s going to watch them?” the officer continued. “What happens if the person we arrest has a U.S.-citizen child? What do we do with the children? Do we need to get booster seats for the vans? Should we get the kids toys to play with?”

Trump’s tweet broadcasting the operation had also created a safety issue for the officers involved. “No police agency goes out and says, ‘Tomorrow, between four and eight, we’re going to be in these neighborhoods,’ ” the officer said.

The idea for the operation took hold in the White House last September, two months after a federal judge had ordered the government to stop separating parents and children at the border. At the time, the number of families seeking asylum was rising steadily, and Administration officials were determined to toughen enforcement. A D.H.S. official told me that, in the months before the operation was proposed, “a major focus” of department meetings “was concern about the fact that people on the non-detained docket”—asylum seekers released into the U.S. with a future court date—“are almost never deported.” By January, a tentative plan had materialized. The Department of Justice developed a “rocket docket” to prioritize the cases of asylum seekers who’d just arrived in the country and missed a court date—in their absence, the government could swiftly secure deportation orders against them.
D.H.S. then created a “target list” of roughly twenty-five hundred immigrant family members across the country for deportation; eventually, the Administration aimed to arrest ten thousand people using these methods.

From the start, however, the plan faced resistance. The Secretary of D.H.S., Kirstjen Nielsen, argued that the arrests would be complicated to carry out, in part, because American children would be involved. (Many were born in the U.S. to parents on the “target list.”) Resources were already limited, and an operation on this scale would divert attention from the border, where a humanitarian crisis was worsening by the day. The acting head of ICE, Ron Vitiello, a tough-minded former Border Patrol officer, shared Nielsen’s concerns. According to the Washington Post, these reservations weren’t “ethical” so much as logistical: executing such a vast operation would be extremely difficult, with multiple moving pieces, and the optics could be devastating.
Four months later, Trump effectively fired them. Vitiello’s replacement at ICE, an official named Mark Morgan—who’s already been fired once by Trump and regained the President’s support after making a series of appearances on Fox News—subsequently announced that ICE would proceed with the operation.

Late last week, factions within the Administration clashed over what to do. The acting secretary of D.H.S., Kevin McAleenan, urged caution, claiming that the operation was a distraction and a waste of manpower. Among other things, a $4.5 billion funding bill to supply further humanitarian aid at the border has been held up because Democrats worried that the Administration would use the money for enforcement operations.

McAleenan had been meeting with members of both parties on the Hill, and there appeared to be signs of progress, before the President announced the ICE crackdown. According to an Administration official, McAleenan argued that the operation would also threaten a string of recent gains made by the President. The Trump Administration had just secured a deal with the Mexican government to increase enforcement at the Guatemalan border, and it expanded a massive new program called Remain in Mexico, which has forced some ten thousand asylum seekers to wait indefinitely in northern Mexico. “Momentum was moving in the right direction,” the official said.

On the other side of the argument were Stephen Miller, at the White House, and Mark Morgan, at ICE. In the days before and after Trump’s Twitter announcement, Morgan spoke regularly with the President, who was circumventing McAleenan, Morgan’s boss. In meetings with staff, Morgan boasted that he had a direct line to the President, according to the ICE officer, who told me it was highly unusual for there to be such direct contact between the agency head and the White House. “It should be going to the Secretary, which I find hilarious, actually, because Morgan was already fired once by this Administration,” the officer said.

Over the weekend, the President agreed to halt the operation. But it’s far from certain whether McAleenan actually got the upper hand. Officials in the White House authorized ICE to issue a press release insinuating that someone had leaked important details about the operation and therefore compromised it. “Any leak telegraphing sensitive law-enforcement operations is egregious and puts our officers’ safety in danger,” an ICE spokesperson said late Saturday afternoon. This was a puzzling statement given that it was Trump who first publicized the information about the operation. But the White House’s line followed a different script : some members of the Administration, as well as the former head of ICE, Thomas Homan, were publicly accusing McAleenan of sharing information with reporters in an attempt to undermine the operation.

For Homan, his involvement in the Administration’s internal fight marked an unexpected return to the main stage. Last year, he resigned as acting head of ICE after the Senate refused to confirm him to the post. Earlier this month, Trump announced, on Fox News, that Homan would be returning to the Administration as the President’s new border tsar, but Homan, who hadn’t been informed of the decision, has remained noncommittal.

Still, according to the Administration official, Homan and the President talk by phone regularly. Over the weekend, Homan, who has since become an on-air contributor to Fox News, appeared on television to attack McAleenan personally. “You’ve got the acting Secretary of Homeland Security resisting what ICE is trying to do,” he said.

Meanwhile, the President spent the weekend trying to leverage the delayed operation to pressure congressional Democrats. If they did not agree to a complete overhaul of the asylum system at the border, Trump said, he’d greenlight the ICE operation once more. “Two weeks,” he tweeted, “and big Deportation begins.” At the same time, his Administration was under fire for holding immigrant children at a Border Patrol facility in Clint, Texas. Two hundred and fifty infants, children, and teen-agers have spent weeks in squalid conditions; they have been denied food, water, soap, and toothbrushes, and there’s limited access to medicine in the wake of flu and lice outbreaks. “If the Democrats would change the asylum laws and the loop
holes,” Trump said, “everything would be solved immediately.”

And yet, last week, when an Administration lawyer appeared before the Ninth Circuit to answer for the conditions at the facility, which were in clear violation of a federal agreement on the treatment of children in detention, she said that addressing them was not the government’s responsibility. Michelle Brané, of the Women’s Refugee Commission, told me, “The Administration is intentionally creating chaos at the border and detaining children in abusive conditions for political gain.” (On Monday, Customs and Border Protection transferred all but thirty children from the Clint facility; it isn’t yet clear where, exactly, they’ll go.)

President Obama was never popular among ICE’s rank and file, but the detailed list of enforcement priorities he instituted, in 2014, which many in the agency initially resented as micromanagement, now seemed more sensible—and even preferable to the current state of affairs. The ICE officer said, “One person told me, ‘I never thought I’d say this, but I miss the Obama rules. We removed more people with the rules we had in place than with all this. It was much easier when we had the priorities. It was cleaner.’ ” Since the creation of ICE, in 2003, enforcement was premised on the idea that officers would primarily go after criminals for deportation; Trump, who views ICE as a political tool to showcase his toughness, has abandoned that framework entirely. “I don’t even know what we’re doing now,” the officer said. “A lot of us see the photos of the kids at the border, and we’re wondering, ‘What the hell is going on?’ ” The influx of Central American migrants, the officer noted, has been an issue for more than a decade now, spanning three Presidential administrations. “No one built up the infrastructure to handle this, and now people are suffering at the border for it. They keep saying they were caught flat footed. That’s a bald-faced f***ing lie.”

Jonathan Blitzer is a staff writer at The New Yorker.



View user's profile
SFandH
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 5262
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 01:13 PM


Thanks, informative article.



Want to adopt a mellow Baja dog or cat? - https://www.facebook.com/bajaanimalsanctuary/
View user's profile
Bajazly
Nomad
**




Posts: 437
Registered: 6-4-2015
Location: Goodbye Cali and Hello San Felipe
Member Is Offline

Mood: More Relaxed Everyday

[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 01:31 PM


Wow! Nothing like a clear and present streamlined plan... Or NOT!!



Believing is religion - Knowing is science

Harald Pietschmann

"Get off the beaten path and memories, friends and new techniques are developed"

Bajazly, August 2019
View user's profile
John Harper
Senior Nomad
***




Posts: 975
Registered: 3-9-2017
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 01:44 PM


Trump's not interested in doing anything, he just wants the fools to believe he's doing something. If he did something, he might have to take responsibility and accountability. Not part of his tool chest.

Breaking eggs and rattling pots and pans does not make you a chef.

John

[Edited on 6-25-2019 by John Harper]
View user's profile
SFandH
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 5262
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 01:51 PM


What is the "loophole" in immigration laws that Trump is talking about? How does he want the laws changed?

[Edited on 6-25-2019 by SFandH]




Want to adopt a mellow Baja dog or cat? - https://www.facebook.com/bajaanimalsanctuary/
View user's profile
Beagle
Nomad
**




Posts: 221
Registered: 10-25-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 02:00 PM


Quote: Originally posted by SFandH  
What is the "loophole" in immigration laws that Trump is talking about? How does he want the laws changed?

[Edited on 6-25-2019 by SFandH]


Don't ever quote his vocabulary and expect it to mean the same thing to the rest of the world. This "loophole" is probably the thing that allowed his wife's parents to have legal status but it's a "loophole" if some darker skinned people, his base hates are using it.

[Edited on 6-25-2019 by Beagle]Edit-words and stuff

[Edited on 6-25-2019 by Beagle]
View user's profile
SFandH
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 5262
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 02:09 PM


I think it has to do with the asylum laws, but specifically what I don't know. You can't just end the idea of asylum, that would be an immoral, disgusting thing to do.



Want to adopt a mellow Baja dog or cat? - https://www.facebook.com/bajaanimalsanctuary/
View user's profile
Bajazly
Nomad
**




Posts: 437
Registered: 6-4-2015
Location: Goodbye Cali and Hello San Felipe
Member Is Offline

Mood: More Relaxed Everyday

[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 02:14 PM


Quote: Originally posted by SFandH  
...that would be an immoral, disgusting thing to do.


And your point is?




Believing is religion - Knowing is science

Harald Pietschmann

"Get off the beaten path and memories, friends and new techniques are developed"

Bajazly, August 2019
View user's profile
SFandH
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 5262
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 02:28 PM


I guess my point is nobody would agree to it.

So what does he want changed?


[Edited on 6-25-2019 by SFandH]




Want to adopt a mellow Baja dog or cat? - https://www.facebook.com/bajaanimalsanctuary/
View user's profile
Bajazly
Nomad
**




Posts: 437
Registered: 6-4-2015
Location: Goodbye Cali and Hello San Felipe
Member Is Offline

Mood: More Relaxed Everyday

[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 03:08 PM


Quote: Originally posted by SFandH  
I guess my point is nobody would agree to it.

So what does he want changed?




None of it is based in reality, all just campaigning
and trying to make the dems look like asses.




Believing is religion - Knowing is science

Harald Pietschmann

"Get off the beaten path and memories, friends and new techniques are developed"

Bajazly, August 2019
View user's profile
pacificobob
Senior Nomad
***




Posts: 770
Registered: 4-23-2006
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 6-25-2019 at 05:51 PM


Quote: Originally posted by John Harper  
Trump's not interested in doing anything, he just wants the fools to believe he's doing something. If he did something, he might have to take responsibility and accountability. Not part of his tool chest.

Breaking eggs and rattling pots and pans does not make you a chef.

John

[Edited on 6-25-2019 by John Harper]

well said john.
View user's profile

  Go To Top

 






All Content Copyright � 1997- Q87 International; All Rights Reserved.
Powered by XMB; XMB Forum Software © 2001-2014 The XMB Group�






"If it were lush and rich, one could understand the pull, but it is fierce and hostile and sullen. The stone mountains pile up to the sky and there is little fresh water. But we know we must go back if we live, and we don't know why." - Steinbeck, Log from the Sea of Cortez

"People don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care." - Ivan R. Misner, Ph.D

"You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them or to them." - Malcolm Forbes

"Let others lead small lives, but not you. Let others argue over small things, but not you. Let others cry over small hurts, but not you. Let others leave their future in someone else's hands, but not you." - Jim Rohn







Thank you to Baja Bound Mexico Insurance Services for your long-term support of the BajaNomad.com Forums site.







Emergency Baja Contacts Include:

Desert Hawks; El Rosario-based ambulance transport; Emergency #: (616) 103-0262