Originally posted by gringorio
"Next morning with the wind moderating, and better able to appreciate the stunning beauty all around, I set off for an exploratory hike. Before I had
gone fifty yards I slid to an urgent stop, my leading foot was inches from a five-foot-long pinkish rattlesnake. As it was so close to my camp I had
no choice, I had to kill it. A single rock throw smashed its neck immediately behind its head." - G.M.
This is just plain wrong. How can Graham have such little respect for wildlife? He claims to have had no choice, but he had plenty of choices that
would not have involved killing the rattlesnake. The first was to leave the rattlesnake alone. The second was to use a long stick and move it well
away from his camp. He has a better chance of being stung by a scorpion than to be bitten by a rattlesnake. His paranoid attitude toward
rattlesnakes has been apparent in all his writings. I would think that someone with so much experience in the desert would have a better
understanding and *respect* for desert animals.
From the description, the rattlesnake sounds like it was a Crotalus ruber, a Red Diamond Rattlesnake. Isla Angel de la Guarda is part of the
Islas del Golfo de California Biosphere Reserve, an ecologically unique and important group of islands. Populations of animals on islands are more
susceptible to extinction for many reasons: Limited resources, competition for resources, changing abundance of prey populations, and of course,
stochastic events like people killing every snake they see.
It seems to me that, while what Graham is doing is very interesting, in the long run his attitude is having a negative effect on the island and its
animals.
gringorio |