This discussion is getting really confusing. Which of these eminent Nomad medical scientists do we believe? Perhaps they could refer us to the proper
Google data search being quoted to better understand.Skipjack Joe - 1-21-2021 at 07:38 PM
This discussion is getting really confusing. Which of these eminent Nomad medical scientists do we believe? Perhaps they could refer us to the proper
Google data search being quoted to better understand.
This discussion is getting really confusing. Which of these eminent Nomad medical scientists do we believe? Perhaps they could refer us to the proper
Google data search being quoted to better understand.
Your assessment seems close to accurate to date, though,compounding on vaccine risk, it seems the PCR RT diagnostic is producing massive false
positives, adding to case counts, while few are actually ill, seniors with pre-existing illness are at risk as always, so, we are vaccinating a large
population unnecessarily, putting some seniors and high allergic at risk, while the vaccine doesn't stop infections, so both the test and the vaccine
not particularly useful, and somehow, common flu cases are nearly zero, so, common flu has been replaced by boutique flu, provoking extremely harmful
restrictions, closures, masks, toxic hand washing, isolation, vaccines, and utter nonsense for children and youth at virtually no risk.
Insight into the practical performance of RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 using serological data: a cohort study
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(20)30200-7/fulltext
