Originally posted by Hook
Quote: | Originally posted by JESSE
Quote: | Originally posted by Hook
Here is an article I found that was linked off the narconews site (but not a narconews article).
It would seem to give a pretty impartial analysis of the rise of the left since the Salinas election of 88. It attempts to describe the waltz of C.
Card##as, Lopez Obrador and Marcos.
Impartial, if you exclude some pointed criticism of Fox.
Jesse, i'd be interested to hear your opinion of this article. Do YOU feel the election of 2006 was stolen, even though your favored candidate,
Calderon, won and the "defeat" of L.O. created another window of stability in Mexico?
http://www.newleftreview.net/?page=article&view=2633 |
All of the supposed "irregularities" have been proven false. For example, OBrador was in the lead but lost narrowly at the end. it might seem strange
to some, but theres a logic explanation for that. The vote count starts once polls start to close, and the first polls that start to close are in
southern Mexico because of time diferences with the north, so naturally 1st we get the votes from the south who is heavyly pro OBrador, but at the
very end, the votes from Baja, sinaloa, and sonora came in, and those where pro Calderon.
In my opinion, the vote was the cleanest and most fair we have ever had. |
So clean that they dont need to bother with things like retaining the ballots or letting the media inspect them, huh?
I guess the "cleanest and most fair" is a rather relative description.
[Edited on 11-1-2006 by Hook] |