So it seems to be true; even ugly guys with small penisis will get the nicest girls using the biggest trucks and houses as babe magnets. I always
supected that and now another species in nature bears it out.
Blotch Side Lizards
Diklang - 12-9-2002 at 11:58 AM
Suspicions confirmed!rollStephanie Jackter - 12-9-2002 at 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Bajabus
So it seems to be true; even ugly guys with small penisis will get the nicest girls using the biggest trucks and houses as babe magnets. I always
supected that and now another species in nature bears it out.
But remember, the guys who had the good rocks in the first place were the hunkers. The researchers artificially manipulated the more natural
situation of the good looking guy getting both the good crib and the babe to see which one she would choose, but given the natural state of things,
she would have normally gotten both.
I wish I could remember the name, but if this stuff interests you, there's a Brittish woman I've heard on NPR talk shows who has done a book about the
sexual habits of insects and small animals that is as fascinating as it is hilarious. Everything from females that eat the heads off their lovers to
males who literally explode inside their mates at the right moment to impregnate. Talk about one heck of a "package"!!! - StephanieBraulio - 12-10-2002 at 10:08 AM
Stephanie -
You mean you actually believe what you hear on NPR? (just kidding)
I think everyone on this board understands that bigger ain't necessarily better.
and BTW Doug - speaking of wild animals, thanks for treating the guests to your board with respect - it's a refreshing difference.Stephanie Jackter - 12-13-2002 at 10:05 PM
Hey Braulio, On an intellectual level, I agree 100% that bigger is not necessarily better, but on a realistic level, look around you. Women across
the planet are just like those animals. We pick the guy that's bigger and almost never consider mating with someone who is smaller than we are. I
believe it's something close to a biological imperative.
roll