BajaNomad

Was: Overzealous Republican golf-loving execs plan to ruin Playa/Estero Santa Barbara ---Now: "Mega-resort for the rich...

Sharksbaja - 6-30-2007 at 01:25 AM

A recent visit to the site confirms the grandiose plans in store for this pristine jewel located near Mulege in the Sea of Cortez.
The plans are quite expansive and truely emulate the global fruits the developer has built to satiate imperial needs and lust.
Peruse the corporate website replete with stolen web-images. Study the plans that offer solace, isolation and the necessities of the very rich.
Now with all that ambiance provided take a look at who exactly are these people and how could they possibly just buy up pristine semi-virgin estero land and turn it into a Cancun stlye private beach club for the rich and famous.

With that aside, the real issue paramount to developing such an incredible site is the abililty to develop and coexist with the virgin mangove estuary and tidal flats.

I was informed that the cheapest room for which there are few will be around $600 per night while most rooms are in the $5000-$6000 per night range.:lol:

But you get beach club and golfing at it's finest. Plus a boutique bla bla bla.............

Ok here's the deal. I saw the place up close and personal and toured the expansive area thoroughly. It is a sensitive and special place in many respects IMHO.

I think that any prudent person who investigated this project and the people and govt relationships would convince anyone why and how this could "just" happen. Would you put trust in an Enron laison or Reagan Amabassador?:rolleyes:
Who really is chipping dog poop into the bay.
Not me. But heck I just did 20 mins online and learned a world of stuff at Geiko!:biggrin:. I wondered who Theodore Gildred was, cause I'd heard that name sometime after the flood when I collected almost $4000 for FD equipment in Mulege from mostly Nomads. I heard he donated to the Sister City program. It turns out a prodige' of his was a fellow named Mike F. associated with the ICF foundation out of La Paz. I wonder if they know each other??;D
I Googled Mr Gildred. WOW! I thought he was just a rich guy.:lol: I had no idea of his political past but I sure understand how this project could be easily installed w/o some type of environmental address. It spells disaster for exactly the type of environment addressed recently in Los Cabos.
The area during my visit showed at high tide salt-water upwelling in the the whole basin. Filling or altering this natural tidal area would have detrimental effects. Another hi-risk issue is that of the arroyo and wash that funnels into this small estero. Boulders the size of small cars and large meandering wash constantly alters the area.
I see nothing but disaster with this project from the stance of preserving a fragile estero and nursery. From the standpoint of exclusive and world-class golfing and spoiling what else could be better? It's easy for me. What do you think?

Plans
Golf course developers

De Palace

Bush connection

Friends of De Palace(ICDSS)

One local long-time playa guy who lives very near the project recently said he hinted for "green fees" in lieu of money for favors and work for the corporation. Must be a "publican"
:lol::lol: Kinda sad really.
....end of rant.......er, post...




[Edited on 7-3-2007 by Sharksbaja]

EsteroSB_7.jpg - 32kB

Crusoe - 6-30-2007 at 06:48 AM

OH Sharks........This is truly a sad scenerio in the making. We need to put a call into Old Hippie and have him cut them off at the legs. Quick!!!! ++C++

viabaja - 6-30-2007 at 07:54 AM

Corporate greed and lust at it's best! Environmental Impact Studies in Mexico! Oh yeah!!! Over building without increasing the infrastructure - this is truly the Baja way. San Felipe is evidence of all said!

DianaT - 6-30-2007 at 08:26 AM

Looks like a beautiful place---the way it is right now. :yes:

Now, if they build that monster, people who pay that kind of money to stay somewhere fly in their private jets. What would they do, fly into Loreto---I know, then they could take the ABC - Plus bus to the resort. :lol:

Really hate to see it happen.

Diane

Halboo - 6-30-2007 at 08:49 AM

A man's kilt should never go past his knees.
This guy is an obvious WANKER!
What can we do to stop this madness?
Golf is a scourge.

805gregg - 6-30-2007 at 09:24 AM

I couldn't find it on my maps. Where exactly is it?

Bob and Susan - 6-30-2007 at 11:10 AM

here

santaBarbara.gif - 24kB

elgatoloco - 6-30-2007 at 11:25 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 805gregg
I couldn't find it on my maps. Where exactly is it?


The white sand beach on the right in the photo is Coyote.

We spent a day exploring the area by kayak about 10 years ago. We tried to find a road into it and found only fences. We asked around and were told that the property was private and owned by the family of one of the former presidents of Mexico. We knew then that it was likely when,not if, it would be developed.

That guy builds some beautiful golf courses. :P

Oso - 6-30-2007 at 11:47 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by grover
I recognize the skirt, but what are those (bag)pipes hanging in front?


It's called a Sporran. It takes the place of pockets.

So Beautiful Now

CaboRon - 6-30-2007 at 12:21 PM

The photos were awesome, I see why you have settled in this area. The thought of this project is really sad. I think they want to make all of Baja Sur into "The Cabo Riveria ". Are there really that many people who can afford this? :rolleyes: CaboRon

Sharksbaja - 6-30-2007 at 02:26 PM

Not one shred of trash or left-overs here:

EsteroSB_10.jpg - 23kB

Sharksbaja - 6-30-2007 at 02:41 PM

Google view of sensitive area:

EsteroSB_Google4.jpg - 39kB

Halboo - 6-30-2007 at 03:02 PM

Quote:

First impressions can be misleading.

Yeah I was wrong;
Quote:

Born and raised in the Scottish lowlands

He's a Greedy Bloody Sassenach Wanker! :mad:
Responsible for the rape of vast tracts of land worldwide.
I see he's the one of those who have screwed up Bandon OR


A I said before; Golf is a Scourge.
There are hundreds off spots around the globe where this scourge has overtaken the natural world.
As they say in Hawaii "You can't eat golf balls." :fire:

http://utenti.lycos.it/dossierisarenas/golf.htm
http://www.earthisland.org/eijournal/new_articles.cfm?articl...

[Edited on 6-30-2007 by Halboo]

David K - 6-30-2007 at 03:08 PM

What is the deal with the Federal Zone not being enforced... I thought nobody could own the land within a certain distance of the high tide line?

I fear that Shell Island will be messed with even though it is surrounded by 'Federal land', ie the lagoons, mud flats, marsh, etc.

El Dorado is eyeing the south end, and some developer says this will be just like Cancun... That sound awful to me, naturally!

DENNIS - 6-30-2007 at 03:45 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
What is the deal with the Federal Zone not being enforced... I thought nobody could own the land within a certain distance of the high tide line?


Concessions. Just another protected public property with a price tag.
20 meters is the distance, David.

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 05:19 AM

One thing though, this is going to make Loreto Bay the Motel 6 class destination of the area.

The people taking the limo to this new resort will look at Loreto Bay and wonder how the poor people can live like that.

How many "rooms", villas are there going to be?

Two words: Runway Interdiction.

http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/usaf/afpam14-210/part06.htm

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 06:18 AM

The developers are the Lomas Santa Fe Group (they have "acquired" the land) and this appears to be their first foray into a foreign country.

If you look at the pdf brochure you'll see a resort full of swimming pools. Looks like each villa has its own. Do they know there's no water? Details I guess.

Lots of air conditioning too!

brochure - http://www.esterosantabarbara.com/AmanESB_Brochure.pdf

developers - http://www.lsfg.com/home.html

[Edited on 7-2-2007 by oldhippie]

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 06:29 AM

[Edited on 7-2-2007 by oldhippie]

The Gull - 7-2-2007 at 06:38 AM

Baja is for sale. Anyone not know that?

Mexico is a country separate from the US. They can do as they please and the opinion of foreigners does not matter when it comes to such small issues as one golf course and hotel rooms along a coastal section that is not currently developed.

Calmate. Amigos.

The Gull Has It!

amir - 7-2-2007 at 06:56 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by The Gull
Baja is for sale. Anyone not know that?

Mexico is a country separate from the US. They can do as they please and the opinion of foreigners does not matter when it comes to such small issues as one golf course and hotel rooms along a coastal section that is not currently developed.

Calmate. Amigos.


This is one of the most clear and succinct statements made recently that spans a broad spectrum of subjects discussed by Nomads.

--Amir

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 07:54 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by amir
Quote:
Originally posted by The Gull
Baja is for sale. Anyone not know that?

Mexico is a country separate from the US. They can do as they please and the opinion of foreigners does not matter when it comes to such small issues as one golf course and hotel rooms along a coastal section that is not currently developed.

Calmate. Amigos.


This is one of the most clear and succinct statements made recently that spans a broad spectrum of subjects discussed by Nomads.

--Amir


A guess a "clear statement" is one that can be understood and a succinct statement is one of few words. Big deal, it still can be wrong.

The point is environmentalism. I really get fed up with this attitude that what happens in a country you happen to not be a citizen of is beyond your control and is none of your business.

Absolute bullchit!

David K - 7-2-2007 at 08:27 AM

It is 'reality' however!

Don Alley - 7-2-2007 at 08:36 AM

The brochure is a hoot, I like the juice they will have to get inside the secure area to greet guests at the Loreto Airport:

"Upon arrival at the Loreto International Airport, you are
immediately struck by the charming local palapa architecture common
throughout Baja California and Mexico. Friendly and attentive hotel
greeting staff are on hand to help you clear customs and retrieve your
bags, but only after offering you a refreshing local potion."

I will pass on this development, as it relies on the mass-transit, bus-like service of commercial airlines at a public airport, instead of the private airstrip that I, and my Gulfstream, deserve.:lol:

I don't like to see developments in Baja, but there is an economic necessity. Unless we think we should be able to visit and live in a Baja populated by dirt poor but friendly happy people riding around on burros and fishing from dug-out sailing boats.

The several huge developments in the immediate Loreto Area involve thousands of units, resulting in tens of thousands of migrants into the area. Huge areas will be developed.

This development is tiny by comparison, but with great "value added" in architecture, staff requirements, and maintenance requirements. Lots of jobs fueled by very high prices that won't have to be discounted to compete with the baby boom masses. Yeah, I hate golf courses. But where water is so scarce, better to use some for a golf course bringing in a big spenders than to provide for a new worker ghetto of 75,000 people, AND a golf course. Hell, I hope they use a TON of water, so that there's none left for anyone else to develop around there. So all you get is ONE development for a relative HANDFUL of guests who will spend LOTS of money. Anyway, that's how I'd plan it.

So if Old Hippie (Old Special Forces?) is going to call in an airstrike, please aim farther south. :biggrin:

Also, places like this provide great security for Mexico. In a crisis, the assets there (the guests) can be siezed for large ransoms or political extortion.:biggrin:

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 08:36 AM

I will say this however, this developer is not greenwashing and it appears that was is planned is relatively small, secluded, and for the super rich only.

I'm confused by the water issue. Is there enough? The Harvard study concluded that the Loreto development will drain the local aquifers. Same water supply for this additional golf course?

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 08:48 AM

Jack of Diamonds, I'm with you on this one. I too got a kick out of the marketing techniques used to attract the monied. The poor people seem to be so confused. All of the stuff, when all that is needed/wanted is a cold beer, a comfortable chair, a dog or two, campfire, and some good company.

But the airstrike I'm planning is on the Loreto airport, the weak link in this chain of development madness. Last night while walking with Smiley and Nacho we were discussing the fact that none of us could recall an incident where a small private group of citizens shut down for good an airport. We all got excited because it's a new challenge.

jerry - 7-2-2007 at 08:49 AM

hmmm i was wondering when the old hippy would flip?? to the other side
seems as long as its popular he will sway with the masses lol
:bounce::bounce::bounce:

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 08:52 AM

Oh, for The Gull, dare I add "ible". That's citizens of the world. Just to preempt your claim I have no right to sabotage airports in another country.:moon:

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 08:56 AM

Jerry, Jerry, Jerry, Loreto Bay is still in my sights.

Don Alley - 7-2-2007 at 02:16 PM

Disclaimer:

I don't know this "Old Hippie" guy.

I was a "Peace and Love" hippie, not a "Destroyer of Airports" hippie.

And we use that airport since I misplaced my Gulfstream. Maybe I left it in Uruguay.

:biggrin:

Slowmad - 7-2-2007 at 03:03 PM

Agree or disagree with Old Hippie, his Krutch signature quote is epic.
Krutch's love and knowledge of the peninsula was—and remains—unimpeachable.

jerry - 7-2-2007 at 03:43 PM

old hippy is not Krutch

mtgoat666 - 7-2-2007 at 03:57 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by oldhippie
All of the stuff, when all that is needed/wanted is a cold beer, a comfortable chair, a dog or two, campfire, and some good company.


Old hippie, I admire anybody who fights the developers and environmental rapists, but.... I think poor people are aspiring to more than "a cold beer, a comfortable chair, a dog or two, campfire, and some good company." The gringo likes to rough it when away from his/her plasma TV, but requires a $40k SUV to trasport his/her beer, chair and pedigree dogs. The poor who only have a beer, chair and dog or two probably seek a few more material goods, and what better way to get such than by fleecing the gringo retirees?

Slowmad - 7-2-2007 at 04:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by jerry
old hippy is not Krutch


Nice catch.

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 08:37 PM

Credits go to Dennis for the Krutch quote. I never heard of the guy before a couple of days ago.

Sharksbaja - 7-2-2007 at 08:40 PM

I should have named this post and I will call it forthwith: "Mega-resort for the rich planned for the Bay of Concepcion".

Gawd, how many times have we heard how this or that mega-project is going to happen in this area. As with the easily accessable beaches and shoreline of Baja, comes the hand of development as profit potential soars.

We've all seen that gloved hand. It waves high in places such as Los Cabos to the south and Playas de Rosarito in the north. The growth factor is phenomenol and the end product is not unlike other prime coastal shores worldwide. The development in Latin countries but especially Mexico and Central America is at full-speed ahead on the grab and develop mindset. There are big profits to be made, especially if you have deep pockets and important connections inside the "machine".
I see there is a definite advantage in having "connections" inside many offices and at various levels of the process, you know, attorneys, consutants, govt. liasons, etc..

Enough of that but the point is; only big, connected, wealthy corps need apply.
----------------

Along comes one certainly powerful developer with all the criteria necessary to accomplish a major development in any country and you may have a problem.
I can spell it out pretty plainly for those who should but doin't understand the ramifications of this type of resort in this type of area.

For the record, the area in discussion here is called Estero Santa Barbara. It is located about 15 mi south of Mulege. It is a magnificant little jewel with shallow clear waters. An important stop for sailors seeking sheltered waters. Historically, the area has been accessable by land only periodically as the arroyo that helped form and feed the area with fresh water floods easily and reverts the track back to riverbed regularily.
The purchace and development plans are grandiose in scale. Many bays in the Bay of Conception contain dwellings, including homes, very few small restaurants and outbuildings. It amounts to small nestled established beaches which used produce uncounted amounts of various shellfish and fish plus whales and other marine mammals.

That's right, Bahia De Concepcion was "The" place to go in the early 80's. Hech, with a small boat, a diver with a hooka, one could cash in on the bounty the bay offered up. Have you seeen the middens of thousands of years of subsistance of Baja dwellers? It's amazing how they managed the resources at their fingertips.
That all went away though. It was eventually necessary to create laws to protect the waters and the populations of sea animals. Gone were all the whales, gone were many types of invertebrates. Gone were thelucrative inshore fishing for countless species.
Did they learn or save much? I think not, I have see prohibited shrimp trawlers in there. Not to mention the shark hunters piles of discarged parts. These are supposedely Federally protected wates. Hmmmmphh! Bull-doo.
The story repeats itself day in and day out in Baja. Maybe to the tune of money?:lol:

------------


Now with all that keen knowledge. Imagine this: a bay, not really tampered with. It has a functional mangrove estuary. It has not been altered or changed in millenium. There is an fresh-water aquifer that feeds that basin and estero.


A few notes. First off the corp has rights to six undeveloped wells in the basis. The aquifer not clearly defined so it may or may not be part of the same aquifer as Mulege.
Second, all arrivees are to be transported to the development via the sea. Hence a prominate dock and support structures will be needed. The road in is for the infrastructure.

Third, I am shocked that because it's not in your neighborhood, some deem it unimportant or of great value. Ironic how passions run here?? What a crock!

My whole point is the potential for distruction of a viable mangrove estuary fed by a fresh water aquifer. I could really care less what political affiliation these developers have but found it quite disturbing that most of these US corps have strong ties to govt. and republicans in general.
Some Nomads think Mexico has the right to destroy or otherwise alter permanently ideal spawning grounds etc etc.
I guess what these people are saying is that Mexicao and it's people and politicians can't learn from others. Man, what a rank insult. They can only learn if they are given information. Sometimes it may be necessary or important to reevaluate concerns or the dynamics of a planned development. Sometimes information needs to be interjected. No? I'm sure the Nomads in Loreto would agree on that in principal. Or maybe not.
You can see this place is very special because of the lack of human interference. To write it off as unimportant because of the scope in terms of visitors is just plain naive and rediculous. So what I am hearing is screams from beaches being changed forever in populated areas. You folks who don't care about this one should really just not get involved or say anythang in related theads . Don't be hypocrits.
----

PLEASE , THINK ABOUT THE FISH for a change.:yes:

oldhippie - 7-2-2007 at 09:29 PM

I don't know sharks, I only have so much time and I think Loreto Bay is much more damaging than this development. Development is going to happen, but the "I'm going to build a city" nutcases need to really scale back. This guy is an ex-ambassador to Argentina and a professor of American-Mexican relations at UC San Diego on top of being a successful developer. There's no stopping this, if he can find buyers.

A Cabo analogy if I may. The somewhat isolated upscale hotels between San Lucas and San Jose are OK with me. But the Plaza las Glorious smack dab on the harbor waterfront is God awful.

Plus, if you look closely at my most emotional rants about Loreto Bay, they stem from what I believe are their bold faced lies about how their development is better for, or at least won't damage, the environment. People are giving them money based upon lies. IMHO, they're money-grubbing, low-life, polluting, criminals.

I don't think I'm being a hypocrite, I'm just choosing my battles.

Dave - 7-2-2007 at 09:45 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
Some Nomads think Mexico has the right to destroy or otherwise alter permanently ideal spawning grounds etc etc.
I guess what these people are saying is that Mexicao and it's people and politicians can't learn from others. Man, what a rank insult. They can only learn if they are given information.


Most of Mexico's politicians and their handlers are well informed...The elite of the country. Most speak better English than most Americans and are schooled at America's finest universities. They do with the country what they will because they either own it or are given carte blanche by the people who elect them.

Greedy foreign corporations need concessions and permits to do what they do... And they don't harvest them from trees.

Sharksbaja - 7-2-2007 at 09:54 PM

Exactamente my point! That's why it is an insult to those with power and influence regardless of their monetary stature. Unfortunately for the fish and birds, money speaks louder than animal abundance.

Don Alley - 7-2-2007 at 10:23 PM

I'm sorry if I have offended, and my earlier post was perhaps too flippant, and failed to consider the the feelings of others including yourself.

But keep in mind that despite my frequent criticisms of Loreto area developments, I am not against all development in the region, only those of a massive scale. It is those differences, not the differences in location, that influenced my opinion. Also, if you carefully read the brochure, the BOC development stresses its connections with Loreto and its airport. In other words, you are perhaps seeing an outer ripple of the greater Loreto area development boom. Welcome to our boat.

I do hope that, should that development come to pass, that the estuary can survive. But I also hope the same for all of the estuaries from Ensenada Blanca to San Bruno, all of which are threatened by the recently approved regional development plan. In my defense I can say that when that destructive plan was formally presented to the municipality, along with a more moderate alternative, and when the Loreto Futures critiques were presented to the municipality, I took the time to attend the meetings to support a more rational development plan.

Thanks Don

Sharksbaja - 7-2-2007 at 11:07 PM

Ok , you do understand the situation obviously and it's good you do not pretend to not know what is happening with big bucks and influence in Baja. I also realize some think I shun any and all development . Not true. I just abhor the ease and arrogance illustrated by this project and the justification of installing a coastal golf course in such a pristine area.

All the rhetoric...

The Gull - 7-3-2007 at 06:02 AM

doesn't change anything.

The sky is not falling and there will not be massive fish kills because some rich folks want to use their money to build a golf resort only rich folks will use.

That is the choice someone with lots of bucks has. The choice to spend it as they please.

Those who have to live within their means, live in Playas de Tijuana, and walk to cross the border with two dollars waving in their hands for the local cops.

Global environmentalism is proof of envy, worldwide.

[Edited on 7-3-2007 by The Gull]

How?

The Gull - 7-3-2007 at 09:20 AM

How patronizing of you to ask!

You're smart. Answer it yourself.

I do believe that this afternoon when the wind picks up along the coast course at Bajamar, I will knock a few range balls into the ocean to keep the world's ecology in balance.

Have yourself a rich day, even if it has to be wishful thinking.

[Edited on 7-3-2007 by The Gull]

Oh, thank you god.

Sharksbaja - 7-3-2007 at 11:56 AM

It's nice to know a higher authority with all his wisdom and predictions can straighten us all out.:rolleyes: I've always subscribed to to "cause and effect" principal for fragile areas. If you fill a pool full of fish with cement the fish will be _____ So exactly when will the world end?:lol:

[Edited on 7-3-2007 by Sharksbaja]

Cypress - 7-3-2007 at 12:33 PM

Golf? Sorta like watching paint dry.:spingrin:

jerry - 7-3-2007 at 01:04 PM

sorry sharks i know you have passion about this place perhaps if you wernt so attamit about hating gulf courses others might see your point but i think you blinded them

vandenberg - 7-3-2007 at 01:08 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by jerry
wernt so attamit





:?::?::P:P:tumble::tumble::lol::lol:

Jerry,
That's one for the books.

Yeah, I know Jerry

Sharksbaja - 7-3-2007 at 01:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by jerry
sorry sharks i know you have passion about this place perhaps if you wernt so attamit about hating gulf courses others might see your point but i think you blinded them


and it happened a long time ago.

jerry - 7-3-2007 at 04:10 PM

ok van i splan it two u was not overbearingly determined:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:::O:O

Sharksbaja - 7-4-2007 at 01:49 PM

No Jerry I don't hate golf courses in general. My rants are always about "coastal" courses. I think they are a problem for many reasons when they are situated between the public and the ocean. It has to do with myriad problems. For those who ask. It's quite obvious really. Water is a big issue. Access is a big issue. Uncontrolled parallel growth is an important issue. Displacement of inhabitants livelyhoods are another. The usefulness of these courses is only for a select number of elite "users" and for only one thing. It may sound like I'm including ALL courses but I've never targeted any but coastal courses.
-----------
Back to the original thread.>>


Looky here, it's just nuther' sensitive area slated for change. I can dig change!! I like change. Change can be good. Change can be bad. Black and white. Sorta. We all like to feel good about a project that assails our own desires and freedoms.
I don't want no control freak, like extreme liberals telling me how my place should adhere to a certain criteria. I like to exercise my freedom(s) too and ability to have nice things as many of you do. Without sounding like a hypocrit it may be possible to convey a simple message and alternative about the blatant big-boy corporate approach. Sure it's legal but it doesn't necessarily make it right. :?: I don't applaud these guys because of their ability to hammer out complicated and expensive developments. Rather their political and monetary stature enables them to do things little people could never do. Especially on the environmental front. Sleep with the devil. It could make you money.
To me, these mega-jobs seem to impress two demographics. Those that have big bucks and can partake of all the fun and those that simply lust and approve thru their imagination. . Most folks never even give it a thought as to the way coastal golf resorts alter the environment.
So many love golf. I salute the athlete/player for what it's worth. Kudos for your determined and tenacious desire to achieve par .
In your quest to do so please remember life (should) come before sport. The animals around you do count for something. Count them in.;D Think deeeeeeeeeply.............:)

jerry - 7-4-2007 at 02:11 PM

and i believe the only reason that ONLY big corp can develop now is strictly that the so called enviromentilists have made it so complecated and made to jump throu so many hoops that the little guy developer doesnt have a chance
hence be carefull what you wish for
every old hippy and the like is causing more problems then there solving
is that looking deep enoff??

Oh....and....

Sharksbaja - 7-4-2007 at 05:53 PM

Happy 4th July

jerry - 7-5-2007 at 12:12 AM

thanks shark and back at ya