Originally posted by Pappy Jon
All of the pics except the last one were straight off the camera. Problem is, those were taken with a point and shoot digital and I can kick myself
for not burning film, especially with the second image (that one should have been exposed to a sheet of 4x5 Velvia). Nothing special was done on the
exposures. When the sun is that low the image just sort of works out ... most of the time. If you look at the first image with the whale skull the
horizon does wash out, which was why it consumed very little real estate on the image.
You can use what's called a "split neutral density" filter. It's dark on the top and light on the bottom. I have one, hate using it.
Stimbo ... I saw that first image you posted and was extremely impressed. More, more, more, please.
Quote: | Originally posted by ZThomas
Pappy Jon and stimbo: Those are gorgeous!
Pappy Jon: Do you do anything special to get the shadows and sun both exposed right, like in the second shot you posted with the cobbles in the
foreground and the sunlit ridge in the background?
Seems like that's a distinguishing talent with really good photographers that I'll be damned if I can figure out. I know some people take two
identical shots -- one exposed for the shadows and one for the highlights -- and then lay them together in Photoshop. Or is it some more subtle kind
of Photoshop manipulation? Or some sort of reflector to light up the shadows a little more? |
|