Originally posted by The Sculpin
Horrific and random crimes have a way of bringing out the torches and pitchforks. The "bullet in the back of the head" solution is made as a panacea
to all our ills. The detail wherein the devil lurks is when do you pull the trigger - and who's head do you shoot? The medical community provides
technical advice based on the information it is given. They don't make the decisions - why would you want to make them accountable for something they
have no part in. Keep in mind that at Gardeners sentencing, there were opposing medical reports, as well as community support for him. As for the
person making the recommendation - that's all they did. The Parole board signed off on it - why not make them responsible? After all is said and done,
you've basically taken out the parole board, the doctors, the defense attorney, the prosecutor, the judge, the DA - that's alot of bullets! And what
do we do with Rothlisberger - shoot him too? This is the 2nd time he's been looked at for a sexual crime - clearly he can't be cured!! Very unworkable
and very Stalin-esque. Currently, we don't have a solution because we are in the unfortunate position of having to wait for a crime to be committed
before we can punish the crime. What we do have is DNA. We have genome mapping. If we can screen the genome for propensity to ahlziemers, we possibly
may be able to screen for violent behaviours. It sounds like eugenics, and there are civil and privacy minefields to navigate, but it sure as heck
beats indiscriminate use of bullets! So please, stop listening to Rick Roberts, think for yourselves, and think about real solutions that don't
involve pitchforks and torches. Oh yea, and visit baja often - the locals desperately need the cash!! |