[Edited on 8-16-2009 by arrowhead]fdt - 8-15-2009 at 08:46 PM
astrobaja - 8-15-2009 at 09:50 PM
The saying " a picture is worth a thousand words" was never so apt Ferna!
Of course I know you were being ironic Arrowhead! Even Rubios is a sad imatation!BajaNuts - 8-15-2009 at 09:52 PM
wait a minute...the last good reason was fish tacos?
WHAT HAPPENED TO INEXPENSIVE BOOZE? Please don't tell me that reason is gone also?!?
edit to say- inexpensive booze instead of CHEAP booze, thanks fdt
[Edited on 8-16-2009 by BajaNuts]arrowhead - 8-15-2009 at 11:39 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by fdt
Ha ha ha!! Good one. Of course all the workers in Long John Silvers ARE Mexicans, ya know?DavidT - 8-15-2009 at 11:49 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by arrowhead
Ha ha ha!! Good one. Of course all the workers in Long John Silvers ARE Mexicans, ya know?
Yeah, but they don't eat there.fdt - 8-16-2009 at 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by BajaNuts
WHAT HAPPENED TO CHEAP BOOZE?
Do you mean inexpensive? BajaNuts - 8-16-2009 at 12:31 AM
YES, fdt, I mean inexpensive!
Quote from another webpage-
"I must confess to misusing the word cheap myself. My father-in-law is quick to correct me whenever I misuse the term, so lets begin by identifying
the difference between the two words. The Free Dictionary defines the word cheap as "Relatively low in cost; inexpensive or comparatively
inexpensive". The word inexpensive is defined as "Not high in price; cheap". Since each word uses the other in its definition, we tend to think of
them as interchangeable. But if you look at the alternate definitions of the word cheap, you'll understand why the two words shouldn't be considered
one and the same. Cheap is also defined as "Of or considered of small value", "Of poor quality; inferior", "Worthy of no respect; vulgar or
contemptible" and "Stingy; miserly". So in shopping terms, lets use "Of poor quality; inferior" to define cheap and "Not high in price" to define
inexpensive."
going back to edit previous post...fdt - 8-16-2009 at 06:53 AM
CaboRon - 8-16-2009 at 07:37 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by DavidT
Quote:
Originally posted by arrowhead
Ha ha ha!! Good one. Of course all the workers in Long John Silvers ARE Mexicans, ya know?
Yeah, but they don't eat there.
They all eat at Taco Bell Barry A. - 8-16-2009 at 10:41 AM
RUBIOS fish tacos are the BEST!!!!!!
Barryrpleger - 8-16-2009 at 10:58 AM
Dimas's Fish Tacos in Mulege ARE the best...Bajahowodd - 8-16-2009 at 11:39 AM
Worse than that. Yum Brands, parent of Long John Silver, Taco Bell, KFC and Pizza Hut. Includes exercises using restaurant furniture.
[Edited on 8-16-2009 by Bajahowodd]fdt - 8-16-2009 at 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Barry A.
RUBIOS fish tacos are the BEST!!!!!!
I have to agree but only if you're inside a Rubios with no exit door.Cypress - 8-16-2009 at 01:09 PM
Fish tacos aren't hard to put together, but they seem to taste better when somebody else makes 'em.Oso - 8-16-2009 at 02:29 PM
If you're in Yuma and need a fish taco fix, fuggit Long John or the bell. Try one of the two Las Palapas places. They're not bad, also cost 99
cents, PLUS you can get a cold Pacifico or Bohemia. Try that at the other places.
On the other side in SLRC, the best tacos of all kinds are at Chipilon's
...when in TIJUANA
Ken Cooke - 8-16-2009 at 08:16 PM
Mariscos La Guerra...located on 4 wheels/tires (roach coach) near La Glorieta...down the street from Carl's Junior and China de Oro (Chinese
Restaurant) just south of Hwy1...David K - 8-17-2009 at 08:50 AM
China's in Bahia de los Angeles
McLuLu's in Loreto
Woooosh - 8-17-2009 at 11:36 AM
Great condiment spread- but where are the radishes and white sauce?
BTW- In Rosarito Beach "TJ Juniors" has free home delivery. Combo #5 is three cheese tacos- one marlin, one fried fish and one shrimp taco with soup
for $630 pesos. The Marlin are very different- nothing you would find stateside.Sharksbaja - 8-17-2009 at 12:54 PM
