Originally posted by gnukid
Enthusiasm for criminal enforcement is great, but, perhaps a critical view might be worth consideration.
There is no evidence presented so far that someone named el teo is responsible for any crime. Yes, there are post-attributions of responsibility,
claims of credit, but no actual evidence presented before and after the arrest.
While we do have evidence of some people who are narco-traffickers, actual evidence, those cases predominantly point to sources such as CIA drug
operations, crashed military extradition planes full of coke, corrupt military and black operations like Iran-Contra of which there are many.
Interestingly that with so many so called investigators and retired police here, none of you have brought up the quite obvious question-about the
evidence that in fact el teo is responsible for anything and where is evidence that the person they arrested is that person.
There are fairly obvious and basic questions, that haven't been brought up nor answered here, so it brings up the obvious question, if this is a crime
and arrest Why is there no evidence, it looks like distractions and obfuscation from actual corruption, not so different from operations to justify
the war of terror, in this case its the police state to justify the war for drugs. |