Originally posted by Bajahowodd
Quote: | Originally posted by tripledigitken
Quote: | Originally posted by Bajahowodd
I'm glad to see that the guy who fell ill at his home near Alfonsina's is making a recovery. Perhaps out of ignorance, however, I ask the question as
to why it was USCG personnel and equipment that responded? Obviously, the cruise ship evacuation falls under their purview. Maybe I missed it
somewhere, but I didn't think international land rescues, especially of civilians, was part of their mission statement. I look forward to being
educated on this one. |
"Why would it matter what their mission statement is? They came to the aid of a US Citizen in trouble, something our Government should do more of,
IMO. Too often the case we hear of just the opposite occurring."
Ken
This just does not seem to me the role of the Coast Guard. In this instance, we are talking about a guy who chose to have a domicile in another
country. In all likelihood, he has lived there, either full-time, or part-time for many years. As has been noted in prior posts, there are a number of
for profit businesses that provide evacuation services. Many Nomads pay for this protection.
All I can ask is that you consider that idea that every citizen of the USA should somehow feel that, wherever they are in the world, an entity such as
the USCG will be at their beck and call whenever they encounter an emergency. It would not seem right to me. Especially considering people,
domestically, who are in peril.
[Edited on 1-25-2010 by Bajahowodd] |
I'll bet you arn't beating the drum to stop military aircraft, and ships from aiding the people in Haiti.
Would you feel the same way if it was a relative of yours?
By the way most of those evacuation policies use Jet aircraft that need paved airstrips.
Ken |