BajaNomad - Guns AGAIN ! - Powered by XMB

Guns AGAIN !

MrBillM - 4-30-2011 at 08:56 PM

The Mex authorities have discovered another weapons cache in Ciudad Juarez which included Heavy Anti-Aircraft Rifles, Grenades and Grenade Launchers in addition to the ubiquitous AKs.

It's really amazing what you can buy at those Discount Gun Shops North of the Rio Grande.

Who Woulda Thunk ?

wessongroup - 5-1-2011 at 07:46 AM

These guys are loading up .... it would appear...

Guys ya can buy anything in the United States ... say are those illegal in Texas :lol:

Udo - 5-1-2011 at 09:29 AM

I made an inquiry wi some of my co-workers in the Houston area, and seems like weapons purchases are on an uptick in Texas...regardless of where they are going.
I personally was looking for another PPK.

Sales UP ? That would be NO Surprise.

MrBillM - 5-1-2011 at 01:59 PM

Fear Redux ?

Gun Sales set records in the first two years of the Wanker Willie Admin.

And Just What Does That Say?

Bajahowodd - 5-1-2011 at 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
Fear Redux ?

Gun Sales set records in the first two years of the Wanker Willie Admin.

Without going into specific detail, I just seem to remember that the Clinton legacy involved high employment and a balanced budget. Or was I just dreaming?

Just seems to me that whenever a Dem gets elected president, there's a huge over reaction because mouth breathers are convinced that somehow guns are gonna be outlawed.

So, who is the fool?

Brian L - 5-1-2011 at 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bajahowodd

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
Fear Redux ?

Gun Sales set records in the first two years of the Wanker Willie Admin.

Mouth breathers, nice. That is a serious insult sir.

To mouth breathers that is.

[Edited on 5-2-2011 by Brian L]

toneart - 5-1-2011 at 05:22 PM

I got a code in my noze.

Cypress - 5-1-2011 at 05:30 PM

I breath through both my mouth and nose, see with both eyes and hear with both ears. Really and truely the Dems have the vast majority of the under-acheivers in their camp. No idea 'bout their breathing mode, but their thinking mode brings to mind some questions.

Breathing Easier

MrBillM - 5-1-2011 at 07:52 PM

Maybe, just Maybe, we react with alarm to a Dem-A-Hole being elected is BECAUSE they not only PROMISE to restrict Gun Rights, but actually TRY to do so. Stinking B.O. is following in Wanker's Footsteps using BATF and other agencies to do what he can't do through Congress.

And, there DO seem to be a LOT of those Mouth-Breathers among the Core Inner-City Dem Constituencies. It doesn't seem like there are a lot of Rocket Scientists among them. It's pretty clear from the 2008 stats that Mullah Man wouldn't have been elected without the overwhelming support of the Under-Achiever Class so the Libs shouldn't demean the Dodos.

THOSE Inner-City Folks LOVE their guns, too. They just buy them on the streets, though. We read everyday how they put them to use and it isn't at the Skeet range. They shoot Black-birds, not Clay-birds.

[Edited on 5-2-2011 by MrBillM]

Hook - 5-1-2011 at 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cypress
I breath through both my mouth and nose, see with both eyes and hear with both ears. Really and truely the Dems have the vast majority of the under-acheivers in their camp. No idea 'bout their breathing mode, but their thinking mode brings to mind some questions.

Underachieving? You mean, like, Katrina? Iraq? Afghanistan? Osama bin where'd-he-go? 9/11? Great Recession? Securities and Exchange Omission? Swiss Cheese border? You mean THAT type underachieving?

Gimme Dem underachieving ANYTIME compared to the recent Repub variety. :lol:

Cypress - 5-2-2011 at 06:18 AM

Yep! Underacheivers. Forgot to mention, as you plainly exhibit, willful ignorance. :biggrin:

redhilltown - 5-3-2011 at 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
Maybe, just Maybe, we react with alarm to a Dem-A-Hole being elected is BECAUSE they not only PROMISE to restrict Gun Rights, but actually TRY to do so. Stinking B.O. is following in Wanker's Footsteps using BATF and other agencies to do what he can't do through Congress.

And, there DO seem to be a LOT of those Mouth-Breathers among the Core Inner-City Dem Constituencies. It doesn't seem like there are a lot of Rocket Scientists among them. It's pretty clear from the 2008 stats that Mullah Man wouldn't have been elected without the overwhelming support of the Under-Achiever Class so the Libs shouldn't demean the Dodos.

THOSE Inner-City Folks LOVE their guns, too. They just buy them on the streets, though. We read everyday how they put them to use and it isn't at the Skeet range. They shoot Black-birds, not Clay-birds.

[Edited on 5-2-2011 by MrBillM]

How can someone with such a cute dog be so....

"Dem-a-hole"..."blackbirds", "core inner city", "wanker", "mullah man", "under achieving class"......and I quote.

We all know what you're saying.

To quote Bladerunner: Proud of yourself, little man?

Pride and Glory

MrBillM - 5-3-2011 at 09:15 AM

Effective communication of thought is sometimes enhanced with provocative words that catch attention.

There is NO effort to convert Lefty Louts. I'm convinced that would be impossible so why be concerned with their sensibilities ?

In choosing descriptive terms, I hold fast to the "Do onto others" rule. In this case, "Do onto them as they do onto you". I'm fairly confident that NONE of my terminology has violated the "They DID" when referring to GWB, Cheney, Rumsfeld, McCain, Palin et all. I feel comfortable with that standard as a Baseline.

And, "Some" of the terms are great to evoke images of those described.

Let's face it, Wanker Willie was best known for Wanking his Wee Willie in the Oval Office Head after Monica brought it to enhanced Tumescence. Everything else he did in office pales.

Well, there's the Monica Receptacle Cigar-Lubing while talking to Arafat.

THAT is an image to hold onto.

Proud ? Yeah, I'm doing OK.

ncampion - 5-3-2011 at 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bajahowodd

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
Fear Redux ?

Gun Sales set records in the first two years of the Wanker Willie Admin.

ncampion - 5-3-2011 at 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bajahowodd

Just seems to me that whenever a Dem gets elected president, there's a huge over reaction because mouth breathers are convinced that somehow guns are gonna be outlawed.

So, who is the fool?

Over reaction???? Every year, little by little, there are more and more restrictions placed on legal gun ownership by the Dems.

So, yes, who is the fool?????

redhilltown - 5-4-2011 at 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
Effective communication of thought is sometimes enhanced with provocative words that catch attention.

There is NO effort to convert Lefty Louts. I'm convinced that would be impossible so why be concerned with their sensibilities ?

In choosing descriptive terms, I hold fast to the "Do onto others" rule. In this case, "Do onto them as they do onto you". I'm fairly confident that NONE of my terminology has violated the "They DID" when referring to GWB, Cheney, Rumsfeld, McCain, Palin et all. I feel comfortable with that standard as a Baseline.

And, "Some" of the terms are great to evoke images of those described.

Let's face it, Wanker Willie was best known for Wanking his Wee Willie in the Oval Office Head after Monica brought it to enhanced Tumescence. Everything else he did in office pales.

Well, there's the Monica Receptacle Cigar-Lubing while talking to Arafat.

THAT is an image to hold onto.

Proud ? Yeah, I'm doing OK.

You're right. I apologize. Your post and follow ups have a coherence and such a linear, detailed, and plausible sensibility that only a marooonic lefty lout would dare argue.

But I'm serious about one thing: you do have a cute dog

1bobo - 5-4-2011 at 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ncampion

Quote:

Over reaction???? Every year, little by little, there are more and more restrictions placed on legal gun ownership by the Dems.

So, yes, who is the fool?????

A common right wing talking point. Specifics, please?

ELINVESTIG8R - 5-4-2011 at 05:14 AM

You better get you automatic rifles and lots of ammo soon as something wicked this way cometh! Do not be a dawdler!

[Edited on 5-4-2011 by ELINVESTIG8R]

Talking Points Left and Right

MrBillM - 5-4-2011 at 08:58 AM

Criticizing the "Loss of Gun Rights" position as mere Talking Points and demanding specifics is, in itself, something of a misdirection "Talking Point" common to the Left since, WHATEVER your position on the advisability of said restrictions, they are common knowledge and covered pretty well even in the (mostly) Left-Wing Press.

That said, such specifics are readily available, even though the LEFT doesn't really want to hear them.

Though my subscriptions are down from peak years, I still receive (4) different Gun-related magazines monthly and they're filled with columns specifying (with legislation numbers) the various restrictive efforts. While I'm not going to sit down and start compiling, I AM going to start noting them as I do the usual reading. After which, I'll be more than happy to start listing those Specifics. Which you'll ignore.

But, then, Libs don't need or want facts. They're too inconvenient.

willyAirstream - 5-4-2011 at 10:40 AM

MrBillM's dog is a stuffed animal, why else would he stay.

MrBills Mood: Continual Schadenfreude

from wikipedia
Schadenfreude is pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others.

Educating Idiots

MrBillM - 5-4-2011 at 04:45 PM

WillyTrailerTrash and his educational effort is like ALL PSAs. Aimed at those who haven't a clue and is, therefore, a waste of effort.

There was "Someone" who DIDN'T know what the word meant ?

It IS a GREAT Feeling, though, ESPECIALLY when it's relating to a Lib and they go Room Temp.

Give it a try.

Being one of MY dogs is GREAT, Too.

My Friends have often commented that I treat Dogs a lot better than I do people.

I can only wonder "so, WHAT's the Point" ? WHY wouldn't you treat Dogs better than people ?

They ARE Better.

As I said once to one of my BEST Friends in a discussion of relative value - "Just to be clear, IF there was a situation where I had to make the choice, I'd save MY Dog before YOUR kid. For that matter, I'd save YOUR Dog before the Kid".

And, I would.

Woof.

[Edited on 5-4-2011 by MrBillM]

Bajamatic - 5-4-2011 at 05:02 PM

Funny. Blaming a liberal for your lack of facts is creative writing, Bill. If you don't have the facts, then don't claim it. If you have em, out with em. Put up or shut up.

Mouth breathers. I love that.

Funny Thing

Bajahowodd - 5-4-2011 at 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bajamatic
Funny. Blaming a liberal for your lack of facts is creative writing, Bill. If you don't have the facts, then don't claim it. If you have em, out with em. Put up or shut up.

Mouth breathers. I love that.

When I used that term in my first post, I was thinking mostly about the wacko fringe element, as opposed to responsible gun owners.

That said, SCOTUS, love'em, or hate'em, given that they've been packed tight by GOP presidents, fundamentally has given the second amendment the clear and unconditional right for all citizens to bear arms.

However, as I referred to the wacko element, I continue to be baffled by those who support the right to own automatic weapons capable of mass destruction.

Arizona congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, God bless her, should be the poster child for the idea that, while everyone should have the right of protection, that when this issue becomes co-opted by the mouth breathers, weapons that only exists to accomplish mass death and destruction are available to all.

There has to be a sane middle ground.

krafty - 5-4-2011 at 07:58 PM

Gun restrictions? Must have missed something. Is that why in TX and AZ you can buy AK-47's over the counter with no paperwork? Talk to Gabby Giffords about gun control-unfortunately most of the others involved in that fiasco are dead. NRA has a serious hold on this, no worries for you Mr. Bill

Mouth-Breathing Gun-Toting Retards ?

MrBillM - 5-4-2011 at 09:22 PM

Most of the Mouth-Breathers I've seen are those "Mongoloid" types with Thick-Foreheads, Buggy Crossed-eyes, Odd-expressions and Drool a lot. We've got a couple up here working at larger Retail Outlets who apparently needed to pad their Equal opportunity stats. I have no idea what their stand on the 2nd Amendment is or any other issue because, frankly not much they say makes any sense anyway.

There seem to be quite a few of the Mouth-Breathers among the Urban Rap Crowd too. They DO seem to like their "Nines", but I'm not sure they are NRA members. A lot of them are Alumni of the Correctional systems, though, and that would probably mean they're not Legal Gun-Owners.

As far as Gunned-Down Giffords goes, WHAT's that point ? The weapon itself was just another semi-auto. Is it the 30-round Mag that she's a Poster Babe for ? They've been around a LONG time. A LOT of 30-round Mags have been sold since post WWII and I think the Guy gone Berserk" Ruger with a THIRTEEN round Mag provided the impetus for the 10-Round mania. The LoonyLibLouts at the time (ignorantly) attributed those 13s as some NEW Evil incarnation. The Browning Hi-Power 9mm came with a 13 beginning in the '30s.

BTW, the AK-47 Select-fire Weapon is NOT readily available without a Class III permit. There ARE Semi-Auto variations, but other than fulfilling the Lefty obsession over "Ugly" guns, they are functionally no more effective than a host of others, notably the Ruger Mini-14 or Mini-30, the SKS, M-1 Carbine, etc, etc, etc. Or, even a semi-auto Hunting rifle. I suppose if you want (Illegal) Auto-Fire, your best bet (albeit pricey) is an AR Variation. With a Drop-In Auto Sear, you can be Legal, Illegal, Legal in seconds.

krafty is (almost) RIGHT about ONE thing. I have (almost) no worries on the Firearms Frontier. I've already got a lot more than most, fewer than some and, fortunately a lot of them predate Paperwork. MY only barrier to MORE comes not from the Feds, Not from the Moonbeam State, BUT from the BOSS.

SHE has been harder and harder to convince that there is a VALID reason to keep spending 500-1000-MORE to duplicate (her word, not mine) what I've got too many of. I point to ALL of those Damned Dresses and shoes, but she doesn't budge. The INVESTMENT argument (which IS valid) hasn't worked lately.

Such is Life on the Firing line.

ODD and I DO share one thought, though. I've ALWAYS referred to Mouth-Breathers as RETARDS. Which some people have taken exception to.

F--k Em, Right ODD ?

[Edited on 5-5-2011 by MrBillM]

redhilltown - 5-4-2011 at 10:52 PM

Well now, finally some clarity and common sense to this thread!!!!!!

There is not necessarily a connection between how someone writes and their intelligence or sanity but Bill baby, you are pushing some limits here.

I honestly think you made more sense when you spoke of Bill Clinton's penis and your love of dogs.

Sense and Sensibility ?

MrBillM - 5-4-2011 at 11:11 PM

Mine, of course, and not Jane Austen's.

As I've said, it's really immaterial whether I make sense to anyone who disagrees with me.

Or, who agrees with me, for that matter.

There's no point to any of these points other than recreation.

You're either talking to the Choir or the Rabble. No minds are changed and nothing's resolved.

AT BEST, well-articulated positions or commentaries "may" give someone else (on your own side) some ammunition for their own useless babbling OR, on the other hand, you may have the pleasure of really irritating someone you have no use for anyway.

The bottom line is to pass the time, have fun and enjoy the misery of others.

Lock and Load.

Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition.

Enjoy the misfortune and demise of all you oppose.

Make sense to yourself.

That's the True meaning of Life.

The Gull - 5-4-2011 at 11:16 PM

Wow Bill,

It is just shameful the way Nomads politicized your posting. They should be ashamed of their behavior.

Bad karma.

Can't we all just get along?

redhilltown - 5-5-2011 at 12:19 AM

Why yes, praise the lord.

Jesus would want you to enjoy the demise of others.

Most biblical scholars would agree that Jesus was locked and loaded.

As to getting along, I promise you I'd be the first to pull over and help anyone in Baja who needed help...do anything I can as I have (as have all of you) many times.

Only Jesus will judge me to the fact that I may have felt more of a kinship to their dog than the person stranded...

See? Bill and I are not that far apart.

Cypress - 5-5-2011 at 04:14 AM

To the antigun crowd, The fact is, gun ownership is legal in the USA. If you don't "feel" that gun ownership is OK, then don't own one. I really don't care whether you own a gun or not. If your choice is not to have a gun handy, that's your decision. Hope you never have cause to regret that decision.

ELINVESTIG8R - 5-5-2011 at 05:03 AM

I made this many years ago and placed it on the wall of every office I worked at as a reminder to never go anywhere without a firearm. To this day I still abide by that.

No whiners

Dave - 5-5-2011 at 01:23 PM

I would support a law that would make it illegal for anyone against gun ownership to own one...ever.

Maybe have their houses painted pink, also.

toneart - 5-5-2011 at 02:05 PM

I support the 2nd amendment as it applies to sensible people. I hate the NRA! I own a powerful weapon and have had good training in how to use it. I live alone so it is always loaded and ready. My dog alerts me when anyone comes on the property.

Having said that, I don't like guns. I don't like the gun mentality. I don't like what they do to people when in the wrong hands or by accident.

I don't get off when a gun goes off. :no:

Hopefully, mine will never go off. My manhood is intact without a surrogate. :smug:

ELINVESTIG8R - 5-5-2011 at 03:49 PM

My manliness is derived from my weapons arsenal and my ability to use it.

Skeet/Loreto - 5-5-2011 at 04:19 PM

Keep in mind my Friends that "Guns do not Kill People" People Kill people.

R=The way this county is going with Gangs etc, it maybe that a time will come when we must defend our homes with Guns.

I hope that it does not happen while I am alive.

WHAT Would Jesus DO ? I KNOW.

MrBillM - 5-5-2011 at 07:56 PM

Because I asked.

And, he said " mi hermano Juan and I Love to go out shooting".

As to the 2000-year old Guy, since he could (reportedly) work miracles and his Dad was THE Godfather, he had advantages the rest of us don't. True, it didn't help when those Rude Romans showed up, but he wasn't the First (or Last) Kid who suffered when a stern parent's Discipline went awry.

But then, I also heard (and read) that the WHOLE Thing went according to plan.

You have to wonder IF (only for a minute, of course) during the Scourging, he didn't think "Dang, just my luck that Sam Colt hasn't even been born yet".

I'll ask next time I see him.

Would We Do as Jesus Do Redux

MrBillM - 5-6-2011 at 12:48 PM

It's probably (or maybe not) worth noting that the pointless debate over giving due to what Jesus would do or not do, ignores that there are a LOT of things he wouldn't or, at least, didn't do that we might find it difficult to emulate.

I mean, (supposedly) he didn't do SEX. Unless you believe the Mary Magdalene rumors, that is.

Unless you're contemplating life as a Catholic Priest, WHO would want to be like that ?

And, even those guys mostly dabble with Choir-Boys or Nuns, depending on their predilections.

Speaking of Nuns, I saw this a.m. where they've declared war on Goldman-Sachs. One Nun who attended the Board Meeting was so agitated she was Twitching and Shaking like Janet Reno.

OK, the O.B., too, probably had the Parkinson Palsy.

Which brings to mind the "Bad" Joke about why the Parkinson gals are valued for intimacy at the Old Folks Home.

But, it's not worth repeating.

Cypress - 5-6-2011 at 01:30 PM

Twitching and shaking? That's a sweet thing to contemplate. Where her eyes open or closed? Was she.....?

The Holy Twitcher

MrBillM - 5-6-2011 at 04:46 PM

As a humorous aside, the Shaking Nun said that she told Lloyd Blankfein that she referred to HIM as Lord GOLDman.

He replied "You can just call me Lloyd".

She didn't laugh when she told it.

But, she did twitch.

They sort of remind you of a Bird when they do that.

Speaking of which, I wonder what Janet looks like by now ?

She was shaking pretty bad quite a few years back. I'd love to see her now.

She IS still breathing, isn't she ?

[Edited on 5-7-2011 by MrBillM]