Woooosh - 8-31-2011 at 06:31 PM
This is the "no means NO" argument for the legally deaf methinks.
http://www.sandiegored.com/noticias/18049/Angry-Calderon-say...
�Independent of what a judge has determined with respect to the circumstances under which the eighty-something banned weapons were found in the house
of Mr. Hank, this is a case where the real truth can be clearly distinguished from the legal truth.
�The legal truth says that the army did not prove that it was pursuing some people, that it found armed people outside of Hank�s house, and what they
found inside Hank�s house. The legal truth says that there was a raid, but not people caught in the act (of breaking the law). The legal truth then is
that there was no crime.
�What is the real truth? That the weapons were there, but even though two of those weapons matched the weapons used to kill two people, that�s to say,
there were two people executed at different times and circumstances in the city of Tijuana, these weapons were found there. That is the real truth,�
the president explained.
gnukid - 8-31-2011 at 06:39 PM
Know it, live it, love it. -It's mexico.
If you don't run, they can't catch you.
woody with a view - 8-31-2011 at 06:57 PM
now i know what the meaning of "is" is.....
DENNIS - 8-31-2011 at 07:14 PM
I am amazed that the President of the Republic came out with these statements. Kinda says, in his own words, that he's in charge of a rogue legal
system......which of course he is.
I'm really starting to like this guy......a lot.
Then again.....an election year is near and the PRI front-runner, Enrique Pe�a Nieto,
is a close ally of Hank Rhon......sad but true.
A win for Pe�a is a win for at least one of the cartels.....in my humble opinion.