BajaNomad

Sea Shepherd Conservation Society

 Pages:  1  

motoged - 7-5-2012 at 01:08 AM

Japan has acknowledged that the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society's anti-whaling efforts recently were successful in disrupting their "research" (i.e. their term for commercial whaling):

http://www.democraticunderground.com/112719256


And the Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard said she would fight the proposal for whaling to resume off South Korea:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/asian-nations-conservationists-want-to-sink-south-koreas-whale-hunt-plan/article4391268/


http://www.starfiretor.com/TheWhaleAndDolphinPeopleProject/SlaughterPhotos.htm

"Former Australian environment minister Ian Campbell told Australian television from aboard a vessel of the anti-whaling activist group Sea Shepherd that the organization would “have to get organized to go out to the oceans and save the whales off South Korea”. "

Just some "nut-job" whale-huggers I guess :rolleyes:

What would Nomads have to say if the whalers dropped by Guerrero Negro for some "fishing"?

[Edited on 7-5-2012 by motoged]

[Edited on 7-5-2012 by motoged]

[Edited on 7-5-2012 by motoged]

[Edited on 7-5-2012 by motoged]

Pescador - 7-5-2012 at 07:37 AM

Just some "nut-job" whale-huggers I guess


I guess you are right.:lol::lol::lol:

goldhuntress - 7-5-2012 at 07:42 AM

I support the Whale Huggers!! Go Sea Shepard!!:bounce::bounce::bounce:

DianaT - 7-5-2012 at 08:55 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by goldhuntress
I support the Whale Huggers!! Go Sea Shepard!!:bounce::bounce::bounce:



:yes::yes::yes:

sancho - 7-5-2012 at 10:17 AM

I started out as a tree hugger back in the '70's
backpacking Yosemite, grew to a Baja cactus/
whale hugger in Mex. I can't fathom any other
position, I would feel guilty if I felt any different.
I agree with all the people that have put themselves
out there, Cousteau, Muir, Paul Watson

Cypress - 7-5-2012 at 10:23 AM

I'd rather be a "tree hugger" than a "stump jumper" any day of the week.:biggrin:

woody with a view - 7-5-2012 at 12:36 PM

what ever happened to CardonHugger?

Cisco - 7-5-2012 at 12:45 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by sancho
I started out as a tree hugger back in the '70's
backpacking Yosemite, grew to a Baja cactus/
whale hugger in Mex. I can't fathom any other
position, I would feel guilty if I felt any different.
I agree with all the people that have put themselves
out there, Cousteau, Muir, Paul Watson


I am very conscious of the environment and realize that we have exceeded the “tipping-point” due to our activities against the earth. Combine this with the power of the exponent and we have 250,000 more new people on the planet daily than die.

Ultimately, as a large specie we are doomed, those survivors will be living lives that we cannot even imagine under circumstances that we, even now with our changing global weather patterns, cannot imagine.

Daily, tens of species become extinct due to our actions.

As to the efforts of individual groups pursuing their agendas outside of the laws that we humans have instituted for the good of all I have no respect. Thus, I have absolutely no respect for Sea Shepard and personally I envision Paul Watson as a narcissist whose entire career has been built on self-aggrandizement, lie’s and illegal pursuits.

The actions of Sea Shepard should be directed to changing the laws in a legal manner rather than infringing illegally upon the rights of others.

Cypress - 7-5-2012 at 01:02 PM

Cisco, The "legal manner"? Tied up in courts for a generation, while the slaughter of whales for "research " continues? The "research", AKA eating whale meat, is practiced by a small portion of the worlds population. Blubber doesn't rate high on most peoples list of food items. The worst immediate threat to whales is the expanding harvest of krill, one of their primary food sources.

motoged - 7-5-2012 at 01:06 PM

All we can do is at least stand up and be counted....then some momentum can be realized once folks realize they are not alone.

And this works for "both' sides (too bad most people see it as an "either-or" situation....a rather limited paradigm...).

The US gov't (and others) continues to break international and moral laws to achieve its goals....so laws are made and ignored.

Sometimes a wake-up call is needed.

"If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything".

We all take a position....and then are (may be) forced to defend it....

dtbushpilot - 7-5-2012 at 01:06 PM

I'm with Cisco on this one.....dt

motoged - 7-5-2012 at 02:04 PM

DT,
We are still friends ? ;D;D

So, do I have to eat a blubber taco when I visit? :saint:

DianaT - 7-5-2012 at 02:35 PM

If there had not been people willing to break the law and risk their lives for their beliefs, there would be no United States. The founders were British Citizens and when working to change the laws did not work, they broke the laws in many different ways.

The protest against the Vietnam war often included braking the law, and it finally was successful. There are lots of examples of environmental victories that did not always follow the law.

Perhaps it is a matter of which laws different people think are worth breaking and if they are willing to pay the consequences for braking the law ---- unless one is a bankster and then there are no consequences.

Quote:

Paul Watson as a narcissist


Probably --it seems to be the way for all leaders. I wish him well in his continued endeavors.

Barry A. - 7-5-2012 at 02:42 PM

I too am with CISCO on this one.

BUT--------

------as we all probably know, 99% of all species that have inhabited the Earth have gone extinct, and by far most of them went extinct before man made his presense felt, I understand. As MitchMan would say, "something to think about".

Barry

LancairDriver - 7-5-2012 at 02:50 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
All we can do is at least stand up and be counted....then some momentum can be realized once folks realize they are not alone.

And this works for "both' sides (too bad most people see it as an "either-or" situation....a rather limited paradigm...).

The US gov't (and others) continues to break international and moral laws to achieve its goals....so laws are made and ignored.

Sometimes a wake-up call

"If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything".

We all take a position....and then are (may be) forced to defend it....


Amen, Amen, and Amen

Watson could do some good in the gulf around Mulege. No one else has the cojones for it, particularly the Mexican government.


[Edited on 7-5-2012 by LancairDriver]

Cisco - 7-5-2012 at 02:58 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT

I wish him well in his continued endeavors.


Really Diana?

"infringing illegally upon the rights of others."

When does that stop???

sancho - 7-5-2012 at 03:11 PM

I love this quote, one of the current Sea Shepard ships, the
Steve Irwin, renamed after the Australian crocadile conservation guy who died,
at the renaming of the ship to the Steve Irwin, his widow wife
was quoted 'Give Him Hell Paul', referring to Sea Shepards harassing the illegal, outlaw
Japan whalers, call him a narcissist, eco terrorist,
all the sucess in the World to people like P Watson,
anyone who is not on the Conservation movement is,
I'll be kind, uninformed and
short sighted

Cisco - 7-5-2012 at 03:17 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Barry A.

------as we all probably know, 99% of all species that have inhabited the Earth have gone extinct, and by far most of them went extinct before man made his presense felt, I understand. As MitchMan would say, "something to think about".

Barry


Barry do realize that the presence in time of man on earth is infinitesimal compared to the hundreds of millions of years of specie evolution and extinction.

Today, percentage-wise, we are losing more species because of man’s direct involvement with the environment than ever before.

DianaT - 7-5-2012 at 03:36 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT

I wish him well in his continued endeavors.


Really Diana?

"infringing illegally upon the rights of others."

When does that stop???


That is always a good question to which the answers are pretty much always subjective. Perhaps the rights upon which he is infringing, are "rights" that are destroying the rights of others --- or destroying something that belongs to the world.

When will it stop? Maybe never as long as people believe they need to stand up for what they believe. And that definitely is on all sides of any issue or politics -- all sides can justify their right to break a law and infringe on someone else.

Is it right, moral, or what? Wish I had the answer. I know I support what Paul Watson is doing even though he is extreme --- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.

[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]

Cisco - 7-5-2012 at 03:37 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by sancho
I love this quote, one of the current Sea Shepard ships, the
Steve Irwin, renamed after the Australian crocadile conservation guy who died,
at the renaming of the ship to the Steve Irwin, his widow wife
was quoted 'Give Him Hell Paul', referring to Sea Shepards harassing the illegal, outlaw
Japan whalers, call him a narcissist, eco terrorist,
all the sucess in the World to people like P Watson,
anyone who is not on the Conservation movement is,
I'll be kind, uninformed and
short sighted


Sancho you have no idea who you are speaking to.

I am a staunch conservationist. Spent a lot of jail time for just that as a matter of fact. I am certainly NOT uninformed nor am I short-sighted regarding environmental issues.

Your statement regarding disregard of International Treaty, wishing success to someone who others consider a terrorist and blindly making uninformed statements regarding the Conservation movement are irresponsible and the kinds of thinking that nations go to war over.

Should I consider you an anarchist? Paul Watson and his inflammatory statements and actions is.

How much do you know about this man and his program??? You do realize he was kicked out of the Greenpeace program do you not?

Get your research and emotions in order before you address me as being "uninformed and short sighted" regarding this issue.

dtbushpilot - 7-5-2012 at 03:57 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
DT,
We are still friends ? ;D;D

So, do I have to eat a blubber taco when I visit? :saint:


Yes but don't worry, I won't need to kill a whale to get enough blubber:lol::lol:

motoged - 7-5-2012 at 04:00 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT.....
--- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.
[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]


Diana,
One benefit of being confused is that it opens up more possibilities....being "certain" about something reduces one's options.


I think that we, as a species, are a virus on this planet....it is all unfolding as it is. If we were to consider ourselves to be parasites (perhaps more generous a thought than being a virus), we still aren't even at the stage of being in a symbiotic relationship as a parasite, as both the host (ie. the planet) and the parasite have mutual benefit in that type of parasitic relationship.

We just suck vitality and viability from our host....and what is most obscene, is that we think we are entitled to that sucking.

Cisco - 7-5-2012 at 04:06 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT
Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT

I wish him well in his continued endeavors.


Really Diana?

"infringing illegally upon the rights of others."

When does that stop???


Is it right, moral, or what? Wish I had the answer. I know I support what Paul Watson is doing --- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.



Diana.

I'm confused also and we are never totally aware of the situation, but let's try this.

I support the whales 100%. I support the Harp seals 100% I support the Dolphins 100%. What I do not support is an independent effort that is in direct opposition to law. THAT is what kills people and does nothing to solve the problem.

Are you in Imperial Beach? I see a lot of references to that city in your posts. Although I'm a tunachoker I married an I.B. girl and had homes there for thirty years. During that time I was very involved (made my living at) commercial and sport fishing operations.

I bring this up because I helped to pretty much deplete the abalone and lobster population of the south coast in addition to many other species of animals and fishes from the Bering Sea to Galapagos.

Someone in this earlier thread was talking about controls in the SOC and how
Watson could take care of that.

You live in BA. Think of the seasonal fisheries there. Abalone now. Envision Paul Watson coming in and telling Juan and the co-op they could no longer dive abalone even though they are completely legal and working a sustainable fishery.

Think about what would happen to Paul Watson.

Look at what one of our BN members was able to do with abalone replenishment at where, San Martin? Because we took them all in our stupidity and now have to rebuild stocks.

Sounds like what a lot of the world is going through for oil doesn't it? I hate to see the deaths of the innocents for natural resource greed.

Abrazos,

Cisco

Cisco - 7-5-2012 at 04:10 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by sancho
I love this quote, one of the current Sea Shepard ships, the
Steve Irwin, renamed after the Australian crocadile conservation guy who died,
at the renaming of the ship to the Steve Irwin, his widow wife
was quoted 'Give Him Hell Paul', referring to Sea Shepards harassing the illegal, outlaw
Japan whalers, call him a narcissist, eco terrorist,
all the sucess in the World to people like P Watson,
anyone who is not on the Conservation movement is,
I'll be kind, uninformed and
short sighted


Oh Sancho. They are not illegal or outlaw either. Just caught that part.

They are totally legal and doing what commercial fishermen do to make a legal living.

You have a problem with that take it up with the IWC.

DianaT - 7-5-2012 at 04:11 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT.....
--- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.
[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]


Diana,
One benefit of being confused is that it opens up more possibilities....being "certain" about something reduces one's options.


I think that we, as a species, are a virus on this planet....it is all unfolding as it is. If we were to consider ourselves to be parasites (perhaps more generous a thought than being a virus), we still aren't even at the stage of being in a symbiotic relationship as a parasite, as both the host (ie. the planet) and the parasite have mutual benefit in that type of parasitic relationship.

We just suck vitality and viability from our host....and what is most obscene, is that we think we are entitled to that sucking.


I hope to never be "certain" --- it will then be time to die.

When it was all more simple and the success of a species simply meant that it lived long enough to reproduce, there was balance, a constantly changing balance. It was the evolution of that thing we call a human brain that made balance perhaps not obtainable.

Virus--- umm I used to think parasite, but you are correct there is no mutual benefit. In my more spiritual questioning moods, when I think about the possible existence of a god or gods, he, she or it, I sometimes see the evolution of the "big" brain as a cruel joke and picture a whole lot of laughing going on.

rts551 - 7-5-2012 at 04:18 PM

Did you spend a lot of time in jail because you also broke the law? If so when is it alright to break laws and when should we refrain?



Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
Quote:
Originally posted by sancho
I love this quote, one of the current Sea Shepard ships, the
Steve Irwin, renamed after the Australian crocadile conservation guy who died,
at the renaming of the ship to the Steve Irwin, his widow wife
was quoted 'Give Him Hell Paul', referring to Sea Shepards harassing the illegal, outlaw
Japan whalers, call him a narcissist, eco terrorist,
all the sucess in the World to people like P Watson,
anyone who is not on the Conservation movement is,
I'll be kind, uninformed and
short sighted


Sancho you have no idea who you are speaking to.

I am a staunch conservationist. Spent a lot of jail time for just that as a matter of fact. I am certainly NOT uninformed nor am I short-sighted regarding environmental issues.

Your statement regarding disregard of International Treaty, wishing success to someone who others consider a terrorist and blindly making uninformed statements regarding the Conservation movement are irresponsible and the kinds of thinking that nations go to war over.

Should I consider you an anarchist? Paul Watson and his inflammatory statements and actions is.

How much do you know about this man and his program??? You do realize he was kicked out of the Greenpeace program do you not?

Get your research and emotions in order before you address me as being "uninformed and short sighted" regarding this issue.

DianaT - 7-5-2012 at 04:32 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT
Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT

I wish him well in his continued endeavors.


Really Diana?

"infringing illegally upon the rights of others."

When does that stop???


Is it right, moral, or what? Wish I had the answer. I know I support what Paul Watson is doing --- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.



Diana.

I'm confused also and we are never totally aware of the situation, but let's try this.

I support the whales 100%. I support the Harp seals 100% I support the Dolphins 100%. What I do not support is an independent effort that is in direct opposition to law. THAT is what kills people and does nothing to solve the problem.

Are you in Imperial Beach? I see a lot of references to that city in your posts. Although I'm a tunachoker I married an I.B. girl and had homes there for thirty years. During that time I was very involved (made my living at) commercial and sport fishing operations.

I bring this up because I helped to pretty much deplete the abalone and lobster population of the south coast in addition to many other species of animals and fishes from the Bering Sea to Galapagos.

Someone in this earlier thread was talking about controls in the SOC and how
Watson could take care of that.

You live in BA. Think of the seasonal fisheries there. Abalone now. Envision Paul Watson coming in and telling Juan and the co-op they could no longer dive abalone even though they are completely legal and working a sustainable fishery.

Think about what would happen to Paul Watson.

Look at what one of our BN members was able to do with abalone replenishment at where, San Martin? Because we took them all in our stupidity and now have to rebuild stocks.

Sounds like what a lot of the world is going through for oil doesn't it? I hate to see the deaths of the innocents for natural resource greed.

Abrazos,

Cisco


IB -- yes, besides BA, we call IB home. We have only lived here for about 8 years, but bought property here before when we were living in Central America. Talk about saving some environment that we love, I have seen the renditions of the old proposed boat harbor.

I am not sure I see your analogy. BA is fortunate to still have abalone after the way it was harvested in the 50s. But they do and I agree it would not be OK for Watson to show up and stop the co-op, but is that really the same? I shall ponder that.

Quote:

What I do not support is an independent effort that is in direct opposition to law. THAT is what kills people and does nothing to solve the problem.


Sometimes I think it does help solve the problem and does change laws. He is very extreme and sometimes I think that all movements need the extreme to make the less extreme more successful. Example, while all has changed, many years ago I believe Greepeace helped the Sierra Club in some causes and in the beginning, Greenpeace was seen as extreme. It is a little of that balance thing- I think.

Quote:

Sounds like what a lot of the world is going through for oil doesn't it? I hate to see the deaths of the innocents for natural resource greed.


AMEN

Still pondering ---

Cisco - 7-5-2012 at 04:32 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by rts551
Did you spend a lot of time in jail because you also broke the law? If so when is it alright to break laws and when should we refrain?



Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
Quote:
Originally posted by sancho
I love this quote, one of the current Sea Shepard ships, the
Steve Irwin, renamed after the Australian crocadile conservation guy who died,
at the renaming of the ship to the Steve Irwin, his widow wife
was quoted 'Give Him Hell Paul', referring to Sea Shepards harassing the illegal, outlaw
Japan whalers, call him a narcissist, eco terrorist,
all the sucess in the World to people like P Watson,
anyone who is not on the Conservation movement is,
I'll be kind, uninformed and
short sighted


Sancho you have no idea who you are speaking to.

I am a staunch conservationist. Spent a lot of jail time for just that as a matter of fact. I am certainly NOT uninformed nor am I short-sighted regarding environmental issues.

Your statement regarding disregard of International Treaty, wishing success to someone who others consider a terrorist and blindly making uninformed statements regarding the Conservation movement are irresponsible and the kinds of thinking that nations go to war over.

Should I consider you an anarchist? Paul Watson and his inflammatory statements and actions is.

How much do you know about this man and his program??? You do realize he was kicked out of the Greenpeace program do you not?

Get your research and emotions in order before you address me as being "uninformed and short sighted" regarding this issue.


OH...I am soo busted.

"Did you spend a lot of time in jail because you also broke the law? If so when is it alright to break laws and when should we refrain?"

Yep. And all peaceful protesting. Well, on my side anyway, not very peaceful on theirs.

Great point, Thank You for my reality check.

DianaT - 7-5-2012 at 04:37 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco

OH...I am soo busted.

"Did you spend a lot of time in jail because you also broke the law? If so when is it alright to break laws and when should we refrain?"

Yep. And all peaceful protesting. Well, on my side anyway, not very peaceful on theirs.

Great point, Thank You for my reality check.




Dang Ralph, you are quick today! This is definitely one of those, "Why didn't I say that moments?" Abreojos must produce clearer thinking.

Cisco, I think we would agree pretty well on most of these issues. Or at least able discuss them :biggrin:

[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]

Cisco - 7-5-2012 at 04:46 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT
Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT.....
--- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.
[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]


Diana,
One benefit of being confused is that it opens up more possibilities....being "certain" about something reduces one's options.


I think that we, as a species, are a virus on this planet....it is all unfolding as it is. If we were to consider ourselves to be parasites (perhaps more generous a thought than being a virus), we still aren't even at the stage of being in a symbiotic relationship as a parasite, as both the host (ie. the planet) and the parasite have mutual benefit in that type of parasitic relationship.

We just suck vitality and viability from our host....and what is most obscene, is that we think we are entitled to that sucking.


I hope to never be "certain" --- it will then be time to die.

When it was all more simple and the success of a species simply meant that it lived long enough to reproduce, there was balance, a constantly changing balance. It was the evolution of that thing we call a human brain that made balance perhaps not obtainable.

Virus--- umm I used to think parasite, but you are correct there is no mutual benefit. In my more spiritual questioning moods, when I think about the possible existence of a god or gods, he, she or it, I sometimes see the evolution of the "big" brain as a cruel joke and picture a whole lot of laughing going on.


I was getting out of this as it was going too far out but I do want to comment on you and Moto's great posts.

I believe (believe???) THINK, it all went to hell when we discovered agriculture.

A couple of weeks ago in one of our 'money' posts I wrote of a contemporary tribe of hunter gatherers that have no problems because none of them have anything more than any of the others.

Which was pretty much nothing. They did not plant, made no sense to plant and then wait for it to be ready to eat when you could just go eat now and wander around and eat some more.

There were maybe two million people on earth, getting along fine, eating and being eaten and then came agriculture. With agriculture came permanence, social stratification, wealth (or the lack of it) and war. Ever see "The God's Must Be Crazy?"

Some thoughts from my notes:

"Yes, funny how we modern people, with all our wealth and "labor- and time-saving" gadgets, think we are masters of creation. But we have less time and we slave more than ever. Why?

As a civilization advances, it tends to let machines do its dirty work. Cars replace horses, nuclear bombs replace infantries, drones replace fighter jets; it's all about increasing efficiency.

I think people like to think we're special. But isn't that what got Galileo and Copernicus into trouble — questioning how special we were? But if we're just another duck in the road, it's not very exciting."

Enjoy what is.

DianaT - 7-5-2012 at 04:58 PM

Cisco --- love your notes and statements about agriculture --- and all that went along with agriculture is defined as "progress". The only thing we seem to be progressing toward is our own extinction.

The God's Must Be Crazy is one of my all time favorite movies. It was one we both showed to our students in prison --- a funny, funny movie with a very good message.

Gees, I have a project I am working on and need to get serious---but I have really enjoyed this conversation.

Saludos
Diana

Cisco - 7-5-2012 at 05:07 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT
Cisco --- love your notes and statements about agriculture --- and all that went along with agriculture is defined as "progress". The only thing we seem to be progressing toward is our own extinction.

The God's Must Be Crazy is one of my all time favorite movies. It was one we both showed to our students in prison --- a funny, funny movie with a very good message.

Gees, I have a project I am working on and need to get serious---but I have really enjoyed this conversation.

Saludos
Diana



It's been nice Diana.

I will be in BA probably August or September for a few months. We should have the opportunity to philosophize.

motoged - 7-5-2012 at 06:03 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by dtbushpilot
Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
DT,
We are still friends ? ;D;D

So, do I have to eat a blubber taco when I visit? :saint:


Yes but don't worry, I won't need to kill a whale to get enough blubber:lol::lol:


David,

OUCH... :wow:....

but I might miss that part of my anatomy....

:biggrin:

dtbushpilot - 7-5-2012 at 06:08 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
Quote:
Originally posted by dtbushpilot
Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
DT,
We are still friends ? ;D;D

So, do I have to eat a blubber taco when I visit? :saint:


Yes but don't worry, I won't need to kill a whale to get enough blubber:lol::lol:


David,

OUCH... :wow:....

but I might miss that part of my anatomy....

:biggrin:



Don't worry, I was referring to your ample gut, I don't know any other part of your anatomy big enough for a meal:o:o:o

motoged - 7-5-2012 at 07:55 PM

David,
Yeah, I got that reference....





and not my....



motoged - 7-5-2012 at 08:03 PM

On a more intelligent level....

http://www.wimp.com/futureours/


2 minutes of your time....:saint:

David K - 7-5-2012 at 08:10 PM

Great Ged... Yes, it is true... or maybe I should say it can be true... the past 3-4 years has seen such a decline in this nation's hopes and aspirations I just hope we can get back on course. :bounce:

DavidE - 7-5-2012 at 09:18 PM

Nature has an answer to overpopulation. What it cannot control by starvation it will control by disease. There are so many hundreds of millions of humans living in too close proximity to poultry and swine that a crossover virus is inevitable. With incredibly effective travel to virtually everywhere in the world, a pandemic is an absolute certainty. Fun reading. The pandemic of 1917 - 1919. Back when entire blocks of civilization were naturally isolated. We do not have that luxury today.

Japanese consume very little of the whale percentage wise. Most of it ends up as fertilizer. The Soviets harvested tens of millions of tons of hake for fertilizer.

Try finding salmon or ling cod or widow fish for sale along the Pacific coast.

fish

captkw - 7-5-2012 at 10:20 PM

Hola,until 5 years ago I gave two salmon away 5 days a week..today..NOT !! there is fish this year..but the future is looking bleak !!! and the fishing all over the world,well...nevermind..too depressing

rts551 - 7-5-2012 at 10:35 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Great Ged... Yes, it is true... or maybe I should say it can be true... the past 3-4 years has seen such a decline in this nation's hopes and aspirations I just hope we can get back on course. :bounce:


Maybe we will with a new House of Representatives.

redhilltown - 7-5-2012 at 11:41 PM

I gotta say as just yer every day nomad this has been a cool and interesting thread with both sides stating their views in pretty much a civilized, mature, and respectful manner.

What the hell is wrong with you people???? :tumble::tumble::tumble:

motoged - 7-6-2012 at 12:52 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captkw
Hola,.... there is fish this year..but the future is looking bleak !!! and the fishing all over the world,well...nevermind..too depressing



Ya....get yer sushi while ya can...:wow:

motoged - 7-6-2012 at 01:00 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by rts551
Maybe we will with a new House of Representatives.


I think we are talking about the planet....not just the USA...

DianaT - 7-6-2012 at 07:06 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
Quote:
Originally posted by rts551
Maybe we will with a new House of Representatives.


I think we are talking about the planet....not just the USA...


Absolutely --- it is all about the planet that we all share, but maybe with a New House of Representatives in the US, we can join with other countries who are understand that we share this planet and are concerned. The current leadership in the House is controlled by their wacko fringe who would like to do away with all regulations, including the EPA. And they really don't give a rip about the rest of the world -- it all about the USA.

Thus, since the US is a major player in pollution, consumption, and power, having our House run by people who believe in science might just help. :yes:

Cypress - 7-6-2012 at 07:16 AM

From what I gather, if we don't elect democrats to house seats the planet is doomed. Those nasty 'ole republicans don't care about the environment or believe in science. Yep, democrats will solve all our problems.:biggrin:

rts551 - 7-6-2012 at 07:58 AM

Just read today where N Korea is going to do some whale "research"

LancairDriver - 7-6-2012 at 08:15 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cypress
From what I gather, if we don't elect democrats to house seats the planet is doomed. Those nasty 'ole republicans don't care about the environment or believe in science. Yep, democrats will solve all our problems.:biggrin:


Right. We need more on food stamps and more unemployment and more debt. That will make the planet much greener. California and the nation has been told they don't have their quota on food stamps and need to canvas for more recipients. Fewer people on the road going to work, less pollution, more votes for the Dems. Win, win situation.

shari - 7-6-2012 at 08:19 AM

just because it's legal doesn't mean it's right

SFandH - 7-6-2012 at 08:22 AM

Many people, like myself and the Sea Shepard folks, view the killing of whales as murder. Whalers are violating the fundamental right to live freely, which extends to all species. The reasoning for this point of view is expressed by the arguments for extending human rights to animals.

Speciesism is an ugly form of discrimination that brings pain and suffering and death to the unfortunate beings that fall subject to it.

Many people think it should stop and are willing to break laws to shed light upon the issue. Unlawful activism does get people's attention, as evidenced by this thread.

Here's a powerful hour long video about the subject

[Edited on 7-6-2012 by SFandH]

mtgoat666 - 7-6-2012 at 08:28 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
The actions of Sea Shepard should be directed to changing the laws in a legal manner rather than infringing illegally upon the rights of others.


many laws and "legal actions" are so grossly wrong that they must be fought by all means (slavery, authoritarianism, apartheid, whaling, etc.). slaughtering whales is wrong, and past 50 years of illegal activities have achieved fabulous success in eliminating whaling, but the war is not yet over. japan and norway and a few other countries continue to say FU to the world, and those countries need to be stopped by all means. if people had followed legal avenues, there would be many fewer whale species today. anyone who defends rights of whalers is a cruel fool.

there is no sane person in USA that thinks japan has a valid "right" to continue whaling. cisco, your defense of japanese slaughter is repugnant!

jbcoug - 7-6-2012 at 08:44 AM

I hope a number of the above posters don't fish or consume sealife, otherwise we have a lot of hypocracy going on.

John

SFandH - 7-6-2012 at 08:45 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by jbcoug
I hope a number of the above posters don't fish or consume sealife, otherwise we have a lot of hypocracy going on.

John


I only eat plants.

[Edited on 7-6-2012 by SFandH]

bigmike58 - 7-6-2012 at 09:00 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by jbcoug
I hope a number of the above posters don't fish or consume sealife, otherwise we have a lot of hypocracy going on.

John


:o Those are fighting words!! LOL

Barry A. - 7-6-2012 at 09:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by mtgoat666
Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
The actions of Sea Shepard should be directed to changing the laws in a legal manner rather than infringing illegally upon the rights of others.


many laws and "legal actions" are so grossly wrong that they must be fought by all means (slavery, authoritarianism, apartheid, whaling, etc.). slaughtering whales is wrong, and past 50 years of illegal activities have achieved fabulous success in eliminating whaling, but the war is not yet over. japan and norway and a few other countries continue to say FU to the world, and those countries need to be stopped by all means. if people had followed legal avenues, there would be many fewer whale species today. anyone who defends rights of whalers is a cruel fool.

there is no sane person in USA that thinks japan has a valid "right" to continue whaling. cisco, your defense of japanese slaughter is repugnant!


Goat----------take off your blinders, and stop making grossly untrue statements!!! Cisco in no way is "defending Japanese slaughter of Whales", as he has stated several times---------he appears to be defending the "rule of law", a worthy endeavor IMO.

I too find the killing of whales repugnant, but civilized folks use laws to stop unjust things, not terrorism. Terrorists will reap what they sew--------.

Barry

mtgoat666 - 7-6-2012 at 09:07 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by jbcoug
I hope a number of the above posters don't fish or consume sealife, otherwise we have a lot of hypocracy going on.

John


spoken like a true ignoramus! congratulations on your ignorance! :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

mtgoat666 - 7-6-2012 at 09:09 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Barry A.
Quote:
Originally posted by mtgoat666
Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
The actions of Sea Shepard should be directed to changing the laws in a legal manner rather than infringing illegally upon the rights of others.


many laws and "legal actions" are so grossly wrong that they must be fought by all means (slavery, authoritarianism, apartheid, whaling, etc.). slaughtering whales is wrong, and past 50 years of illegal activities have achieved fabulous success in eliminating whaling, but the war is not yet over. japan and norway and a few other countries continue to say FU to the world, and those countries need to be stopped by all means. if people had followed legal avenues, there would be many fewer whale species today. anyone who defends rights of whalers is a cruel fool.

there is no sane person in USA that thinks japan has a valid "right" to continue whaling. cisco, your defense of japanese slaughter is repugnant!


Goat----------take off your blinders, and stop making grossly untrue statements!!! Cisco in no way is "defending Japanese slaughter of Whales", as he has stated several times---------he appears to be defending the "rule of law", a worthy endeavor IMO.

I too find the killing of whales repugnant, but civilized folks use laws to stop unjust things, not terrorism. Terrorists will reap what they sew--------.

Barry


you guys continue to sit on your bloody hands. i applaud the people doing whatever it takes to stop the slaughter.

rts551 - 7-6-2012 at 09:13 AM

Many of you don't seem to realize it is ILLEGAL to kill whales! Unless, Of course, unless it is for research. So what Japan and a few others do is kill whales to see what they are/were eating. The byproduct of the research is then sent home for processing rather than waste it.

Sounds real ethical doesn't it.

SFandH - 7-6-2012 at 10:36 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Barry A.
I too find the killing of whales repugnant, but civilized folks use laws to stop unjust things, not terrorism. Terrorists will reap what they sew--------.

Barry


We just celebrated July 4th. The date in 1776 when 56? people signed the Declaration of Independence. An act of treason under the laws they were governed by.

Terrorists, eh?

These anti-whaling activists are fighting to save lives, not take them as terrorists do.

[Edited on 7-6-2012 by SFandH]

sancho - 7-6-2012 at 10:40 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
Oh Sancho. They are totally legal and doing what commercial fishermen do to make a legal living.

You have a problem with that take it up with the IWC.



As pointed out good discussion, Cisco you did force me
into a little research, and it APPEARS that the International
Community signs off on no whaling, while the few nations
you attempt to defend as within their rights looks like
it doesn't hold water, looks like you batting average is slipping, and thanks for the Oh Sancho, kinda heartwarming
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Whaling_Commissio...

rts551 - 7-6-2012 at 10:43 AM

You mean this guy is just helping to enforce the law? Kinda like Arizona helping out the feds?

Cisco - 7-6-2012 at 10:44 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by mtgoat666
Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
The actions of Sea Shepard should be directed to changing the laws in a legal manner rather than infringing illegally upon the rights of others.


japan and norway and a few other countries continue to say FU to the world, and those countries need to be stopped by all means. if people had followed legal avenues, there would be many fewer whale species today. anyone who defends rights of whalers is a cruel fool.

there is no sane person in USA that thinks japan has a valid "right" to continue whaling. cisco, your defense of japanese slaughter is repugnant!


Tom you need to reread what I have written about the animal/man interaction and get your head around what may be legal and what should be moral.

Then, after talking about the slaughter of defenseless species we can get into a lively conversation about why we (U.S.A.) are abusing the moral/legal interface of international law regarding sovereign countries.

Get it???

SFandH - 7-6-2012 at 10:49 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by rts551
You mean this guy is just helping to enforce the law? Kinda like Arizona helping out the feds?


Stay on topic. This topic is something I have very deep, innate feelings about. I hope the discussion continues.

What kind of research requires 100s of freshly murdered whales every year? I'm sure someone who is standing up for the rights of the killers knows. Right?

[Edited on 7-6-2012 by SFandH]

Cisco - 7-6-2012 at 11:23 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SFandH
Quote:
Originally posted by rts551
You mean this guy is just helping to enforce the law? Kinda like Arizona helping out the feds?


Stay on topic. This topic is something I have very deep, innate feelings about. I hope the discussion continues.

What kind of research requires 100s of freshly murdered whales every year? I'm sure someone who is standing up for the rights of the killers knows. Right?

[Edited on 7-6-2012 by SFandH]


I too have deep feelings regarding the killing of species and the rape of other natural resources on our planet.

I deplore the killing of the animals as I have stated before, but, man and his "rules" allow that killing as they allow the sustainable harvest of the baby harp seals that only the rich wear as ornament.

I deplore the illegal shark-fin industry and other abuses of harvest that are being perpetrated due to the economic system of the U.S.

You live in San Diego although I don't know your age. I harvested lobster from the huge navy buoy chains in San Diego Bay. I harvested abalone from Sunset Cliffs. Until there were no more and then I took my commercial operation elsewhere.

I see legal sustainable fisheries that are well maintained and protected in Baja. Fisheries that have sustained the people for generations and with the maintenance I see of the respective fisheries will sustain their people for many more generations.

I could write pages about this problem and connect it to the looting and pillage of the World as one great eco-society, which it is, and the abuses made by those 5% with the power who will TAKE 25% of the resources for their own selfish needs.

What is the difference with the whales? The Japanese are doing it legally, whether you agree with that or not. Change the law if it doesn't feel good.

But, to your statement: "What kind of research requires 100s of freshly murdered whales every year? I'm sure someone who is standing up for the rights of the killers knows. Right?"

I have no idea what, if any, kind of research requires that amount of product and I believe it is a scam to get a resource, like the Dolphin kills also, the Sea Hare's, the Abulon produced in Baja for asian consumption, BUT IT'S LEGAL!!!

When you begin taking an "Ox-Bow" type mentality and lynch-mob vigilante methods to contain what you personally do not agree with then all of mankind is in anarchy.

rts551 - 7-6-2012 at 11:28 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SFandH
Quote:
Originally posted by rts551
You mean this guy is just helping to enforce the law? Kinda like Arizona helping out the feds?


Stay on topic. This topic is something I have very deep, innate feelings about. I hope the discussion continues.

What kind of research requires 100s of freshly murdered whales every year? I'm sure someone who is standing up for the rights of the killers knows. Right?

[Edited on 7-6-2012 by SFandH]


#1 Who made you the boss of this thread?

#2 If you read through these posts in a sane manner you will see I support the efforts to stop the senseless slaughter of protested sea life.

My comments about research and Arizona were tongue in cheek. You need to learn to appreciate satire.

SFandH - 7-6-2012 at 11:46 AM

Sorry rts551 I didn't mean to be bossy. Threads often morph into political hot button topics and I didn't want that to happen here.

Cypress - 7-6-2012 at 12:27 PM

With the depletion of the whale's food supply, the harvesting of some species might not be a bad thing. They may well be faced with a serious food shortage. Man's increasing harvest of krill, their source of food, puts us in direct competion with whales.:(

willardguy - 7-6-2012 at 12:53 PM


come on, how can you not adore these bumbling fools?:lol:

Cypress - 7-6-2012 at 12:56 PM

willardguy, Good point!:D

SFandH - 7-6-2012 at 01:09 PM

Cisco,

I understand what you and others are saying about the illegal aspects of the anti-whaling group's actions.

I'm a vegan but I don't support PETA because I think they go too far.

You said:

"When you begin taking an "Ox-Bow" type mentality and lynch-mob vigilante methods to contain what you personally do not agree with then all of mankind is in anarchy."

I'm always suspicious of slippery slope arguments such as you present. I don't think it's necessarily so that the actions we're discussing will lead to "all of mankind is in anarchy".

I see shades of gray, seldom is anything, for me, black and white.

[Edited on 7-6-2012 by SFandH]

rdrrm8e - 7-6-2012 at 02:05 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by willardguy

come on, how can you not adore these bumbling fools?:lol:


Perfect....!

Only Paul is much more dangerous

Cisco - 7-6-2012 at 02:17 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SFandH
Cisco,

I understand what you and others are saying about the illegal aspects of the anti-whaling group's actions.

I'm a vegan but I don't support PETA because I think they go too far.

You said:

"When you begin taking an "Ox-Bow" type mentality and lynch-mob vigilante methods to contain what you personally do not agree with then all of mankind is in anarchy."

I'm always suspicious of slippery slope arguments such as you present. I don't think it's necessarily so that the actions we're discussing will lead to "all of mankind is in anarchy".

I see shades of gray, seldom is anything, for me, black and white.

[Edited on 7-6-2012 by SFandH]


I certainly applaud your choice of Veganism. What we have been discussing is the killing of animals and being aware of the growth and harvesting methods utilized in the U.S. for our meat and dairy products is sickening to me. Probably was “The Jungle” although I have not read it in years it has stayed with me.

Regarding the legality/illegality of whale harvesting as a food source I am researching some information that Sancho alerted me to and am amazed at the world-wide pirate whaling that is in effect at this time by numerous countries.

This is opening up a whole new area of study for me and I am fascinated by the IWC history and the ability of countries to circumvent the resolutions that have been mandated.

That though was not my entire intent on discussing in this thread. (oh, want to get this in before I forget. “The Sierra was severely damaged after being rammed by activist Paul Watson aboard his ship, the Sea Shepherd. The Sierra was later sunk in port by unknown saboteurs with limpet mines. Paul Watson continues to be a controversial figure at odds with whaling and particularly Japan.”) Ship sunk, people injured because I’m right and you're wrong??? And I will stand by my statement:

"When you begin taking an "Ox-Bow" type mentality and lynch-mob vigilante methods to contain what you personally do not agree with then all of mankind is in anarchy."

and your very perceptive “slippery slope” analogy.

I am using the whales here to hopefully project the immensity of the global problems that we have in utilizing the Earths resources and the demands made, many times at gunpoint, to secure something we (whomever WE are) WANT and take it from the other, whether WE or the other is an individual or a country.

When we feel that we have license, rationalize,... to justify acts against other animals, humans, social systems, then we have achieved anarchy. It is justification of our actions. And yes, I should have confined it to that specific incident. Thanks for bringing it up.

Sometime we can talk about morality and how it impacts the legal system but I think we are getting out on the “slippery slope” a bit far for this thread as it is.

Saludos...

Cypress - 7-6-2012 at 03:10 PM

Cisco, The "slippery slope" is a downhill slide. "Ox-Bow" mentality? That's a new one! Lynch-mob? That one's pretty much worn out. See anything south of the Mason-Dixon line that is in opposition to the current US administration.:biggrin:

rts551 - 7-6-2012 at 03:25 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cypress
With the depletion of the whale's food supply, the harvesting of some species might not be a bad thing. They may well be faced with a serious food shortage. Man's increasing harvest of krill, their source of food, puts us in direct competion with whales.:(


Interesting statement. At some point with that mentality we will undoubtedly become the species that is consumed. There is no guarantee that we are the top of the food chain.

shari - 7-6-2012 at 03:30 PM

actually Killer Whales are at the top of the food chain.

Cypress - 7-6-2012 at 03:39 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by shari
actually Killer Whales are at the top of the food chain.

Only because they aren't on our grocery list.:biggrin:

jbcoug - 7-6-2012 at 04:52 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mtgoat666
Quote:
Originally posted by jbcoug
I hope a number of the above posters don't fish or consume sealife, otherwise we have a lot of hypocracy going on.

John


spoken like a true ignoramus! congratulations on your ignorance! :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:


Goat,

First I want to state clearly that I am on the whales side, but I'm not above catching a fish now and then. I respect the opinions voiced by both sides, but I don't think it is ignorant to question someone about where they draw the line between "murder" and catching dinner. The line tends to get blurred as a matter of convenience at times. I certainly respect those that back up thier beliefs by not eating meat, your position is clear. Since I like meat, and many other nomads at least like fish, it's harder to draw that line. I'm just trying to not be a hypocrit.

John

estebanis - 7-6-2012 at 05:21 PM

You all should really watch this...
I am an avid outdoorsman and this video outright attacks my lifestyle however it is an awsome film...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTJ1H0Zp6zQ

watizname - 7-7-2012 at 09:52 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT.....
--- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.
[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]


Diana,
One benefit of being confused is that it opens up more possibilities....being "certain" about something reduces one's options.


I think that we, as a species, are a virus on this planet....it is all unfolding as it is. If we were to consider ourselves to be parasites (perhaps more generous a thought than being a virus), we still aren't even at the stage of being in a symbiotic relationship as a parasite, as both the host (ie. the planet) and the parasite have mutual benefit in that type of parasitic relationship.

We just suck vitality and viability from our host....and what is most obscene, is that we think we are entitled to that sucking.
I think motoged is right on. Look at satilite photos of the earth and see how the giant developed areas look grey, and dead, like a cancer on a living cell. That's us folks. I don't think we have much longer, in geologic time.:(

gnukid - 7-7-2012 at 10:47 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by watizname
Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT.....
--- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.
[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]


Diana,
One benefit of being confused is that it opens up more possibilities....being "certain" about something reduces one's options.


I think that we, as a species, are a virus on this planet....it is all unfolding as it is. If we were to consider ourselves to be parasites (perhaps more generous a thought than being a virus), we still aren't even at the stage of being in a symbiotic relationship as a parasite, as both the host (ie. the planet) and the parasite have mutual benefit in that type of parasitic relationship.

We just suck vitality and viability from our host....and what is most obscene, is that we think we are entitled to that sucking.
I think motoged is right on. Look at satilite photos of the earth and see how the giant developed areas look grey, and dead, like a cancer on a living cell. That's us folks. I don't think we have much longer, in geologic time.:(


Can you people get a grip on yourselves?

Humans are a life form like any other, they are not evil nor do humans suck imperatively. When people build cities to live in they do so because it meets the needs of society, people living in cities is more efficient and uses less space and resources. The fact that cities are built of cement and are grey doesn't make them inherently bad. Nor is countryside somehow always better. The truth is humans are a species and have every right and reason to make things, eat things, produce waste and to live. Cows, fish, and insects are no different.

Certainly you would agree living inside a beehive, or ant hill or bat cave may seem claustrophobic but it serves the needs of the organism.

The idea that people are bad because they exist is purely a false idea designed to produce guilt and use that guilt to oppress people. The idea of Gaia, Agenda 21 and Anthopogenic Global Warming are demonstratable to be false, their roots are well documented as purely social ideas to control people.

Whereas the truth is organisms do come and go, they do become extinct always in every case. The idea that people should die or be restricted so that an near extinct animal can live or so that one persons idea of society can be cut from anothers existence is pure nonsense based in beliefs not in any science nor beneficial practice.

It was Malthus who promoted the idea that human population would grow faster than food production and that humans would die due to lack of resources. Malthus was wrong, we have the ability to produce as much or more food than we need. Except that the current UN and USA admin still quotes and claims to believe in Malthus and his ideas are promoted by Holdren et al under Obama.

The truth is people do not suck, they are not a plague, people are beautiful just like flowers or birds.

The thing that sucks is war, aggression, the endless death toll wrought by US military against civilians all for profit for the military industrial complex.

But instead of being brave enough to say that we are all responsible for the endless terror, torture and rape by the US military, you have cowards here blaming people for living in a city as a form of evil?

Take a moment and turn off the TV and perhaps using pen and paper start writing down your priorities, make columns for pro and con and jot down reasons why you think humans suck vs. other organisms. Try to identify what really sucks, what is absurd and what mechanisms are really harmful. Then try to give reasons to support your ideas. Perhaps using this method you will come to different conclusions than the idea that people are bad. Whats bad is hierarchical systems that promote oppression of one over another, especially those that use violence and aggression to profit.

[Edited on 7-7-2012 by gnukid]

Cypress - 7-7-2012 at 10:56 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by gnukid
Quote:
Originally posted by watizname
Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT.....
--- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.
[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]


Diana,
One benefit of being confused is that it opens up more possibilities....being "certain" about something reduces one's options.


I think that we, as a species, are a virus on this planet....it is all unfolding as it is. If we were to consider ourselves to be parasites (perhaps more generous a thought than being a virus), we still aren't even at the stage of being in a symbiotic relationship as a parasite, as both the host (ie. the planet) and the parasite have mutual benefit in that type of parasitic relationship.

We just suck vitality and viability from our host....and what is most obscene, is that we think we are entitled to that sucking.
I think motoged is right on. Look at satilite photos of the earth and see how the giant developed areas look grey, and dead, like a cancer on a living cell. That's us folks. I don't think we have much longer, in geologic time.:(


Can you people get a grip on yourselves?

Humans are a life form like any other, they are not evil nor do humans suck imperatively. When people build cities to live in they do so because it meets the needs of society, people living in cities is more efficient and uses less space and resources. The fact that cities are built of cement and are grey doesn't make them inherently bad. Nor is countryside somehow always better. The truth is humans are a species and have every right and reason to make things, eat things, produce waste and to live. Cows, fish, and insects are no different.

Certainly you would agree living inside a beehive, or ant hill or bat cave may seem claustrophobic but it serves the needs of the organism.

The idea that people are bad because they exist is purely a false idea designed to produce guilt and use that guilt to oppress people. The idea of Gaia, Agenda 21 and Anthopogenic Global Warming are demonstratable to be false, their roots are well documented as purely social ideas to control people.

Whereas the truth is organisms do come and go, they do become extinct always in every case. The idea that people should die or be restricted so that an near extinct animal can live or so that one persons idea of society can be cut from anothers existence is pure nonsense based in beliefs not in any science nor beneficial practice.

It was Malthus who promoted the idea that human population would grow faster than food production and that humans would die due to lack of resources. Malthus was wrong, we have the ability to produce as much or more food than we need. Except that the current UN and USA admin still quotes and claims to believe in Malthus and his ideas are promoted by Holdren et al under Obama.

The truth is people do not suck, they are not a plague, people are beautiful just like flowers or birds.

The thing that sucks is war, aggression, the endless death toll wrought by US military against civilians all for profit for the military industrial complex.

But instead of being brave enough to say that we are all responsible for the endless terror, torture and rape by the US military, you have cowards here blaming people for living in a city as a form of evil?

Take a moment and turn off the TV and perhaps using pen and paper start writing down your priorities, make columns for pro and con and jot down reasons why you think humans suck vs. other organisms. Try to identify what really sucks, what is absurd and what mechanisms are really harmful. Then try to give reasons to support your ideas. Perhaps using this method you will come to different conclusions than the idea that people are bad. Whats bad is hierarchical systems that promote oppression of one over another, especially those that use violence and aggression to profit.

[Edited on 7-7-2012 by gnukid]

Amen!!!

woody with a view - 7-7-2012 at 11:00 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by rdrrm8e
Quote:
Originally posted by willardguy

come on, how can you not adore these bumbling fools?:lol:


Perfect....!

Only Paul is much more dangerous


separated at birth!!!!:lol:

Cisco - 7-7-2012 at 11:10 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by gnukid
Quote:
Originally posted by watizname
Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT.....
--- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.
[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]


Diana,
One benefit of being confused is that it opens up more possibilities....being "certain" about something reduces one's options.


I think that we, as a species, are a virus on this planet....it is all unfolding as it is. If we were to consider ourselves to be parasites (perhaps more generous a thought than being a virus), we still aren't even at the stage of being in a symbiotic relationship as a parasite, as both the host (ie. the planet) and the parasite have mutual benefit in that type of parasitic relationship.

We just suck vitality and viability from our host....and what is most obscene, is that we think we are entitled to that sucking.
I think motoged is right on. Look at satilite photos of the earth and see how the giant developed areas look grey, and dead, like a cancer on a living cell. That's us folks. I don't think we have much longer, in geologic time.:(


Can you people get a grip on yourselves?

Humans are a life form like any other, they are not evil nor do humans suck imperatively. When people build cities to live in they do so because it meets the needs of society, people living in cities is more efficient and uses less space and resources. The fact that cities are built of cement and are grey doesn't make them inherently bad. Nor is countryside somehow always better. The truth is humans are a species and have every right and reason to make things, eat things, produce waste and to live. Cows, fish, and insects are no different.

Certainly you would agree living inside a beehive, or ant hill or bat cave may seem claustrophobic but it serves the needs of the organism.

The idea that people are bad because they exist is purely a false idea designed to produce guilt and use that guilt to oppress people. The idea of Gaia, Agenda 21 and Anthopogenic Global Warming are demonstratable to be false, their roots are well documented as purely social ideas to control people.

Whereas the truth is organisms do come and go, they do become extinct always in every case. The idea that people should die or be restricted so that an near extinct animal can live or so that one persons idea of society can be cut from anothers existence is pure nonsense based in beliefs not in any science nor beneficial practice.

It was Malthus who promoted the idea that human population would grow faster than food production and that humans would die due to lack of resources. Malthus was wrong, we have the ability to produce as much or more food than we need. Except that the current UN and USA admin still quotes and claims to believe in Malthus and his ideas are promoted by Holdren et al under Obama.

The truth is people do not suck, they are not a plague, people are beautiful just like flowers or birds.

The thing that sucks is war, aggression, the endless death toll wrought by US military against civilians all for profit for the military industrial complex.

But instead of being brave enough to say that we are all responsible for the endless terror, torture and rape by the US military, you have cowards here blaming people for living in a city as a form of evil?

Take a moment and turn off the TV and perhaps using pen and paper start writing down your priorities, make columns for pro and con and jot down reasons why you think humans suck vs. other organisms. Try to identify what really sucks, what is absurd and what mechanisms are really harmful. Then try to give reasons to support your ideas. Perhaps using this method you will come to different conclusions than the idea that people are bad. Whats bad is hierarchical systems that promote oppression of one over another, especially those that use violence and aggression to profit.

[Edited on 7-7-2012 by gnukid]


"Agriculture's sudden rise, however, came with a price. It introduced infectious-disease epidemics, social stratification, intermittent famines, and large-scale war.

Jared Diamond, the UCLA professor and writer, has called the adoption of agriculture nothing less than "the worst mistake in human history"--a mistake, he suggests, from which we have never recovered."

gnukid - 7-7-2012 at 11:40 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco

"Agriculture's sudden rise, however, came with a price. It introduced infectious-disease epidemics, social stratification, intermittent famines, and large-scale war.

Jared Diamond, the UCLA professor and writer, has called the adoption of agriculture nothing less than "the worst mistake in human history"--a mistake, he suggests, from which we have never recovered."


Agriculture isn't itself a problem, the issue is the method of production and forces that cause farmers to produce only one crop, such as corn for ethynol due to subsidies for the crop while producing no other beneficial crops. Furthermore, the use of GMO corn harms the farmer, the land and the crop by failing to increase output and instead reduce output, poison the land and the people and leave them in debt using round-up ready seeds that do not germinate and require seed subscritpions to continue use of seed. These actions are part of a collective integrated with government, in this case in the form of Rumsfeld working for Monstanto.

Other well known examples of this process of creating loans teo create debt to acquire land and consolidate land has occurred under USA leadership for decades if not centuries, commonly known as the banana republics under Dole. These invasive tactics in combination with military invasions to bring democracy are well devised system to remove self-sufficiency and create imperialism, fascism and total dominance over a region while leaving lands destroyed.

This pattern is one that is our rich history of the USA, one which is in full swing today as we destroy cultures throughout the world using depleted uranium, bombs, fund terror, spread disease through bio-weapons and kill women and children as well of course all men.

While it is easy to blame agriculture, agriculture is not problematic, its the methods of massive commercial collective agriculture, GMO, IMF, WHO, UN and military that destroy the intricate economies and overall health.

The result is the creation of desert through poor practices, while it has also been demonstrated that desert can be greened through best practices. So one can see, the myopia that leads to blaming people, populations or agriculture for the damage to land, society and world biological destruction is misguided. A more detailed look at the issues shows that it is monopolies, large scale corrupt politics and large scale militarization to support commercial agriculture that is a problem.

It should come as no surprise that the USA is fighting the longest war of it' history to support heroine production in Afghanistan. This should come as no surprise since we all studied the history of the East India Company owned by the Queen whose product was heroine among other agricultural products. Nothing has changed today except the ghost holding company name.

Now, one can not expect Nomads fueled on Cable TV, cheezwiz and factory processed crap to be able to see or rationally discuss these failing mechanisms that are poison to society, just as Diet Soda is poison that leads to obesity and death, or pain medicines that kill you, or any of the nonsense on the shelves of your average grocery store, it's poison that you support, fund and ingest that is heart of the evil.

All one needs to do is simply start farming, even on a 1sq foot plot and you will receive the benefits, while putting an end to funding the poisons that are killing you, and share these fruits with others, in order to take control of agriculture and your life.



[Edited on 7-7-2012 by gnukid]

woody with a view - 7-7-2012 at 11:50 AM

my little patch of earth is currently producing the following: 2 types of tomatos, 2 types of peaches, oranges, limes, lemons, lemongrass, avocado, mango (not producing yet), asparagus, basil, 3 types of squash, 2 types of Peruvian chili peppers, bell peppers, huacatay, spinach, greens, red onions, kale, carrots, 5 different herbs (not THAT kind!), and stawberries.

no pesticides or fertilizers and they ALL taste better than anything bought from a store.

gnukid - 7-7-2012 at 12:04 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by woody with a view
my little patch of earth is currently producing the following: 2 types of tomatos, 2 types of peaches, oranges, limes, lemons, lemongrass, avocado, mango (not producing yet), asparagus, basil, 3 types of squash, 2 types of Peruvian chili peppers, bell peppers, huacatay, spinach, greens, red onions, kale, carrots, 5 different herbs (not THAT kind!), and stawberries.

no pesticides or fertilizers and they ALL taste better than anything bought from a store.


Every Mexican rooftop is a perfect place to start a garden, all the materials are available, water (grey), compost, sun and a farmer.

Imagine if every rooftop was being farmed, the greening for cities, the increase in local production and the reduction of dependency on commercial cops and their destructive methods.

If everyone took one step to help themselves through home gardening, the benefits would be evident by reduced dependency on commercial crops, and you might find that you think clearer due to the increased nutrition and reduced poison in your foods.

Don't forget plants need CO2, it's their food and the building block of life, the idea that CO2 is a poison is among false notions that are used to divide people in a nonsensical discussion (like this one) that wastes time and reduces our productivity, happiness and health.

Beware of the green eco trap of false logic to prompt dialectic to divide people or worse to encourage funding collectives that oppress others such as EPA, WHO, UNESCO, IMF FDA.

Cisco - 7-7-2012 at 12:14 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by gnukid
Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco

"Agriculture's sudden rise, however, came with a price. It introduced infectious-disease epidemics, social stratification, intermittent famines, and large-scale war.

Jared Diamond, the UCLA professor and writer, has called the adoption of agriculture nothing less than "the worst mistake in human history"--a mistake, he suggests, from which we have never recovered."


Agriculture isn't itself a problem, the issue is the method of production and forces that cause farmers to produce only one crop, such as corn for ethynol due to subsidies for the crop while producing no other beneficial crops. Furthermore, the use of GMO corn harms the farmer, the land and the crop by failing to increase output and instead reduce output, poison the land and the people and leave them in debt using round-up ready seeds that do not germinate and require seed subscritpions to continue use of seed. These actions are part of a collective integrated with government, in this case in the form of Rumsfeld working for Monstanto.

Other well known examples of this process of creating loans teo create debt to acquire land and consolidate land has occurred under USA leadership for decades if not centuries, commonly known as the banana republics under Dole. These invasive tactics in combination with military invasions to bring democracy are well devised system to remove self-sufficiency and create imperialism, fascism and total dominance over a region while leaving lands destroyed.

This pattern is one that is our rich history of the USA, one which is in full swing today as we destroy cultures throughout the world using depleted uranium, bombs, fund terror, spread disease through bio-weapons and kill women and children as well of course all men.

While it is easy to blame agriculture, agriculture is not problematic, its the methods of massive commercial collective agriculture, GMO, IMF, WHO, UN and military that destroy the intricate economies and overall health.

The result is the creation of desert through poor practices, while it has also been demonstrated that desert can be greened through best practices. So one can see, the myopia that leads to blaming people, populations or agriculture for the damage to land, society and world biological destruction is misguided. A more detailed look at the issues shows that it is monopolies, large scale corrupt politics and large scale militarization to support commercial agriculture that is a problem.

It should come as no surprise that the USA is fighting the longest war of it' history to support heroine production in Afghanistan. This should come as no surprise since we all studied the history of the East India Company owned by the Queen whose product was heroine among other agricultural products. Nothing has changed today except the ghost holding company name.

Now, one can not expect Nomads fueled on Cable TV, cheezwiz and factory processed crap to be able to see or rationally discuss these failing mechanisms that are poison to society, just as Diet Soda is poison that leads to obesity and death, or pain medicines that kill you, or any of the nonsense on the shelves of your average grocery store, it's poison that you support, fund and ingest that is heart of the evil.

All one needs to do is simply start farming, even on a 1sq foot plot and you will receive the benefits, while putting an end to funding the poisons that are killing you, and share these fruits with others, in order to take control of agriculture and your life.



[Edited on 7-7-2012 by gnukid]


I was responding to your initial post and had you followed my other posts you would have understood that I am speaking to a society that has no need for money. Unfortunately a place that only a few societies occupy in today's world and a place where we humans will not go back to as we (the only money using species on the planet) have become aware that money is basically stored energy.

My statement:

"Agriculture's sudden rise, however, came with a price. It introduced infectious-disease epidemics, social stratification, intermittent famines, and large-scale war."

may perhaps be better understood by you now.

What we have done to ourselves in the creation of social stratification, disease and mayhem are the processes that you point out, not the genesis.

gnukid - 7-7-2012 at 12:25 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco

I was responding to your initial post and had you followed my other posts you would have understood that I am speaking to a society that has no need for money. Unfortunately a place that only a few societies occupy in today's world and a place where we humans will not go back to as we (the only money using species on the planet) have become aware that money is basically stored energy.

My statement:

"Agriculture's sudden rise, however, came with a price. It introduced infectious-disease epidemics, social stratification, intermittent famines, and large-scale war."

may perhaps be better understood by you now.

What we have done to ourselves in the creation of social stratification, disease and mayhem are the processes that you point out, not the genesis.


Ah well hmm, it is hard to follow your point, without breaking it down further, we can't understand the forces that cause or create mayhem.

Society doesn't just lurch along for no reason, if by accident. Instead society is moved along by promoted messaging (memes) and by collective strategy which in some cases is designed to cause destabilization, consolidation and profit.

There is a rhyme to the reason.

More to your point:

1) E=MC2 all material things are stored energy

2) Currency can be anything, our system of debt based currency inherently owned by a private (secret) club known as the Federal Reserve is designed to absolutely be a debt and absolutely result in inflation. There can be other case when interacting with the FedRes. Any other form of currency would be preferred.

How can we use stored energy and reduce our dependency on FedReserve currency? Grow food in your garden. Share it with friends.

Amazing how simply getting involved in your food production can solve so many problems you cause for yourself.

Cisco - 7-7-2012 at 12:34 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by gnukid
Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco

What we have done to ourselves in the creation of social stratification, disease and mayhem are the processes that you point out, not the genesis.


Ah well hmm, it is hard to follow your point, without breaking it down further, we can't understand the forces that cause or create mayhem.


Greed.

Cisco - 7-7-2012 at 12:42 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco
Quote:
Originally posted by gnukid
Quote:
Originally posted by Cisco

What we have done to ourselves in the creation of social stratification, disease and mayhem are the processes that you point out, not the genesis.


Ah well hmm, it is hard to follow your point, without breaking it down further, we can't understand the forces that cause or create mayhem.


Greed.


An example just came to me Paul.

There is a children's video "A Bug's Life" that explains all.

"Hopper" and his band of grasshoppers annually demand tribute from an ant colony in the form of seeds. The demand is under threat of force.

What is happening is that "Hopper" and his band do not want to labor for their food, rather take it by force.

Sound familiar???

DavidE - 7-7-2012 at 12:43 PM

"Here ya go. You are incapable of counting your money, and for that matter knowing when and how to sell your crop. Let me sit here at my desk and consume thousands of hours of your labor, and a huge chunk of your potential profit so I can tell you how much to borrow for net year's crop. If it weren't for us speculator-investors who knows...your next crop might be worthless".

Speculation is the most primitive, punitive, and damaging tax there is. The tax disappears out of the money supply available to low-income individuals. Speculation is a tax. Without speculation gasoline would cost around a dollar and a half per gallon, and exploration and refining upgrades would not suffer one whit.

So, go ahead and keep fretting over Obamacare, tax nickels, and ignore speculation dollars taxation. America worked perfectly for centuries without commodities speculation, and the standard of living was relatively high. In the famous words of Inspector Clouseau "Not.....Any.....More"

SFandH - 7-7-2012 at 12:56 PM

Whale "accidently' caught auctioned off for $57,000

http://www.smh.com.au/world/hopes-sink-with-seouls-scientifi...

It makes sense to me to make it illegal to sell these animals.

[Edited on 7-7-2012 by SFandH]

whale_opt.jpg - 34kB

watizname - 7-8-2012 at 08:09 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by gnukid
Quote:
Originally posted by watizname
Quote:
Originally posted by motoged
Quote:
Originally posted by DianaT.....
--- I am a rather confused believer in situational ethics. I say confused because of so many questions in my mind.
[Edited on 7-5-2012 by DianaT]


Diana,
One benefit of being confused is that it opens up more possibilities....being "certain" about something reduces one's options.


I think that we, as a species, are a virus on this planet....it is all unfolding as it is. If we were to consider ourselves to be parasites (perhaps more generous a thought than being a virus), we still aren't even at the stage of being in a symbiotic relationship as a parasite, as both the host (ie. the planet) and the parasite have mutual benefit in that type of parasitic relationship.

We just suck vitality and viability from our host....and what is most obscene, is that we think we are entitled to that sucking.
I think motoged is right on. Look at satilite photos of the earth and see how the giant developed areas look grey, and dead, like a cancer on a living cell. That's us folks. I don't think we have much longer, in geologic time.:(


Can you people get a grip on yourselves?

Humans are a life form like any other, they are not evil nor do humans suck imperatively. When people build cities to live in they do so because it meets the needs of society, people living in cities is more efficient and uses less space and resources. The fact that cities are built of cement and are grey doesn't make them inherently bad. Nor is countryside somehow always better. The truth is humans are a species and have every right and reason to make things, eat things, produce waste and to live. Cows, fish, and insects are no different.

Certainly you would agree living inside a beehive, or ant hill or bat cave may seem claustrophobic but it serves the needs of the organism.

The idea that people are bad because they exist is purely a false idea designed to produce guilt and use that guilt to oppress people. The idea of Gaia, Agenda 21 and Anthopogenic Global Warming are demonstratable to be false, their roots are well documented as purely social ideas to control people.

Whereas the truth is organisms do come and go, they do become extinct always in every case. The idea that people should die or be restricted so that an near extinct animal can live or so that one persons idea of society can be cut from anothers existence is pure nonsense based in beliefs not in any science nor beneficial practice.

It was Malthus who promoted the idea that human population would grow faster than food production and that humans would die due to lack of resources. Malthus was wrong, we have the ability to produce as much or more food than we need. Except that the current UN and USA admin still quotes and claims to believe in Malthus and his ideas are promoted by Holdren et al under Obama.

The truth is people do not suck, they are not a plague, people are beautiful just like flowers or birds.

The thing that sucks is war, aggression, the endless death toll wrought by US military against civilians all for profit for the military industrial complex.

But instead of being brave enough to say that we are all responsible for the endless terror, torture and rape by the US military, you have cowards here blaming people for living in a city as a form of evil?

Take a moment and turn off the TV and perhaps using pen and paper start writing down your priorities, make columns for pro and con and jot down reasons why you think humans suck vs. other organisms. Try to identify what really sucks, what is absurd and what mechanisms are really harmful. Then try to give reasons to support your ideas. Perhaps using this method you will come to different conclusions than the idea that people are bad. Whats bad is hierarchical systems that promote oppression of one over another, especially those that use violence and aggression to profit.

[Edited on 7-7-2012 by gnukid]
gnukid, I wasn't trying to make a determination of whether mankinds development of the earth was good or bad, only that it looks to me like the earth is being consumed, and that mankind is on it's way out as a species. Not necessarily tomorrow, but comming up. Like you said, "organisms do come and go, do become extinct always and in every case.

Barry A. - 7-8-2012 at 08:28 AM

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:


Can you people get a grip on yourselves?

Humans are a life form like any other, they are not evil nor do humans suck imperatively. When people build cities to live in they do so because it meets the needs of society, people living in cities is more efficient and uses less space and resources. The fact that cities are built of cement and are grey doesn't make them inherently bad. Nor is countryside somehow always better. The truth is humans are a species and have every right and reason to make things, eat things, produce waste and to live. Cows, fish, and insects are no different.

Certainly you would agree living inside a beehive, or ant hill or bat cave may seem claustrophobic but it serves the needs of the organism.

The idea that people are bad because they exist is purely a false idea designed to produce guilt and use that guilt to oppress people. The idea of Gaia, Agenda 21 and Anthopogenic Global Warming are demonstratable to be false, their roots are well documented as purely social ideas to control people.

Whereas the truth is organisms do come and go, they do become extinct always in every case. The idea that people should die or be restricted so that an near extinct animal can live or so that one persons idea of society can be cut from anothers existence is pure nonsense based in beliefs not in any science nor beneficial practice.

It was Malthus who promoted the idea that human population would grow faster than food production and that humans would die due to lack of resources. Malthus was wrong, we have the ability to produce as much or more food than we need. Except that the current UN and USA admin still quotes and claims to believe in Malthus and his ideas are promoted by Holdren et al under Obama.

The truth is people do not suck, they are not a plague, people are beautiful just like flowers or birds.

The thing that sucks is war, aggression, the endless death toll wrought by US military against civilians all for profit for the military industrial complex.

But instead of being brave enough to say that we are all responsible for the endless terror, torture and rape by the US military, you have cowards here blaming people for living in a city as a form of evil?

Take a moment and turn off the TV and perhaps using pen and paper start writing down your priorities, make columns for pro and con and jot down reasons why you think humans suck vs. other organisms. Try to identify what really sucks, what is absurd and what mechanisms are really harmful. Then try to give reasons to support your ideas. Perhaps using this method you will come to different conclusions than the idea that people are bad. Whats bad is hierarchical systems that promote oppression of one over another, especially those that use violence and aggression to profit.

[Edited on 7-7-2012 by gnukid]

Amen!!!


Gnukid----------"AMEN" is right!!! :light:

Gnukid, that is a brilliant & concise 'piece' you have written there. Congratulations, and thank you.

Barry

Skipjack Joe - 7-8-2012 at 08:37 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Cypress
From what I gather, if we don't elect democrats to house seats the planet is doomed. Those nasty 'ole republicans don't care about the environment or believe in science. Yep, democrats will solve all our problems.:biggrin:


Republicans subordinate science to profit. When money is not involved they become more clear-headed.

Skipjack Joe - 7-8-2012 at 09:16 AM

Much was written about man's abuse of our planet, it's inhabitants, and our certain path to extinction.

Gnukid tried to make the correction but in so doing added his pet conspiracy theories that had little to do with the subject.

Back in the late 60's the Stanford professor Paul Erlich was a late night visitor of late night television who became interested in his book "The Population Bomb".

This book clearly maps out how our population is growing and all of the known agricultural and potential agricultural centers of our planet. The potential of our oceans was also evaluated. The global food resources were evaluated. The food requirements of mankind were evaluated. And finally a graph was presented. A horizontal line for food availability and a diagonal line for our growth. At the interesection of the 2 we were going to start experiencing global famines.

This was supposed to happen somewhere in the late 70's - early 80's. The 70's - early 80's came and went with none of the predictions being met. Paul Erlich was no longer a popular speaker.

As any biologist knows no living species continues to grow unabated forever. Ehrlich assumed that the balance would be reached through starvation. But there are many other ways. We self regulate.

My wife's peruvian family had 14 siblings but none of those sivlings had more than 2 kids. My grandmother belonged to a family of 11 but, again nobody had more than 3 kids.

The fact is that when a population is growing at a exponential rate without restrictions it will reproduce very differently then when the carring capacity of the environment is reached.

The reason we're not starving is because we've adapted. And because we can adapt there will be no extinction.

And we will adapt to global warming in some way when the stakes get high enough.

gnukid - 7-8-2012 at 10:32 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by watiznamegnukid, I wasn't trying to make a determination of whether mankinds development of the earth was good or bad, only that it looks to me like the earth is being consumed, and that mankind is on it's way out as a species. Not necessarily tomorrow, but comming up. Like you said, "organisms do come and go, do become extinct always and in every case.


There have always been catastrophic changes in the earth, for example North America was once covered in glaciers and the artic was once green, volcanos create massive changes in the earth and atmosphere, of course the earth orbit changes known as the Milankovitch cycles.

And humanity has cycles as well. It's apparent that far in the past humans understood astronomy, mathematics, and they were able to create high quality objects of stone, such as some of the pyramids with presicion cut stones weighing more than 100,000 tons, perfect stone bowls made of some of the hardest material on earth, and many of the worldwide objects were created in a similar fashion yet by different cultures around the earth so long distance communication existed as well, and we can not recreate the quality or the method today?

So, humans apparently have cycles of intelligence and awareness of their world. It's clear that there are some people who are connected to the earth such as the indigenous people of North America, sort of spiritually connected, intimately aware of how their actions interrelate to the earth, while others have lost this connection today.

So, as opposed to a single rise and fall of humanity, there have been countless cycles of increased and decreased intelligence. Furthermore, today we have dumbing down programming as a constant, TV and media present false and idiotic notion as a surplus of their content focus. All of the issues with humanity partial decline have to do with the ability or loss of ability to think and reason rationally. Nutrition is a key component. The brain won't function when it lacks adequate nutrients.

So, no the earth isn't dying, humanity isn't doomed. Humans are simply in a low intelligence cycle lacking spiritual connection to the earth and proper nutrition and exercise. Yet there is rising awareness as evidenced by our enthusiasm for nutrition, connection and rational discussion presently.



[Edited on 7-8-2012 by gnukid]

Flynn Effect

Skipjack Joe - 7-8-2012 at 11:06 AM

IQ scores have been rising steadily ever since it was first measured.

Many proposals have been made as to why. One is that the media awareness and availability is actually increasing our intelligence. Another has to do with better nutrition. And still another is the great reduction in infectious diseases that can thwart brain development during the early years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect

I found nothing regarding cycles of intelligence. Although it seems compelling to think that the intelligence of the average european dropped during the middle ages after the sacking of Rome.

But to suggest that intelligence is waning due to an embracing of technology has more to do with a person's value system (good=smart, bad=dumb) than with intelligence. Sitting Bull = intelligent, Bill Gates = stupid.

gnukid - 7-8-2012 at 11:13 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Skipjack Joe
Much was written about man's abuse of our planet, it's inhabitants, and our certain path to extinction.

Gnukid tried to make the correction but in so doing added his pet conspiracy theories that had little to do with the subject.

Back in the late 60's the Stanford professor Paul Erlich was a late night visitor of late night television who became interested in his book "The Population Bomb".

This book clearly maps out how our population is growing and all of the known agricultural and potential agricultural centers of our planet. The potential of our oceans was also evaluated. The global food resources were evaluated. The food requirements of mankind were evaluated. And finally a graph was presented. A horizontal line for food availability and a diagonal line for our growth. At the interesection of the 2 we were going to start experiencing global famines.

This was supposed to happen somewhere in the late 70's - early 80's. The 70's - early 80's came and went with none of the predictions being met. Paul Erlich was no longer a popular speaker.

As any biologist knows no living species continues to grow unabated forever. Ehrlich assumed that the balance would be reached through starvation. But there are many other ways. We self regulate.

My wife's peruvian family had 14 siblings but none of those sivlings had more than 2 kids. My grandmother belonged to a family of 11 but, again nobody had more than 3 kids.

The fact is that when a population is growing at a exponential rate without restrictions it will reproduce very differently then when the carring capacity of the environment is reached.

The reason we're not starving is because we've adapted. And because we can adapt there will be no extinction.

And we will adapt to global warming in some way when the stakes get high enough.


SkipJack's reply provides an example of the irrational thought programming that is the single most significant plague on humanity. His reply contains a number of fallacies, theories and conclusion.

SkiJack makes a personal attack on me without making or rebutting a point? This is fallacious argument, ad hominem, and is used by people with no point to make.

Skipjacks notes about Paul Erlich false predictions don't make a point. Using a negative conclusion as evidence doesn't support a valid argument or make a point. Saying this didn't happen so therefore x is true doesn't make a point except that x didn't happen. Erlich was wrong, so what?

Furthermore, population isn't growing exponentially, it's unclear that is growing at all as we see in all developing countries population is decreasing. The overall population is currently stable and many if not most countries are losing population as a product of births per family.

He uses the term global warming as a reference but that as well is theory while it is clear the earth was absolutely warmer previously, as well with much higher CO2 than today. In fact, the highest global temperature recorded was in 1988, Mann's hockey stick theory of global warming has been proven demonstrably not just wrong but unethical and junk science.

So, SkipJack makes a series of inflamatory and false statements which support absolutely no other conclusion than irrational thought is rampant and lack of reason is a most serious obstacle toward thoughtful discussion and human evolution.

So what is the cause of the loss of reason among humanity and what can we do to reverse the trend?

[Edited on 7-8-2012 by gnukid]

woody with a view - 7-8-2012 at 11:37 AM

"Furthermore, population isn't growing exponentially, it's unclear that is growing at all as we see in all developing countries population is decreasing. The overall population is currently stable and many if not most countries are losing population as a product of births per family."

i remember being a kid when the news made a big deal out of the 2 billionth human dropping onto planet Earth.

anyone know what the number is now-a-days?

edit: answer= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population :O



[Edited on 7-8-2012 by woody with a view]

Skipjack Joe - 7-8-2012 at 11:43 AM

The things I wrote about in regards to Erlich are basic fundamentals of population bilogy taught in undergraduate classes in most zoolog departments. Look up Gaussian experiments of the 30's. r and K selection. Carrying capacity of environments.

In fact, Ehrlich was not wrong. Mankind did make the adjustments it had to make. Most higher evolved animals do self regulate. That also has been studied in nature. The Canadians at univerisity of british columbia did it with voles.

Quote:
Originally posted by gnukid

In fact, the highest global temperature recorded was in 1988, Mann's hockey stick theory of global warming has been proven demonstrably not just wrong but unethical and junk science.


Coming from you that is funny. You are the king of junk science on this board. A pseudoscientist that mixes his own thoughts with cherry picked articles and comes out with fantastic theories that are worded to sound scholastically.

 Pages:  1