Originally posted by Bajaboy
Or one can home school their child and teach them a radical agenda whether it be politics, religion, or something else. The difference in a public
school is that there are other students with different backgrounds, opinions, etc. Also, after primary school, students are exposed to a variety of
teachers. So it seems to me like a public education might protect the child more so.
I teach at an excellent middle school. In fact, we were just named a California Distinguished School. While there are a few sub par teachers on
campus, most are very dedicated, highly educated, and committed to the students.
More often than not, at least at my school, the children that are not successful academically, more often than not, do not get adequate support at
home. The parents are the key and far too often are quick to blame the schools.
Just my two cents....
Quote: | Originally posted by J.P.
Quote: | Originally posted by soulpatch
I have yet to meet a union teacher that likes "teaching" to mandated standards.
Takes the teaching out of teaching...
So, are you a teacher or support? |
Mandated stamdards are not the best thing going, but if they let the teacher teach what ever they like you wind up with some Wingnut teaching some
radical agenda whether it be politics ,religion or something else, it's difficult at best to find a ideal situation,
We tried with my youngest and public school failed miserably. private choices were very limited so we home schooled.
We were lucky we lived in a state where there was a lot of support.
[Edited on 4-17-2013 by J.P.] | |