Originally posted by monoloco
Quote: | Originally posted by DENNIS
Quote: | Originally posted by monoloco
Do you believe that the OP completely made up the story that there are tenants there who have developed there own spaces? If they had leases they
would have some legal recourse, which it appears they do not. If the two posters who claim to have developed places there are lying about not having a
lease I will retract, but I tend to believe that they had some sort of dealings with Mr. Sewell that caused them to post warnings here.
|
Hold on, amigo mono...........I've been around "Beach Camps" for too many years and seen tenants feel secure enough to invest in their plot of land as
though there would be no end to anything. They trusted their deal with the landlord, and figured they would all live forever.
Probably, none of them have legal leases. What they have are "Rental Agreements"....which are kinda like hand-shakes.
I'm not siding with anyone here. I'm just sayin' there may be more...or less.... here than meets the eye. | All I'm saying is that if Mr. Sewell was a scrupulous business man he would have made sure his tenants had leases before allowing
them to enter into an agreement that went beyond month to month tenancy, and make improvements to his property, if he did not, he was stacking the
deck in his own favor. |