Originally posted by Barry A.
Quote: | Originally posted by mtgoat666
Quote: | Originally posted by Barry A.
Not sure about "endangered", but the big cats are on the increase in CA (and elsewhere) due to measures to protect them (from us). There use to be
Griz (etc.) all over the Southwest USA and northern Mexico, and they were extremely hazardous to man and beast back before 1840, or so, and were
greatly feared, with good reason.. I am torn on this subject-------man and the large predators are NOT known to get along. Both bears and big-cats
are dangerous to man and beast, with bears being a downright nuisance, in my book, especially in the Sierra Nevada Mts...where protected.
Barry |
animal attacks are so rare -- let the animals be!
sharks, bees, snakes, bears, cats,... they are all a risk - just leave them alone. is an acceptable loss if we loose a minuscule number of human
victims each year.
if you want to wipe out critters to stop a minuscule handful of deaths, your efforts would be better focused on bigger killers like handguns or
malaria. get your priorities straight! |
Ahhhh Errrrr, Goat, I think you need to do a little more research. Take a backpack trip into the Yosemite or Sequoia/Kings Canyon wilderness areas
(etc.) and you are almost guaranteed to have bear problems, often serious. I gave up that sport years ago because I had so many trips ruined due to
bears taking our food, ripping up our gear, and scaring the H--- out of me and mine. When it comes down to 'them or me', they lose if possible. Who
needs bears-----not me!!!!!! but thanks to protectionist laws, they won----we don't go there anymore, and won't ever again.
Barry |