Cisco - 4-5-2014 at 04:08 PM
March 31, 2014 |
There are five millions reasons that the United States can't seem to fix the insane and inhumane deportation policies that tear families apart and
punish hard working immigrants. Protests can get angrier and louder but until the five million reasons are addressed, there will be no solution to the
deportation problem.
Did I say five million reasons? Let me correct that; I meant to say five million reasons a day.
Very few taxpayers have ever heard of the Congressional Bed Mandate — the quota that requires 34,000 undocumented immigrants be detained every single
night — but it's costing them five million dollars, each and every day.
The Bed Mandate is the main engine powering the deportation machine that's chewing up the lives of so many good people. The mandate is wrong on every
level, from ethical to fiscal. It's so wrong that I wish I could just blame it on the Republicans.
But when it comes to the Congressional Bed Mandate, Democrats are a big part of the problem, which brings me back to the five millions reasons. This
betrayal of immigrants is about dollars. It may be a cliché to say "Follow the Money" but even in the strange universe of immigration reform, tracking
down the cash can lead to some very interesting places.
How else can one explain the votes of immigration reform minded Democratic congressmen and congresswomen like Henry Cuellar (D-TX) or Ann Kirkpatrick
(D-AZ) who voted to keep the crazy boondoggle of the Congressional Bed Mandate in place?
The money trail on the Bed Mandate leads from immigration reform directly to another pressing issue of our time — America's private prison industrial
complex.
You probably know the statistics about how the U.S. incarceration rate, per capita, isthe highest in the world. This is due in no small part to the
explosive growth of the private prison industry and inconceivable contractual demands such as "100 percent occupancy" rates. In the Public Interest
noted:
"Private prison beds were intended to be a safety valve to address demand that exceeded public capacity. It was never intended that taxpayers would be
the safety valve to ensure private prison companies' profits."
As reported by National Watchdog Group, the Center for Media & Democracy (CMD):
George Zoley is America's highest paid "corrections officer" and CEO of private prison giant GEO Group. Zoley made $22 million in compensation between
2008 and 2012. CMD estimates that GEO Group makes 86 percent of its revenue from the taxpayers. GEO Group writes language into private prison
contracts that forces taxpayers to keep prisons full or else pay for empty beds.
The Congressional Bed Mandate is another manifestation of the private prison debacle and because the victims weren't born in the United States,
there's a significant percentage of the country who doesn't even want to hear about the problem. This is the impact of the dehumanization of
undocumented immigrants.
There's no outcry if they aren't treated humanely.
Why are Democrats like Cuellar or Kirkpatrick going along with it? Why were they among the Democrats who voted against ending the Bed Mandate? They
had a chance when legislation called the Deutch Amendment was brought up that would have ended this cruel and inhumane policy.
2014-03-29-DemocratswhovotedagainstDeutchtoendbedmandate.JPG
Why didn't they stop it? Five million reasons a day.
You see, the Bed Mandate requires that five million dollars a day gets doled out to private prisons and other detention facilities. Some of those
facilities just coincidentally happen to be located in Cuellar's and Kirkpatrick's respective districts. The same is true for other Democrats (and
even some pro-immigration reform Republicans) who also voted down the Deutch Amendment as shown in the below map.
2014-03-29-PrivatePrisonMap.jpg
The money meant more to them than the suffering.
Republican or Democrat, remember this on election day."
I cannot post photos or charts that go with this article. If you have interest go to: http://www.alternet.org/immigration/there-are-5-million-dirt...
EDIT 4-6-14 For some reason there was no time-line nor "ouote" posted on this post so it was impossible for anyone to respond should they choose.
Be aware that I have received your thoughts via u2u and appreciate them, thank you.
Unfortunately there are several that the system will not allow me to respond back on u2u, some kind of glitch I'm sure, wanted you to know I received
the messages..
[Edited on 4-6-2014 by Cisco]