BajaNomad

Native California Indians in the 1700s as illustrated by the Jesuits

David K - 2-10-2016 at 03:15 PM

Of the three Catholic Orders of missionaries who operated in Baja California (1683-1855), only the Jesuits (1683-1768) showed special interest in reporting on the Indians' lifestyles and appearance. In many reports from the peninsula are the Californians described during the Jesuit period.


Three published works by the Jesuits contains illustrations of the Native California Indians. Here are a few of those illustrations:


From Padre Miguel Venegas in 1739 (published in 1757):

California Indian men, women, and infants:



Notice the baby in a carrier-net.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Padre Jakob Baegert 1751-1768 (published in 1772):


A Californian, with his catch of rats.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Padre Ignacio Tirsch 1762-1768 (published in 1972):


California Indians with a killed deer.


“Out of the wilderness a heathen and his wife are coming with their daughters and son to the mission to be converted.”


Christianized California Indians


dtbushpilot - 2-10-2016 at 04:08 PM

Cool, thanks David.

David K - 2-10-2016 at 05:12 PM

Quote: Originally posted by dtbushpilot  
Cool, thanks David.


You're welcome David.
These are some of the illustrations that will appear in the new book.
Padre Ignacio Tirsch (who drew the last three images above) was the last Jesuit missionary at Santiago (and San José del Cabo, which was a visita of Santiago from 1748 to 1768). So, those are likely how he saw the natives who walked about where you now live!

Here is another, by Tirsch of the Santiago mission circa 1765. The church entrance is just above the cemetery:



The Santiago mission ruins in 1919:



The new mission-site church in 1950:



The modern church being built on the mission site in 1957:



That Santiago church in 2012:


4x4abc - 2-10-2016 at 06:09 PM

pretty cool!

Tioloco - 2-10-2016 at 06:23 PM

Pretty interesting pictures, David

David K - 2-12-2016 at 09:05 PM

Thank you! I think so, too...

Osprey - 2-13-2016 at 12:01 PM

David, do you have any info about the Indians depicted in your post? Can you tell us where they (and the artists, priests, etc ) were when the pictures were sketched?

What did they call themselves? Did they speak Yuman? Many descriptions of southern Indians showed them to be much more primitive than the people in these sketches. Do you think the priests made their converts or potential converts look more noble than they appeared in real life?


monoloco - 2-13-2016 at 12:58 PM

Those natives definitely look well fed.

sargentodiaz - 2-13-2016 at 01:55 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Osprey  
David, do you have any info about the Indians depicted in your post? Can you tell us where they (and the artists, priests, etc ) were when the pictures were sketched?

What did they call themselves? Did they speak Yuman? Many descriptions of southern Indians showed them to be much more primitive than the people in these sketches. Do you think the priests made their converts or potential converts look more noble than they appeared in real life?



David may correct about this but these appear to be natives of Baja California as depicted by the Jesuits. That being the case, they are likely Cochimi, Guaycura, or Pericu. Although they spent most of their time scraping for food, they were reported of being "well built." The same held true for the Indians of Upper California.

David K - 2-13-2016 at 03:39 PM

Thank you Lancesf.
I have a little additional data to yours if I may contribute it:

The first TWO (not 4) images come from Padre Miguel Venegas's book. He was a Jesuit writer in Mexico (not Europe) and recorded the activities based on letters from the peninsula. The first two illustrations appear on his map that was published in 1757. His book was originally written 18 years earlier.

The second TWO images are from Padre Baegert who was the Jesuit at Mission San Luis Gonzaga from 1751 to 1768 (Guaycura Indians) and while his book was published in Germany in 1772 it is from his pen.

The final THREE images are from Padre Ignacio Tirsch who was the Jesuit at Mission Santiago from 1763 to 1768 (Pericú Indians) and administered the visita of San José del Cabo as it was reduced from mission to visita in 1748. Tirsch's art was unknown to the historical world until they appeared on a Czechoslovakian calendar in 1970!

Yes, Barco's is a good book:





[Edited on 2-13-2016 by David K]

wessongroup - 2-13-2016 at 04:13 PM

Its to bad ... The camera wasn't around at that time

Enjoy this guys "work" and have a couple of prints ... that I bought from the New York Times ... Photographic collection

Well worth the money ... and they have actually gone up in value ...

Still enjoy looking back in time .... at things

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/edward-curtis-epic-pro...

Thanks DK ... and "hunter gathers" were still around in the 1700's in the "America's" ... big time ... Hard to imagine the amount of natural resources that would have been available in that time period, in certain locations which had not been impacted by European settlers ... or Invaders .. depending on one's position in the pecking order at that time



[Edited on 2-13-2016 by wessongroup]

Barry A. - 2-13-2016 at 05:13 PM

Regarding "resources", then and now: I am always fascinated with so-called "before and after" photos when recent photos of wild lands are compared with photos taken in the 1800's of the exact same spot. Many (most?) times the abundance of vegetation in the "now" photos is vastly more than the sparse vegetation in the historic photos.

wessongroup - 2-13-2016 at 05:41 PM

Me too ... Its one of the reason I watch old movies

Check out The Big Trail .. filmed on location in WY in 1930

John Wayne is really, really young

Amazing ... just amazing from a lot of different standpoints

The pictures I got of Curtis were from: early 1900's ... hard to find much earlier than that ... here is a cool site

https://www.archives.gov/research/american-west/

I'll bet the Salmon runs were a bit different ... :):)

Not to mention the Buffalo ...

And Owens Valley was a paradise... compared to now, its still pretty nice ... but, what it must have been like in 1710 :):)

[Edited on 2-14-2016 by wessongroup]

Barry A. - 2-13-2016 at 05:54 PM

Quote: Originally posted by wessongroup  
Me too ... Its one of the reason I watch old movies

Check out The Big Trail .. filmed on location in WY in 1930

John Wayne is really, really young

Amazing ... just amazing from a lot of different standpoints

The pictures I got of Curtis were from: early 1900's ... hard to find much earlier than that ... here is a cool site

https://www.archives.gov/research/american-west/

I'll bet the Salmon runs were a bit different ... :):)

Not to mention the Buffalo ...

And Owens Valley was a paradise :):)


There are 100's of old photos from the 1869 and 1870's river trips of John Wesley Powell (Green and Colorado Rivers), and at least one huge book of photos taken about 1965 or so of the duplicate shots-----------and they are amazing!!! I have those books somewhere, and I will have to dig them up again. LOL

Owens Valley is STILL a "paradise" in my book. The "Salmon" have taken a huge hit in the coastal rivers, but vastly more trout in Owens Valley now, and lots of deer and elk, birds, and other creatures. 2 years ago my son and I were up on top of the Coyote Plateau, west of Bishop, and laughed a lot as the Indian's were all over the place hunting from ATV's-----we did not see one white-eye up there that day. LOL


wessongroup - 2-13-2016 at 06:10 PM

Haven't been up ... since my last trip, which was just before I went in for fusion surgery on my back ... that was 2001

Used to make it up just about every year, opening day was a tradition :lol::lol: ... but, would try and make it up at least one time in addition to opening day ... Lived for 10 years on the others side ... and used that side ... but, I've always liked the East side of the Sierras over the West side .. not sure, maybe cuz of the Westerns filmed around Lone Pine ... as a kid it WAS THE PLACE both my brother and I couldn't wait to get to every summer with the old man

Glad to hear things are getting better ...as it was looking a bit worn out at that time ... hope the Court Ruling has helped on the water pulled by LA from the region

Didn't get back into the back country ... just the usual ... Owens River, Convict, South and North Lakes and some on Bishop Creek .. a favorite place to camp and fish

Our jumping off point when growing up ... and in my 20's to the John Muir Trail

Had starting liking Baja better by that time, in the 60's .. less people and a lot of good fishing too

Thanks had forgot about Powell ... He did some pretty amazing stuff ... will check him out :):)

Sorry DK for the hijack ... Let's get back to Baja ... as it is still pretty cool in places too and the people who were able to (make a living there are still interesting) :):)

btw ... good to see ya posting again Barry

[Edited on 2-14-2016 by wessongroup]

[Edited on 2-14-2016 by wessongroup]

David K - 2-13-2016 at 08:00 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Lancesf  
Sorry didn't mean to refer to the place Venegas wrote, just to the engravings themselves. Although Venegas wrote at an earlier time, the book itself was not published until 1757 and contains those engravings. The engravings in Venegas were done in Europe, weren't the engravings in Baegert done in Germany for publication there?


Baegert in the other 16 Jesuits were removed from California like prisoners. If he drew that while in California (what we call 'Baja' today) it likely would have become toilet paper to the soldiers, as what happened to some mission records in Norther Baja?

So yes, those two very well could have been drawn in Germany between the time Baegert was released by Spain and when he wrote the book (~1771). If it was Baegert's artwork or someone doing it under his direction, I don't know.

Again, this is pretty much ALL we have to show how the Indians looked, accurate or exaggerated?

Obviously, the final image of a Christian Pericú Indian man and woman looks no different that any other Christian couple, in Tirsch's eyes. Hopefully, it showed the Native Californians as regular people to other Spaniards or Europeans and not as "savages" as the Dominicans have been quoted calling them.

wessongroup - 2-13-2016 at 08:10 PM

Back in the 50's hardly anyone went down south of Ensenada

And most that got down to the some of the nice locations "flew"

Tough "sledding" back in those really old days ... until the "Highways" got in

It was what I liked about Baja as a kid of 10 ... nothing to worry about ... other than what one had already learn about : snakes, sharks, stickers, bears, "cats", look out for strangers .. et al ... pretty basic stuff .. work's just about any place ya go :):)

Really cool your dad took pictures ... and something you picked up and carried over .. From you old man .. nice touch

wessongroup - 2-13-2016 at 08:35 PM

Thanks ... An interesting painting technique used by Padre Ignacio Tirsch in that first illustration "California Indians with a killed deer" ... for that time period

Would appear he was really ahead of his time by a few hundred years ... appears he did do any more .. too bad

David K - 2-13-2016 at 09:06 PM

Quote: Originally posted by wessongroup  
Thanks ... An interesting painting technique used by Padre Ignacio Tirsch in that first illustration "California Indians with a killed deer" ... for that time period

Would appear he was really ahead of his time by a few hundred years ... appears he did do any more .. too bad


There's an entire Dawson series book with Tirsch's art.
In my new book I also include his paintings of Santiago and San José del Cabo.

wessongroup - 2-13-2016 at 09:20 PM

Thanks .. will check it out ... glad you read between the lines

This guy did some photographic work from the civil war and into the next few decades .. .His work is also interesting to view a time long gone .. in photographs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_H._O%27Sullivan

I have his shot of Canyon de Chelly ... preferred it over Curtis's ... did like a couple of Curtis that I got ... had to imagine native american's running around horse back as late as 1910

[Edited on 2-14-2016 by wessongroup]

BajaBlanca - 2-14-2016 at 08:00 AM

this is wonderful to look at! thanks, David.

David K - 2-14-2016 at 08:36 AM

De nada Blanca! Glad you like that.
I have a chapter on the Lost Missions in my new book... one of them is supposed to be real close to you!

David K - 6-14-2016 at 05:01 PM

Nearly all of the historic images seen above have been included in my book.

Lee - 6-15-2016 at 05:41 AM

Quote: Originally posted by David K  


“Out of the wilderness a heathen and his wife are coming with their daughters and son to the mission to be converted.”


Sad commentary on white men rewriting Native history, isn't it David? The spanish really did see the locals as heathens in need of conversion to christianity -- and if the pagans didn't convert willingly, they were beaten or put to death.

How is this a good thing?

mtgoat666 - 6-15-2016 at 07:03 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
Quote: Originally posted by David K  

“Out of the wilderness a heathen and his wife are coming with their daughters and son to the mission to be converted.”


Sad commentary on white men rewriting Native history, isn't it David? The spanish really did see the locals as heathens in need of conversion to christianity


thankfully (praise jesus!), in the end everything turned out well, and now we all share in the world's plenty of cheetos, jello, toyotas, netflix and telenovellas.


nandopedal - 6-15-2016 at 07:11 AM

WAIT......WAIT....uuppss I guess I am falling asleep at the wheel, it is here, good one goat!!

[Edited on 6-15-2016 by nandopedal]

David K - 6-15-2016 at 08:12 AM

Where was it said that was a good thing?
History is the accurate telling of what happened, not a judgement of its political correctness by modern standards. The Jesuits never put to death natives who did not convert. However, once the government took over civil authority after the Jesuits, the natives were treated as tools.

Lee - 6-15-2016 at 10:08 AM

I get the impression that David rebels against political correctness. Trump rebels against being correct too.

If the Jesuits were sent by the spanish christian church, and the church was part of the corrupt spanish government, forced religious conversion was politically incorrect 500 years ago as it is today.

Sorry, this drawing doesn't depict Native indians. More like white europeans.

That's alright. Just keep rewriting and romanticizing history. For a profit.

Hey, just for the record, Jesuits taught me through the university level. Smartest religious in the church. Let's call a spade a spade.

Quote: Originally posted by David K  


Christianized California Indians
[/rquote]

David K - 6-15-2016 at 10:48 AM

That is how Tirsch illustrated them, showing them no different than Europeans rather than as savage animals. That was a good thing, I think.

rts551 - 6-15-2016 at 10:49 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
I get the impression that David rebels against political correctness. Trump rebels against being correct too.

If the Jesuits were sent by the spanish christian church, and the church was part of the corrupt spanish government, forced religious conversion was politically incorrect 500 years ago as it is today.

Sorry, this drawing doesn't depict Native indians. More like white europeans.

That's alright. Just keep rewriting and romanticizing history. For a profit.

Hey, just for the record, Jesuits taught me through the university level. Smartest religious in the church. Let's call a spade a spade.

Quote: Originally posted by David K  


Christianized California Indians
[/rquote]


The transformation was amazing. Don't people recognize that all conquerors had an interest in writing history "their" way.

mtgoat666 - 6-15-2016 at 11:19 AM

The eyes are quite large. The guys eyes are at different levels. The woman has a thick neck like a linebacker. All a bit odd.

Quote: Originally posted by rts551  
Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
I get the impression that David rebels against political correctness. Trump rebels against being correct too.

If the Jesuits were sent by the spanish christian church, and the church was part of the corrupt spanish government, forced religious conversion was politically incorrect 500 years ago as it is today.

Sorry, this drawing doesn't depict Native indians. More like white europeans.

That's alright. Just keep rewriting and romanticizing history. For a profit.

Hey, just for the record, Jesuits taught me through the university level. Smartest religious in the church. Let's call a spade a spade.

Quote: Originally posted by David K  


Christianized California Indians
[/rquote]


The transformation was amazing. Don't people recognize that all conquerors had an interest in writing history "their" way.

AKgringo - 6-15-2016 at 11:27 AM

Was peyote used by the indigenous population of Baja, or did the artist have to bring his own?

Lee - 6-15-2016 at 12:32 PM

Quote: Originally posted by AKgringo  
Was peyote used by the indigenous population of Baja, or did the artist have to bring his own?


They were growing cannabis before it was politically correct.

willardguy - 6-15-2016 at 12:44 PM

pretty obvious.....kooks from the valley!



bajabuddha - 6-15-2016 at 03:54 PM

To refute the murder of Native Americans for non-conversion as a pseudo-historian is ludicrous. The so-called 'Expert' should become a speech writer for one of the two political parties.... either one, take your pic.

It's like the Mor(m)ons refuting "Blood Atonement" is no longer practiced, or even worse, never happened. Not only is it set in stone in their most Holy book, Doctrine and Covenants (yes, more important than the Book of Mor(m)on), but it's still on the Law Books of Utah, and I can prove it. Peace through Christ, or we'll kill ya.

rts551 - 6-15-2016 at 03:58 PM

Quote: Originally posted by David K  
That is how Tirsch illustrated them, showing them no different than Europeans rather than as savage animals. That was a good thing, I think.


I see David was converted. There is power in getting people to believe the unbelievable.

David K - 6-15-2016 at 04:12 PM

There is no "belief" involved in this thread.
This is how a Jesuit illustrated life in California, from his mission at Santiago. Obviously, it was his artistic freedom or novice abilities that we see it as perhaps not the actual way they looked.
However, until some other evidence can be seen, that is what there is. Take it or not, nobody is asking anyone to believe anything more than what Padre Tirsch drew. Too bad others did not.

sargentodiaz - 6-17-2016 at 10:47 AM

Something seldom mentions about the Catholic missionaries in the New World is their almost ignoring female Indians. It is surmised that their vows of celibacy caused them to do their best to ignore the healthy bodies shown in all their glory - before they were able to have them almost totally clad in blue cotton dresses.

It also meant that many missionaries failed to use the girls and women to perform those tasks they did before their arrival.

Another point - most of the missionaries were prolific in writing diaries and journals - most including amazingly detailed drawings of everything surrounding them. Makes one wonder where all those beautiful drawings are.

Re-photographing for Barry A & others

John M - 6-17-2016 at 02:47 PM

With all respect to David, and not wishing to contribute to the hijacking of threads, I will respond to Barry A.

On the subject of Grand Canyon re-photography, I believe the book you may be referring to is "Grand Canyon - A Century of Change" by Robert H. Webb. this is a magnificent book, alas it isn't a re-do of the Powell Survey but of the 1889/1890 Robert Brewster Stanton railroad route survey. Webb, one-hundred years later replicated hundreds of Stanton survey images, using as closely as possible the time of day, day of the year, and the original camera locations.

If there is a rephoto of the Powell survey that would be yet another book to have! Although I believe many of the images in Powell were sketches. If you find it, would you U2U me with the info?

John M

[Edited on 6-18-2016 by John M]

Grand Canyon a Century of Change cover.jpg - 26kB

David K - 6-17-2016 at 03:19 PM

Thank you John!
Any hijack that provides additional history and information is welcome!

rts551 - 6-17-2016 at 06:16 PM

Quote: Originally posted by sargentodiaz  
Something seldom mentions about the Catholic missionaries in the New World is their almost ignoring female Indians. It is surmised that their vows of celibacy caused them to do their best to ignore the healthy bodies shown in all their glory - before they were able to have them almost totally clad in blue cotton dresses.

It also meant that many missionaries failed to use the girls and women to perform those tasks they did before their arrival.

Another point - most of the missionaries were prolific in writing diaries and journals - most including amazingly detailed drawings of everything surrounding them. Makes one wonder where all those beautiful drawings are.


I believe there is some documentation that a few Padres succumbed to the temptations if the female natives.

Lee - 6-17-2016 at 08:11 PM

Quote: Originally posted by rts551  
Quote: Originally posted by sargentodiaz  
Something seldom mentions about the Catholic missionaries in the New World is their almost ignoring female Indians. It is surmised that their vows of celibacy caused them to do their best to ignore the healthy bodies shown in all their glory - before they were able to have them almost totally clad in blue cotton dresses.

It also meant that many missionaries failed to use the girls and women to perform those tasks they did before their arrival.

Another point - most of the missionaries were prolific in writing diaries and journals - most including amazingly detailed drawings of everything surrounding them. Makes one wonder where all those beautiful drawings are.


I believe there is some documentation that a few Padres succumbed to the temptations if the female natives.


Male natives too.

rts551 - 6-17-2016 at 09:08 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
Quote: Originally posted by rts551  
Quote: Originally posted by sargentodiaz  
Something seldom mentions about the Catholic missionaries in the New World is their almost ignoring female Indians. It is surmised that their vows of celibacy caused them to do their best to ignore the healthy bodies shown in all their glory - before they were able to have them almost totally clad in blue cotton dresses.

It also meant that many missionaries failed to use the girls and women to perform those tasks they did before their arrival.

Another point - most of the missionaries were prolific in writing diaries and journals - most including amazingly detailed drawings of everything surrounding them. Makes one wonder where all those beautiful drawings are.


I believe there is some documentation that a few Padres succumbed to the temptations if the female natives.


Male natives too.


At least at that point they left no off-spring behind.

David K - 6-17-2016 at 09:20 PM

One of the popular stories is Padre Gabriel Gonzales of Todos Santos was indeed the "father" of his congregation!

[Edited on 6-18-2016 by David K]

Barry A. - 6-17-2016 at 10:28 PM

Quote: Originally posted by John M  
With all respect to David, and not wishing to contribute to the hijacking of threads, I will respond to Barry A.

On the subject of Grand Canyon re-photography, I believe the book you may be referring to is "Grand Canyon - A Century of Change" by Robert H. Webb. this is a magnificent book, alas it isn't a re-do of the Powell Survey but of the 1889/1890 Robert Brewster Stanton railroad route survey. Webb, one-hundred years later replicated hundreds of Stanton survey images, using as closely as possible the time of day, day of the year, and the original camera locations.

If there is a rephoto of the Powell survey that would be yet another book to have! Although I believe many of the images in Powell were sketches. If you find it, would you U2U me with the info?

John M

[Edited on 6-18-2016 by John M]


John-------I just saw this post. The book I thought I had (but don't) is a total photographic book with photos taken about 1969 each facing the almost exact same shots taken by EO Beaman (I think that's the name) of the 1871 expedition by JW Powell down the Green and Colorado Rivers. Apparently that book is in possession of Dinosaur Natl. Monument in NE Colorado where I was the first NPS "River Management" Ranger back in 1969 thru 1972. They were all black and white photos, and it was a loose leaf booklet about an inch and a half thick. Many, many comparative pictures, mostly of the Canyons of the Green River thru Dinosaur and Flaming Gorge, and Desolation and Gray Canyons, etc.. I don't remember the actual photographer of the 1969 shots, but they were taken for the centennial celebration of the original expedition, I believe, published by the US Geological Survey.