BajaNomad

Mexico to retaliate against U.S. expats?

 Pages:  1  

pauldavidmena - 2-3-2017 at 04:47 PM

I just read this article alleging that Mexican members of Congress have proposed legislation to confiscate property owned by U.S. citizens in Mexico. I have no idea whether or not this is true, but it does suggest the possibility of retaliation against Trump's executive orders with matching draconian actions. Has anyone heard of this?

mtgoat666 - 2-3-2017 at 05:02 PM

Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
I just read this article alleging that Mexican members of Congress have proposed legislation to confiscate property owned by U.S. citizens in Mexico. I have no idea whether or not this is true, but it does suggest the possibility of retaliation against Trump's executive orders with matching draconian actions. Has anyone heard of this?


If trump forces Mexico to pay for his wall, in a way that Mexico finds to be illegal, it would be fair in some books for Mexico to take over USA assets in Mexico, I.e. Assets of USA citizens or corporations. Just saying. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

Trump is a loose canon, he will endanger Americans in many ways.

DENNIS - 2-3-2017 at 05:02 PM


Please don't publish crap like this here....or anywhere, Paul. It's like yelling fire in a theatre. It hasn't happened, and I sincerely doubt it ever will.

DENNIS - 2-3-2017 at 05:05 PM

Quote: Originally posted by mtgoat666  

Trump is a loose canon, he will endanger Americans in many ways.


As will your big effing mouth. You have nothing here and less to loose, so stay out of it.



[Edited on 2-4-2017 by DENNIS]

Lee - 2-3-2017 at 05:22 PM

Quote: Originally posted by DENNIS  

Please don't publish crap like this here....or anywhere, Paul. It's like yelling fire in a theatre. It hasn't happened, and I sincerely doubt it ever will.


Hey Paul -- Dennis is not the censor here and has over stayed his welcome. Yesterday he was trying to censor me as being too dramatic. Relative to what? How about the Washington fiasco -- that's drama.

Seriously Dennis -- chill and depersonalize the political stuff. You can always move back to Newport.

And Paul? This stuff is circulating in response to the new prez pu$$ygrabber's insistence that MX will pay for a wall. Things can change overnight you just don't know.

Gringoes owning land in Baja should be aware that they have no rights in Baja and Napoleonic Rule applies if you're white.

Let's all hope for the best. I do this and expect the worst politically speaking.

bajabuddha - 2-3-2017 at 05:23 PM

Kind of hard to stomach that a citizen of the powerful United States of America can be simply collateral damage, isn't it? And, "As will your big effing mouth. You have nothing here and less to loose, so stay out of it" goes, Republican'ts have a reputation for giving orders and not letting the 1st Amendment work without invoking the 2nd Amendment as a codicil.
Who says arrogance isn't bliss? :P

JoeJustJoe - 2-3-2017 at 05:28 PM

Sounds like fake news, but then again, the USA isn't the only country to have crazy politicians.

So it's not that far fetched to believe some Mexican politicians talked about retaliating against Trump's crazy plans to get Mexico to pay for the wall, especially if they were drinking before they said it.

I would not panic until I heard the same thing in the main stream media, on either side of the border, and knew for a fact there was proposed legislation actually written and before Mexican Congress.

bajaguy - 2-3-2017 at 05:28 PM

Yup....we are all shaking in our boots, we are packing up. What we can't take with us we will destroy.......yup, all 500,000 or 1 million of us

bajalinda - 2-3-2017 at 05:29 PM

look who this article is published by....cuencahighlife! an ad for "Ecuador living" while trying to spark fear in the hearts of US expats in Mexico. Wasn't there another thread/post a few days ago on this forum that was also connected to cuenca?


imlost - 2-3-2017 at 05:38 PM

If you read the whole article, it seems clear that this article is slanted toward comparing the liberal immigration policies of Equador, to poor 'ol Mexico. As always, it's important to consider the news source. Does this author have an agenda? His articles seem to be sales oriented.

[Edited on 2-4-2017 by imlost]

pauldavidmena - 2-3-2017 at 06:06 PM

In fairness, I did take pains to include the disclaimer that I didn't know if this "news" was true or not. That said, it does prompt some pertinent discussion, including the time-honored maxim to not invest more in Mexico than you're willing to leave behind.

bajaguy - 2-3-2017 at 06:19 PM

In 1932, during his first inaugural address, FDR said..."the Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself”

Good advice then and good advice now. Deal with facts, not rumors or fear mongers.

Udo - 2-3-2017 at 06:49 PM

Amen!!!

I don't see this happening considering the number of foreign citizens in Mexico...let alone Baja.

Thanks for your insight DENNIS!


Quote: Originally posted by DENNIS  

Please don't publish crap like this here....or anywhere, Paul. It's like yelling fire in a theatre. It hasn't happened, and I sincerely doubt it ever will.

monoloco - 2-3-2017 at 06:53 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
Quote: Originally posted by DENNIS  

Please don't publish crap like this here....or anywhere, Paul. It's like yelling fire in a theatre. It hasn't happened, and I sincerely doubt it ever will.


Hey Paul -- Dennis is not the censor here and has over stayed his welcome. Yesterday he was trying to censor me as being too dramatic. Relative to what? How about the Washington fiasco -- that's drama.

Seriously Dennis -- chill and depersonalize the political stuff. You can always move back to Newport.

And Paul? This stuff is circulating in response to the new prez pu$$ygrabber's insistence that MX will pay for a wall. Things can change overnight you just don't know.

Gringoes owning land in Baja should be aware that they have no rights in Baja and Napoleonic Rule applies if you're white.

Let's all hope for the best. I do this and expect the worst politically speaking.
Last time I looked, Napoleonic Law ruled here no matter what color you are.

imlost - 2-3-2017 at 06:56 PM

It sure sounds more like a distasteful joke, rather than news...
"Three members of the Mexican congress, one small-handed baby and a Russian autocrat enter a bar, and the small-handed baby says...

Lee - 2-3-2017 at 07:04 PM

Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
In fairness, I did take pains to include the disclaimer that I didn't know if this "news" was true or not. That said, it does prompt some pertinent discussion, including the time-honored maxim to not invest more in Mexico than you're willing to leave behind.


This article showed up this past week followed by a spirited discussion. I stated I didn't read anything slanted -- and not an advertise for Cuenca. Who the heck wants to live in Ecuador anyway? If you're looking for a liberal government seemingly foreigner friend, this might be the place. Costa Rica comes to mind too.

I believe in the old adage that ''where there's smoke there's fire.'' If the prez keeps on stirring the pot like he's done, MX, I believe, will retaliate. Don't know how but Nieto isn't going to lose face in this scenario.

As for time honored maxim's, walking away from an investment is the stupidest thing I ever heard of. How much money are we talking about?

AKgringo - 2-3-2017 at 07:12 PM

Quote: Originally posted by bajaguy  
In 1932, during his first inaugural address, FDR said..."the Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself”


I thought that was Custer's last quote!

He was also surrounded by angry locals. :lol:

Sweetwater - 2-3-2017 at 07:37 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
In fairness, I did take pains to include the disclaimer that I didn't know if this "news" was true or not. That said, it does prompt some pertinent discussion, including the time-honored maxim to not invest more in Mexico than you're willing to leave behind.


This article showed up this past week followed by a spirited discussion. I stated I didn't read anything slanted -- and not an advertise for Cuenca. Who the heck wants to live in Ecuador anyway? If you're looking for a liberal government seemingly foreigner friend, this might be the place. Costa Rica comes to mind too.

I believe in the old adage that ''where there's smoke there's fire.'' If the prez keeps on stirring the pot like he's done, MX, I believe, will retaliate. Don't know how but Nieto isn't going to lose face in this scenario.

As for time honored maxim's, walking away from an investment is the stupidest thing I ever heard of. How much money are we talking about?


Trump is not popular among US residents let alone other nationals. His approach is not popular but he is pandering to the base that managed to promote his election. Unfortunately, under many scenarios, this isn't going to be pretty or smooth. Best case, it opens the eyes of the US population that has been cruising through recent history. Where are moderate patriots?

imlost - 2-3-2017 at 07:40 PM

There is currently an estimated 32-35 million international tourists to Mexico each year. I doubt Mexico is going to want to disrupt that flow of income. There are also many of us who pay property tax to Mexico every year - Mexico wants our steady flow money. It seems counter-intuitive that they would confiscate our property or add liens. What use is our property to them? They want our wallets to continually open, and for the money to continually pour out. Again, consider the source of the "news".

pauldavidmena - 2-3-2017 at 07:54 PM

Quote: Originally posted by imlost  
There is currently an estimated 32-35 million international tourists to Mexico each year. I doubt Mexico is going to want to disrupt that flow of income. There are also many of us who pay property tax to Mexico every year - Mexico wants our steady flow money. It seems counter-intuitive that they would confiscate our property or add liens. What use is our property to them? They want our wallets to continually open, and for the money to continually pour out. Again, consider the source of the "news".


I'm hopeful that EPN will resist his desire to save face and will consider a trusted source of revenue from the saner elements of the U.S.. A bully ignored is stripped of its power, especially when there are so many other shiny objects to choose from. Mexico was a convenient scapegoat during the campaign, but now that Trump has picked bigger fights, is it too optimistic to think that The Wall could end up on the back burner?

DENNIS - 2-3-2017 at 08:41 PM

Quote: Originally posted by AKgringo  

I thought that was Custer's last quote!



I think it was Custer who said, "Give me just one machine gun, and I'll give you "loose slots" in my casinos.

[Edited on 2-4-2017 by DENNIS]

imlost - 2-3-2017 at 09:24 PM

Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
Mexico was a convenient scapegoat during the campaign, but now that Trump has picked bigger fights, is it too optimistic to think that The Wall could end up on the back burner?
I think trump fully intends to move forward with his plan. Let's just hope congress makes it difficult (or impossible) for him to follow through with it.

mtgoat666 - 2-3-2017 at 09:54 PM

Quote: Originally posted by imlost  
Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
Mexico was a convenient scapegoat during the campaign, but now that Trump has picked bigger fights, is it too optimistic to think that The Wall could end up on the back burner?
I think trump fully intends to move forward with his plan. Let's just hope congress makes it difficult (or impossible) for him to follow through with it.


The wall will be trump's folly. He will spend a fortune on the wall and not fund the staff or infrastructure to do surveillance, so the wall will just become a minor obstacle for smugglers...
So many things trump promises,... in 3 years even the deplorables will be able to see the emperor has no clothes!

BigWooo - 2-4-2017 at 06:18 AM

The article says "three congressmen propose". There's always three nut-job congressmen proposing something in the U.S. that never gets traction. Not even a blip on the political radar. Just some journalist looking to get attention.

The Wall Has Already Started Being Built

Lobsterman - 2-4-2017 at 07:00 AM

I was in a recent meeting with the company CEO I work part-time for. They have already received a contract to start the initial design for part of the wall's infrastructure, i.e. 100' towers with observation platforms every 25'. I'm assuming for personnel and electronic surveillance. Consequently, they are setting up another division within the company to bid on other wall projects (pending funding) and are currently actively looking to staff that division. Talk is it will not be a brick-in-mortar type of wall but a mirror image of the type of fencing-system Israel built on its borders. This method is much more inexpensive and easier to construct than a solid wall. A Congressman has already visited Israel in December to tour their fencing system and forwarded his report to the current administration.

If the USA just copies the time-tested conceptual design and construction techniques of Israel's wall, the wall's completion will go much faster than starting from scratch, thus taking a year or two off the wall's completion date. Guided towers like the one in the picture cost much less to design and build than a self-standing tower like a radar tower.






Quote: Originally posted by imlost  
Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
Mexico was a convenient scapegoat during the campaign, but now that Trump has picked bigger fights, is it too optimistic to think that The Wall could end up on the back burner?
I think trump fully intends to move forward with his plan. Let's just hope congress makes it difficult (or impossible) for him to follow through with it.



[Edited on 2-4-2017 by Lobsterman]

[Edited on 2-5-2017 by BajaNomad]

Osprey - 2-4-2017 at 07:57 AM

Pablo, I'm prepared. After 21 years and counting, if I tallied it all up my investment is $46,000 for the house, $10,000 for the bank trust, about $200 for property taxes equals $$56,200 divided by 21 looks like it has cost me a whopping $225 bucks a month to be here, safe and sound for over two decades. Not a bad deal even if they took the place today.

And yeah, they told me "Don't buy anything you can't afford to walk away from" so I didn't. I'm not too bright but I follow instructions well when I'm sober (just that one day when I decided it would all be worth the risk).

pauldavidmena - 2-4-2017 at 08:13 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Osprey  
Pablo, I'm prepared. After 21 years and counting, if I tallied it all up my investment is $46,000 for the house, $10,000 for the bank trust, about $200 for property taxes equals $$56,200 divided by 21 looks like it has cost me a whopping $225 bucks a month to be here, safe and sound for over two decades. Not a bad deal even if they took the place today.

And yeah, they told me "Don't buy anything you can't afford to walk away from" so I didn't. I'm not too bright but I follow instructions well when I'm sober (just that one day when I decided it would all be worth the risk).


Jorge - Mary and I are beginning to see the light, and it's very much like the amber of a Pacifico bottle.

Even if these mythical three Congressmen of the apocalypse really did propose some sort of reprisal against gringos, I'm doubtful it would gain much momentum. The forces driving nationalism in the U.S. don't seem to have a counterpart in Mexico, although I could be wrong.

mtgoat666 - 2-4-2017 at 08:44 AM

Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
Quote: Originally posted by Osprey  
Pablo, I'm prepared. After 21 years and counting, if I tallied it all up my investment is $46,000 for the house, $10,000 for the bank trust, about $200 for property taxes equals $$56,200 divided by 21 looks like it has cost me a whopping $225 bucks a month to be here, safe and sound for over two decades. Not a bad deal even if they took the place today.

And yeah, they told me "Don't buy anything you can't afford to walk away from" so I didn't. I'm not too bright but I follow instructions well when I'm sober (just that one day when I decided it would all be worth the risk).


Jorge - Mary and I are beginning to see the light, and it's very much like the amber of a Pacifico bottle.

Even if these mythical three Congressmen of the apocalypse really did propose some sort of reprisal against gringos, I'm doubtful it would gain much momentum. The forces driving nationalism in the U.S. don't seem to have a counterpart in Mexico, although I could be wrong.


Change is constant. The USA is closing it's borders, turning inward ala North Korea, and abandoning it's immigration heritage -- it may work, or it may be a sign of the end of the USA. I think the later.

Perhaps as the USA decays into a sniveling nationalistic isolationist mess led by a deranged childish bully (he reminds me of Kim Jong Il, bad haircut and all), Mexico will simultaneously rise, a golden opportunity, second rise of Aztec domination.
I suspect as USA becomes closed off ala North Korea, many other countries will have opportunity to take over market share that USA loses.


mtgoat666 - 2-4-2017 at 08:52 AM



History has shown that when nations build a wall it just perpetuates conflict between the people on opposite sides of wall, and tearing down walls ALWAYS results in something better.

:light::light::light::light::light:

Quote: Originally posted by Lobsterman  
I was in a recent meeting with the company CEO I work part-time for. They have already received a contract to start the initial design for part of the wall's infrastructure, i.e. 100' towers with observation platforms every 25'. I'm assuming for personnel and electronic surveillance. Consequently, they are setting up another division within the company to bid on other wall projects (pending funding) and are currently actively looking to staff that division. Talk is it will not be a brick-in-mortar type of wall but a mirror image of the type of fencing-system Israel built on its borders. This method is much more inexpensive and easier to construct than a solid wall. A Congressman has already visited Israel in December to tour their fencing system and forwarded his report to the current administration.

If the USA just copies the time-tested conceptual design and construction techniques of Israel's wall, the wall's completion will go much faster than starting from scratch, thus taking a year or two off the wall's completion date. Guided towers like the one in the picture cost much less to design and build than a self-standing tower like a radar tower.






Quote: Originally posted by imlost  
Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
Mexico was a convenient scapegoat during the campaign, but now that Trump has picked bigger fights, is it too optimistic to think that The Wall could end up on the back burner?
I think trump fully intends to move forward with his plan. Let's just hope congress makes it difficult (or impossible) for him to follow through with it.



[Edited on 2-4-2017 by Lobsterman]


[Edited on 2-5-2017 by BajaNomad]

pacificobob - 2-4-2017 at 09:04 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
Quote: Originally posted by DENNIS  

Please don't publish crap like this here....or anywhere, Paul. It's like yelling fire in a theatre. It hasn't happened, and I sincerely doubt it ever will.


Hey Paul -- Dennis is not the censor here and has over stayed his welcome. Yesterday he was trying to censor me as being too dramatic. Relative to what? How about the Washington fiasco -- that's drama.

Seriously Dennis -- chill and depersonalize the political stuff. You can always move back to Newport.



And Paul? This stuff is circulating in response to the new prez pu$$ygrabber's insistence that MX will pay for a wall. Things can change overnight you just don't know.

Gringoes owning land in Baja should be aware that they have no rights in Baja and Napoleonic Rule applies if you're white.

Let's all hope for the best. I do this and expect the worst politically speaking.



well said lee. paul, ignore dickish remarks

[Edited on 2-4-2017 by pacificobob]

21 years ago

Osprey - 2-4-2017 at 10:10 AM

I should have mentioned that 21 years ago prices were very reasonable but there wasn't much down here. I didn't even know what I would find. Would there be beer and munchies? Well, you can see I just did the best I could with what I had at the time.



drone in desert.jpg - 74kB

JoeJustJoe - 2-4-2017 at 10:26 AM

One sign the article could be "fake news" is the fact the article's writer, doesn't mention which three members of Mexican Congress, have an answer to Trump's funding wall plans.

"Three members of the Mexican Congress have an answer to U.S. President Donald Trump’s funding plan for his wall on the southern U.S. border."

imlost - 2-4-2017 at 10:50 AM

Thanks for planting all of that cactus when you first came here, Osprey. It looks nice now. You should have kept some of those camels around. I've heard those are handy.

pauldavidmena - 2-4-2017 at 03:48 PM

Quote: Originally posted by JoeJustJoe  
One sign the article could be "fake news" is the fact the article's writer, doesn't mention which three members of Mexican Congress, have an answer to Trump's funding wall plans.

"Three members of the Mexican Congress have an answer to U.S. President Donald Trump’s funding plan for his wall on the southern U.S. border."


Yeah, I've been looking for corroboration of the original "news" and have yet to find it. Sadly, it meets the criterion of "fake news" in that it only has to be feasible - not factual - to be news. North of the Border we call it "The Bowling Green Effect".

bajabuddha - 2-4-2017 at 04:55 PM

Cost of "The Wall"... $60 Billion dollars.

"The Bowling Green Effect"...... PRICELESS. :smug:

luv2fish - 2-4-2017 at 07:34 PM

Quote: Originally posted by imlost  
Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
Mexico was a convenient scapegoat during the campaign, but now that Trump has picked bigger fights, is it too optimistic to think that The Wall could end up on the back burner?
I think trump fully intends to move forward with his plan. Let's just hope congress makes it difficult (or impossible) for him to follow through with it.


I don"t see what all the commotion is about, the Chinese built a wall over 2000 years ago, and they still have no Mexicans.:lol::lol::lol:

gnukid - 2-4-2017 at 08:04 PM

How about US Expats to Retaliate against Mexico

If the vast majority of Mexicos economy is either US expats, US tourism or US expatriated money from US to Mexico don't you think the greatest leverage lies within US and the economic decisions and demands US expats make? Mexico does not exist as an economy without US dollars and US dollar is the greatest influence. Stop your crying and comments like its not our country, when you are the economy and the current government doesnt function to serve you then you decide with your payments what you will pay for. At the moment corrupt Mexico serves only a few thieves and hurts the rest of all of us and must be stopped in order to bring a functional capitalist economy to benefit labor and business and support families not thieves.

mtgoat666 - 2-4-2017 at 08:38 PM

Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  
How about US Expats to Retaliate against Mexico

If the vast majority of Mexicos economy is either US expats, US tourism or US expatriated money from US to Mexico don't you think the greatest leverage lies within US and the economic decisions and demands US expats make? Mexico does not exist as an economy without US dollars and US dollar is the greatest influence. Stop your crying and comments like its not our country, when you are the economy and the current government doesnt function to serve you then you decide with your payments what you will pay for. At the moment corrupt Mexico serves only a few thieves and hurts the rest of all of us and must be stopped in order to bring a functional capitalist economy to benefit labor and business and support families not thieves.


The USA economy depends on immigrants. No immigrants, the USA economy will collapse.
Trump is an a$$hat to be focusing on attacking immigrants, and especially the Mexican laborers that work 3x harder than lazy-a$$ European-descent Americans.
The USA would benefit from deporting the lazy European-descent gringos all collecting disability from fake injuries. Have you ever met a retired Irish cop that didn't take early retirement on fake disability claim?

THAT is FUNNY !

MrBillM - 2-4-2017 at 08:41 PM

Americans united and organizing in BIG enough numbers for LONG enough to effect influence on Mexican (or U.S.) policy ?

Yeah, Sure, You Betcha !

mtgoat666 - 2-5-2017 at 07:55 AM

Trump's Puppet-masters Bannon and Putin have 2 goals for the fence: keep Mexicans out, keep Americans in.

Quote: Originally posted by paranewbi  
Quote: Originally posted by Lobsterman  
I was in a recent meeting with the company CEO I work part-time for. They have already received a contract to start the initial design for part of the wall's infrastructure, i.e. 100' towers with observation platforms every 25'. I'm assuming for personnel and electronic surveillance. Consequently, they are setting up another division within the company to bid on other wall projects (pending funding) and are currently actively looking to staff that division. Talk is it will not be a brick-in-mortar type of wall but a mirror image of the type of fencing-system Israel built on its borders. This method is much more inexpensive and easier to construct than a solid wall. A Congressman has already visited Israel in December to tour their fencing system and forwarded his report to the current administration.

If the USA just copies the time-tested conceptual design and construction techniques of Israel's wall, the wall's completion will go much faster than starting from scratch, thus taking a year or two off the wall's completion date. Guided towers like the one in the picture cost much less to design and build than a self-standing tower like a radar tower.






Quote: Originally posted by imlost  
Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  
Mexico was a convenient scapegoat during the campaign, but now that Trump has picked bigger fights, is it too optimistic to think that The Wall could end up on the back burner?
I think trump fully intends to move forward with his plan. Let's just hope congress makes it difficult (or impossible) for him to follow through with it.



[Edited on 2-4-2017 by Lobsterman]


Seems that the fence top is cantilevered towards the tower side (US?) and should be towards the Mexico side...much harder to get over (unless like state prisons you want to keep those inside in). Also, the asphalt is on the wrong side?


[Edited on 2-5-2017 by BajaNomad]

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 08:50 AM

Quote: Originally posted by mtgoat666  

The USA economy depends on immigrants. No immigrants, the USA economy will collapse.


Nonsense. Industry needs more, bigger and better robots. If someone ever comes up with a machine that picks strawberries, [and it's only a matter of time] this issue will no longer exist.



.


[Edited on 2-5-2017 by DENNIS]

Cliffy - 2-5-2017 at 09:54 AM

Aaaa, the picture is on the Israeli/Egypt border not the USA border.

pauldavidmena - 2-5-2017 at 10:28 AM

I still haven't found a news article independently corroborating my original posting, but this blog post basically repeats the same premise, citing the same three anonymous Congressmen. Toward the end of the article, the real motive appears - a recommendation that Mexican expats under threat move instead to Ecuador. Methinks we've been pranked.

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 10:29 AM

Quote: Originally posted by paranewbi  

Or a nice cliff side Punta Banda hostel for the oppressed middle east populace?


Christians only, please. We don' need no stinkin' Sharia Law here.

[Edited on 2-5-2017 by DENNIS]

Cliffy - 2-5-2017 at 10:33 AM

Just some observations as I've been watching this thread since its inception-

Why is it that there can never be a discussion about anything political without it gravitating to name calling and gutter talk?

Why are there always derogatory comments and personal attacks against either the poster or the subject of the conversation instead of educated debate on the issues?

I would love to discuss some issues with my opposite minded contributors but it seems that will never happen.

I would really like to understand their position in an air of mutual respect of differing ideas to see where common ground could be achieved.

Our country was founded on trying to find a compromise and moving forward. It was never designed or envisioned to be "my way or the highway".

So here's my proposition- is there anyone on the negative side of "the wall" that would be interested in a new thread of respectful discussion
of the issue, out in the open for all to see?

Anyone? Anyone?


JoeJustJoe - 2-5-2017 at 10:57 AM

Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  
How about US Expats to Retaliate against Mexico

If the vast majority of Mexicos economy is either US expats, US tourism or US expatriated money from US to Mexico don't you think the greatest leverage lies within US and the economic decisions and demands US expats make? Mexico does not exist as an economy without US dollars and US dollar is the greatest influence. Stop your crying and comments like its not our country, when you are the economy and the current government doesnt function to serve you then you decide with your payments what you will pay for. At the moment corrupt Mexico serves only a few thieves and hurts the rest of all of us and must be stopped in order to bring a functional capitalist economy to benefit labor and business and support families not thieves.


Gunkid, shows typical thinking of many Americans, believing the world revolves around the USA, and them personally.

It's amazing a fake news story could get someone so worked up.

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 11:02 AM



The new blind, blanket denial...."Fake News." I am so sick and tired of hearing it since it took over from "the party of NO."

mtgoat666 - 2-5-2017 at 11:02 AM

Quote: Originally posted by DENNIS  
Quote: Originally posted by paranewbi  

Or a nice cliff side Punta Banda hostel for the oppressed middle east populace?


Christians only, please. We don' need no stinkin' Sharia Law here.

[Edited on 2-5-2017 by DENNIS]


Sharia law is probably better than Trump law.

wessongroup - 2-5-2017 at 11:05 AM

I have a working knowledge of Sharia Law ... Trump Law is something new to me ... Perhaps you can point it out in the: Declaration of Indepence, Constitution, Bill of Rights or in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

How about doing a comparison and contrast of the two ... point by point :biggrin::biggrin:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_law

Will say I find some aspects of Islamic Law on Finance a bit better

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_banking_and_finance


[Edited on 2-5-2017 by wessongroup]

JoeJustJoe - 2-5-2017 at 11:19 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
Aaaa, the picture is on the Israeli/Egypt border not the USA border.


Just more fake news from our residential tea-party member, and Trump fan, Lobsterman.

Yes, it's Israel's apartheid wall in that photo, and I believe that wall is only about 400 miles, not the 2000 mile wall that Trump campaigned on, and it remains to be seen what kind of wall is actually in the plans to be built, or if a wall from coast to coast could even be built, , because all the other Great Wall plans from 2006 on have failed or not lived up to expectations.

We also still don't know who is going to pay for the wall, and The US Congress has not yet allocated from 10 to 40 billion dollars of US tax payers money to start construction of the wall.

I'm also unaware of any US Government contract bidding and winning of those government contracts to any specific company, although if you follow the stock market, there are about 10 companies that received a bump because many are guessing those companies will benefit if a wall is built.



[Edited on 2-5-2017 by JoeJustJoe]

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 11:24 AM

Quote: Originally posted by wessongroup  
How about doing a comparison and contrast of the two ... point by point :biggrin::biggrin:




Not me.

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/sharia-law.html

Cliffy - 2-5-2017 at 11:39 AM

OK so I gotta ask again-
Why the derogatory adjectives JoeJustJoe?
" apartheid wall "
" residential tea-party member, and Trump fan,"
Why the derogatory inferences?
Why not just a straight educated respectful debate?

Still waiting on my above request- anyone? Anyone?

JoeJustJoe - 2-5-2017 at 11:55 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
OK so I gotta ask again-
Why the derogatory adjectives JoeJustJoe?
" apartheid wall "
" residential tea-party member, and Trump fan,"
Why the derogatory inferences?
Why not just a straight educated respectful debate?

Still waiting on my above request- anyone? Anyone?


Because the thread turned ugly, bigoted, and mean spirited.

That's usually my calling card.

Cliffy, hasn't you heard that you NEVER mix politics and religious?

It never goes well, and is one of the reasons there are any real political forums with a mix of both liberals or conservatives, it's either just liberal or conservative, but not both.

Cliffy, I find it interesting you call me out for mentioning Israel's apartheid wall, and the benign mention of a "tea-party member, which the person named would readily admit to. ( we go way back)

Where is your outrage over the posts bashing Mexico, and talking Sharia law.

I also expect this thread to be closed very soon, or moved to the OT where it belongs.


mtgoat666 - 2-5-2017 at 11:58 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
OK so I gotta ask again-
Why the derogatory adjectives JoeJustJoe?
" apartheid wall "
" residential tea-party member, and Trump fan,"
Why the derogatory inferences?
Why not just a straight educated respectful debate?

Still waiting on my above request- anyone? Anyone?


The truth hurts you? Tough. You may call them "derogatory inferences." I call them accurate and precise descriptions.
Trump is a fraud! Trump is an illegitimate autocratic despot! Trump is destroying USA to reward Putin and USA oligarchs. Wake up sheeple! Trump is destroying the USA to reward himself and his close cronies!

Cliffy - 2-5-2017 at 12:14 PM

OK I'll try it from where we sit right now-
goat - can you elaborate exactly what you are referring to in-
" illegitimate " We'll start there if that's OK
Please explain-

BTW, you don't even know where I stand but I'll move on from that.


bajabuddha - 2-5-2017 at 12:18 PM

Cliffy, it's called "Nomania". Usually only takes less than a full page to begin.
You might as well try to pi$$ out a forest fire. :no:

Cliffy - 2-5-2017 at 12:30 PM

Joe-
Why am I "calling you out" by asking about the adjective you used?
I wasn't trying to be disrespectful, only to question why such an adjective would be used if it wasn't needed for the conversation. And, it does have derogatory inferences.

My contention again is why conversations need to go to the gutter?

Bashing Mexico? Sharia law? I don't bash Mexico. I like Mexico. I like Baja. Been going there for 35 years.

For a position? Sharia Law has no place in the USA legal system.

I am pretty founded in my thoughts on immigration. My Mother came here in 1924 from Norway. So yes I have a position on the subject but I try not to let that gravitate down to the gutter in conversations about it.

Still waiting for someone to take me up on my above proposal.


ELINVESTIG8R - 2-5-2017 at 12:37 PM

Elinvestig8r says President Trump is the best thing to happen to the United States of America. What I can't understand is why Jihad Joe became a US citizen if he hates the USA so much.

Lee - 2-5-2017 at 12:46 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
Joe-
Why am I "calling you out" by asking about the adjective you used?
I wasn't trying to be disrespectful, only to question why such an adjective would be used if it wasn't needed for the conversation. And, it does have derogatory inferences.

My contention again is why conversations need to go to the gutter?

Bashing Mexico? Sharia law? I don't bash Mexico. I like Mexico. I like Baja. Been going there for 35 years.

For a position? Sharia Law has no place in the USA legal system.

I am pretty founded in my thoughts on immigration. My Mother came here in 1924 from Norway. So yes I have a position on the subject but I try not to let that gravitate down to the gutter in conversations about it.

Still waiting for someone to take me up on my above proposal.



Subjects of politics/religion are too divisive for rational debate online. The country is divided and politics & religion have created much of it. Both represent, in my opinion, everything wrong with this country. So, no respect from me.

On the subject of the wall, taxpayers will foot the billions -- I do not have a solution to the immigration problem. Wish I did.

Udo - 2-5-2017 at 12:56 PM

Do the people who keep arguing about religion, Mexico's politics, USA politics, Trump, or the wall...

Do they REALLY think they are going to change someone's mind?

All they are doing if defending their beliefs, whether we like it or not. For that reason if I smell post regarding one of the above topics, I either delete it, or just not read it.

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 01:45 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Udo  
Do the people who keep arguing about religion, Mexico's politics, USA politics, Trump, or the wall...

Do they REALLY think they are going to change someone's mind?

All they are doing if defending their beliefs, whether we like it or not. For that reason if I smell post regarding one of the above topics, I either delete it, or just not read it.



Strange thing about human nature. Most people just like to be heard and acknowledged for their opinion. Makes us feel less insignificant.
Nobody is trying to convert anyone.

JoeJustJoe - 2-5-2017 at 02:38 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
Joe-
Why am I "calling you out" by asking about the adjective you used?
I wasn't trying to be disrespectful, only to question why such an adjective would be used if it wasn't needed for the conversation. And, it does have derogatory inferences.

My contention again is why conversations need to go to the gutter?

Bashing Mexico? Sharia law? I don't bash Mexico. I like Mexico. I like Baja. Been going there for 35 years.

For a position? Sharia Law has no place in the USA legal system.

I am pretty founded in my thoughts on immigration. My Mother came here in 1924 from Norway. So yes I have a position on the subject but I try not to let that gravitate down to the gutter in conversations about it.

Still waiting for someone to take me up on my above proposal.



Umm Cliffy, I detect that you're from red state, joined the tea-party, or have become a Trumpster, because of your opinion of Sharia law.

The only ones who are alarmed about Sharia law, and actually pass laws against Sharia law, are the red slave state of North Carolina, Alabama, Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, South Dakota and Tennessee.

In the liberal blue states, we roll our eyes when right-wingers start talking about Sharia laws in the US, as if it's something to really worry about.

You need to come clean Cliffy, conservative leaning, or liberal leaning, to get a better reference where you are coming from, although you are leaving clues all over the place. ( please no pretend fence sitters, pick a side)

Yes topics like this has to end up in the gutter, because it provokes strong emotions on both sides. I have yet to see one site, with both liberals and conservatives, not end up in the gutter.

ELINVESTIG8R - 2-5-2017 at 02:43 PM

Jihad Joe hates the USA!

del mar - 2-5-2017 at 02:58 PM

so what have we learned, there's still 23 miles of dirt between coco's and chapala?

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 03:00 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
For a position? Sharia Law has no place in the USA legal system.



Wake up, America......you too, Cliffy. It is the driving force behind Islam.
Study...ask....wonder....and when you find yourself on the short end of the stick, don't bother asking why. Just look in the mirror.
There are Muslim communities in the USA today that profess Sharia overrides US civil law .
Pay attention. Study the Crusades. Wake the eff up.

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 03:07 PM


Here..............let Bill Warner try to explain it to you.

https://www.politicalislam.com/

The CRUSADES ?

MrBillM - 2-5-2017 at 03:11 PM

Is there a coming new Crusade ?

Will Crusader Rabbit be returning ?

I always enjoyed that.

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 03:31 PM


Maybe...........



Crusader Rabbit - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusader_Rabbit








[Edited on 2-5-2017 by DENNIS]

Rabbit Return ?

MrBillM - 2-5-2017 at 03:46 PM

They'll need a replacement host.

Sheriff John is GONE !

in 2012.

Joe Arpaio could use a new gig, though.

I can hardly wait.

ELINVESTIG8R - 2-5-2017 at 04:05 PM

Islam is a political ideology not a religion.

pauldavidmena - 2-5-2017 at 04:31 PM

Quote: Originally posted by ELINVESTIG8R  
Islam is a political ideology not a religion.


I'm accepting this as your opinion and not a statement based on fact. I have Muslim friends, most of them U.S. citizens, who will tell you otherwise.

pauldavidmena - 2-5-2017 at 04:37 PM

I'm also not sure what Islam has to do with the original post, but such is the nature of a hijacked thread.

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 04:41 PM

Quote: Originally posted by ELINVESTIG8R  
Islam is a political ideology not a religion.


It's both. Read my link, or forever hold your peace ..or piece of whatever you have left.

Cliffy - 2-5-2017 at 05:03 PM

This is getting weird. One side says I am a racist Islamophobe and the other says I'm wandering in the mist of radical Liberalism. How's that for labels? What does it get? Nothing. So let's drop it.

For one, I'm not a fan of either major political party. I don't trust McConnell any more than I trusted Reid (and he was my Senator for a decade). They are both liars and in the same boat as far as I'm concerned. I was disappointed in Bush (the younger) and I didn't trust any of the Clintons. Their foundation will turn out to be a slush fund. Although i didn't vote for Obama I really felt he had the opportunity to one the greatest Presidents this country ever had. Unfortunately he didn't live up to my initial cogitations.
Frankly, I don't think any Presidential administration since Eisenhower has been worth a damn, save maybe Reagan (that's as far as I go back with any memory).
Now we come to the current administration. I don't feel he's either right or left but somewhere in the middle. It's way too early to make a concise decision as to whether or not he's good for the country IN THE LONG RUN.
Kennedy had Cuba right at first, Truman had to drop the bomb, Johnson inherited the VN war, Nixon tried a cover up, they all have issues either right at first or somewhere along the way. There will never be a "perfect" candidate but somehow we always muddle through. For 240+ years, we've muddled through.
Right now we have a President that half the country voted for (right at 63 million people and yes we have an Electoral College for a valid reason that our forefathers were enlightened enough to foresee the need for same and I would say that no matter who won ) and i'm not fully convinced of everything he wants to do is correct but enough seems to be to be able to support him and see how things turn out. Could he turn out to be a disaster? Sure, just like others in the last 44 Presidents have been but we don't know yet. It's too early to tell. If one studies American history we can see parallels in other administrations and heated debates about the then current President as far back as we go (just look to Adams and Jefferson, at times they hated each other but on July the 4th 1826 Jefferson's last words were, "at least Adams survives" (paraphrased), unfortunately Adams died the same day). BTW, that was exactly 50 years to the day of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, but, we always seem to come through in the end.

Now if anyone wants to have a reasonable discussion on immigration I'm all ears. But I would preface it with this question (and it is a question for discussion ans NOT an accusation).

Does any independent State (that is the correct term) have the right to control who they allow in through their borders?
It's an easy question to answer, only one of two answers- yes or no.
If you want to answer please back it up with why you feel that way in a courteous manner.

DENNIS - 2-5-2017 at 05:03 PM

Quote: Originally posted by pauldavidmena  

I'm accepting this as your opinion and not a statement based on fact. I have Muslim friends, most of them U.S. citizens, who will tell you otherwise.


Not if they are honest. If the deny knowledge of Sharia, they lie, and are not your friends.

[Edited on 2-6-2017 by DENNIS]

Suffering the Sharia Shakes ?

MrBillM - 2-5-2017 at 06:03 PM

Firmly ensconced in the "be wary" of most Mosquers category AND possessing a fairly suspicious (paranoid ?) nature, I have to say that those who go the extra distance into "Sharia Fear Syndrome" are a bit TOO far over the edge.

It's NOT coming to a town near you.

luv2fish - 2-5-2017 at 08:27 PM

Quote: Originally posted by DENNIS  
Quote: Originally posted by wessongroup  
How about doing a comparison and contrast of the two ... point by point :biggrin::biggrin:




Not me.

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/sharia-law.html

A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old. One of the many sharia laws...puke

willardguy - 2-5-2017 at 09:12 PM

Pete was right "hope I die before I get old".....you folks need to find a hobby!:(

Hope to Die ?

MrBillM - 2-5-2017 at 09:36 PM

It would take only one old guy to die and make millions rediscover a Lust for Life.

But, unfortunately, it's unlikely.

Cliffy - 2-6-2017 at 07:45 AM

Thank you for the respectful reply.
Actually, with regard to "States", in diplomatic circles I do believe members of say the UN are referred to as "States" not "countries".

The question was regarding "countries" but maybe I'm trying to cut to fine a definition.

I do appreciate the commentary however.

DENNIS - 2-6-2017 at 08:34 AM


Those who disassociate Mexico with the Arab [Muslim] influence are blind to history, specifically the Crusades in Spain.
An example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_language_influence_on_t...

shari - 2-6-2017 at 09:23 AM

Quote: Originally posted by DENNIS  
Quote: Originally posted by Udo  
Do the people who keep arguing about religion, Mexico's politics, USA politics, Trump, or the wall...

Do they REALLY think they are going to change someone's mind?

All they are doing if defending their beliefs, whether we like it or not. For that reason if I smell post regarding one of the above topics, I either delete it, or just not read it.



Strange thing about human nature. Most people just like to be heard and acknowledged for their opinion. Makes us feel less insignificant.
Nobody is trying to convert anyone.


see how astute Mr.D is!!!!!!

DENNIS - 2-6-2017 at 09:47 AM


Ahhhhhh, mon Sharí................Je vous remercie. ;)

ELINVESTIG8R - 2-6-2017 at 09:52 AM

Quote: Originally posted by JoeJustJoe  
Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
Aaaa, the picture is on the Israeli/Egypt border not the USA border.


Just more fake news from our residential tea-party member, and Trump fan, Lobsterman.

Yes, it's Israel's apartheid wall in that photo, and I believe that wall is only about 400 miles, not the 2000 mile wall that Trump campaigned on, and it remains to be seen what kind of wall is actually in the plans to be built, or if a wall from coast to coast could even be built, , because all the other Great Wall plans from 2006 on have failed or not lived up to expectations.

We also still don't know who is going to pay for the wall, and The US Congress has not yet allocated from 10 to 40 billion dollars of US tax payers money to start construction of the wall.

I'm also unaware of any US Government contract bidding and winning of those government contracts to any specific company, although if you follow the stock market, there are about 10 companies that received a bump because many are guessing those companies will benefit if a wall is built.



[Edited on 2-5-2017 by JoeJustJoe]




JIHADI JOE HATING AMERICA AS USUAL!



DENNIS - 2-6-2017 at 10:13 AM


Interesting offer...."Learn Arabic in Punta Banda."
I wonder what else they plan to teach?

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1214099862007916&...

Devlish Discussion Delivered with Derision and Disgust

MrBillM - 2-6-2017 at 11:04 AM

It's GREAT.

All combined here influencing (and costing) nothing.

The Hallmark of (anti) Social Media.

A forum filled to capacity with hardened advocates devoid of minds open to persuasion.

Resulting in nothing more than recreational self-satisfaction (and FUN) for those individuals otherwise unimportant to the resolution of any important issues.

Which is, of course, value enough.

More convenient and less costly than actually participating in physical or financial advocacy out in the REAL world.

STRANGELY, there are those who think that they are "somehow" accomplishing something constructive.

Indicating a slippery grip on reality ?

In any case, it's a game well worth the price of admission for a few minutes (or hour) daily.

Especially for those of us who have more limited opportunity to irritate in person with our sage opinions and sardonic wit.

That's about the ONLY thing I miss from my working days in the office environment.

Sarcastic Repartee.

A tasty daily dish.




JoeJustJoe - 2-6-2017 at 11:12 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
This is getting weird. One side says I am a racist Islamophobe and the other says I'm wandering in the mist of radical Liberalism. How's that for labels? What does it get? Nothing. So let's drop it.

For one, I'm not a fan of either major political party. I don't trust McConnell any more than I trusted Reid (and he was my Senator for a decade). They are both liars and in the same boat as far as I'm concerned. I was disappointed in Bush (the younger) and I didn't trust any of the Clintons. Their foundation will turn out to be a slush fund. Although i didn't vote for Obama I really felt he had the opportunity to one the greatest Presidents this country ever had. Unfortunately he didn't live up to my initial cogitations.
Frankly, I don't think any Presidential administration since Eisenhower has been worth a damn, save maybe Reagan (that's as far as I go back with any memory).
Now we come to the current administration. I don't feel he's either right or left but somewhere in the middle. It's way too early to make a concise decision as to whether or not he's good for the country IN THE LONG RUN.
Kennedy had Cuba right at first, Truman had to drop the bomb, Johnson inherited the VN war, Nixon tried a cover up, they all have issues either right at first or somewhere along the way. There will never be a "perfect" candidate but somehow we always muddle through. For 240+ years, we've muddled through.
Right now we have a President that half the country voted for (right at 63 million people and yes we have an Electoral College for a valid reason that our forefathers were enlightened enough to foresee the need for same and I would say that no matter who won ) and i'm not fully convinced of everything he wants to do is correct but enough seems to be to be able to support him and see how things turn out. Could he turn out to be a disaster? Sure, just like others in the last 44 Presidents have been but we don't know yet. It's too early to tell. If one studies American history we can see parallels in other administrations and heated debates about the then current President as far back as we go (just look to Adams and Jefferson, at times they hated each other but on July the 4th 1826 Jefferson's last words were, "at least Adams survives" (paraphrased), unfortunately Adams died the same day). BTW, that was exactly 50 years to the day of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, but, we always seem to come through in the end.

Now if anyone wants to have a reasonable discussion on immigration I'm all ears. But I would preface it with this question (and it is a question for discussion ans NOT an accusation).

Does any independent State (that is the correct term) have the right to control who they allow in through their borders?
It's an easy question to answer, only one of two answers- yes or no.
If you want to answer please back it up with why you feel that way in a courteous manner.


Cliffy, you want people to answer your provocative question on immigration where you try to limit their answers to a yes or no answer like an attorney would ask to restrict them and back them in the corner.

Like I said, Cliffy, no pretend fence sitters because I have no respect for anyone who sits on the fence throwing rocks at only one side of the aisle and then acting like they're neutral or they claim they don't like either side of the aisle, be it democrat or republican, liberal or conservative.

Your type always claims, nobody is good enough for him regarding past Presidents, yet reading between the lines, your political leanings come through loud and clear.

You Cliffy, are a Trumpster, that much is obvious, and you have been conservative for many years, maybe not ultra conservative, but for sure conservative, and you're anti-immigration, and you maybe even racist if you voted for Trump!

You think Reagan, was a good President, so you can't be liberal, because most liberals think Reagan, was stupid, uninformed, and even senile when he was in office, but he knew his limitations and depended on those around him including his wife, who consulted the stars with the help of an astrologer to chart America's course. Reagan, was pretty much responsible for widening the divide between the rich and poor.

Look at how you bash Clinton, and it's amazing you didn't bring up Monica. Clinton's eight years in office, were great, better than anything Reagan did, and he balanced the budget, but eight years later that dope George Bush, left the USA on a brink of another great depression, but Obama, brought the USA back, as well as could be expected, giving the hole Bush left Obama in.

Cliffy, you didn't vote for Obama, not even in his first term when he was running on" hope and change," and most people wanted to get away from what Bush did the previous eight years, and McCain, was seen as someone who would continue Bush''s polices.

I'm sorry Cliffy, that alone pigeonholes you as least a conservative, maybe not a republican, because after eight years of Bush, republican became a bad word, so conservatives labeled themselves as Libertarian or so-called Independent conservatives, but their stripes never changed.

What really gives you away Cliffy, is the way you act like Trump is a normal President, that you're willing to give him a chance. Any liberal, probably most Independents, and even many conservatives see Trump, as a megalomaniac, racist thin-skinned fool, who now thinks he is king of the USA, and the world! We will be lucky that Trump, doesn't start world war III because another country's leader insulted him.

Cliffy, you say that Trump won half the vote. That's wrong, he lost to Hillary Clinton, by 3 million votes, although he did win the dated Electoral College that should be abolished in favor of the popular vote to reflect the will of the people, and because I'm tired of seeing a handful of small swing states with deplorable white non-educated voters determine everything.

[Edited on 2-6-2017 by JoeJustJoe]

SERIOUSLY ?

MrBillM - 2-6-2017 at 12:58 PM

One answer is as important and material as another.

ALL having equal effect on the opinions of others.

And, equally affecting the eventual political actions.

Opposing ideas are rejected as uninformed.

Corroborating expressions valued as affirmation.

Which obviously makes sense.

I have always found that MY assessments are correct and, therefore, a contrary expression has to be WRONG.


DENNIS - 2-6-2017 at 01:32 PM



Right. No...waiddaminit....wrong. Oohh yeah....right...er.... wrong....but, maybe right wrong or right wrong right wrong right wrong right wrong right wrong right wrong right wrong right wrong right wrong right wrong. Yeah....thas it....right wrong

ELINVESTIG8R - 2-6-2017 at 01:59 PM

Quote: Originally posted by JoeJustJoe  
Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
This is getting weird. One side says I am a racist Islamophobe and the other says I'm wandering in the mist of radical Liberalism. How's that for labels? What does it get? Nothing. So let's drop it.

For one, I'm not a fan of either major political party. I don't trust McConnell any more than I trusted Reid (and he was my Senator for a decade). They are both liars and in the same boat as far as I'm concerned. I was disappointed in Bush (the younger) and I didn't trust any of the Clintons. Their foundation will turn out to be a slush fund. Although i didn't vote for Obama I really felt he had the opportunity to one the greatest Presidents this country ever had. Unfortunately he didn't live up to my initial cogitations.
Frankly, I don't think any Presidential administration since Eisenhower has been worth a damn, save maybe Reagan (that's as far as I go back with any memory).
Now we come to the current administration. I don't feel he's either right or left but somewhere in the middle. It's way too early to make a concise decision as to whether or not he's good for the country IN THE LONG RUN.
Kennedy had Cuba right at first, Truman had to drop the bomb, Johnson inherited the VN war, Nixon tried a cover up, they all have issues either right at first or somewhere along the way. There will never be a "perfect" candidate but somehow we always muddle through. For 240+ years, we've muddled through.
Right now we have a President that half the country voted for (right at 63 million people and yes we have an Electoral College for a valid reason that our forefathers were enlightened enough to foresee the need for same and I would say that no matter who won ) and i'm not fully convinced of everything he wants to do is correct but enough seems to be to be able to support him and see how things turn out. Could he turn out to be a disaster? Sure, just like others in the last 44 Presidents have been but we don't know yet. It's too early to tell. If one studies American history we can see parallels in other administrations and heated debates about the then current President as far back as we go (just look to Adams and Jefferson, at times they hated each other but on July the 4th 1826 Jefferson's last words were, "at least Adams survives" (paraphrased), unfortunately Adams died the same day). BTW, that was exactly 50 years to the day of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, but, we always seem to come through in the end.

Now if anyone wants to have a reasonable discussion on immigration I'm all ears. But I would preface it with this question (and it is a question for discussion ans NOT an accusation).

Does any independent State (that is the correct term) have the right to control who they allow in through their borders?
It's an easy question to answer, only one of two answers- yes or no.
If you want to answer please back it up with why you feel that way in a courteous manner.


Cliffy, you want people to answer your provocative question on immigration where you try to limit their answers to a yes or no answer like an attorney would ask to restrict them and back them in the corner.

Like I said, Cliffy, no pretend fence sitters because I have no respect for anyone who sits on the fence throwing rocks at only one side of the aisle and then acting like they're neutral or they claim they don't like either side of the aisle, be it democrat or republican, liberal or conservative.

Your type always claims, nobody is good enough for him regarding past Presidents, yet reading between the lines, your political leanings come through loud and clear.

You Cliffy, are a Trumpster, that much is obvious, and you have been conservative for many years, maybe not ultra conservative, but for sure conservative, and you're anti-immigration, and you maybe even racist if you voted for Trump!

You think Reagan, was a good President, so you can't be liberal, because most liberals think Reagan, was stupid, uninformed, and even senile when he was in office, but he knew his limitations and depended on those around him including his wife, who consulted the stars with the help of an astrologer to chart America's course. Reagan, was pretty much responsible for widening the divide between the rich and poor.

Look at how you bash Clinton, and it's amazing you didn't bring up Monica. Clinton's eight years in office, were great, better than anything Reagan did, and he balanced the budget, but eight years later that dope George Bush, left the USA on a brink of another great depression, but Obama, brought the USA back, as well as could be expected, giving the hole Bush left Obama in.

Cliffy, you didn't vote for Obama, not even in his first term when he was running on" hope and change," and most people wanted to get away from what Bush did the previous eight years, and McCain, was seen as someone who would continue Bush''s polices.

I'm sorry Cliffy, that alone pigeonholes you as least a conservative, maybe not a republican, because after eight years of Bush, republican became a bad word, so conservatives labeled themselves as Libertarian or so-called Independent conservatives, but their stripes never changed.

What really gives you away Cliffy, is the way you act like Trump is a normal President, that you're willing to give him a chance. Any liberal, probably most Independents, and even many conservatives see Trump, as a megalomaniac, racist thin-skinned fool, who now thinks he is king of the USA, and the world! We will be lucky that Trump, doesn't start world war III because another country's leader insulted him.

Cliffy, you say that Trump won half the vote. That's wrong, he lost to Hillary Clinton, by 3 million votes, although he did win the dated Electoral College that should be abolished in favor of the popular vote to reflect the will of the people, and because I'm tired of seeing a handful of small swing states with deplorable white non-educated voters determine everything.

[Edited on 2-6-2017 by JoeJustJoe]



CUT AND PASTE JIHADI JOE IS AGAIN SPEWING HIS HATE FOR AMERICA!




Cliffy - 2-6-2017 at 02:30 PM

I guess that if one is not a Liberal, somewhat to the left of Bernie, then it is not worth having a civil conversation with.
I don't think I called anyone any names, I don't think I labeled anyone with any "deplorable" labels (pun intended) and yet I see a diatribe of such directed at me.
I specifically asked if anyone wanted a civil conversation. Those with other plans were, by request, not invited to the conversation. This is exactly why President Trump won the election. People are tired of this kind of behavior. To hold that those American citizens who vote in the flyover states are something less than qualified voters is somewhat disingenuous to say the least.
I guess in some circles only the Liberal Elite should be allowed to vote as they are obviously the only ones who know who should be elected.

Its really a sad case when one can't see the forest for the trees and realize they are what they abhor and how much of an ass they appear to the public that reads their postulations.

Over and out!




JoeJustJoe - 2-6-2017 at 02:54 PM

I don't have problems debating conservatives, and over the years some of my best friends have actually been conservatives, if you believe that, although they at times make me crazy.

What I don't like is fence sitters, or pretend sitters sitters, because with them it seems there are more interested in winning augments, and if you try to pin them down, on some policy of their candidate, President, or politician is advocating, they punt, and say, "who me," I'm independent" I didn't vote for that guy, yet most of their talk or posts, end up attacking one side or another.

If you want to have a friendly debate on hot red button issues, then at least come clean, and be a straight shooter, and tell us your political affiliations, or leave little doubt where you are coming from like most people do.

The talking about Walls, American exceptionalism, US supremacy, pure bigotry, Islamophobia, non-existent Sharia laws in the US are also insulting to some people, although I don't point any individual out, but I'm just looking at this thread and some of the posts made so far in this thread.



[Edited on 2-6-2017 by JoeJustJoe]

ELINVESTIG8R - 2-6-2017 at 04:02 PM

Quote: Originally posted by JoeJustJoe  
I don't have problems debating conservatives, and over the years some of my best friends have actually been conservatives, if you believe that, although they at times make me crazy.

What I don't like is fence sitters, or pretend sitters sitters, because with them it seems there are more interested in winning augments, and if you try to pin them down, on some policy of their candidate, President, or politician is advocating, they punt, and say, "who me," I'm independent" I didn't vote for that guy, yet most of their talk or posts, end up attacking one side or another.

If you want to have a friendly debate on hot red button issues, then at least come clean, and be a straight shooter, and tell us your political affiliations, or leave little doubt where you are coming from like most people do.

The talking about Walls, American exceptionalism, US supremacy, pure bigotry, Islamophobia, non-existent Sharia laws in the US are also insulting to some people, although I don't point any individual out, but I'm just looking at this thread and some of the posts made so far in this thread.



[Edited on 2-6-2017 by JoeJustJoe]



NEVER BET WITH JIHADI JOE BECAUSE HE WILL WELCH ON HIS BET THEN LAUNCH INTO A DIATRIBE WHY YOU DID NOT WIN WHEN CLEARLY YOU DID!

HIS WRITING ABOVE IS GOBBLEDYGOOK HE CUTS AND PASTES FORM DIFFERENT PLACES TO MAKE HIM SEEM SMART WHEN IN FACT HE IS A DUMB FENCE SITTER.


Setting Sitters Straight ?

MrBillM - 2-6-2017 at 06:07 PM

OK, I got lost on the Sitters situation.

Clarification ?

".......what I don't like is fence sitters, or pretend sitters sitters........"

Silly Cliffy

Lobsterman - 2-7-2017 at 08:33 AM

Don't you know that this is a liberal site that does not handle another's view of the USA very well. I'm sure most do but some active posters above do not. It's either their way or the highway. There's only a little more than a handful that make a bad name IMO for this board. They badger, filthy name call, make up false facts about one or his family, etc., if you do not have a left-leaning position. That's just the way it is Cliffy, so live with it or bug out.

I've always wondered why this board is so far-left liberal with little acceptance for another's view point. But with the left's name calling, falsehoods and criminal acts against Trump, I guess it's just inherent in their political platform when they do not get their way. Sounds childish to me.

Myself I just laugh at them to myself for being so myopic and mean spirited which is counter I'm sure to their hypocritical view of being decent minded people. You mention Trump and the hairs on their necks bristle and their decency towards the debater fades quickly.

As for what I see happening in Baja when the current administration repatriates millions of criminal illegals back into Mexico can not be good. Add to that potentially millions of non-criminal illegals, self-repatriations, some kind of tax (NAFTA or stipends), and decreased foreign investment and you have a possible troubling situation brewing. I'm taking a pause on my fishing trip to BOLA this spring until I see how Baja fares with the new challenges they face.

Happy Deplorable Fisherman



Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy  
I guess that if one is not a Liberal, somewhat to the left of Bernie, then it is not worth having a civil conversation with.
I don't think I called anyone any names, I don't think I labeled anyone with any "deplorable" labels (pun intended) and yet I see a diatribe of such directed at me.
I specifically asked if anyone wanted a civil conversation. Those with other plans were, by request, not invited to the conversation. This is exactly why President Trump won the election. People are tired of this kind of behavior. To hold that those American citizens who vote in the flyover states are something less than qualified voters is somewhat disingenuous to say the least.
I guess in some circles only the Liberal Elite should be allowed to vote as they are obviously the only ones who know who should be elected.

Its really a sad case when one can't see the forest for the trees and realize they are what they abhor and how much of an ass they appear to the public that reads their postulations.

Over and out!






[Edited on 2-7-2017 by Lobsterman]

motoged - 2-7-2017 at 10:14 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Lobsterman  
Don't you know that this is a liberal site that does not handle another's view of the USA very well. ...... I'm taking a pause on my fishing trip to BOLA this spring until I see how Baja fares with the new challenges they face.

Happy Deplorable Fisherman
[Edited on 2-7-2017 by Lobsterman]


Boy oh boy....Mexican economy is going to take a huge hit with your upcoming absence :lol:

I nearly spit my coffee out when I saw the comment about Nomads being a liberal-minded forum...I sure don't see it that way, but if so, I am glad some light is shining through.

Outspoken lefties?

Let's be blunt, because the stakes demand it... what is preventing Trump from violating the US Constitution and illegally grabbing power? The President truly appears to be leading a master class in transforming the United States into a dictatorship. Trump -- and it's fair to assume it is by design -- has sought to undermine anyone or anything that tries to counter him.

First, Trump has made the media -- which is a watchdog of your presidents -- a focus of his attacks, calling them "dishonest," claiming they peddle "fake news" and even recently labeling them "the opposition party." The practical result is that when the citizenry and media call out Trump's lies and presents objective facts to counter him, his followers will likely dismiss the media reports and instead side with Trump.
Then Trump went after your intelligence agencies because he didn't agree with their views on Russia's involvement in your recent election. Trump lashed out, calling these agencies, charged with gathering information for our national security, "disgraceful" and accusing them of leaking information, comparing it to "something that N-zi Germany would have done."

Trump has clearly begun the process of destroying the credibility of critics ( eg. CIA, the judiciary) and the mainstream media so if they come forward in the future to oppose his views or offer facts to undermine his position, he will tell his followers they also aren't to be believed.
There's no doubt Trump supporters are very loyal to him personally. Keep in mind that Trump infamously bragged that he could even shoot a person on Fifth Avenue in New York and his supporters would still be on his side. And according to a CNN/ORC poll, while Trump has only a 44% approval rating overall, 90% of Republicans think he's doing a good job.

Trump's concerted attacks to delegitimize the media, your intelligence community and now your federal judiciary are evident. And it should be terrifying to every American who truly believes in your Constitution and in the promise that the USA once offered.

motoged - 2-7-2017 at 10:59 AM

Quote: Originally posted by paranewbi  
....

but with MOST of the voters (the 'master class') electing to kick out democrats in Congress and the Senate as well as Governorship's....


How does 3+ million votes more for Clinton equate to your faux "fact"?

chuckie - 2-7-2017 at 11:19 AM

About like electing Justin Trueducks in Canada? At least Trump is old enough to buy me a beer....Speaking of which ....

JoeJustJoe - 2-7-2017 at 11:28 AM

Quote: Originally posted by MrBillM  
OK, I got lost on the Sitters situation.

Clarification ?

".......what I don't like is fence sitters, or pretend sitters sitters........"


Weak trolling but I'm glad Gaylord, has made his way to this thread with comments, because Gaylord, who admits to be a long time conservative republican, and who I believe harbors the worse qualities of many ultra conservatives when it comes to issues like immigration, and social programs. ( I'm really trying to be nice here)

But even Gaylord, has turned his back on Trump during the campaign and he voted for Hillary! Gaylord, doesn't view Trump as a real republican, nor does he see Trump, being qualified to be President, and basically sees Trump as a con man, who is pulling the wool over the eyes of uniformed voters. ( trying to be nice again)

Free free to correct me Gaylord, including any grammar or spelling issues, you're anal-fixated over, because I don't want to put words in your mouth that aren't there.

But the main thing is even Gaylord, see Trump coming miles away, and Gaylord, isn't the only ultra conservative that has turned his back on Trump. The fact is most educated conservatives don't like Trump.

So it almost makes me laugh when I here things like "lets give Trump a chance." I have seen enough, he is total nutcase, and he is really dangerous, because he alone could start world war III.

Regarding Lobsterman's claim, that "Baja Nomad' is a liberal site. That's funny, "Baja Nomad" is full of older Americans, who grew up during the 60's hippy era, but along the way most have aged and turned a hard right, and are now very conservative, however, when it comes to Trump, many "BN" conservatives, and even ultra conservative voters, have turned their back on Trump, and think he is nothing but a thin-skinned con man who is out for only himself.





[Edited on 2-7-2017 by JoeJustJoe]

motoged - 2-7-2017 at 11:34 AM

Quote: Originally posted by chuckie  
About like electing Justin Trueducks in Canada? At least Trump is old enough to buy me a beer....Speaking of which ....



And out of the morning beer crawls Chuckie....don't let all the young guys scare ya.....they might have something valuable to say :light:

 Pages:  1