Quote: Originally posted by rts551 | just don't get it. David begs to be let back in to talk baja...but hates it. Paco does not use face book but likes Talk baja. You guys need toi
rename Baja Nomads to Baja Nominds.
David K you need to stop your preoccupation with me ..Its not healthy anD has me worried,,, how many guns do you own? i DID NOT BAN YOU . Ron
did and for good reason. wHEN ARE YOU GOING TO GET IT?
Nomad guru/DK disciples pls help this guy.
|
I've been around here a long time and have had many run-ins with DavidK. So, I am no "disciple".
But I've always felt that it was YOU who had the preoccupation with HIM. No question. He will cross swords with you when you provoke him, but it is
usually YOU who draws the sword first. And I have seen him extend many an olive branch to you, that you ignore.
Hey, David comments on far too many posts that he has little knowledge on. I have called him out on this before, here. It does no good, obviously. But
YOU just refuse to let him alone. Always challenging him, making sarcastic comments to him. It's a rare post of his, that you leave alone without some
snarky comment. Yes, often between the lines, that any regular here can pick up on.
So, you're a mod on Talk Baja? That figures. You treat him like a surly moderator without the power to delete his posts. Discredit, in lieu of
deletion of the post or the poster.
Maybe my favorite was him claiming that HWY 5 was still going to take years to complete and you were all over him about it; refuting his stats on how
fast it HAD been built and his predictions on how slow it would continue to go. Of course, either contention was completely unknowable. But you
wouldnt let up on him; just INSISTING that it would be done by now. His estimates have proven to be true. It's still probably a minimum of one year
away.
And now you have the audacity to put down the Nomads board as being a place deserving of types like David and others? If I was a mod, I would ban your
azz from here, immediately! Or, better yet, as you have suggested to others (vis a vis Talk Baja), since you have such a low opinion of Nomads,
terminate your own account. Why remain in a place so beneath you?
I am no great fan of DavidK, but you have no credibility, now, with me. Your motives are suspect, now that I realize you are a moderator on a
competing Baja website. You have a motive for stirring the pot with David and others; just to give Nomads (or NoMINDS, as you say) the bad image,
that you profess it has. Possibly just to send people packing to Talk Baja.
I am happy to spend ZERO time on Talk Baja if moderators delete potential information simply because it cant be independently verified by their
nebulous criteria. Especially something as dangerous as this current subject.
All because surfers "might" be engaging in a concerted effort to reduce crowds on their waves? That's a ridiculous reason to delete posts. That's
Orwellian. Where's the verification on THAT? Sure, it probably occurs but that's the cure worse than the disease.
And I am sure they are happy I am not there on Talk Baja. 'Cause I would call them on that crap. Win Win!
Besides, not all events that occur in the middle of the desert can be verified. And filing police reports or complaints in Mexico isnt usually
productive. JJJ is ALWAYS looking for verification like this, that rarely exists in Mexico. Not reality-based thinking. So, he discounts anything that
portrays Baja in a bad light.
From what I have seen over at TB, there IS a bias against anything bad being reported in Baja. Anyway, the whole Facebook organization of posts is
just so unorganized.
I agree with the Nomad administrator that virtually no post is deleted here, unless it was simply unrelated to Baja. He lets much go, especially
out-and-out attacks on others. The JJJ/"Elvis" wars are a good example. Warts are an inconvenience, but largely harmless.
I like the organization of boards like Nomads or Bloody Decks. Trip related posts go HERE, road condition reports go THERE.
Facebook's organization of posts is like a never-ending case of diarrhea. Finding something valuable in a stream like that is not easy, if it is a few
days or weeks old. Very messy. But very immediate, chronologically, no doubt.
Talk Baja is shooting itself in the foot on this one, IMO. Deleting "unverifiable" posts that portray Mexico in a bad light?
Bad news travels fast. Censorship is bad news. Why post in an environment like that? People who are discredited in that manner, wont return,
especially if the information is legit. People who read about the censorship happening, wont either. That's the way it should be.
Wouldn't one rather SEE important information like this and decide for one's self, if it is legit? Isn't that better than having a potential incident
swept under the rug and not be forewarned about this checkpoint? This checkpoint has been the worst one since the 90s, at least. The flim-flamming at
it, comes and goes. But it exists. Too many of us have experienced it. That's verification enough for most.
The truth will out. Let statements and posts stand. If they are untrue or simply an aberration, it will be borne out in time.
I'm sticking with Nomads. Still the most freedom. Still the most organized. Still the easiest to find info. Still works for people with attention
spans measured in hours and days, instead of nanoseconds.
Still the best. Warts and all.
[Edited on 8-21-2018 by Hook] |