thank you Dali Dali for so eloquently illustrating my point.
It's clear your definition of a Radical is anyone who is not a right wing trumpty dumpty,
. So your definition of a radical is one who has liberal views on immigration, views LGBT individuals as people , believes people are individuals
and should be treated as such, instead of classified and reacted to based on their skin color, doesn't like voter supression or colluding with
foreign countries to influence US elections.
we used to call those people patriots,
and the russia lovers were communist, white supremacists were N-zi sympathizers. when did that become "conservative"
but I guess you can label em anyway you want , comrade!
y Quote: Originally posted by DaliDali | Opinions are fine.....it's in the technique of how they are presented that defines who is rational and who is the radical.
And when the first words from a commenters fingers are "you're a racist, bigot, homophobic miscreant, orange hair loving fool, killer and torturer of
sport fish, brown skinned hater, legless "grifter", immigrant hater, fan of some dude named Alex Jones, fan of this hate site or that hate site....
and a jackbooted thug.....it's very likely a radical doing the key banging.
Radicals, as such, thrive off of how much controversy they can stir up.....in an attempt to upset the balance of how you think, what you think and why
you think it.
And dare you disagree with a radical, or even ask them to explain it all.....you're a gawd damn denier.
And as 4x4abc mentioned, rather than change minds, it only makes people dig in their heels deeper and deeper....out of defiance to being dissed by
this constant rage filled radical.
[Edited on 12-9-2018 by DaliDali] | |