BajaNomad - It Just Doesn't End !

It Just Doesn't End !

MrBillM - 11-15-2006 at 05:38 PM

How about that Sergio ? The Latest Hurricane off of the Pacific Coast of Mexico heading Northwest.

toneart - 11-15-2006 at 06:03 PM

Quick!

Somebody clue Senor Bush that there is no Santa Clause but there is global warming. Maybe there's time to get that fence up and stop Sergio at the border. :lol:

SERGIO

bajajudy - 11-15-2006 at 06:03 PM

He is a far away but Sergio is punching over 100kts of wind and may get stronger.
THEY say he wont come here(Baja) but what the heck do they know. THEY sure have been wrong a lot this year.

[Edited on 11-16-2006 by bajajudy]

comitan - 11-15-2006 at 06:23 PM

Breakup in a couple of days and go east onto the mainland giving Acapulco lots of rain.

Getting a Clue.

MrBillM - 11-17-2006 at 10:29 AM

Considering the fact that this Hurricane Season (Atlantic and Pacific) has been one of the milder ones and severe Hurricane seasons with events as late as December have occurred for hundreds of years prior to "The Global Warming" hysteria, Anyone who believes that this represents a PROOF of the Global Warming Phenomenom qualifies for an instant membership in ND's "Special-Ed" group of the learning disabled.

oxxo - 11-17-2006 at 10:34 AM

You are absolutely right Bill..........and smoking doesn't cause cancer either. :no:

Taco de Baja - 11-17-2006 at 12:06 PM

Global warming AND cooling have been going on for Billions of years. The real fact is that cooling and warming will happen with or without us and there is nothing we can do to change either one. IT IS NATURAL.

Another FACT to think about is that that it is really global COOLING that destroys societies. See: Roman Empire, Mayan Empire, Egyptian Empire, Anasazi, Vikings....Not to mention the "Dark Ages" in Europe which occurred during a COOLING period.

So, please stop with the prayers for global cooling, not that they will do any good. You will find it is much worse to live in a cooling world, look at history.

.

toneart - 11-17-2006 at 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
Considering the fact that this Hurricane Season (Atlantic and Pacific) has been one of the milder ones and severe Hurricane seasons with events as late as December have occurred for hundreds of years prior to "The Global Warming" hysteria, Anyone who believes that this represents a PROOF of the Global Warming Phenomenom qualifies for an instant membership in ND's "Special-Ed" group of the learning disabled.

Hey! I represent that! :bounce:

Mexitron - 11-17-2006 at 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Taco de Baja
Global warming AND cooling have been going on for Billions of years. The real fact is that cooling and warming will happen with or without us and there is nothing we can do to change either one. IT IS NATURAL.

Another FACT to think about is that that it is really global COOLING that destroys societies. See: Roman Empire, Mayan Empire, Egyptian Empire, Anasazi, Vikings....Not to mention the "Dark Ages" in Europe which occurred during a COOLING period.

So, please stop with the prayers for global cooling, not that they will do any good. You will find it is much worse to live in a cooling world, look at history.

.

Yah, sure, but when sea levels rose a few million years nobody was around to care. Now if the ocean rises a couple feet there's serious economic consequences. Whether its natural or man-made is relevant as to whether we can(or wish to) control it to some degree.

comitan - 11-17-2006 at 04:32 PM

Ok I go along with the warming and cooling for thousands of years, but I also think we are making contributions that are affecting it and possibly putting us over the edge. Who's to say? Mr.Bill (climate expert) :bounce:

[Edited on 11-17-2006 by comitan]

Taco de Baja - 11-17-2006 at 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mexitron

Yah, sure, but when sea levels rose a few million years nobody was around to care. Now if the ocean rises a couple feet there's serious economic consequences. Whether its natural or man-made is relevant as to whether we can(or wish to) control it to some degree.

You don't have to go back millions of years. During the period from 18,000 to 6,000 years ago, sea level rose close to 300 feet (works out to 0.8 cm per year or ~30 inches every 100 years)......That’s a lot of coastal flooding at a fast rate, and there were Humans around who were affected by this!

Sea level has continued to rise, just more slowly, over the last 6,000 years.

Ever see the National Geographic specials on the Greek and Roman ruins that are below water in the Mediterranean sea? Do you think they caused the water to rise? Maybe through their cooking fires :rolleyes:

??? And, what could have the Greeks and Romans done to stop the rising water?

There are in fact tens of thousands of archaeological sites that are under water on all the coasts of the world, including Baja and California. They may not be as spectacular and the Greek and Roman cities, but they were villages that were inundated none the less. And there was nothing the early humans did to cause the rising water and nothting they could have done to stop it... It's NATURAL.

Besides, Mexitron, you don't live near the coast anymore, so why should you care about sealevel MAYBE rising 1 to 2 cm over the next 50 years?

Oxxo's Right !

MrBillM - 11-18-2006 at 10:07 AM

Although I suspect that Oxxo's comment to the effect that "Smoking Cigarettes doesn't Cause Cancer, he or she is Correct !

Although smoking is a contributing factor (perhaps the greatest), the FACT that some people smoke on a regular basis for 50 or more years before dying a natural death while others die of Lung Cancer without having been exposed to any of the usual risk factors, indicates that there isn't a pure causal relationship. It's just one piece of the puzzle along with genetic makeup and environment.

As far as Commitan assigning to me the title of Climate Expert, I am merely repeating KNOWN FACTS from a historical perspective. Argue with those FACTS if you'd like. Overblown Hyperbole ("The Sky is Falling") does more to discredit your viewpoint than anything else.

You can Think all you wish to that the Industrial World is having a significant effect on the Current Warming regime. Some people think that they are Jesus. No harm in that, but thus far there is NO scientific PROOF that such is the case.

Lastly, The Kyoto Kooks who condemn the U.S. for not supporting their Chicken Little crusade ignore the fact that any agreement which allows China, India and other Asian countries to opt out will have no significant environmental result and will simply put us at an economic disadvantage.

Mexitron - 11-18-2006 at 11:11 AM

Taco--I have no conclusion as to why the ocean is rising, but its important to study why it is and if man has anything to do with it. If we do then perhaps we can change course to effect it--more nukes and less Iraqi oil for instance. That said, the broader brush is that regardless of natural or man-made there's a lot more at stake than there was 6,000 years ago--you're talking about putting levees around major cities like Long island or abandoning them, not moving your teepee inland a few hundred yards. We'll survive either way I'm sure but the economic shift could be substantial if we are in an accelerated event. (Geez, at least we're employing some scientists by studying it and probably learning a lot about how the ocean/atmosphere works as a side benefit.)

toneart - 11-18-2006 at 05:34 PM

There is plenty of evidence that global warming is occuring at this point in time; polar caps melting; sea level rising; destructive climate changes, etc. The water in Sea of Cortez was warmer than anytime since records have been kept. It has attracted hurricanes more often, caused more destruction (in Mulege) and are still occuring, way later than normal.

None of this is "proof" that man is causing it, but there is scientific evidence that man puts harmful agents into the atmosphere, destroying the ozone layer and that this could have an altering effect on our climate. The fact that this is occuring does not refute the fact that there have been warming and cooling cycles througout the history of the world.

I hate it when this issue becomes politicized. Those in power have the ability to do what they can to halt the harm that man causes. We have to do what we can do.

Chicken Little ran up to Ozzie Ostrich who was standing by the side of the road. He was flapping his wings and screeching, "the sky if falling, the sky is falling". Well, Ozzie was in the exotic feather business and humans came from miles around to be tickled and adourned. "Shhhh=h-h-h!" shushed the ostrich. You are scaring away business. He didn't much care for chickens anyway and so he plopped his head into the sand. Well......neither of these birdbrains saw the semi coming down the road towards them. Kids, I'm sorry I made you cry, but that's the end of the story. On that very day their sky did fall and it was very bad for business.

Yada, Yada, Yada

MrBillM - 11-19-2006 at 09:58 AM

IF and When, The Kyoto Kooks can come up with an argreement (which can be enforced) that includes China, India and Southeast Asian Countries which are currently exempt, Then there can be a discussion of the current proposals and their merits. It is the height of naivete to think that the U.S. population would accept measures which would create potential Economic disaster for America.

sigh

k1w1 - 11-19-2006 at 10:20 AM

so many idiot rednecks, so little Baja.

(hows about the guy talking of roman cooking fires vs industrial revolution!?? hahahahahahahahahahahaaha)

Summanus - 11-19-2006 at 10:25 AM

think....... 4.4 billion years of ....Volcanos :smug:

oxxo - 11-19-2006 at 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM

Although smoking is a contributing factor (perhaps the greatest), the FACT that some people smoke on a regular basis for 50 or more years before dying a natural death while others die of Lung Cancer without having been exposed to any of the usual risk factors, indicates that there isn't a pure causal relationship. It's just one piece of the puzzle along with genetic makeup and environment.

As far as Commitan assigning to me the title of Climate Expert, I am merely repeating KNOWN FACTS from a historical perspective.

MrBillM you are priceless! Doing a little trolling, huh? Must be a little slow out at the campo today? I am beginning to appreciate your satirical sense of humor. Only an idiot would take your comments seriously.

:lol:

By the way, I will be in San Felipe this Friday, look for me. Oh wait, you don't even know my gender. Just look for the bumper sticker that says, "Some village in Texas has lost their idiot" right next to the one that says, "W/04"

Mexitron - 11-19-2006 at 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Summanus
think....... 4.4 billion years of ....Volcanos :smug:

We're talking about the gases put out by man in addition to 4.4 billion years of volcanos and fires.

Taco de Baja - 11-19-2006 at 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mexitron

Quote:

Originally posted by Summanus
think....... 4.4 billion years of ....Volcanos :smug:

We're talking about the gases put out by man in addition to 4.4 billion years of volcanos and fires.

Don't forget gases put out by plants.....

Taco de Baja - 11-19-2006 at 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by toneart
There is plenty of evidence that global warming is occuring at this point in time; polar caps melting; sea level rising; destructive climate changes, etc. The water in Sea of Cortez was warmer than anytime since records have been kept. It has attracted hurricanes more often, caused more destruction (in Mulege) and are still occuring, way later than normal.

So what caused the earliest snow falls in both New York and Colorado this year??? Global warming???? :lol:

Plenty of places on the Earth are cooling, including Antarctica. You just don't hear about them much because it does not fit the catastrophic warming that the fear mongers are currently trying to ram down our throats.

oxxo - 11-19-2006 at 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Taco de Baja
So what caused the earliest snow falls in both New York and Colorado this year??? Global warming???? :lol:

Yes, that is correct

Quote:

Plenty of places on the Earth are cooling, including Antarctica.

Please give me a specific reference to this bit of information. And Rush Limbaugh does not count.

toneart - 11-19-2006 at 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Taco de Baja

Quote:

So what caused the earliest snow falls in both New York and Colorado this year??? Global warming???? :lol:

Names and labels....typical. It is doubtful the (political) climate has changed in Orange County, CA since the stone age. Sir! When one only quotes that portion which suits his personal purpose, he exposes the shortcomings of his greater political agenda. Nice going, John Wayne!

[Edited on 11-20-2006 by toneart]

toneart - 11-20-2006 at 12:23 AM

Sergio is a wimp!. Rush Limbo was right. This is absolute proof that global warming isn't happening. What a revelation! I'm having a religious experience. Oh oh..... I think I'm still a fear monger. Jeez...I think I'm going to f-f-f-fr-freeze.

Mexitron - 11-20-2006 at 08:28 AM

Taco-you're joking I hope--you know that specific events like early snowfalls or heat waves in any particular year don't mean squat to the global average temperature.

And plant gases--correct me if I'm wrong but even after accounting for the CO2 emitted by plants in their respiratory "dark photosynthesis" phase they still have a slight net gain in O2 production and absorbtion of CO2. That and the CO2 which is temporarily locked up in the plant's biomass(or semi-permanently if the biomass is used for building construction or put in an anaerobic landfill).

Taco de Baja - 11-20-2006 at 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mexitron
Taco-you're joking I hope--you know that specific events like early snowfalls or heat waves in any particular year don't mean squat to the global average temperature.

Yes, I am being a devils advocate, but when someone says "the SOC (or, insert location on the planet here_____) is the warmest it has ever been since records have been kept" and they WRONGLY believe it is because of global warming...they are showing their ignorance about the whole global warming theory. And they need some additional counter points to look at. Such as some area receiving the earliest snows on record, the largest snow storm ever, the coldest day ever seen since 1652….

Global warming is not about an area being 10 degrees warmer (or cooler) in a year. It is fractions of a degree Celsius over decades; same with sea surface temps...fractions of a degree over decades.

And as with ANY graph showing temperatures, you can make them say anything you want, depending on the start and end dates you choose, and the all important scale.

Taco de Baja - 11-20-2006 at 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by oxxo

Quote:

Originally posted by Taco de Baja

Plenty of places on the Earth are cooling, including Antarctica.

Please give me a specific reference to this bit of information. And Rush Limbaugh does not count.

Here is a temperature graph from New Mexico, looks like COOLING to me

And yes, I know, graphs can be used to "prove" anything...do you kow that.... :rolleyes:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A longer period of temps from the Swiss Alps showing we are still below temps during the Medeival Warm Period (AD800-1300)

Mangini, A., Spotl, C. and Verdes, P. 2005. Reconstruction of temperature in the Central Alps during the past 2000 yr from a O-18 stalagmite record. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 235: 741-751.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Antarctica info (just one article in a respected science journal, and not the Limblow Letter). I highlighted the key points and conclusion for you since the science is quite technical:

Van de Berg, W.J., van den Broeke, M.R., Reijmer, C.H. and van Meijgaard, E. 2006. Reassessment of the Antarctic surface mass balance using calibrated output of a regional atmospheric climate model. Journal of Geophysical Research 111: 10.1029/2005JD006495.

What was done
Results of model-simulated Antarctic surface mass balance (SMB) - derived from a regional atmospheric climate model (RACMO2/ANT) for the time period 1980 to 2004 that used ERA-40 fields as lateral forcings - were compared with "all available SMB observations [our italics] from Antarctica (N=1900)" in a recalibration process that ultimately allowed the authors "to construct a best estimate of contemporary Antarctic SMB." The many real-world observations employed in this process came from the studies of Vaughan et al. (1999), Van den Broeke et al. (1999), Frezzotti et al. (2004), Karlof et al. (2000), Kaspari et al. (2004), Magand et al. (2004), Oerter et al. (1999, 2000), Smith et al. (2002) and Turner et al. (2002). Derived by a number of different measurement techniques - such as stake arrays, bomb horizons and chemical analyses of ice cores - the various observations covered time periods that ranged from a few years to more than a century.

What was learned
Van de Berg et al. report that "the SMB integrated over the grounded ice sheet (171 ± 3 mm year-1) exceeds previous estimates by as much as 15%." The largest differences between their results and those of others, according to them, are "up to 1 m year-1 higher in the coastal zones of East and West Antarctica, which are without exception in areas with few observations."

What it means
Because of their blending of climate modeling with the employment of massive amounts of real-world data to constrain the results, the four Dutch researchers rightly conclude that their "new estimate of Antarctic SMB is as reliable as the reliability that is credited to atmospheric models." Hence, they further conclude that "support or falsification of this result can only be found in new SMB observations from poorly covered high accumulation regions in coastal Antarctica," which is indeed reasonable. Until such time as new data might indicate otherwise, therefore, we have no reason to believe anything different from what they have concluded, i.e., that the mass of Antarctica's grounded ice sheet has been steadily growing over the past quarter-century.

References
Frezzotti, M., Pourchet, M., Flora, O., Gandolfi, S., Gay, M., Urbini, S., Vincent, C., Becagli, S., Gragnani, R., Proposito, M., Severi, M., Traversi, R., Udisti, R. and Fily, M. 2004. New estimations of precipitation and surface sublimation in East Antarctica from snow accumulation measurements. Climate Dynamics 23: 803-813.

Karlof, L., Winther, J.-G., Isaksson, E., Kohler, J., Pinglot, J. F., Wilhelms, F., Hansson, M., Holmlund, P., Nyman, M., Pettersson, R., Stenberg, M., Thomassen, M. P. A., van der Veen, C. and van de Wal, R. S. W. 2000. A 1500-year record of accumulation at Amundsenisen western Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, derived from electrical and radioactive measurements on a 120-m ice core. Journal of Geophysical Research 105: 12,471-12,483.

Kaspari, S., Mayewski, P.A., Dixon, D.A., Spikes, V.B., Sneed, S.B., Handley, M.J. and Hamilton, G.S. 2004. Climate variability in West Antarctica derived from annual accumulation rate records from ITASE firn/ice cores. Annals of Glaciology 39: 585-594.

Magand, O., Frezzotti, M., Pourchet, M., Stenni, B., Genoni, L. and Fily, M. 2004. Climate variability along latitudinal and longitudinal transects in East Antarctica. Annals of Glaciology 39: 351-358.

Oerter, H., Graf, W., Wilhelms, F., Minikin, A. and Miller, H. 1999. Accumulation studies on Amundsenisen, Droning Maud Land, by means of tritium, dielectric profiling and stable-isotope measurements: First results from the 1995-96 and 1996-97 field seasons. Annals of Glaciology 29: 1-9.

Oerter, H., Wilhelms, F., Jung-Rothenhausler, F., Goktas, F., Miller, H., Graf, W. and Sommer, S. 2000. Accumulation rates in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, as revealed by dielectric-profiling measurements of shallow firn cores. Annals of Glaciology 30: 27-34.

Smith, B.T., van Ommen, T.D. and Morgan, V.I. 2002. Distribution of oxygen isotope ratios and snow accumulation rates in Wilhelm II Land, East Antarctica. Annals of Glaciology 35: 107-110.

Turner, J., Lachlan-Cope, T.A., Marshall, G.J., Morris, E.M., Mulvaney, R. and Winter, W. 2002. Spatial variability of Antarctic Peninsula net surface mass balance. Journal of Geophysical Research 107: 10.1029/JD000755.

Van den Broeke, M.R., Winther, J.-G., Isaksson, E., Pinglot, J.F., Karlof, L., Eiken, T. and Conrads, L. 1999. Climate variables along a traverse line in Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Journal of Glaciology 45: 295-302.

Vaughan, D.G., Bamber, J.L., Giovinetto, M. and Cooper, A.P.R. 1999. Reassessment of net surface mass balance in Antarctica. Journal of Climate 12: 933-946.

Source: co2science.org

[Edited on 11-20-2006 by Taco de Baja]

Liberals and Other marooons

MrBillM - 11-20-2006 at 09:56 AM

Given that there is no hope of expecting rational thought from any Liberal which conflicts with the tenets of their animistic "religion", further attempts in this context are hopeless.

However, we can take comfort in Knowing that Our line of thought Will prevail over their mix of junk science and cult devotion. Fortunately, economic considerations will guarantee that their skewed view is Never adopted and they'll be relegated to the Whiners corner for the rest of their lives, sulking and miserable because their "Mother" Earth is being defiled by the Barbarians of extravagant consumption.

Let's really Tick them off and go out and buy lots more toys, including SUVs and Trucks with Big engines. It gives them apoplexy.

TROLL ALERT!

oxxo - 11-20-2006 at 10:07 AM

MrBillM is trolling as usual.

Oxxo

MrBillM - 11-20-2006 at 03:40 PM

No need to let me know when you're in San Felipe or thereabouts. I have no desire to meet you. I run into people like you whenever I'm out and about in town. Thanks for the warning, though. IF I were to see a vehicle with that bumper sticker, I would assume that the villager is the one behind the wheel and, no doubt, be correct.

You still have not cleared things up with me. Are you Male or Female ? I wouldn't want to insult the wrong gender. Maybe you would be Oxxa if female ?

comitan - 11-20-2006 at 03:59 PM

You can argue about this for weeks, months. I think the real issue is The world as we know it could be at stake. Don't you think the sane thing to do, would be to do something to cut down on the pollution, no matter what the cost because once the damage is done there's no turning back.

BajaWarrior - 11-20-2006 at 05:04 PM

It's November 20th, it is hot as Hades outside, must be that Global Warming kicking in, right?

Hot Air

MrBillM - 11-21-2006 at 10:03 AM

When I got up this a.m., it was five degrees cooler than the day before. Does this mean we're turning the corner on Global Warming ?

One question I'd like to ask oxxo and the other ******* ******* Nomads is: "What sort of vehicle do you drive to Baja". Since the Global Warming issue is SO important that we should do Whatever is necessary no matter WHAT the Cost, to be true and consistent in their values they should be driving Hybrid MiniVans with Solar Panels on the roof and engines that run on recycled Cooking Oil. Be true to your own selves. Anything to help at Whatever the cost.

Besides, it'll leave more room and supplies at the gas pumps for my 360 cid gas Dodge trucks.

[Edited on 11-21-2006 by BajaNomad]

comitan - 11-21-2006 at 11:34 AM

Dodge trucks, yes that tells us a lot about you. :lol:

Hook - 11-21-2006 at 11:46 AM

Power down your computers and monitors and END THIS THREAD.

It will help reduce global warming. :lol:

BajaNomad - 11-21-2006 at 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
engines that run on recycled Cooking Oil...

...360 cid gas Dodge trucks.

Hey, if they were diesel, we could make that cooking oil connection for you somehow...

http://www.greasecar.com/profile.cfm?profileID=87

pendejo

k1w1 - 11-21-2006 at 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
Besides, it'll leave more room and supplies at the gas pumps for my 360 cid gas Dodge trucks.

haha CLASSIC! don't forget the gun racks bubba. "get 'er done" tehehe

ps 4 cyl Toyota (forget that 'merican garbage)

[Edited on 11-21-2006 by k1w1]

[Edited on 11-21-2006 by k1w1]

Bruce R Leech - 11-21-2006 at 04:13 PM

It Just Doesn't End !

this thread is sure named right

Pendejo ?

MrBillM - 11-21-2006 at 04:14 PM

Well, that's certainly uncivil, if not unexpected. I thought you guys (Kiwis) were extinct. Too bad.

Thanks for using less Gas so I'll have more.

I'm just trying to do my part for the Mexican economy. BOTH of my Dodge Trucks were built in Mexico. No gun racks, though. California is so pick-picky about carrying guns in the cab, that I quit doing it long ago. It just wasn't the same hanging the contractor's levels on the rack. Nowadays (en El Norte), it's just usually one of my Colt M1911s or my Browning Hi-Power under the seat.

Boy, has this thread strayed. Sergio's long gone.

[Edited on 11-21-2006 by MrBillM]

Bruce R Leech - 11-21-2006 at 04:17 PM

what hapened to Hurricane SERGIO? :?:

otra vez!!

k1w1 - 11-21-2006 at 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
I thought you guys (Kiwis) were extinct. Too bad.

[Edited on 11-21-2006 by MrBillM]

the gift that keeps on giving! tehe you really are so wordly (not!)
check the username ... it's not k-i-w-i. California bubba.
And ask all your mexican amigos (yea right) the meanings of pendejo (it's not only the nasty version = a-hole ... it's also (as in this application ... 'suckeeer')) that's for free this time. out. lates

oxxo - 11-21-2006 at 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM
No need to let me know when you're in San Felipe or thereabouts. I have no desire to meet you.

That's the old Baja Nomad spirit! I think we would get along splendidly. "Los Dos Pendejo(a)s"

:lol:

comitan - 11-21-2006 at 06:05 PM

DK

Is going to be our moderator for a few days, my guess is he's going to charge for viewing this thread, posting for free. Hope it isn't too much I'd sure miss BillM's Pendejo replies.

Taco de Baja - 11-22-2006 at 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bruce R Leech
what hapened to Hurricane SERGIO? :?:

It got too hot, and he left.

Ad Nauseam

MrBillM - 11-22-2006 at 10:01 AM

Well, Doofus, I Was aware that Your k1w1 was not kiwi. I'm not as dumb as the vast majority of Looney Leftie Pendejos (speaking at your level), but I simply assumed that it was some kind of cute inside joke known only to you and other MDSOs.

I'm especially glad that my replies provide educational and entertainment value. If nothing else, they illustrate that Some of us Do have a command of the written word. Aside from that, who cares what your opinion of anything is ? Certainly not me, although some of your more illiterate musings do provide lighter moments.

A - M - F

toneart - 11-22-2006 at 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBillM

Some of us Do have a command of the written word. Aside from that, who cares what your opinion of anything is ? Certainly not me,
A - M - F

I guess that says it all. "Some of us" do care what others' opinions are (even if we don't agree). That's why we read and participate on BajaNomad. Otherwise we bloviate for our own, solitary entertainment and self-validation. :wow:

David K - 11-22-2006 at 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by comitan
DK

Is going to be our moderator for a few days, my guess is he's going to charge for viewing this thread, posting for free. Hope it isn't too much I'd sure miss BillM's Pendejo replies.

Hose A has the job covering for Doug... Charging? Nope, and my stickers are still free! :tumble:

Valued Opinions

MrBillM - 11-22-2006 at 05:06 PM

Believe me,(Tuneart, Commitan, oxxa, Pendejo [k1w1]) I'm not giving you contempt freely for illogical and irrelevent opinions.
You have earned it with repeated Leftie nonsense.

Trolling, Trolling Trolling

oxxo - 11-22-2006 at 06:04 PM

Things must be REALLY slow at the ol' campo today! Looks like some of us REALLY get under your skin!

:lol:

Healthy Epidermis

MrBillM - 11-23-2006 at 10:09 AM

No problem there.

I'm here because I enjoy the banter. It's fun to dabble with dolts.

As far as your concern over a slow day, I've found those to be the best kind. Right now, It is a pretty normal day in the campo. The Sky is Clear, the Sun warm and the wind Calm. Most people seem to be up and around, doing whatever they do. Many of the residents have family and friends down for the Holiday. Many don't. The crowd of Touristas on the beach are pretty quiet, but that will change as the day goes on. They were a little rowdy last night, but it quieted around 2200. My plans for the day are pretty much the same as yesterday and day before, although we do have a turkey (no, not a Liberal) in the oven and plan to visit with some neighbors in the evening. Other than that, after my a.m. Internet browsing and Bill-Paying, I plan to do a few maintenance items, maybe go for a drive on the beach and let the dogs run and swim, stop at the cantina for a Cerveza, soak up some warm Sun and be happy I'm in Baja and Retired with no appointments or committments to keep.

Yeh, it IS a slow day and that's good.