BajaNomad

Loreto Bay

 Pages:  1  

edinnopolo - 9-27-2007 at 11:47 AM

Apparently nobody paid any attention to my post in Loreto Construction about Loreto Bay being finished by popular rumour.
Well, just got the info. that the homeowners have been notified that LB is "NO"" more and Citigroup has taken over. According to my info. they will complete the already sold homes.
Of course one of the big questions is going to be what will be done about the beach club and amenities, which were included in the purchase price, as I understand.

edinnopolo - 9-27-2007 at 11:53 AM

Also, supposedly in the letter to the owners, Air Alaska's contract with Loreto's Airport is up in 3 months and will not be renewed. OUCH !!!:o:o:?::?:

jerry - 9-27-2007 at 12:15 PM

is this for real?? why would citigroup be telling LB home owners about alaska airs intention??

edinnopolo - 9-27-2007 at 12:47 PM

Jerry,
Just relaying the info. I received from friends in town. Real Estate people. For the rest, I know as much as you do. But, like you know, always lots of substance to those kind of tales.:P:o:O

vandenberg - 9-27-2007 at 12:51 PM

:?::?::?:Loreto in mourning.:?::?::?::biggrin:

oldhippie - 9-27-2007 at 01:00 PM

Ed, I read your earlier post and thought it was a joke. If it's true, oh happy days!!! I've read they have sold 750 units, far cry from the 5000 King Butterbrains was planning.

Please let it be true, I can't wait to find out what scam those liars were trying to pull off.

oldhippie - 9-27-2007 at 01:02 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by jerry
is this for real?? why would citigroup be telling LB home owners about alaska airs intention??


Loreto Bay was subsidizing Alaska airlines flights.

jerry - 9-27-2007 at 01:09 PM

it said alaskas contract with loreto Airport is up and will not be renewded doesnt say its contract with LB is up??

bajajudy - 9-27-2007 at 01:09 PM

Where does this leave the people who have bought there?
Is citigroup only going to finish the homes already started? No plans to complete the project?
I am sorry for the people who bought there if they are hung out to dry.

Bajaboy - 9-27-2007 at 01:11 PM

ALASKA AIRLINES FILES TO SERVE LORETO, MEXICO IN PARTNERSHIP
WITH LEADING DEVELOPER LORETO BAY COMPANY

SEATTLE (October 19, 2004) — Alaska Airlines today announced it has applied for authority to provide nonstop service from Los Angeles to Loreto, Mexico. The service will be supported by a marketing partnership with The Loreto Bay Company. The twice-weekly flights will begin February 17, 2005, pending U.S. Department of Transportation approval.

Located on the Sea of Cortez side of Mexico’s Baja Peninsula about 150 miles north of La Paz, Loreto is one of five areas (the others being Cancun, Cabo San Lucas, Huatulco and Ixtapa) identified by FONATUR, Mexico's tourist development agency, as prime tourism growth sites in Mexico. FONATUR selected The Loreto Bay Company as the primary developer of the destination.

“We are pleased to be partnering with The Loreto Bay Company to develop air service to Loreto in conjunction with the resort’s development,” said Gregg Saretsky, Alaska's executive vice president of marketing and planning. “Our customers will be able to enjoy the warmth and uniqueness of a charming Mexico resort within same-day service from California, the Pacific Northwest, Alaska and western Canada.”

Loreto is a seaside village sandwiched between the Sierra de la Giganta Mountains and the cobalt blue Sea of Cortez. Steeped in colonial history as the site of Mexico’s first mission, Loreto is renowned for its marina, fishing, water sports, pristine beaches and authentic cuisine.

The proposed flights will operate Sundays and Thursdays. They will depart Los Angeles at 11:10 a.m. and arrive in Loreto at 1:59 p.m. Return flights will depart Loreto at 4:00 p.m. and arrive in Los Angeles at 4:55 p.m. Alaska plans to use MD-80 series aircraft on the route--seating 12 in first class and 128 in the main cabin.

Loreto will be Alaska Airlines’ eighth destination in Mexico. Alaska currently serves Mazatlan, Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Manzanillo/Costa Alegre, Cancun and Guadalajara. Alaska Airlines Vacations plans to offer a complete range of vacation packages to Loreto.

Alaska and its sister carrier, Horizon Air, together serve more than 80 cities in Alaska, the Lower 48, Canada and Mexico. Upon government approval, reservations and vacations to Loreto may be found at www.alaskaair.com. For more news and information, visit the Alaska Airlines Newsroom on the Internet at http://newsroom.alaskaair.com.

The Loreto Bay Company, a Canadian American corporation headquartered in Scottsdale Arizona, is developing The Villages of Loreto Bay, a series of seaside villages built on 8,000 acres in the foothills near Loreto. For more news and information visit www.loretobay.com.

oldhippie - 9-27-2007 at 01:13 PM

Notice that the broker license (CO547643000) status is inactive:

http://services.azre.gov/publicdatabase/DetailEntity.aspx?Id...

The broker at the address is: Edwin J. Ricketts

http://www.loretobay.com/cms/page1724.cfm

Bajaboy - 9-27-2007 at 01:14 PM

Tuesday, July 31st, 2007
Horizon Air wants to fly south of the border
Posted by John Gillie @ 05:22:22 pm

Sea-Tac-based Horizon Air has applied to the Mexican government for its first route to Mexico.

The regional airline has asked permission to fly between Los Angeles and Loreto on the Baja Peninsula.

Horizon is contemplating flying the route using its Bombardier CRJ-70 jets, said Horizon spokeswoman Jen Boyer.

Horizon's sister airliner, Alaska Airlines, pioneered the route from LA to the small Mexican town on the Gulf of Cortes. Under a plan Horizon is considering, it would fly its 70-seat jets to Loreto on days when demand is too light for Alaska's 737s.

Meanwhile, the federal Department of Transportation has issued Alaska Airlines a certificate of convenience to carry passengers and cargo to and from American Samoa.

Don't count on buying an Alaska ticket soon to the far South Seas. Alaska was among 20 airlines granted that permission.

http://blogs.thenewstribune.com/business/2007/07/31/horizon_...

Hook - 9-27-2007 at 01:15 PM

WOW...........if true, this is HUGE!!!! The ripples on the Baja real estate pond could be significant.

jerry - 9-27-2007 at 01:21 PM

thanks for the info Bajaboy

rhintransit - 9-27-2007 at 02:23 PM

thanks for the info. can this really be true? so soon I mean? amazing. another great notion...the old Mexican way.

anybody tell CaptMike about this? quote: "I really don't understand all the expats complaining about this project when as far as i can tell no one b-tching has lost any money yet as a direct result of buying a home there." maybe none of the Cassandras of the Nomad board has lost money, but we have compassion for those taken in by the real sharks of Baja.

vandenberg - 9-27-2007 at 02:59 PM

Just got a hold of a copy of the letter to the homeowners.
Mainly in typical bullsh#t Loreto Bay speak. Butterfly, the " hands on " sustainable garbage sprouter, is no more. Probably off to his next failure, to add to his accomplishments, with his common condo complex, which "adorns" Victoria harbor the highlight.
The other hotshots are now absorbed in the big one, Citigroup, to spout some more of their nonsense to the gullible..One of my Loreto Friends is supposed to post the complete letter.
So, more to come.:no::no:
Don't forget, you heard it here first folks.:P:P:P

Loreto Bay latest news

Petunia - 9-27-2007 at 03:42 PM

Just received from a friend: letter send to all homeowner/investor of Loreto Bay. I will not copy the intire text, a lot of Blah! Blah! but send the most interesting parts.

Sept 24, 2007

A series of recent developments have taken place within Loretp Bay Company that we would like to share with each of you, as valued home owners.

Changes made along the way have been intended to best serve individuals, like you, who have made substantial investments in, and remain dedicated to, our community's vision for the future.

In order to achieve those goals and accomodate appropriate development timelines, Loreto Bay's current partner, Citygroup Property Investor, has made a commitment to become the majority owner in the project and, in turn, will provide the capital and resources needed to successfully develop Loreto Bay. CPI clearly is poised to support the long term vision for Loreto Bay, and remains dedicated to the project, as well as its clear commitment to sustainable development.

In addition to announcing CPI's commitment to assume an expanded role in the project, we would like to share news concerning the company's executive management team. While he will remain a consultant to the company, David Butterfield will be stepping down as a "hand on" chairman. David's vision has been an important driving force behind Loreto Bay and he will continue to play a valuable role moving forward. Jim Grogan and Tom Nolan have agreed to remain on board and continue to work with CPI on a variety of key initiative. In addition to working diligently, Jim and Tom will be working closely with CPI to bring long envisioned community amenities to fruition, and further refine plans for the community future phases, while also helping to ensure our commitment to sustainable development is consistantly maintain.

Finally, in addition to the duties outlined above, Jim Grogan will also serve as interim president of Loreto Bay's costum home division.

Peter Wardle will pursued other opportunities outside the company.

In the coming days, many of you will receive additional correspondence from specific department within the Company that will provide further detail concerning Costum Homes, Village Homes and other areas with which you may be directly involved. In the meantime, if you should have any questions concerning the information provided in this letter, please contact Jim Grogan in our Scottdale office.

We appreciate your continued support of Loreto Bay and look forward to sharing many years of future success.

Sincerely
Loreto Bay Company

OK! CPI is left holding the bag! Now we just have to wait to see how this will effect Loreto.

Petunia

oldhippie - 9-27-2007 at 03:55 PM

The plot thickens:

SDE Business Partnering to Provide MRO Services for Loreto Bay Sustainable Development Project

http://tinyurl.com/2fc2ke

Minnow - 9-27-2007 at 04:02 PM

The flags go up when you see citygroup. Defiantly a play on Citigroup. Intended to deceive potential investors.

backninedan - 9-27-2007 at 04:12 PM

Very interesting are the sound alike companies of "Citigroup" and the actual buyer "Citygroup." Time to google citygroup to find out just who they are.

Roberto - 9-27-2007 at 04:13 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Minnow
The flags go up when you see citygroup. Defiantly a play on Citigroup. Intended to deceive potential investors.


Or, a typo.

bajalou - 9-27-2007 at 04:13 PM

might be a typo - there are several in the post.

A month or two ago there were posts regarding CitiGroup investing there.

[Edited on 9-27-2007 by bajalou]

backninedan - 9-27-2007 at 04:16 PM

I think you may be right Lou. They list the company as CPI and that is Citigroup.

Minnow - 9-27-2007 at 04:19 PM

I believe I have seen it spelled that way before in LB's sales literature.

tripledigitken - 9-27-2007 at 04:25 PM

If this is such a great development I wonder why the owners have bailed out?

Could be the lack of water, power, etc. that many here have been writing about. I would venture to say that the most money to be made here has been made, and those with it have moved on to someplace else. Surprize, surprize!

Someone want to buy a $400,000 condo, with no golf course, marina, disco's, outlet malls, and Hummer rentals? "By the way that equity loan you wanted for that Mexican second home, is now 9% and you can only qualify for $175,000."

It's going to be interesting to see what happens next.

Ken

Al G - 9-27-2007 at 04:27 PM

You are right Minnow...any company that that finds it necessary to use a name Knock-off is already committed to deception.
That was not the main reason in this case...only the next step to break all promises and have deniable. look people we are new company and we will screw you in the back door
It would surprise me if any of you believe they would do anything they promised...a desal plant...:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
They saw a way to screw the community and took it. Say good-bye to you water Loreto...

Minnow - 9-27-2007 at 04:30 PM

:lol::lol:Ken, One only needed to take a trip to Puerto Escondido to see what is going to happen next. I wonder if LB took prospective clients there before they bought. :lol::lol:

I will lay dollars to donuts that in 5 years you will be able to pick up one of those houses for less than half of what the first owner bought it for.

Roberto - 9-27-2007 at 04:31 PM

Guys, before you go off the deep end with this Citygroup thing, check this:

http://www.loretobay.com/cms/page1236.cfm

and

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=citigroup+property+...

It's a typo (and not the only one) in the reproduced letter above.

[Edited on 9-27-2007 by Roberto]

Minnow - 9-27-2007 at 04:47 PM

Roberto, I have never seen a typo on any of my citigroup statements. :lol: They are always professional, and I know who to call it I have a problem. Besides, they can throw all the money at it they want. Ain't gonna happen. You have been there?:lol:

I am speaking from a purely financial perspective. Throw in the old hippies, and that is a completely different can of worms.

[Edited on 27-9-2007 by Minnow]

bajalou - 9-27-2007 at 04:51 PM

Looks like the poster's typo, not CitiGroup's

Minnow - 9-27-2007 at 04:58 PM

Lou, Petunia must be OldHippies' evil twin.:lol:

Petunia - 9-27-2007 at 04:59 PM

Sorry, boys! it is a typo! My fault! The letter say "Citigroup Property Investor" . Typing too fast, I guess

tripledigitken - 9-27-2007 at 05:04 PM

With all due respect Roberto, does anything in that glossy brochure from LB, make you feel this project has more of a chance of success now?

The part that says that Citigroup has committed $50 billion over 10 years to address global warming should be enough for any investor of Citigroup to sell stock or short it. (Unless that means they are going to retrofit the LB homes on poles ala South Carolina.):lol::lol::lol::lol:

Frankly all their published sales brochures have turned me off from the begining. IMHO Loreto will never be another Cabo or Cancun.

And yes Minnow some deals will be had for those first houses.

Ken

Al G - 9-27-2007 at 05:12 PM

Roberto...that changes nothing...LB has been repossed and the bank will bail out at the best price point.
They will not put up the money to develop...they are not developers.
They will only finish sold houses...the can of worms will not change...

Minnow - 9-27-2007 at 05:24 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by oldhippie
This is a duplicate thread.

http://forums.bajanomad.com/viewthread.php?tid=27040


No dude, stick to your never ending rehashing of the same old crap that takes 2 minutes to load.

This one is much better. It is full of quick whittled comments and misinformation.

What does yours got? Facts? :lol::lol:

If I want that I will check out Fox news.

edinnopolo - 9-27-2007 at 05:30 PM

Petunia is a friend of mine and the letter she posted is the one I was referring to in my previous post.:)

oldhippie - 9-27-2007 at 06:51 PM

haha, that's pretty funny! Fox news, hohoho.

oldhippie - 9-27-2007 at 06:56 PM

for the baitfish still using dial-up:

SDE Business Partnering to Provide MRO Services for Loreto Bay Sustainable Development Project



Development Project Employs Sustainability Principles to Protect and
Enhance the Natural Environment

DETROIT, Sept. 25 /PRNewswire/ -- SDE Business Partnering (SDE), a
Detroit-based minority-owned provider of labor, MRO integrated services,
program management and vendor management services, has been awarded a
multi- year contract to manage the procurement, materials management, and
logistics services for the Loreto Bay Company. SDE will oversee all
purchasing, vendor management, inbound logistics, receiving, material
handling, warehousing, and disbursement for the sustainable development
project in Baja California Sur, Mexico.
"This is an exciting award for SDE on many levels," said Earle
Steinberg, SDE president, Construction/MRO. "This marks our first
sustainable development project and we look forward to following the
sustainability principles in every aspect of our work. This adds a unique
element to procurement, as well -- we will only seek out vendors who are
equally committed to the sustainability principles in an effort to protect
and enhance the Loreto Bay environment."
Loreto Bay, a $3 billion project to develop a series of romantic,
walkable seaside villages, will be the largest resort community in North
America committed to the principles of sustainable development and New
Urbanism. Loreto Bay will follow three important sustainability principles:
harvest more potable water than it consumes; create, through solar or wind
power, more energy than it uses; and enhance the habitat and nurture the
bio-diversity of the land it occupies. In addition, the new community will
foster economic opportunities for the region in the form of housing,
planning and training, as well as the creation of jobs and business
enterprises for the local community.
SDE will staff 21 management and purchasing positions in Loreto Bay,
all of which will be filled with Mexican American or Mexican citizens. In
addition to 15-20 years of professional experience in procurement and
logistics, every employee is required to speak fluent English and Spanish.
"We expect SDE to help us solve many of the procurement and logistics
problems that come with a sustainable development such as ours in a
relatively less developed location such as Loreto Bay," said Tom Nolan,
chief financial officer, the Loreto Bay Company.
"This is a truly dynamic development project and we're excited to be a
part of it," said Steinberg. "We have worked very hard to create a client-
driven model that brings additional procurement and project management
expertise to the projects we support. This award proves SDE's commitment to
its industry-leading MRO program and illustrates our dedication to deliver
truly exceptional value for our customers. We look forward to bringing this
expertise to other construction projects in the future."
About SDE Business Partnering
Headquartered in Detroit, SDE Business Partnering is a minority-owned
and operated custom services integrator in procurement, materials
management, logistics in staffing, serving customers in the automotive,
construction, education, and other industries.
About Loreto Bay
Loreto is located approximately 700 miles south of San Diego along the
Sea of Cortes in Baja California Sur. The $3 billion development project,
which will be built over ten years, will create a town of approximately
6,000 homes in pedestrian-oriented, car-free neighborhoods with the use of
bicycles and electric cars as primary transportation. The project includes
development of a world-class Beach Club and Spa, Golf Club, plus space for
retail, entertainment, artisans' village and recreational facilities. Of
the 8,000 acres encompassed in the master plan, 5,000 acres will be
maintained as a natural "green lands" preserve. This area will have trails
for hiking, cycling and horseback riding, plus areas for organic farming
and orchards.

bajalou - 9-27-2007 at 07:08 PM

CitiGroup is NOT CitiBank although under the same umbrella company. CitiGroup gets private investors together for projects. Not risking the bank's money, only the investors.

Roberto - 9-27-2007 at 09:06 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Al G
Roberto...that changes nothing...


Reading comprehension ... a wonderful thing.

It changes everything when it comes to the statement I was adressing,

Quote:

The flags go up when you see citygroup. Defiantly a play on Citigroup. Intended to deceive potential investors.


I pointed to the "glossy brochure" as a reference to the fact that they have always said it's Citigroup that it's their partner.

I'm not touching the rest of the letter with a ten foot pole.

1. I don't care.
2. It would be useless with this group.

Is that clear enough? :lol::lol::lol:

Minnow, does that put me in the category of posters who have nothing to share and are curmudgeons? (that's the correct spelling, by the way, DK told me so). :o

amir - 9-27-2007 at 10:49 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by oldhippie
SDE Business Partnering to Provide MRO Services for Loreto Bay Sustainable Development Project
...
...
...


It's deja'vu all over again...

SkyMedBarbara - 9-28-2007 at 09:01 AM

I sure hope they finish what they have started....we have to look at it.....

oldhippie - 9-28-2007 at 09:07 AM

"SDE Business Partnering (SDE), a Detroit-based minority-owned provider of labor, MRO integrated services, program management and vendor management services, has been awarded a multi- year contract to manage the procurement, materials management, and logistics services for the Loreto Bay Company."

I've managed many multi-year contracts where there is no money on contract. The money comes as a result of task orders that are negotiated one-by-one. It's a contract vehicle where wages, other costs, and terms and conditions are negotiated up front, whether of not it is used, and for how long, is up to the discretion of the contracting agency.

[Edited on 9-28-2007 by oldhippie]

cajhawk - 9-28-2007 at 11:26 AM

1) Citibank is a bank. Citigroup is owned by the same holding company and is focused on real estate due to regulations over banks and real estate holdings since the Savings and Loan debacle. They purchased the hotel with Loreto Bay and then rolled their equity position into a partnership for the whole development. They are the lender on the project as well.

2) SDE is getting Loreto Bay to become less of an American/Canadian company and more of a Mexico based company. If you read closely, they will provide construction management by Mexicans with Mexicans IMHO.

3) The current management hasn't been able to finish amenities and is a high overhead operation. Citigroup will probably focus on correcting both.

I think this bodes well for homeowners long term. The golf course has been partially renovated and would think that some retail space would be their next focus.

This is what I think is going on from my experience with LB. Sorry to disappoint those that think the "Citygroup" thing was a scam!

mismisty - 9-28-2007 at 04:05 PM

Good thing since Citygroup is a Hong Kong company

vandenberg - 9-28-2007 at 05:30 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by cajhawk




3) The current management hasn't been able to finish amenities and is a high overhead operation.

I think this bodes well for homeowners long term.



High overhead operation:?::?: You mean the lining their pocked phase is over and they're passing the baton.:?::?::P:P
As for boding well for the owners, I agree with the thought in mind that Citigroup has a reputation to uphold and can ill afford to walk away. At least we're talking "DEEP" pockets.:biggrin::biggrin:

oldhippie - 9-28-2007 at 06:33 PM

Just to set the record straight about the Citigroup involvement, they're investing other people's money (OPM) pronounced "opium" using a brand new investment stategy. Loreto Bay is their first investment in "sustainable building projects". Given the size of Citigroup compared to Loreto Bay Company, the amount invested could be considered chump change and was probably taken from the petty cash cigar box in some secretary's desk drawer.

Plus, in general, real estate investment instruments are taking a beating. Many people think that real estate in general is overvalued. Not to imply that a $400,000 or more for unit in Loreto Bay is a bad deal, especially if there's running water for a year or two and they get the raw sewage flowing in the streets of the town cleaned up.


"Citi Alternative Investments
Various businesses at Citi Alternative Investments (CAI) have been active in making environmentally friendly investments. For example, as part of the Sustainable Development Investment Program, CVC International has invested $150 million to date, including such notable transactions as Suzlon Wind Energy, a wind turbine manufacturer based in India, and Sindicatum Carbon Capital, a developer of projects that reduce GHG emissions globally. Citi Property Investors (CPI) invests in sustainable building projects. Its first such investment was in the Loreto Bay Company, a 5,000-home community in Baja California, Mexico that is one of the largest sustainable resort communities in North America."

http://www.citigroup.com/citigroup/press/2007/data/070508a.h...

https://citigrouppropertyinvestors.com/reinst/

Also, this encouraging news:

Citi's alternatives unit struggles in first quarter

http://tinyurl.com/33wm32

wilderone - 10-1-2007 at 09:26 AM

Said Earle Steinberg, SDE president, Construction/MRO. "This marks our first
sustainable development project and we look forward to following the
sustainability principles in every aspect of our work. This adds a unique
element to procurement, as well -- we will only seek out vendors who are
equally committed to the sustainability principles in an effort to protect
and enhance the Loreto Bay environment."
This tells all. They haven't a clue as to what they're doing. They're from Detroit for godsake - haven't a clue as to what Baja is all about.

LB Co. started something from fantasy and found out they couldn't deliver. All the hype about their commitment, and obviously their integrity is pure smoke. They leave a man-made abomination in their wake, and all the promises to all the buyers in jeopardy.
Citigroup is a NYSE publicly-owned conglomerate, subject to investors' interests. CPI is "the real estatement investment management business of Citigroup" trying to protect its investment - private investor funds - and must be diligent in doing so, or suffer the allegations of investors and SEC. If SDE is their choice to make everything alright, then they're doomed.
And I wonder what the results of the test wells for the desal plant were.

flyfishinPam - 10-2-2007 at 07:25 AM

Bump!

this is important news for Loretanos.

so far it hasn´t frightened any local negociantes that I speak to. it doesn´t frighten me. but it sure is scaring the panties off many real estate agents and the carpetbagging leeches who´ve come here for a quick buck on the chittails of that projecto. hopefully this development, excuse the pun, will bring the prices back to reality all over the baja peninsula. it sure will be difficlut for the founders to see a gain or a break even on their "investment" there.

don't be! pay $$ take chances!!!

capt. mike - 10-2-2007 at 08:55 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by bajajudy
Where does this leave the people who have bought there?

I am sorry for the people who bought there if they are hung out to dry.


anyone who "invests" more in mexico than they can afford to walk away from needs a brain transplant!:lol::lol:

well the place looked tidy as i buzzed it sat and sun from 500 ft.
didn't have the time to van over tho. had other biz just in town.

as for me....who cares?? except for the workers who may lose jobs, i care for the mex people, not gringos like me!!

ok you eco naysayers, you win!:lol::lol:

i never gave it more than 50-50, i just felt gringos should mind their own biz on matters relating to the real citizenry.

it may never be the 5000 units butter beans:lol: said it would but the completed units and partials that MIGHT get finished will be fine for those who like clustervilles.

my friends said , ok - good , less neighbors. that was a riot.

if his place drops 50% he will shrug and say win some lose some.....
how many of you were invested there baja in the 70s when peso devalued 50% every other month and folks had CDs in mex accounts, like their life savings??
that wasn't butter sauce doin it, twas the guvmint!!:lol:
well.........time to check the mex real estate web sites for some fresh bargains!! hahaha

edinnopolo - 10-2-2007 at 10:39 AM

Quote:
Quote:


anyone who "invests" more in mexico than they can afford to walk away from needs a brain transplant!:lol::lol:









You mean "can't walk away from" I presume:?:

Of all the times I heard and read that statement, I've always thought it to be one of the dumbest I've ever heard. It maybe true for folks who spend their 2 or 3 vacation weeks here, but what about the people that make Baja their home and moved here lock, stock and barrel, like many of us ?
We did choose this country for many different reasons, and I, myself, am very glad to be out of the crazy California rat race. And NO, if I would loose my place here for whatever reason, I wouldn't be destitute, but it would put a dent in my way of living. But that's part of living. If you want to go through life without taking any chances you're a poor soul in my book.
And I would be really surprised if many of the people that live here don't agree with me, and more surprising, that nobody ever mentioned this in this forum.

capt. mike - 10-2-2007 at 10:56 AM

sorry for your situation amigo - but you're putting one too many bets on the come line. and - just this guy's opinion - many others out there do what you do - how do ya'll sleep at night?? well, that is if you don't have a great fall back plan.

and yes - i stand by my statement - if you can't afford to walk away from a second home in baja should things go to caca - then you are short one home. And if you think that's "dumb" don't bother me with any other investment tips like buying property in places where you can't vote nor enjoy citizens' rights.

placing all your eggs in the baja retirement basket thinking all will be peachy in perpetuity is risky as all get out. But hey........its your dough my friend. use it or lose it.

risks are fine, i calculate them all the time and pick the ones i am comfortable with. i'll tell ya this for sure tho - i have no intention of becoming a "poor soul".:?:

glad you're out of the CA. rat race - can't blame you there.

welcome to the land of the real rats, ones with practice .:biggrin::biggrin:

comitan - 10-2-2007 at 11:10 AM

Capt. Mike I'm afraid you have a mind set, the only thing you understand is investments that will make money. Those of us who have gotten out of the rat race and moved to Mexico lock stock and barrel have an investment into comfortable living at less expense, great weather, clean air, and a feeling of security(yes I feel safe) A great water water playground, my investment is for my life.

capt. mike - 10-2-2007 at 12:14 PM

no sweat, i respect that. i just could never do what you all do with out a safe sanctuary back up plan. Just my Boy Scout training. you know - be prepared.

Hell - i am good with a palapa/trailer/truck/BBQ and if i lose that i still have AZ digs paid for.;D

yeah, i got some investments, 2 kinds actually - ones that make $$ and ones that don't. But i don't keep anything too long that loses $$.
do you??!!

Osprey - 10-2-2007 at 12:36 PM

Mike, I gotta agree with Ed and Comitan. Some of us wanted a real nice retirement home in the tropics, found the opportunity in Baja California, did what we had to do to be comfortable and safe. We just didn't want the "YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR" kinda thing, you know, a camper/trailer in the parking lot of a hotel. We wanted a nice place of our own AND some self-respect. All worked out for us. How you doin?

tuna stick - 10-2-2007 at 01:10 PM

bounce: Is it too early to break out the rum and have a chorus of "Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead"/,or do we have to wait for that fat lady to sing?

edinnopolo - 10-2-2007 at 01:31 PM

Quote:


Hell - i am good with a palapa/trailer/truck/BBQ and if i lose that i still have AZ digs paid for.;D



But we're not "good with that" and yes, I have paid for digs in Sacramento, a place that over the last 20 years turned into another LA type chithole with unbelievable traffic and crime.:(:( Comparing to that, my place here is unbelievable and will, without any doubt, last me and my kids a lifetime.:biggrin::biggrin:

edinnopolo - 10-2-2007 at 01:33 PM

And BTW who the hell wants to live in Phoenix.:no::no:

capt. mike - 10-2-2007 at 03:20 PM

Hey Ed - !! Dumb me. I just figured out why you hated LB so much - you live in no polo? - yes??

Who wants phx?? lots of snow birds from the east and mid west for one example, well in the winter anyway. Built a few shacks for them over the years too.

I'll take sunshine and 75 in January anytime too. And when its hot for 3 lousy months, i stay inside where my home, office and cars are heavily A/C'd. big deal. (and buzz up north for weekends)

Well, i ain't retired yet so a portable and disposable vaca spot with an adjacent airport, bar, pool, hotel for drop ins and a bunch of great friends is damn nice. yeah.....doin real nice Osprey and thx for asking! I'll be doing nicer with an east cape lot one day tho so i am watching them go up.

and i can come south for a weekend iffin i want - can you?:lol: Or get right home in about 3 hours on short notice if i need to.

so if baja still has the allure down the road when i decide making $$ fighting ratz is no longer fun or needed, i'll be buying or building something a little more substantial to fit my tastes and style, and it will be VERY comfortable, trust me......for about 1/2 a year at a time, that's all.
I love the SOC but pac side is too cold and gloomy winters and SOC above the tropic line is way worse than PHX for heat and humidity.:o

like i said above here or sum place else - if it works for you, great!

whatever floats your panga.....or liveaboard - how ever you are set. :coolup:

wilderone - 10-2-2007 at 03:54 PM

Mike - you are confused. Maybe that rarified air a bit too thin?
"if you can't afford to walk away from a second home in baja should things go to caca - then you are short one home. And if you think that's "dumb" don't bother me with any other investment tips like buying property in places where you can't vote nor enjoy citizens' rights. placing all your eggs in the baja retirement basket thinking all will be peachy in perpetuity is risky as all get out."
AND THEN:
"so if baja still has the allure down the road when i decide making $$ fighting ratz is no longer fun or needed, i'll be buying or building something a little more substantial to fit my tastes and style, and it will be VERY comfortable, trust me......for about 1/2 a year at a time, that's all."
You'd make a good LB real estate pimp. Custom patter for one and all. Actually, we don't care whether you do or not. So don't bother us with your housing tips.
"Hot" for 3 months out of the year? 115 in the shade ain't hot, mi amigo, it's unfu___inglivable.
And: "buying property in places where you can't vote nor enjoy citizens' rights." FYI, I can't vote in So. Lake Tahoe. Their voting scheme is calculated to take advantage of those who can't vote - usually a tax assessment - yes, it is unconstitutional. What citizens' rights are you talking about that would preclude one from buying property in Mexico? You are aware that over half-million social security checks are mailed to Mexico to American citizens every month?

edinnopolo - 10-2-2007 at 06:06 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by capt. mike
Hey Ed - !! Dumb me. I just figured out why you hated LB so much - you live in no polo? - yes??








Hey Clouseau,
Your power of deduction has no end.:lol::lol::lol:

Ed IN Nopolo:?::?:

rogerj1 - 10-2-2007 at 09:27 PM

Back off on Capt. Mike, he's just sharing his opinion, which anyone can agree with or disagree with. It takes courage to take the other side in an emotional topic like LB.

Over the last year I've spent time with the rats and I'll tell you, if I hadn't done my homework I would have risked losing a fair amount of money.(Mike, I'll update you on Rancho el B). It felt like being in the middle of the Gold Rush in the Wild Wild West. Most of the risk involved developers offering ownership in a development that they didn't actually own or have clear title on. The advice of talking to a Mexican attorney is very good advice.

I work for a company, like Citigroup, and got involved in introducing potential deals in Mexico to our real estate group. There is billions of dollars being raised from investors looking to invest in Mexico. They have no idea how to do it, so they turn to a company like Citigroup. Loreto is considered to be "opportunistic" which means property values have some speculative upside relative to more established resort towns like Cabo, Puerto Vallarta, and Cancun. There's a chain of deals that take place going from most speculative to opportunistic to conservative income producing properties. What it sounds like to me is that early investors are taking profits and that more conservative money is getting in. The developers of LB took substantial risk to turn "nothing" into an established town. Give them credit, they made it happen. I doubt the original developers have the capital to take their plan for LB to it's conclusion. That's where big money starts to come in. Citigroup may be using some of their own money and/or money they've raised from investors that want to make money in Mexico at a rate of 20% a year instead of the 100% the seed money made. Eventually Citigroup will pay off their investment by selling to an insurance company or university endowment that will buy Loreto Bay for it's income producing ability. That's how the game works.

jerry - 10-2-2007 at 09:44 PM

Roger then why would the letters contain alaska airlines contract expiring with the airport in Loreto?? is it shooting them selves in the foot is it manditory disclosier? or driving the stock??

jerry - 10-2-2007 at 09:52 PM

Id like to know if Loreto Bay fails who is going to help pay for the desalt plant when the wells fail?? and we all know they will sooner then later.
whos going to pay for staffing the nice new hospital that Loreto Bay payed for??
whos going to pay for the improvements to the sewer shared by loreto Bays and nopolos and Loretos new housing ??

capt. mike - 10-3-2007 at 05:11 AM

HAHA!!:D Who's seen the new terminal under construction at loreto?
:light:
thx Roger - you know your stuff but don't expect the non biz minded reading here to comprehend long range alternative planning and structured work-outs. :O
Don't worry about me, i get a real kick out of a little dialogue and controversy yaking with the confused few here. Its too funny!;D How a few get so wrangled.......:rolleyes:
this was all about opinion, nothing else - i got real issues i deal with elsewhere that truly matter, not about retiring or living or owning "arena" in a foreign country!

Yes - fill me in when you can on the latest for R. el B.
I just flew over it thurs headed to Loreto and Cabo for DP Racing's 1000 pre run. Rich keeps inviting me down but haven't had the time with the other AZ stuff i got going on.

Hey Wilderone, stop off in phx this summer, its less than 115 in the shade at my place - i have misters. :smug:
And i can introduce you a few real pimps if you want to understand how they really operate. :saint:

oldlady - 10-3-2007 at 05:48 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by capt. mike
HAHA!!:D Who's seen the new terminal under construction at loreto?
:light:
thx Roger - you know your stuff but don't expect the non biz minded reading here to comprehend long range alternative planning and structured work-outs. :O
Don't worry about me, i get a real kick out of a little dialogue and controversy yaking with the confused few here. Its too funny!;D How a few get so wrangled.......:rolleyes:
this was all about opinion, nothing else - i got real issues i deal with elsewhere that truly matter, not about retiring or living or owning "arena" in a foreign country!


Having worked in the esoteric world of investment bankers I would like to say that if either one of you really "knew your stuff" you would be able to explain the process more clearly to the people on this board who have not been exposed to it. Your arrogant and dissmissive attitude is unusual for someone who is selling a service.

backninedan - 10-3-2007 at 07:35 AM

Leave it to the money hungry to consider the nopolo area "nothing" until there is an 'established town" there. That is really sad.

Crusoe - 10-3-2007 at 07:49 AM

rogerj1......Your conception of "nothing" is so ignorant and disgraceful you should go find a deep dark hole to climb into it. It is people like you that are so insensitive to ecological and natural ethnic human development that is ruining alot of the nicer places that exist in Baja.Your shortsighted attitude is sick beyond belief!!!!:mad::mad::mad::mad:

Skipjack Joe - 10-3-2007 at 07:53 AM

Yes, Backninedan, that's the core of the matter.

Quote:
Originally posted by rogerj1
The developers of LB took substantial risk to turn "nothing" into an established town.


They see it as turning nothing into an established town. And we see it as turning a lovely area into nothing.

How sad.

flyfishinPam - 10-3-2007 at 08:22 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by oldlady

Having worked in the esoteric world of investment bankers I would like to say that if either one of you really "knew your stuff" you would be able to explain the process more clearly to the people on this board who have not been exposed to it. Your arrogant and dissmissive attitude is unusual for someone who is selling a service.


Yes Captain Mike and the ther person with a sun avatar whose name I can´r recall. I am no expert on financial subjects but I live in this town and I guess I along with the other town's residents are your pawns to be used as playthings. I would certainly appreciate a clear explaination without condesention for a change. I would not speak or write in the tone that you have if I were to explain say, the physical chemisrty of tertiary protein reactions to synthetic enzyme substrate analogs to those who were learning about it for the first time. The concepts of which we speak are likely equally complex.

Loreto Bay did not make a town and they did not start with nothing. Over and over I was told by their sales force that they acquired a complete infrastructure with which to build out and finish (and make wads of moolah). This was part of their schpeel. They said the hard work was already done. They were a bunch of crooks and that will be proved.

A town has homes and families, retail markets, schools, medical facilities and necessary services. Where are the schools in LB? Where is the retail in Loreto Bay? Only a fool would set up shop there as it would be like setting up shop in the middle of nowhere, actually worse it wouldn't be noticed at all because everything looks the same there, and also there are no consumers. This can be proven by the taking a look at the existing market there El Porton, who can´t keep a simple deli running or stock oon its shelves despite state of the art equipment inside a beautiful building, the business just isn't there. Maybe that is why there is no retail there yet?

All LB has done is build a bunch of condos and if you take a look at what other offerings there are in this area it is a bad deal and a joke, and now more than ever. Mike wouldn't invest there because #1 he hasn't the money and #2 he probably deep down thinks its a lousy investment.

I like others in this conversation did not come to Loreto to speculate on land so as to raise the value out of orbit to those who really deserve to obtain it (the real Loretanos). I came here to LIVE. I have a family and we have a future, a future that we will take into our hands and not allow a bunch of outsiders to shape. and since we live here we have chosen not to live under a palapa in an RV but inside a house instead on our own land. This is not just our recreational area its our life. If something catastrophic would happen up in PHX would Mike be able to easily just leave his home, his property and business behind? Your words are insulting to people like me and to people who don't read this board, the many Loretanos who also LIVE here and aren't here just to recreate.

Don't worry about the Alaska flights being canceled. It was in the plan for a long time that Frontier their subsidiary airlines would take over so this is not new news. Alaska has hurt from the competition from Delta. They have to cut costs and downsize their planes to fit the needs of the marketplace.

Jerry about the desal plant and other ammenities...we won't get a desal plant as it is too costly. LB never promised it if you read their fine print. LB never promised a beach club or a marina, those were NEVER guaranteed. The hospital according to the news we read and the huge sign next to it is being paid for by taxpayer funds and enhanced with donations by private industry. LB HAD to make a hospital work it was part of their sales pitch as many of the aging folks that considered buying in were concerned with the serious lack of medical care obtainbale in Loreto.

If you think Loreto has water issues you may want to join those who are concerned as that was the heart of most of the issues discussed. I don't give a rats ass about how many developments are to come here but if the natural resources and the man made infrastructure cannot support them then I do give a rats ass and you should too. Without water we have NOTHING, our property will be worth NOTHING and the speculators will have thrown their money into a barren desert.

One more thing. Many LB employees are now waiting for their liquidation, separation severance which is required by law. They will ALL have to be laid off and new ones brought in or the productive ones rehired. Many construction workers who were brought in are now looking for housing. I know this because they wander around where I live asking us if we know of places to live. Some are sleeping on the beaches. And they are all looking for work around town. It is obvious some of them are stuck here with no money to return to where they came from. Gracias Loreto Bay :fire:

wilderone - 10-3-2007 at 08:42 AM

Roger, if bale-outs, intentional deceit, empty promises to those who actually put up the cash, a plan that has no substance or viability, millions of dollars flung around amounting to a big circus show, constitute how the game works, then they should explain all the rules of the game to all involved. Don't you think that's fair? Anything less is fraud.

flyfishinPam - 10-3-2007 at 08:44 AM

"Most of the risk involved developers offering ownership in a development that they didn't actually own or have clear title on. The advice of talking to a Mexican attorney is very good advice."
words of the dude with the sol avatar


uh...that´s what LB was doing. They were selling land that had not yet been handed over to them by FONATUR wey.

On another note, this thread comes up number 7 and 9 respectively when you enter the words

Loreto Bay + citibank

and Loreto Bay + citigroup

no doubt that people doing their diligent homework before handing over wads of money will stumble on this board and read the TRUTH for a change written by people who LIVE here and are affected by this fiasco. for this the nomad board is of great value. keep up the posts and remember to use key words like Loreto Bay and investment and repossession and citigroup and citibank and serious water issues etc. :dudette:

oh yeah thanks wilderone here´s another keyword...FRAUD

[Edited on 10-3-2007 by flyfishinPam]

jerry - 10-3-2007 at 08:52 AM

ok pam what is going to happen when the wells runs dry?? why are you building a busness in a town with no future
the only way Loreto will have a future is water and the only way it will have water is a desalt plant whos gona pay for it??
i believe the future of Loreto is bound to the development of the area witch will provide for the amenaties we all need
to stagnate is to die

flyfishinPam - 10-3-2007 at 09:14 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by jerry
ok pam what is going to happen when the wells runs dry??


you seem to have enough brain cells to answer this question yourself, why put me on the spot here? I already gave my response to this.

Quote:
Originally posted by jerrywhy are you building a busness in a town with no future


Jerry, this is another attack is it not? I started my business eleven years ago before any of this was known. It wasn't until 2005 that the Harvard study results were published. If I had known this before I wouldn't have done so but now I must live in the bed that I made myself of my own free will, but I am not alone. Why don't you ask this question to all of the other businesspersons in town? Make sure you have a helmet on though.


Quote:
Originally posted by jerrythe only way Loreto will have a future is water and the only way it will have water is a desalt plant whos gona pay for it??


good question. the demised development who spoke through both sides of their mouth and the other end promised waaay too much they obviously couldn't deliver. this will stand as an example of what kind of boondogle other develepments will pose and Loretanos will question them more intensly. that is good. now Loretanos must be made to fully understand that water is the most imortant resource there is, without it life cannot be sustained. Loretanos must take charge of their own future and embrace a complete understanding on how they can conserve this precious resource. This will boil down to caps on growth in this area.

Quote:
Originally posted by jerryi believe the future of Loreto is bound to the development of the area witch will provide for the amenaties we all need
to stagnate is to die


you can believe what you want but economic reasons for developing are very much outweighed by the sustainability of life itself. if it comes down to you the outsider or Loretanos for this resource who do you think will prevail? I know the answer to that one, its in the constitución. Investors and foreigh retirees will neveer win. I suggest you read the history of Mexico, go back to the Mexican revolution where foreigners owned much of the resources in this country and look at what happened.

I must exit and get back to work now. Mas mas tarde.

jerry - 10-3-2007 at 10:48 AM

pam please make your self clear are you saying all foreigner should leave loreto so there will be no need for water?? do you think a cap on development will refill the wells?? dont do anything to help the problem except a cap on development??
with out foreigners, their money,and tourests Loreto would dry up and blow away there is no industry little imployment in Loreto that isnt directly conected to foreigners
I think it is nessary to produce out of a problem rather stagnating

backninedan - 10-3-2007 at 11:03 AM

Jerry, I find it hard to believe you live here in Loreto and have not a clue. It amazes me.

flyfishinPam - 10-3-2007 at 11:31 AM

taking a quick break before I pick up my kids from school..

jerry you have a reading comprehension problem.

among growth caps, other conservation measures such as using less, fixing leaks and rationing will have to be put into place in order to maintain Loreto's water supply to sustainable levels.

HA!

jerry here's now a question for YOU: what would be a sustainable population level and growth rate for this town? I don't know the answer to that and believe more research must be done, but I do know that we can't trust developers to tell us what it will be.

vandenberg - 10-3-2007 at 01:11 PM

To me, this project had, right from it's infancy, a kind of Barnem & Bailey feel to it. All hype and no substance.
Their original brochures stated in the fine print that the amenities, like spas, beachclub, restaurants, etc , were only proposals and thus not to be taken for fact.
I remember that during the first few months of its inception I met several folks on the beach asking me questions about the project. I remember vividly the lady who build and finished the first custom house. When she told me in the fall of 2004 that she was moving in in April, I asked her what year, and was told that I was not very nice.:tumble: Well, they moved in 2 years later, were here for a few months and I haven't seen them since. The very first very fancy Home, accross the street from me, was completed, but the owners were so disgusted with LB, that they sold within weeks of completion. And people associated with LB bought it, likely to prevend negative reports about the real goings-on.
I find it hard to find any kind compassion for those folks that plunked down their money for a very poorly thought out project. I think they deserved what they got. If you can afford that kind of money for a second home you have to have half a brain and should be able to use it.
Let's face it, developers wouldn't be able to come up with these kind of scams if it wasn't for the old Barnum adage " a sucker born every minute ".
But it seems that there is another sales event this weekend, so they haven't given up trolling for more.
For us , living here, we have hopes that Citigroup will not desert the project and make this ending up looking like Escondido. Hope their pockets are deep enough to ,at least, finished the part that has been started.
And again, as for the LB owners, You Deserve What You Got !!

Marie-Rose - 10-3-2007 at 01:51 PM

http://forums.bajanomad.com/viewthread.php?tid=1432#pid47179

Just went back to this thread started in 2003 about Villages of Loreto Bay
and it is SO interesting to see everyones feelings back then and now see
some of the same peoples comments.

Pam
I especially was interested and respect your views. You gave this project a hesitant "thumbs up" hoping that they would follow thru and make things better for you and
your community. Unfortuantely it wasn't to be...:no:

Skipjack Joe - 10-3-2007 at 06:44 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by vandenberg
If you can afford that kind of money for a second home you have to have half a brain and should be able to use it.
...
And again, as for the LB owners, You Deserve What You Got !!


Even someone with half a brain deserves compassion.

flyfishinPam - 10-4-2007 at 07:50 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Marie-Rose
http://forums.bajanomad.com/viewthread.php?tid=1432#pid47179

Just went back to this thread started in 2003 about Villages of Loreto Bay
and it is SO interesting to see everyones feelings back then and now see
some of the same peoples comments.

Pam
I especially was interested and respect your views. You gave this project a hesitant "thumbs up" hoping that they would follow thru and make things better for you and
your community. Unfortuantely it wasn't to be...:no:


I guess I´m just a flip flopper or whatever you call it these days. Yes I was very much for the project, we all were and we needed the economic stimulus. I believed the promises, well many of them and I appreciated their understanding of the beauty and fragility of this place by keeping their project sustainable. But that was before I knew the facts and I believe that many of the buyers were suckered, like I was, into believing it too. The Loreto Bay plan was much better than the original FONATUR high rise plan but the size of the project had always scared me and many others.

LB was definately crucial in bringing in Alaska Air Lines service which saved Loreto. Aero California was grounded a year and a half ago and Aeromexico didn't renew its contract. If it weren't for Alaska Air it would have been very difficult here. Alaska's presence here brought the attetion of other airlines like Delta and Contenental. So for that our town and myself really benefited.

The turning point for me was when I translated an important article back in February 2007. It was then that I realized the huge problems that we may face if development continues unchecked here. The article came from a prominent Mexican journal called La Jornada and it disappoints me that the periodicals of the USA and Canada are not critical at all about the projects proposed here, so we must turn to Mexican journalism for the truth, how ironic!

Its not over yet, one poster says they´re having another sales event and another says citigroup will simply finish the paid for constructions and move on. My take is that citigroup will do what makes money and will care less about how the welfare of this town.

I think that this change at Loreto Bay is a good thing and will eventually reverberate throughout the industry and slow it down. I see that it has already slowed down from last year and the year before and prices of land, despite what everyone says, are in reality declining here.

I would like to see FONATUR wake up and realize that Loreto is unique of its other destinations (Los Cabos, Ixtapa, Cancun and Hualtulco and others like Litibú). Our climate is different, our beaches are not the same, access is limited, our water is lacking, our infrastructure is lacking... In all of those other places there were no developments of towns of significant size but here in Loreto these was already an established town. I have been speaking with lots of the older folks about how FONATUR came to acquire so much land here and its forming an interesting picture about the recent history of the Loreto area. IMHO Loreto would be a much better place without them.

Bajaboy - 10-4-2007 at 07:56 AM

Pam-

Just curious on the progress of the big development in San Bruno. How will that affect town, Loreto Bay, etc. I was blown away with all the fences, security guards, etc. that we saw out there. Everyone talks about LB but I haven't heard much about this project. What's the latest?

Zac

flyfishinPam - 10-4-2007 at 09:05 AM

Zac,

Don't know the answer to that question. Keep in mind the proximity of Loreto Bay to town vs that of San Bruno and Ensenada Blanca. Also marketing is lacking for the San Bruno projects and only just starting for the Villas Group project in Ensenada Blanca. The San Bruno project is a Spanish owned deal and IMHO they don't have the same ability to speak to their target buyers, Americans and Canadians as effectively as Loreto Bay did. The Spanish are oh so much different from their target buyers (americans and canadians). For some reason, gut mostly, I am not confident that this project will be successful. The Villas project also placed guard gates and fences and although looks inevitable has met with much resistence mostly because of their attitude which I will explain briefly becuse its important.

The villages of Ligui and Ensenada Blanca were established many, many years ago after the establishment of the mission at Ligui (maybe David K has more detail here). They are villages that sustain themselves from the bounty of the sea. When the Villas Group came in they were horrified at the shacks and these authentic Mexican villages so made it public that they would buy all of them out and bulldoze them so their guests wouldn't have to look at such eyesores when they were driving on their way to the new resort. Immediately they fenced off access to the beach, cutting off the lifeblood of the Ensenada Blanca fishermen who had to use it to make their living. They installed a guard gate where they took the names of all persons who went thourough, including all guests, workers and owners of the two hotels already in the area, El Santuario and Danzante Resort. Needless to say guests at these hotels were frightened at having to go through a checkpoint with armed guards after driving from the airport and through desert 30 miles away. This affected business significantly. The Villas group has been sneaking around these properties and intimidating everyone. Last year the mayor brought a lady to the Danzante Resort very late at night to stay in the hotel. fortunately the owners were present and told them there was no vacancy. This is very suspicious as the owners feel this lady was likley going to plant something on their property and therefore cause future problems. Since then it has been a reservations only policy at both hotels and I can't blame them at all. The citizens of Ciudad Constitucion were outraged at the colsing of "their beach" as they use it extensively for Easter Week. After threatening to close access for Easter Week 2007, the Villas Group allowed it to remain open (there truly would have been a riot if they had not). Who knows what will happen for 2008. The governor has been in the town to ease peoples nerves but it doesn't look good. We'll just have to wait and see. The electric lines are currently being strung to Ligui and Ensenada Blanca from the Puerto Escondido electric substation. YOu can see this while driving on the highway.

As for San Bruno I did hear there were forced evacuations of farmers and farm workers from the area but they were not well publicized and took place when I was in full swing of my busy season so I couldn't pay close attention. I heard about fencing off but I didn't know to what extent is was there.

As for Golden Beach at Puerto Escondido. what beach is there? When people come to look at Golden Beach that will be the first question, where is this Golden Beach. What a completely stupid name, misleading to say the least. I wouldn't think investors take getting duped very well, but if they are stupid enough not to turn on a computer and take a look at the information that's already out there then they'll deserve the duping.

Bajaboy - 10-4-2007 at 09:59 AM

Thanks Pam! I hear everyone talk about LB but wonder if most know of all the other developments in waiting. Again, we were shocked with all the fenced off land and activity.

I've also heard rumors that Agua Verde is headed down the same path...one of our favorite Baja beaches.

Zac

ElFaro - 10-4-2007 at 12:45 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by jerry
Id like to know if Loreto Bay fails who is going to help pay for the desalt plant when the wells fail?? and we all know they will sooner then later.
whos going to pay for staffing the nice new hospital that Loreto Bay payed for??
whos going to pay for the improvements to the sewer shared by loreto Bays and nopolos and Loretos new housing ??


There seems to be an assumption that the only alternative to Loreto's furure water needs is a desal plant. Assuming for a minute that desal is not an option, wouldn't the govt. go inland to the surrounding valleys and canyons, sink water wells, pipe it to collection systems, and then pipe the resultant water to Loreto? That has been the MO for other towns in Baja...no? Or has this already been done and the inland sources are tapped out?

wilderone - 10-4-2007 at 01:28 PM

Loreto water has been thoroughly researched:
http://www.futurosalternativosloreto.org/hydrology/2_assess....

[Edited on 10-5-2007 by BajaNomad]

jerry - 10-4-2007 at 09:39 PM

ok backninedan you answer the question i asked Pam seems know one knows but there comementing on speculations tell me what ya think??

rogerj1 - 10-4-2007 at 11:34 PM

Pam, I'm Roger and I look forward to meeting you some day.

The reason I put "nothing" into quote marks when referring to the Loreto Bay development was to signify how a developer might look at it. Please don't misconstrue it as my opinion. I, unfortunately, haven't been to Loreto and was under the impression that the development was out of town at the site of a failed development. I wrote my piece to help convey how development looks from the viewpoint of the developer.

flyfishinPam - 10-5-2007 at 06:44 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by rogerj1
Pam, I'm Roger and I look forward to meeting you some day.

The reason I put "nothing" into quote marks when referring to the Loreto Bay development was to signify how a developer might look at it. Please don't misconstrue it as my opinion. I, unfortunately, haven't been to Loreto and was under the impression that the development was out of town at the site of a failed development. I wrote my piece to help convey how development looks from the viewpoint of the developer.


cool no hay problema hope to meet you too sometime. :D

Skipjack Joe - 10-5-2007 at 06:47 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by wilderone
Loreto water has been thoroughly researched:
http://www.futurosalternativosloreto.org/hydrology/2_assess....

[Edited on 10-5-2007 by BajaNomad]


Article makes no sense to me. Why do you have groundwater if you always have negative recharge?

flyfishinPam - 10-5-2007 at 07:11 AM

my guess would be because

recharge = (what goes in) - (what goes out)

what's going out (being pumped out) is greater than what's going in (rainwater recharge) so the overall recharge is negative. I hated hydrology in school but I guess I should've paid more attention and not sold that book after passing the class. :rolleyes:

ElFaro - 10-5-2007 at 08:28 AM

Wilderone...

I read the hydrology report you referenced. The only water source studied here was the San Bruno aquifer adjacent to Loreto. The report states the watershed is only about 623 sq. km (240 sq mi or about 12 mi. X 20 mi.) and the aquifer is only 225 sq. km (88 sq. mi or about 7 mi X 12mi.)...a very small area for water storage indeed. There is also alot of estimating and assumptions in this report of key data. There is no mention of other water sources contributing to the San bruno aquifer (e.g. artesian supplies). The last statement in the summary states: "Consequently, any future development in the region must find and develop an alternative water source for that development and the associated growth in supporting population." Again as in my previous post the Govt. could pipe water in from other aquifers / watersheds that are say on the Pacific side and pump it over the mountains. Loreto water does not have to be limited to the San Bruno aquifer or a desal plant. I'm not necessarily supporting this alternative...just did not want it to be ignored.

the Govt. could.....

djh - 10-5-2007 at 09:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by ElFaro

Again as in my previous post the Govt. could pipe water in from other aquifers / watersheds that are say on the Pacific side and pump it over the mountains. Loreto water does not have to be limited to the San Bruno aquifer or a desal plant. I'm not necessarily supporting this alternative...just did not want it to be ignored.


The government COULD . . . Now there's a can-o-worms, eh ? ?

what could be.... and what is.... the human paradox....

wilderone - 10-5-2007 at 11:43 AM

Well, I suppose a government that doesn't adequately fund its schools, clinics, environmental protection entities or any other municipal responsibly throughout the entire country couldn't be expected to put a whole lot of money into a relatively small town such as Loreto when there is no dire need to do so. Also, many things could be done to conserve water use in Loreto. It is understood that most faucets leak 24/7. How much water is wasted every day from every faucet - 25 gallons? The LB Foundation should distribute washers, hoses and hose bibs to every household and stop the waste. Every household should have a water barrel with which capture rainwater or grey water to use on plants and street washing. There could be ancillary small reservoirs built for special purposes. There has been very little, if any, research done or attempts made at conserving water or utilizing other methods, which, in combination, would improve the water situation for the residents of Loreto. If the population were not violently inflated due to projects like LB, but rather, a natural, regulated growth spurred by more natural and regular occurrences, then there should be enough water. Potable water is a problem in rural areas all over the world, and there are workable, inexpensive solutions. There doesn't seem to be anyone in Loreto who is tasked with looking into those alternatives and making them happen. An initial effort to eliminate wasted water would be an easy first step.

Skeet/Loreto - 10-5-2007 at 03:38 PM

Widone:
Just for the record would you check the Annual Rainfall Data for Loreto and report your findings on this Thread.

Also a good look into the Purchase of the Water Rights from the Ranches in San Juan and the Number of Wells which have already been drilled and are in use by Loreto.

If you will go back to the time of the early 70's you will find factual information on the Severe Drought sufferred in Baja Sur, the Seeding of the Clouds by the Ranchers etc.
You will also find it interesting to Pinpoint the Location of the Drilled and producing Wells in relation to the Coast to the North of Loreto , San Bruno .

During the time of the Driugh, many of the people of Loreto learned to save and Conserve Water, Many Pilas were built, Street Watering was forbidden.

Simply put- There is not enough Rainwater in Loreto to Conserve- There is not enough Rainwater in the Mountains to keep the Wells up , if another 7 year Drough comes around-
There is just not enough Water in those Mountains to meet the Demand!

Skeet/Loreto

Skipjack Joe - 10-5-2007 at 04:44 PM

Here's a crazy thought I had last night that has little to do with this thread.

When the citizens of Loreto were given the privilege to decide whether to have the LB project approved. They should have agreed - on the condition that LB provide all of them with the same homes built for gringos at prices that they could afford. That way Loreto would not grow into a town of haves and have nots. The Mexicans need to be hard bargainers. They're in a powerful position and should take advantage of it.

Nonsense, you say. Perhaps.

Skeet/Loreto - 10-6-2007 at 06:49 AM

Skipjack.
There is sonething missing with your words and Wildone's--
Most of the people of Loreto have not had the Education Level that we have in the States. Many of my Mexicano Friends did not even finish 3rd Grade. They are the present 50 to 75 year olds.
Facts: Loreto has always had the Haves and Have Nots,- Several Families have always controlled Loreto.
Another thing is the "manana" or "Not today' feeling of Living. The education Systen has improved greatly in the past few years, but it will be many years more before the young People ever get the Power to control their Destiny.

There are past incidents where the People got fed up with the Govt. and in Mass closed the one and only Road to get what they wanted- In the case of the missing Church Bell and the forcing of the Govt. to drill more wells for Water.

If you will locate the Wells in use today you will find that any Water from the Mountains West of San Bruno is already in use for Loreto. Ligui is a very interesting case also, as Angus McKensie bankrolled the present well that serves that area, then ended up in a Law Suit over the use of that well.

Loreto as some of us know is Gone- All the words and acts are in Vain to try and stop the Development.
The next Drough of 7 years will be what will bring about the change- Good and Bad.
It is up to the People of Loreto to make any changes, not the Americans or Canadains

You can lead a Horse to Water, but you can't make him Drink!
Skeet/Loreto

capt. mike - 10-6-2007 at 07:24 AM

well said Skeeter!
you have the most Loreto experience of any one here, your insight is obvious - yours and Pam's who lives there.

i agree that water rules all. but it still is a market function - without water there can be nada.

future wars will be fought over water, not oil.

if no LB, then no desal, then no water then no loreto??!!

tuna stick - 10-6-2007 at 12:14 PM

:?: For what it's worth,a friend of ours went out to the office at Loreto Bay yesterday. When he inquired as to what was going on, they just laughed,and said nothing has changed, and everything is going ahead as planned. Only the financing has changed hands. He did say it looked like thousands of workers on the job. On the other hand,we live a half a block off Mex 1,between a convenience store and a small market. Usually there are a goup of LB workers hanging out in front of the convenience store,and a pretty steady stream of workers walking back and forth to the market. This week there has been no one in front of the store,and very little foot traffic. It is 1:00 pm. Sat.,and still no traffic to the market.:?:

tuna stick - 10-8-2007 at 01:12 PM

:?: Sun. afternoon,very little foot traffic,and no one hanging out at the convenience store. Since Sun. is day off,usually quite busy.:?:
 Pages:  1