BajaNomad

enviromental report

greta-inbaja - 2-18-2008 at 02:56 PM

Hello all,
We are starting the permit process for our casa in Baja Sur. We are about 10 miles south of Cabo Pulmo. The prices for the enviromental report that I have heard from others have been pretty high. Has anyone had one done recently??? I'm trying to find our what to expect money wise.
Thanks,
Greta

Bob and Susan - 2-18-2008 at 09:31 PM

i was at profepa today in la paz
report follows

here is the guy how finished my problem...
he was the lawyer for profepa last year

he will answer your questions and
can put you together with someone that will
complete your enviormental permit quickly
no BS:lol::lol:

email him
Manuel Barajas
manuelbarajas@hotmail.com

longlegsinlapaz - 2-18-2008 at 11:09 PM

Lomas Centenario....1,600 sq meter property....7 months....approximately $5,000....yes I'm serious! This was done totally legally through SEMERNAT. Applied first week in December 2006 & finally received "blessed" paperwork authorizing clearing of land for construction to begin on June 30, 2007.:(:( And my builder did 99% of the legwork & follow-ups for me....gratis. So that total cost does not include a fee for any "agent" time. That is purely the cost for the reports, studies, site visits required by SEMERNAT! Unfortunately, I fell into the time frame of the infamous head honcho change in the office when the only person with signing approval in the La Paz office was transferred to Mexico City, so that added 2-3 months of time sitting in a pile awaiting the new signing authority's arrival!

BTW....SEMERNAT fees for SEMERNAT personnel to do the entire process & reports are nearly double the cost of finding authorized people independent of SEMERNAT to do the reports & generate the study for SEMERNAT's final blessing!!!

EDIT: Yes, that is USD!:(
EDIT #2: Checked my spreadsheet & corrected cost!
[Edited on 2-19-2008 by longlegsinlapaz]

[Edited on 2-19-2008 by longlegsinlapaz]

greta-inbaja - 2-19-2008 at 07:11 PM

Thanks longlegs. That is pretty much the ballpark numbers I have been hearing . A least living in California, we are very good at jumping through hoops. Our taxes also went way up.. Our Baja property is now classified as "oceanfront" ... we are 10-15 walk through the desert (no road) to the beach. We are also now classified "urban.". We are 45 minutes from san Jose, 45 minutes from La Ribera, on a dirt road with no power. I guess we have Mucho work ahead of us and we sure are gettin good at hoops.
Thanks again for the input

longlegsinlapaz - 2-19-2008 at 07:37 PM

Greta.....I think that's "Urbano", which is SUPPOSED to mean the property is buildable...different interpretation than we're used to! What they don't tell you is that they supposedly screwed up & a LOT of properties were assigned an Ubrano designation by mistake & despite the fact that the title states it's Urbano, many (ME included) still have had to pay again to have the official Urbano designation...how much more legal/official can it be than showing on the original title & in Catastro's records?? Nonetheless, I jumped through those hoops & paid it to stay legal!:( Sometimes it seems like they get us coming & going!!:no:

Bob and Susan - 2-20-2008 at 06:54 AM

i was quoted $25,000 for an enviormental report... twice...go figure


now...here's our story
we were "not in compliance" when Profepa came this summer
and "cited" 90 out of 100 property owners here on the bay in mulege

we were required to post a $21,000 bond to complee construction

this was returned yesterday after paying a smaller fine and completing a damage report

the first lawyer we got from mexico city "did nothing" for 5 months
watch out...there is stll alot of lawyers that cannot complete the task

our "new" lawyer got us a "resolution" letter in just a week from Profepa
Manuel Barajas
manuelbarajas@hotmail.com
manuel worked for Profepa as the lawyer

Capt Mike flew me to La Paz and back on Thanksgiving day!!!
what a day!!!

This letter stated what our fine was and what was to be included in the "damage report"

Manuel arranged to have the the damage report done from someone he "knew" could complete it correctly and quickly

this data and the fine was submitted monday...
our "bond" was returned from Profepa as promised

it was an easy process as manuel
had it ALL set up in advance and
walked me through the entire thing

This law... ALL construction must begin with an enviornmental report...
has been around since 1988

it was just not enforced until now

if you fight the fine and do not follow the procedures in the resolution letter you could be "cited: the next time...it WON"T be over

if you live in a development with sub-divided lots
the develpoment can get the enviormental permit for the entire project
or
each homeowner can get their own

whetever you do... do not let people tell you this permot is NO NEEDED in your area

they are WRONG!!!

longlegsinlapaz - 2-20-2008 at 08:11 AM

Bob, are you talking pesos or dollars????:o:o

My builder helped some friends who had a PROFEPA stop-work order issued on their construction & the maximum fine is supposed to be $10K (equivalent USD). They too had to post the bond to complete their work & after they jumped through all the hoops, it was refunded.

I thought SEMERNAT was a pain to deal with to do things up front & LEGALLY, but in my case, I'd probably have been better off financially to have just started construction & gone the PROFEPA bond route when caught! But I refuse to knowingly run afoul of Mexican laws, so by staying legal & adhering to the process, it cost me a 7-month delay in construction start-up, an additional 7-months rent (through this point in time) in alternative housing & I had to bite the bullet on increased materials & Seguro Social costs!

Also, having submitted the paperwork & waiting for SEMERNAT to complete the process it still doesn't authorize you to do ANYTHING (plant new things, remove existing natural plants or even move existing foliage, start excavation or construction!). You aren't in the "clear" to touch the property until you get the official document back & in your hot little hand. Additionally, the builder who begins construction is in NO WAY liable for any of the violation penalties, YOU, the property owner are fully liable, even if your builder tells you you don't need to wait. Of course their going to tell you it's not necessary, because they can start earning $$ sooner & they're totally in the clear for the violation penalties!:no:

I'm wondering if; like varying property tax discounts in another recent thread; the penalties might vary by geographical area.:?:

Bob and Susan - 2-20-2008 at 08:17 AM

dollars...

oldlady - 2-20-2008 at 08:36 AM

Greta-
I am the friend that longlegs and her builder helped. Longlegs nailed it.
Even though she went through the pain and expense of waiting until it was all done right, we incurred a tremenduous amount of loss because of the interruption in our project. If we had known (and the person who sold us the land did, but didn't bother to tell us or to do it when he subdivided),
we would have rolled it into the cost of the project, and done it through the process. It would have been easier and much cheaper!

From what I understand the cost for the study varies depending on the size of land being developed and /or subdivided....and probably the mood of SEMERNAT on any given day...but that's just my cynical side speaking.

BigWooo - 2-20-2008 at 09:08 AM

Here's a little more info:

It is better to do the Environmental Impact Study legally, especially if you have a lot of land. If Profepa fines you, the fine only covers the area that was cleared at the time they did their inspection. If you want to alter any other part of your property, or do additional construction at a later date, you will still need to get an environmental impact study through Semarnat to make those changes.

If you do the EIS up front legally, you are permitted to alter or clear any part of your property.

The cost of the EIS is based on how far you are from La Paz.
In areas more to the north the cost is three or four times the cost of a study done in or near La Paz

greta-inbaja - 2-20-2008 at 09:43 AM

Thanks everyone. I am about 2.5 hours south of La Paz. All this info will take a bit to digest. I'll get back to you. Thanks again,
Greta

longlegsinlapaz - 2-20-2008 at 06:44 PM

Quote:
The cost of the EIS is based on how far you are from La Paz. In areas more to the north the cost is three or four times the cost of a study done in or near La Paz


Thanks BigWooo....I kinda suspected that! I believe people in the out-lying areas might still be able to minimize the costs to some degree by having certified/qualified non-SEMERNAT personnel prepare the report for final submittal to SEMERNAT. The cost SEMERNAT quoted for their people to do it for me was double the cost for qualified people they'll accept the work from. Granted I'm less than 10 miles from their office, but I'd imagine either making arrangements to pick the guys up for a site visit to your property & bringing them back to La Paz could result in some degree of savings. At least it'd be worth checking into.

oladulce - 2-23-2008 at 03:09 PM

Quote:
quote]Originally posted by longlegsinlapaz
I believe people in the out-lying areas might still be able to minimize the costs to some degree by having certified/qualified non-SEMERNAT personnel prepare the report for final submittal to SEMERNAT.


A few years ago Semarnat changed their rules which now allows anyone to perform or submit an impact study. Some clever folks have seen this lucrative niche so be careful when choosing who you hire. One doesn't need to be an Ingeniero, I'm not aware of a certification process, and it's really hard to tell who the heck is qualified out there.

I would add to Longleg's excellent info:

1. The most important qualification to look for in someone you're considering to do an Impact study is a proven track record of successfully completing the entire process (EIS/MIA and Cambio Uso de Suelo) for clients- in other words, get references.

2. Do not give alot of weight in your decision to hire a guy based on:
- "I have friends at SEMARNAT and/or PROFEPA"
- " My uncle, cousin,sister works at SEMARNAT"
- "I used to, or currently work at SEMARNAT or PROFEPA"

It's surprising how many current, former, or related SEMARNAT employees we've come across while trying to get this done.



[Edited on 3-12-2008 by oladulce]

Acuity - 2-23-2008 at 05:52 PM

Maybe this is a stupid question, but for what type of properties do you need an EIS? Is it just waterfront, or is the issue broader?

longlegsinlapaz - 2-23-2008 at 06:43 PM

Acuity, not a stupid question....the issue is much broader than waterfront properties! ALL unimproved land w/o previous permanent construction. All of Mexico. And YOU have to be able to prove that any existing structures or improvements to the land were done prior to the EIS requirement. Dated pics, an old printout of a GoogleEarth map, etc., can really help your cause. There is apparently a minimal number of sq. meters of land that does not require an EIS....but I think that's only applicable to Mexicanos who build a 300 sq ft rustico casa. I know that the area my property is located, SEMERNAT told my builder & I "Anything below Calle Palo de Arco is considered rustico & doesn't require an EIS". Well, guess what!! I'm ON the downhill side of Calle Palo de Arco, and I had to get one! So maybe there's an obscure nationality requirement that comes into play!:mad::lol:

Todos Santo is definitely with easy reach of the PROFEPA people based out of La Paz....as, obviously, are some of the more remote areas....good rule of thumb, if there is a road in, PROFEPA will undoubtedly find you eventually!:bounce: And it won't be a fun-filled, nor inexpensive time when they do!:no: Be legal & if there is any doubt, check with the SEMERNAT office in La Paz before you touch your property. When buying improved property, ask the seller for a copy of the EIS as a term of the purchase contract. Or check to see if one is on file in La Paz. It'll save you a lot of headaches!

Bob and Susan - 2-23-2008 at 06:49 PM

this is good advise;)

shari - 2-24-2008 at 12:40 PM

another stupid question...today someone told me that EI studies are not required if they are within municiple boundaries...true or false?

Bob and Susan - 2-24-2008 at 01:08 PM

does the municiple have a EI for it's area??

if it does you're covered under it...

otherwise the municiple needs to get one too...

BigWooo - 2-24-2008 at 01:26 PM

I was told by a company that specializes in Environmental Impact Studies (Geobios) in La Paz that : "all projects that are out of the bounds of a city and are covered with natural vegetation require an environmental impact study".

I would interpret that to mean that you don't need one inside a municipality... but I would rather hear the answer directly from SEMARNAT before starting any project.

Before starting our project we called SEMARNAT on the phone to make initial contact with on of the engineers. Once we introduced ourselves and explained our intentions, he gave us his email address so we could send him the location and basic title info of our property along with some pictures. He was very cordial and promptly emailed us an answer.

Unfortunately our architect didn't follow through with the study and we didn't follow up to assure it was completed. Now we are now going through the profepa phase which you truly want to avoid

[Edited on 2-24-2008 by BigWooo]

Bob and Susan - 2-24-2008 at 01:42 PM

city of mulege was required to get an EI to complete the river project

greta-inbaja - 5-16-2008 at 04:48 PM

Thank You Susan, We met w/ Manuel Barajas today. The news is painful. for a 825 m2 lot, 1500 sq foot house, 500 sq foot garage. close to 10,000usd.incls his fee. No one in our small developement thinks the environmental is required. They all think we are nuts and that the requirement is only for beach front and resort or marine park land (cabo pulmo). We are 12 km south of pulmo. I guess when thay came to cabo pulmo in 2006, they never went south of there. Even the developer, La rebiera building dept and the local delegado says we don't need one. Manuel said they are mistaken. If anyone has a comment on any of this, Great.
Thanks again for the input.
Greta

longlegsinlapaz - 5-16-2008 at 07:51 PM

Greta, if I were you, I'd ask all those "officals" (developer, La Ribera building department & the local delgado) if they are so positive that an EIS is NOT required, to put it in writing on their official business or agency letterhead, over their signature & then you take those letters to SEMERNAP in La Paz & get a truly official answer/determination from the agency who is responsible. Or take them to PROFECO & get a legal determination from Manuel Barajas, since he's with the violation enforcement agency. I'm betting NONE of them will be willing to put it in writing.

My current construction is not "beach front, resort or marine park", and I was legally required to get one, despite the fact that I only has 2 things which fall under environmentally protected growing on my property. Three SEMERNAP employees said my property didn't need an EIS, upon request of my builder, they wrote a letter to that effect & presented it to the only authorized signature authority at SEMERNAP...their boss...and he refused to sign it & countermanded their determination...I got the EIS.

Edit: SEMERNAP and/or PROFECO should have their feet held to the fire to make sure all the outlying offices are notified of current laws & make them accountable when they intentionally mislead property owners!!:fire::fire:


Quote:
Originally posted by greta-inbaja
Thank You Susan, We met w/ Manuel Barajas today. The news is painful. for a 825 m2 lot, 1500 sq foot house, 500 sq foot garage. close to 10,000usd.incls his fee. No one in our small developement thinks the environmental is required. They all think we are nuts and that the requirement is only for beach front and resort or marine park land (cabo pulmo). We are 12 km south of pulmo. I guess when thay came to cabo pulmo in 2006, they never went south of there. Even the developer, La rebiera building dept and the local delegado says we don't need one. Manuel said they are mistaken. If anyone has a comment on any of this, Great.
Thanks again for the input.
Greta


[Edited on 5-17-2008 by longlegsinlapaz]