BajaNomad

MISSIONS THAT WERE MOVED

David K - 2-23-2009 at 12:51 PM

In many cases, there were more than one location for many of the missions.

A site may have been picked because it was close to the Indian population centers, but often needed to be relocated because the source of water wasn't enough for the European farming system imposed by the padres on the natives.

During the Jesuit period, the missions that were moved (more than a mile), or closed from the original founding location are:

SAN JAVIER (mission moved from Rancho Viejo site)

LIGUI (mission closed and everyone was relocated to the new mission of Los Dolores)

SAN JOSE COMONDU (mission moved from Comondu Viejo site, many miles away)

Comodu Viejo (1708-1737)


New site was built into the largest church in all California, torn down in the 1920's to build a school!



A side chapel is all that was spared:



LA PURISIMA (mission moved several miles from Purisima Vieja site)

LA PAZ (mission moved to Todos Santos area near where Mision Santa Rosa de las Palmas was established)

LOS DOLORES (mission moved from near the coast many miles inland to the La Pasion visita site. Some authors have listed La Pasion as a seperate mission.)

Early site: (photo from distant ridge)


Final site at La Pasion:


SANTIAGO (Mission activity began near Los Barriles, moved far inland to Real de Santa Ana, then as a new mission a couple miles from today's Santiago, then into today's Santiago. Some historians say it made one more move to Caduaño.)

SAN JOSE DEL CABO (First site at 'San Jose Viejo' had poor soil and the mission was moved to the present location of the town. A modern church is now on the site.)

CALAMAJUE/ SANTA MARIA (Began at Calamajue, moved many miles north because of bad water and renamed Santa Maria de los Angeles)

Calamajue:


Santa Maria:

=================================================

Dominican missions that required moving to new locations after buildings were erected:

ROSARIO (moved a couple miles to edge of river after spring on hillside dried up).
First site:


Final site:


SAN MIGUEL (moved 7 miles to site in La Mision after one year)

SANTO TOMAS (moved because of mosquitos about 4 miles)
First site:


Final site:


SAN PEDRO MARTIR (moved from 8,000' at La Grulla to 5,000' because of cold conditions)

Some historians consider the missions of Descanso and Guadalupe just new locations for Mision San Miguel. Because there was no seperate funding, they aren't really seperate missions.



[Edited on 2-23-2009 by David K]

fishbuck - 2-23-2009 at 10:34 PM

And just when we thought the information about the old dead rocks couldn't be anymore useless!:lol:

fishbuck - 2-23-2009 at 10:37 PM

Just kidding. It could be useful. Somehow. To somebody, somewhere, someday.
Couldn't it?:?:

fishbuck - 2-23-2009 at 10:48 PM

The pictures are nice.

Barry A. - 2-23-2009 at 10:53 PM

For History buffs like me it's great!!! Thanks, David.

Well done.

Barry

fishbuck - 2-23-2009 at 10:57 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Barry A.
For History buffs like me it's great!!! Thanks, David.

Well done.

Barry


See! I know there would be atleast one person interested in piles of rocks way out in the middle of no where.:coolup:

David K - 2-23-2009 at 10:57 PM

Thanks Guys...

Fishbuck, those photos and a lot more have been (and still are) at http://vivabaja.com/bajamissions (link on my home page as well: 'The Spanish Missions of Baja California'

fishbuck - 2-23-2009 at 10:59 PM

I hope you know I'm teasing. My first Baja trip was a 4x4 trip through Orange Coast College and we went to a lot of the missions.

Barry A. - 2-23-2009 at 11:04 PM

It's the "middle of nowhere" that is the main draw------the "piles of rock" are just the excuse to actually go there.

It's ALL good!!!

:spingrin:

BArry

Diver - 2-23-2009 at 11:06 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by fishbuck
My first Baja trip was a 4x4 trip through Orange Coast College and we went to a lot of the missions.


Maybe you could return the souvenir stones and bricks you took home ? :P :lol:

fishbuck - 2-23-2009 at 11:11 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Diver
Quote:
Originally posted by fishbuck
My first Baja trip was a 4x4 trip through Orange Coast College and we went to a lot of the missions.


Maybe you could return the souvenir stones and bricks you took home ? :P :lol:


I didn't know they were like historical and stuff. David K wasn't there to tell me. :(

David K - 2-24-2009 at 10:33 AM

Ah guys... I know it is weird to some... but I do love to see and be at the places where 200-300 years ago the padres and the Indians built so much with rock, cut stone and adobe... and the hundreds of miles of road through the desert and mountains.

Before the mission period, there was the rock art made by people who were long gone when the Spanish arrived... After the mission period was the miners time in Baja seeking gold, silver and other metals...

All three types of Baja history is interesting to me!

Mexitron - 2-24-2009 at 11:34 AM

DK--Wonder why they couldn't figure out that La Grulla was too cold before they built there... ...I don't recall now--is the location for the higher mission known, specifically?

Barry A. - 2-24-2009 at 12:38 PM

I spent several days camping at La Grulla in 1954 and we walked and rode horses all over that meadow-------never saw any "ruins" that I can remember.

(which, or course, means nothing) :lol:

Barry

DanO - 2-24-2009 at 12:49 PM

I thought I read somewhere that Santo Tomas was moved twice, the initial location being out on the coast, which didn't work out because the local indians were hostile and the padres had trouble keeping their heads attached. Am I wrong about that?

Update: No, I'm not wrong. Wikipedia says there were indeed three different locations, but that the first location is unclear.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misi%C3%B3n_Santo_Tom%C3%A1s_de...

[Edited on 2-24-2009 by DanO]

David K - 2-24-2009 at 02:31 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by DanO
I thought I read somewhere that Santo Tomas was moved twice, the initial location being out on the coast, which didn't work out because the local indians were hostile and the padres had trouble keeping their heads attached. Am I wrong about that?

Update: No, I'm not wrong. Wikipedia says there were indeed three different locations, but that the first location is unclear.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misi%C3%B3n_Santo_Tom%C3%A1s_de...

[Edited on 2-24-2009 by DanO]


Wikimapia's source from some of the info is Ed Vernon, the author of a great (the best) book on the missions... http://www.bajacaliforniamissions.com/

However, there is disagreement between Ed and one of his sources of information... our own Nomad 'academicanarchist' (Dr. Robert Jackson).

While it is certain the first mission location is off the road to La Bocana, by the oak tree camp area.... and the final site is next to Hwy 1 and the El Palomar campground... the question is about a new mission building constructed on the north side of the canyon, near the 'first site'... Meigs sketched in in 1926 and labeled it the mission church and the 'first site'.

It was built perhaps in 1794 per one document, and then destroyed by road crews grading the road to La Bocana, in recent history.

The problem Dr. Jackson has with Ed calling it a 'second site', is that the church is only one part of a 'mission'... and only because the church was relocated (less than a mile away)... doesn't mean the entire 'mission' was moved. In fact, the records show only one move was authorized by Dominican leaders.

So, while I have great respect for Ed... I tend to agree with Robert on this mission having only two unique mission sites. Ed's belief came from the writings and sketches of Peveril Meigs that didn't identify a site, on the south side of the creek... only the adobe that was later destroyed by road crews on the north side.... what Ed believes to be a 'second site'.

Naturally, none are alive to know this first hand, so we history buffs have to come to some concussions based on the facts available and observations.

Baja Angel and I visited both sites in 2005:

First site, founded in 1791



The first location of the Santo Tomas mission is 3.9 miles from Hwy. 1, just 1/4 mile off the Puerto Santo Tomas/ La Bocana graded road, at 31 34.18, 116 28.80 (NAD27).

In 1799, the mission was moved to its final location (where the town grew from):



Once a large mission complex, only a few low adobe walls remain 156 years after it was abandoned. Located just east of the highway and north of the El Palomar campground in Santo Tomas at 31 33.50, 116 24.77 (NAD27).

[Edited on 2-10-2015 by David K]

Jack Swords - 2-24-2009 at 02:49 PM

Mexitron: here is a link that provides more information on the La Grulla site. Julia is the INAH person for northern Baja. Want to hike
up there?

www.pcas.org/Vol33N3/333Fostr.pdf

David K - 2-24-2009 at 03:20 PM

Great link Jack... Max Kurillo has a lot of details too.

Do you have a good link to the Santo Tomas sites... beyond or to enforce what I wrote above?

Jack Swords - 2-24-2009 at 07:39 PM

According to INAH, there was only one site of Mission San Tomás. They cite Doctor M. Mathes about the second site at the entrance to town as serving as a bodega for the mission, not as a mission. Then again, their literature includes planos (drawings) of foundation plans and refers to "primera misión de Santo Tomás" for one drawing, and "Santo Tomás de Aquino" for the second. Why the "first" site and implying a second is a mystery. Tomás Robertson (who lived in the Ensenada area) states that in 1794 the mission was moved to its present site where you enter the puebla of San Tomás. He even says Engelhardt gave dimensions of the church and rooms. Two padres were murdered there in 1803. Ed (Vernon) cites conflicting reports on this mission (s) as well and so it apparently remains as one of the many enigmas in Baja.

Spent one day exploring San Hilario north of La Paz. It was cited as a "garden" of the mission La Paz by G & G. Lots of rancheros knew its history, but not a single artifact was able to be found. Nice watered area, but not even a wall remains.

La Huerta, south of La Paz has historical significance and a very interesting graveyard. Needs more time and info. Can't get much information from discussions with the locals. I'll try to post some photos of mission-era remains.

Want to hike into La Grulla and photograph that first site of San Pedro Martir?

David K - 2-25-2009 at 08:21 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Jack Swords
According to INAH, there was only one site of Mission San Tomás. They cite Doctor M. Mathes about the second site at the entrance to town as serving as a bodega for the mission, not as a mission. Then again, their literature includes planos (drawings) of foundation plans and refers to "primera misión de Santo Tomás" for one drawing, and "Santo Tomás de Aquino" for the second. Why the "first" site and implying a second is a mystery. Tomás Robertson (who lived in the Ensenada area) states that in 1794 the mission was moved to its present site where you enter the puebla of San Tomás. He even says Engelhardt gave dimensions of the church and rooms. Two padres were murdered there in 1803. Ed (Vernon) cites conflicting reports on this mission (s) as well and so it apparently remains as one of the many enigmas in Baja.

Spent one day exploring San Hilario north of La Paz. It was cited as a "garden" of the mission La Paz by G & G. Lots of rancheros knew its history, but not a single artifact was able to be found. Nice watered area, but not even a wall remains.

La Huerta, south of La Paz has historical significance and a very interesting graveyard. Needs more time and info. Can't get much information from discussions with the locals. I'll try to post some photos of mission-era remains.

Want to hike into La Grulla and photograph that first site of San Pedro Martir?


INAH may mean well... but their facts are off and information is real shallow.

When ever you have new photos of sites, I will add them to your web page: http://vivabaja.com/swords

The first San Pedro Martir mission site at La Grulla (known as Casilepe) would be interesting to see... As I understand, they found the dozens of square base stones upon which a wooden structure was built?

Mexitron - 2-26-2009 at 11:23 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Jack Swords
Mexitron: here is a link that provides more information on the La Grulla site. Julia is the INAH person for northern Baja. Want to hike
up there?

www.pcas.org/Vol33N3/333Fostr.pdf


Sounds like fun to me! We're trying for a month-long Baja trip in July-ish...might be able to do it then if the hike isn't too arduous (my wife will be with me)

Mission Fact Sheet (Part 1, Jesuit Missions)

David K - 3-11-2009 at 03:50 PM

The Baja Missions web pages at VivaBaja.com are going to be totally revised with a new look... I am using my time while not working irrigation jobs to fine tune the dates and facts on the missions in Baja...

Here is what I have done today... the Jesuit Order's seventeen missions in 'Antigua California'.

(Information from books by Crosby, Vernon, Robertson, Engelhardt, and Gerhard)

Baja California Spanish Mission Fact Sheet

Seventeen Jesuit founded missions 1697-1768

1 Nuestra Señora de Loreto Conchó 1697-1829

2) San Francisco Javier de Biaundó 1699-1817
(Moved 5 miles south in 1710)

3) San Juan Bautista de Ligüí/ Malibat 1705-1721
(Endowment used to found Los Dolores, in 1721)

4) Santa Rosalía de Mulegé 1705-1828

5) San José de Comondú 1708-1827
(Moved to visita site ‘San Ignacio’, in 1736)

6) La Purísima Concepción de Cadegomó 1720-1822
(Moved ~1735)

7) Nuestra Señora del Pilar de la Paz Airapí 1720-1748
(Moved to Santa Rosa de las Palmas and replaced that mission in 1748)

8) Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe de Huasinapí 1720-1795

9) Nuestra Señora de los Dolores Apaté 1721-1741 & 1741-1768, at La Pasión
(Moved to visita site La Pasión, at Chillá, renamed Los Dolores Chillá 1741- 1768. Often known as ‘Dolores del Sur’ to separate it from the proposed mission in the north ‘Dolores del Norte’)

10) Santiago el Apóstol Aiñiní 1724-1795 (An early site that failed was at Real de Santa Ana, started in 1722. The 1724 Santiago mission site, at Rancho La Misión, was moved after approx. ten years to the location of the modern town church. Some historians report a third move in 1790, to Caduaño.)

11) Nuestro Señor San Ignacio Kadakaamán 1728-1840

12) San José del Cabo Añuití 1730-1840
(Soon moved 5 miles inland from near the sea. Moved back, close to sea in 1735. One final move about one mile inland, in 1753)

13) Missions at Todos Santos 1733 to 1840:
Santa Rosa de las Palmas 1733-1748. (Previously a visita of the La Paz mission named Todos Santos). The La Paz mission moved here and Santa Rosa was renamed Nuestra Señora del Pilar (de la Paz) 1748-1840. (Moved ~1825 approx. one mile south)

14) San Luis Gonzaga Chiriyaqui 1737-1768

15) Santa Gertrudis de Cadacamán 1751-1822 Originally designated as ‘Dolores del Norte’ on Jesuit records and maps, name changed by request of the benefactor.

16) San Francisco de Borja Adac 1762-1818

17) Calamajué 1766-1767 & 1767-1769, at Santa María
(Moved to Cabujakaamung and renamed Santa María de los Angeles 1767-1769)

David K - 3-11-2009 at 04:12 PM

From 1697 to 1768 (The Jesuit Period) only two missions were 'terminated' under their control:

San Juan Bautista de Ligüí/Malibat in 1721 (the mission endowment was used to establish Los Dolores and the Ligüí mission Indians were moved there.

Santa Rosa de las Palmas in 1748. Misión Nuestra Señora del Pilar de la Paz Airapí was moved from La Paz Bay south to Todos Santos and 'replaced' the mission of Santa Rosa de las Palmas, that was at Todos Santos since 1733.

The Jesuits were expelled from California in February of 1768... later that year the Spanish King's Inspector General, Don José de Gálvez made harsh orders that resulted in the deaths of many natives as he ordered the closing of Los Dolores and San Luis Gonzaga and their Indians were made to relocate far from their lands to Todos Santos.

David K - 4-25-2009 at 07:18 AM

BRAND NEW, REVISED MISSION DATA, begins here: http://vivabaja.com/missions1

Includes photos and details of all THREE Santo Tomas sites.

[Edited on 10-14-2009 by David K]