Originally posted by Bajaboy
Quote: | Originally posted by jdtrotter
Quote: | Originally posted by Bajaboy
So let's see....FMTs, fishing licenses, and now a new few...what does one get in return for these fees? Sounds like another way to discourage tourism
to me. |
The fees for the Preserve are not new----just not enforced in lots of areas in the past.
Lots of people criticize the Preserves for not "preserving" enough, so maybe with the enforcement of the fees, there will be more money available for
good projects. Unlike a lot of tax money that goes to Mexico City, from our understanding, the fees stay local.
New roads, new development, new Baja and not everyone is going to like it.
We hope it will not discourage tourism, just like charging fees for using Yosemite certainly has not discouraged tourism.
[Edited on 6-14-2009 by jdtrotter] |
When I buy a fishing license in California it goes towards protecting the sealife. When I go to Yosemite, I can count on public bathrooms, maintained
trails, campgrounds, etc. This is just another money grab by someone in govt. I'm sure the licensed tour guides are paying licensing fees that
should go towards the preserve.
All I'm saying is add up the fees for a family of four....FMTs about $90...fishing licenses $200 and now another $80. There are better means and
methods to raise money for the preserve if that is what this is really about. I really don't think that is the case. |