Originally posted by Woooosh
Quote: | Originally posted by JESSE
Quote: | Originally posted by DENNIS
Quote: | Originally posted by JESSE
Has the american media hyped things? Off course it has |
Ok....I'm not trying to argue with Jesse but, show me just one instance where the US media has overblown a report. Where and when did the press
over-react?
Everybody screams "Media Over-reaction" but, show me just one case. Please. |
Just last May, the Swine flu thing. We had 0 cases, but they made it look like all of Mexico was contaminated. Days and weeks of bad press. Or look at
many political races in the US, destroyed by stories that where later known to be untrue. |
hindsight is 20/20. If Mexico hadn't claimed the swine flu as their own and built a bronze statue in it's honor- the media might have gone easier.
No cases in Baja? There are over a million swine flu cases now- baja didnt escape- it just refused to acknowledge it was here.
As one comedian says... You can't fix stupid. The media loves stupid. Did you miss the protests in the area of the flu origin by residents unhappy
with the lack of information and response? I saw and heard that and the media certainly picked up on it. When everyone is scared and in a panic- the
media fills in the blanks, for right or wrong. Mexico waited too long.
You can go back now, after the facts and events are clearer and reconstruct the flu event and even make Mexico look better in hindsight- but at the
time of the event there was clearly panic in that area and why wouldn't the media feed on that? If Mexico had found flu origin sooner- it would have
been worse actually because sealing it off from the world would have worked to contain it. But they waited too long, it got out of the area and
containment wasn't an option. It doesn't mean Mexico wasn't initially to blame- it just meant it was too late to contain it at that point.
Do you have a better example?
[Edited on 6-29-2009 by Woooosh] |