BajaNomad

Construction in Bahia de Las Animas??

OCEANUS - 2-9-2010 at 05:32 PM

There have been some reports on the Bloody Decks website regarding an wealthy individual (telecommunications guy) who is using barges to transport construction supplies into Bahia de Las Animas to build a home/hotel.

Has anyone here heard of this?

If it is true...
1) Where is this person placing the structure?

2) Is the site near the yurts that claim to be in Las Animas, or is he actually building closer to the fish camps south of there?

3) Who actually owns the land that he is building on?

Thank you, any news would be appreciated

Sharksbaja - 2-9-2010 at 08:28 PM

Ask DK the "promoter". Where else can you get panoramic views of sensitive yet desirable coastal places.

I hear there is fresh water there. Golf anyone??:mad:

Sharksbaja - 2-9-2010 at 08:30 PM

I swear to God David, if they develop that area I'll put the blame directly on you.

marv sherrill - 2-9-2010 at 08:40 PM

It is actually at Pescador, which is also called Las Animas - why I don't know - its Carlos Slim -he has a giant barge in LA bay and transports lots of stuff - so far just a couple of giant fancy palapas to go with the cabanas that have been there for quite a while - I don't know what his ultimate plans are but probably "condos and a giant golf course"....ain't gonna happen - no worries -

Barry A. - 2-9-2010 at 08:45 PM

-----------again, no fresh water known of at, or near, Bahia de las Animas. Yurts are not in Animas, but are quite a bit north.

Barry

Sharksbaja - 2-9-2010 at 09:36 PM

Ok then.... nevermind:P

BornFisher - 2-9-2010 at 10:07 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
I swear to God David, if they develop that area I'll put the blame directly on you.


If you are serious here, please explain how DK is to blame!

Diver - 2-9-2010 at 10:33 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by BornFisher
Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
I swear to God David, if they develop that area I'll put the blame directly on you.


If you are serious here, please explain how DK is to blame!


Is it possible that DK posted and then deleted his posts; as he so often does ?
.

David K - 2-9-2010 at 10:41 PM

Yah, this is getting old... they were some old rock walls and circles that someone found in 1966 and thought they could be connected to a proposed mission on a 1757 map. I talked by phone to the head archeologist who has published research papers on the area... NOTHING UNIQUE (or fragile)...

It was special to Choral Pepper that I would find the site, and with your help (and blessing to do so) I published the trip here and on Discover Baja, with credit to YOU (with the name you asked me to use) for showing me what you saw on Google Earth... that indeed turned out to be the site I had made several searches for and nobody in the Erle Stanley Gardner party could remember where it was.

So Corky, let it go... there are many mystery walls in Baja. You helped me find ONE that was special to me, now you have some need to make it something else entirely.

The story and photos can be seen on my site: http://vivabaja.com/109

This wall is easily seen by anyone at Las Animas or from the road to Las Animas if they look towards the hill, 2 miles from the beach.

You have since found other walls and keeping them secret... for whatever purpose that has, so you can enjoy them and call them your secret walls. They are probably known by others, and they will still be there for hundreds of years... just like the points on the Pacific side of Baja... If it makes you happy to not tell anyone, then great. Just because it isn't on Baja Nomad doesn't mean others don't already know! :rolleyes:;D

David K - 2-9-2010 at 10:43 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Diver
Quote:
Originally posted by BornFisher
Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
I swear to God David, if they develop that area I'll put the blame directly on you.


If you are serious here, please explain how DK is to blame!


Is it possible that DK posted and then deleted his posts; as he so often does ?
.


No, not the case... You also need a life on Nomad beyond picking on me... Let's play fair, okay?: Only pick on me whenever I pick on you, okay Diver... That should be ... ummm, let's see... oh yah, NEVER! :light:

Diver - 2-9-2010 at 10:54 PM

A bit over-sensitive tonight ? :tumble:

I am not aware of the background so only asked the question.
I know you wouldn't deny that you delete your posts at times.
A simple "No, not this time." would have been fine.

We've been through the "get a life" thing before and you lost.
I think that counts as an attack; what do you think ?
I could post quotes of you picking on me in the past but you've probably deleted them already. :P :lol:
.

Diver - 2-9-2010 at 10:56 PM

So why IS Sharky peaved at DK ??
Did he discover and market the land to the developers or something ?
Post a GPS coordinate for someone ?
What ?

Sharky ?? DK ??

Martyman - 2-10-2010 at 09:29 AM

We stopped by once to check out the fancy palapas. Just a caretaker and his family. Tried to get a beer...not for sale. Scenic place.

David K - 2-10-2010 at 09:40 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Diver
So why IS Sharky peaved at DK ??
Did he discover and market the land to the developers or something ?
Post a GPS coordinate for someone ?
What ?

Sharky ?? DK ??


I think I explained pretty well above... but, apparently not good enough... If you have been reading my posts here since 2002 and Amigos de Baja up to 2003 when it died, then you will know I have been seeking a rock wall, on a hillside, south of Bahia de los Angeles... A wall found by the Erle Stanley Gardner expedition of Feb., 1966 when they opened the road south to San Freancisquito.

I made a web page about the old map and Choral Pepper who was there and took two photos of the wall site, was helping and hoping I could find it: http://vivabaja.com/1757 Those photos were published in her Desert magazine a few months later... She, nor others still alive in 2001 could remember where excatly they were... With so many other discoveries they made, this one was not major... In Gardner's 1967 'Off the Beaten Track in Baja' covering that trip, it wasn't included.

Sharks spotted what looked like a wall on a hillside while looking at Google Earth... and showed it to me, wondering if that was the wall. Naturally, I wouldn't know unless I went there... so New Years, 2009, we did... and it was the wall in the 1966 photo... and I told Sharks... and I asked him how he would like to be mentioned in the article I was going to write, and he told me to use his full name, and that should have been the end of it.

But, there seemed to be a need to make drama so he has ever since nagged at me for writing the article, after he gave his blessing and knew that was my quest all these years... I thanked him many times for helping me find the site... I don't know what else to do, it is beyond me.

It is just an old wall and some typical sleeping circles, found all over the area. It was special because Choral Pepper thought it may have been a proposed mission being started called Santa Maria Magdalena, because of that 1757 map showing a mission by that name as being 'started' south of L.A. Bay.

Choral's 1973 Baja missions and mysteries book describes the site and Tom Miller's 1974 'The Baja Book' uses Choral's information for his mission chapter... That makes it interesting to me and important to share with everyone who loves Baja... so we might find an answer.

Keeping a rock wall location a 'secret' helps nobody and furthers no education on California history. It is only a secret to you for not sharing, but it is likely well known to the people of the area, archeologists, etc. You can see the wall from the beach, 2 miles away at Las Animas! How secret is that?

rob - 2-10-2010 at 10:14 AM

Four years ago in San Diego I saw a/the master plan for Las Animas by the (then) owner's group. How things are changing.

This beautiful bay had to be one of my favorite places in all of Baja for remote camping - but no water we ever found.

Somewhere I have a picture of our rotty nose to nose with a dolphin (porpoise?).

Diver - 2-10-2010 at 10:25 AM

Ah, thanks for the explanation DK.
I don't often follow the historical posts so I probably missed it - not really my thing.

David K - 2-10-2010 at 10:37 AM

You are welcome Diver...

Baja has some fascinating history... keeps me rivited to the peninsula's mysteries... It is where 'California' really began, afterall!

Sharksbaja - 2-10-2010 at 01:52 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Diver
Ah, thanks for the explanation DK.
I don't often follow the historical posts so I probably missed it - not really my thing.


:lol: David please! You know darn well that even if you had discovered artifacts there you would still downplay it and still post all about where how and who, you can't help yourself. Just like you do with your right-wing crap.

Truth is you don't really know if that old wall holds historical significance or not. Do you?

Diver, David is always right according to him.;D

Who said there is no water there, David?



btw, those rocks all over Baja with art on them are just rocks.

David K - 2-10-2010 at 05:07 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
Quote:
Originally posted by Diver
Ah, thanks for the explanation DK.
I don't often follow the historical posts so I probably missed it - not really my thing.


:lol: David please! You know darn well that even if you had discovered artifacts there you would still downplay it and still post all about where how and who, you can't help yourself. Just like you do with your right-wing crap.

Truth is you don't really know if that old wall holds historical significance or not. Do you?

Diver, David is always right according to him.;D

Who said there is no water there, David?



btw, those rocks all over Baja with art on them are just rocks.


You know Corky, I thought we were friends on here... yet, you continue to bring this up and mis-quote me and accuse me of crap.

"Downplay it?"... I do just the opposite... I expose anything good about Baja to encourage the people brave enough to go to see history, first hand... and help the economy. Secrets help nobody.

I contacted the lead archeologist researching the Las Animas site... and there is nothing 'significant' about that rock wall site.

The real 'crime' is the real missions dissappearing before our eyes and our exposing the historic sites PRESERVES them and makes their plight known to more, so better chance of someting being done.

If there were artifacts I most certanly would show them... before one of your hotel developers tears it all down, someday!

The photos I take and others have taken the past 100 + years is preservation! At least in the photios the future can see the sites the way we did.

I didn't say a thing about water availability there... I asked Marv Sherrill about the area's water... as he used to bring his class there every year for a week. In 1966, the fishernen distilled sea water there...

The date palm indicates there was water or is near the surface at the site.

Bajahowodd - 2-10-2010 at 05:19 PM

It has been an interesting couple of days for DK. Must have something to do with the rain.:lol:

Barry A. - 2-10-2010 at 05:26 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
Quote:
Originally posted by Diver
Ah, thanks for the explanation DK.
I don't often follow the historical posts so I probably missed it - not really my thing.


:lol: David please! You know darn well that even if you had discovered artifacts there you would still downplay it and still post all about where how and who, you can't help yourself. Just like you do with your right-wing crap.

Truth is you don't really know if that old wall holds historical significance or not. Do you?

Diver, David is always right according to him.;D

Who said there is no water there, David?



btw, those rocks all over Baja with art on them are just rocks.


Wow, this does get wearisome------------I can testify that David K is 100% correct on this matter, and I KNOW that David has talked to the Lead Archaeologist for this area as he is a personal aquaintenance of mine, and I have talked with him on this specific subject many times, and worked with him for many years. I spent my entire career involved with, and enforcing archaeological laws (what few there are) in addition to other "resource" laws as a Ranger, and can say that in my opinion what David is doing, and has done, with his promotions and posts is exactly what I would be doing if I had the knowledge that David does. I applaud his efforts and consider him invaluable to this NOMADS board.

This constant criticism of the good work that David does really dismays me, and is beyond my understanding. :no:

Barry

mtgoat666 - 2-10-2010 at 05:36 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Barry A.
in my opinion what David is doing, and has done, with his promotions and posts is exactly what I would be doing if I had the knowledge that David does. I applaud his efforts and consider him invaluable to this NOMADS board.
Barry


2 wrongs don't make a right.

publication of location data for unprotected cultural sites is irresponsible, because it aids looters. publication of location data is only ok if artifacts are protected from looting. i read DK's blog on the site and it is apparent that DK has no knowledge if site is protected or vulnerable, so he should not be publicizing location data.

David K - 2-10-2010 at 06:03 PM

Protect it from who or from what? It is sites that are unknown that get damaged!

If nobody saw it and reported it, then it would be like it never exicted! At least us history buffs have something we can ponder, and maybe figure an answer to?

The known mission sites are crumbling before your eyes... and what are you doing about it? At least I am showing what it looks like when I visit these sites! I wish there were more old photos!

mtgoat666 - 2-10-2010 at 06:19 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Protect it from who or from what? It is sites that are unknown that get damaged!

If nobody saw it and reported it, then it would be like it never exicted!


dk, sometimes you blather nonsense :P

David K - 2-10-2010 at 06:24 PM

bite me :lol:

Barry A. - 2-10-2010 at 08:21 PM

MtGoat--------what you advocate makes you a card-carrying member of the FREEZER CLUB.---------just freeze everything in place, until it disappears "naturally" with only the "select few" having the priviledge of viewing it. How selfish is that???? This "club" also advocates the "closing of the desert" to all but themselves, back-packers, or a few accredited scientists, or even more bazaar stopping ANYBODY from seeing and appreciating our public lands (which more often than not is what really happens).

Many, if not most, of the thousands of Archy sites "not revealed" by the "experts" will simply disappear thru natural weathering without EVER being inventoryed, let alone analysed scientifically. In my book, that is selfish, anti-social, and borders on a crime----------In my opinion, David's largely right in that the more that see a site, and at least partially understand and appreciate it, the better off mankind in general will be, and the site will survive in photos and memories.

Having said that, I do admit that some certain few sites are so valuable in the unique artifacts found there and what they will possibly reveal, that they are worth "hiding" until proper inventory and scientific study can be accomplished. But the huge majority of sites are NOT unique, and should be promoted to the public in order for the better understanding and appreciation by as many as possible-------if for no other reason than to enrich their lives with the wonder of it all.

Barry

Sharksbaja - 2-10-2010 at 09:29 PM

Fair enough Barry. Could you get that reputable and responsible fellow you know to join us and let us all know here that he has studied and deemed that spot "archelogically insignificant".

I would feel much more comfortable knowing that INAH and the Mexican archealogical society and the American research scientist(s) have done a through survey and evaluations of that particular site.

I have seen other papers and maps detailing other known sites in the area. Remember it wasn't I who proposed it was an ancient wall. Wasn't it one of your mentors David?

I was shocked when you (along with some others)
decided that it was of no importance. Especially since the type and age of the structure appeared old, oddly designed and suspiciously placed. You pushed those ideas on everyone. I'm just here to help support you actually because I still believe all those ideas and notions you had about the place.
They seem(ed) plausible to me.

So you get me all excited about the "Lost Mission" then you claim it's nothing and protest my attempt(s) to know more. I still feel the place has merit and should be professionally scoped out. Please direct me to the source of your proclamation and a science paper or study to back it up.

That isn't too much to offer since you are so adament about the whole thing. I just need to be satisfied that your current determination holds water.

I wouldn't go knocking down those walls if they were truely important would you?;D

We are not enemies David, paz.

FYI Barry I have appreciated much of David' work and have complimented him many times over the years, you should know that.

Thanks in advance

LYM - 2-10-2010 at 11:11 PM

Thanks guys, being new to this site I'm gaining quite an education on things and this has truly been an entertaining conversation string. I particularly enjoyed Sharks sarcastic outbursts and David I truly appreciate your helpfulness and sharing of information both on this site and your own.

I do however know first hand how great places do get ruined by too many tourists with a lack of respect for the environment having lived in one of BC's formerly most well kept secrets for 15 years until our neighbors from Alberta decided to take it over and overun the place. Now many of the places that we used to camp at and have all to ourselves for a weekend are overrun with ATVs all over the place, broken glass on the ground, grafiti on the rocks, things burnt down...so there's trade-offs to everything.

Anyway, good to be part of this site now and thanks for the info.

Sharksbaja - 2-11-2010 at 01:25 AM

Thanks for the er, compliment LYM? :lol: I have a sister named Lynn.

So very true though, those Canucks ruin every neighborhood! JOKE! :lol:

......and welcome Oceanus and yourselves.!

.......and did you mean like "neighbors" to the north or are you a Canucklian as well?



[Edited on 2-11-2010 by Sharksbaja]

now that's funny!!

capt. mike - 2-11-2010 at 06:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
bite me :lol:


tell it how it is.

i knew you had it in you DK!:lol::lol:

LYM - 2-11-2010 at 01:33 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
Thanks for the er, compliment LYM? :lol: I have a sister named Lynn.

So very true though, those Canucks ruin every neighborhood! JOKE! :lol:

......and welcome Oceanus and yourselves.!

.......and did you mean like "neighbors" to the north or are you a Canucklian as well?



[Edited on 2-11-2010 by Sharksbaja]

LYM - 2-11-2010 at 01:38 PM

Yes am 100% Canuck from BC and you may be right about some neighborhoods but that's definitely not a trait exclusive to Canadians. thanks for the welcome and it was meant as a compliment by the way.

marv sherrill - 2-11-2010 at 06:40 PM

way to hijack a thread everyone.....

David K - 2-11-2010 at 07:07 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by marv sherrill
way to hijack a thread everyone.....


Marv, I talked to you in person last year regarding the area since I consider you the Nomad expert on Las Animas... But, perhaps for the rest of the gang... if you care to answer one or both of these?

1) What is the water source for the few locals who live there... and they may be seasonal residents, correct?

2) Is it an educational benefit to show other people/ students the walls there so they can ponder their purpose and perhaps discover why they were built or who built them. OR, should nobody but a few elites know they exist, and if people see the wall and ask to look at it, should we tell them no, it is too fragile a rock wall for you to get any closer?

You are a professional educator, a long time visitor to Las Animas, and a Baja buff... Your opinion matters.:cool:

Muchas Gracias!

Wouldn't this happen to the publicized wall left unattended?

Skipjack Joe - 2-11-2010 at 07:47 PM

... and shouldn't the person publishing it's whereabouts be responsible that this doesn't occur before doing so?

Quote:
Originally posted by Pompano










[Edited on 2-12-2010 by Skipjack Joe]

David K - 2-11-2010 at 08:59 PM

Igor, that is not a historic mission or petroglyph site... and since it was given no special value to preserve and appreciate or appeared on well known web sites (until now)... look what happens, because modern 'free-expression' society raises children to have no respect for (in the above case) a religious shrine.

That looks like the new location for La Virgen, along Hwy. 1. I hope it isn't the original about 2 miles east, on the old road.

Sharksbaja - 2-11-2010 at 11:20 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Quote:
Originally posted by marv sherrill
way to hijack a thread everyone.....


Marv, I talked to you in person last year regarding the area since I consider you the Nomad expert on Las Animas... But, perhaps for the rest of the gang... if you care to answer one or both of these?

1) What is the water source for the few locals who live there... and they may be seasonal residents, correct?

2) Is it an educational benefit to show other people/ students the walls there so they can ponder their purpose and perhaps discover why they were built or who built them. OR, should nobody but a few elites know they exist, and if people see the wall and ask to look at it, should we tell them no, it is too fragile a rock wall for you to get any closer?

You are a professional educator, a long time visitor to Las Animas, and a Baja buff... Your opinion matters.:cool:

Muchas Gracias!


Wait a sec! I never inferred any of that elite stuff. I only wanted to make sure you were acting as a prudent visitor by not promoting a potentially important site. You have determined there is nothing of significance mainly because you spent a couple hours there. I contest your authority on the place, sorry.

You also make the claim that it isn't because of what a professor said. I hope that his determination was based upon actual science or was it of conjecture.

The fact that you made that pronouncement so shortly after my visual and your physical discovery of the plateau made me thinkj that no actual ground study was done after the discovery. That is what iI would like to know.

Can I assume that there hasn't been or if there was point me to it so I won't keep crawling up yer arse every time the place is mentioned.

BTW If you look closely with Google Earth you will see an area that has much more green growth than the surrounding features. That usually occurs when subsurface water is available.

It would be terrible to see that bay developed.

Barry A. - 2-12-2010 at 07:31 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by soulpatch
I am curious.
How many times have you two played out this fun time?
Does it ever end?


No, because few ever change their mind no matter what "facts" are presented to back up what one says.

Human nature, I suppose, but it makes progress difficult and tedious.

Barry

David K - 2-12-2010 at 08:42 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Quote:
Originally posted by marv sherrill
way to hijack a thread everyone.....


Marv, I talked to you in person last year regarding the area since I consider you the Nomad expert on Las Animas... But, perhaps for the rest of the gang... if you care to answer one or both of these?

1) What is the water source for the few locals who live there... and they may be seasonal residents, correct?

2) Is it an educational benefit to show other people/ students the walls there so they can ponder their purpose and perhaps discover why they were built or who built them. OR, should nobody but a few elites know they exist, and if people see the wall and ask to look at it, should we tell them no, it is too fragile a rock wall for you to get any closer?

You are a professional educator, a long time visitor to Las Animas, and a Baja buff... Your opinion matters.:cool:

Muchas Gracias!


Wait a sec! I never inferred any of that elite stuff. I only wanted to make sure you were acting as a prudent visitor by not promoting a potentially important site. You have determined there is nothing of significance mainly because you spent a couple hours there. I contest your authority on the place, sorry.

You also make the claim that it isn't because of what a professor said. I hope that his determination was based upon actual science or was it of conjecture.

The fact that you made that pronouncement so shortly after my visual and your physical discovery of the plateau made me thinkj that no actual ground study was done after the discovery. That is what iI would like to know.

Can I assume that there hasn't been or if there was point me to it so I won't keep crawling up yer arse every time the place is mentioned.

BTW If you look closely with Google Earth you will see an area that has much more green growth than the surrounding features. That usually occurs when subsurface water is available.

It would be terrible to see that bay developed.



Corky, it is some walls, some rock circles, a scraggly palm tree and it is right on the road to Bahia Las Animas that anyone can see... and it looked the same 43 years after the first photos were PUBLISHED in 1966.

Now, I can only presume that the site is known or not considered special enough to examine more. That is after I talked with Dr. Ritter who has published papers on Las Animas archeology sites. INAH is way understaffed and financed to even think of them doing anything with so many known sites left unprotected (like many missions in Baja). If this was an established mission site, being rock and not adobe makes it about as protected as it will ever be.

I reported the details on Nomad and Discover Baja because it is interesting to some Baja fans... and because Choral Pepper was so well liked by her readers, it was some closure to her spirit of adventure and wanting to go back there. There is no harm that can come to the site from any Baja Nomads. The damage will come from locals, should they want to build houses on that hill... and keeping my story off the Internet won't have any affect on that... it will only deny a few more from enjoying an interesting place before it is destroyed. It is too interesting to people like us to not share.

Because it isn't on the bay, I doubt if anything will happen there for hundreds of years. Have you even gone there since I went? In fact, I know of two Nomads that planned to visit it but at the last moment, plans changed (Neal Johns and Phil C). It just isn't that big of a magnet to most. even as much as I put into the story or your bringing it back up over and over.

DESERT MAGAZINE, JULY 1966:



2009:





Really, is this little wall worth so much fuss?



Have a great day Corky and everyone else!

Sharksbaja - 2-12-2010 at 12:41 PM

David we already have read this stuff over and over. Since it's "just" a rock wall that is unimportant please tell us how old it is and who built it. Thanks and have a happy Valentines Day.:biggrin:

Tag......your it.....;)

[Edited on 2-12-2010 by Sharksbaja]

bajabum - 2-12-2010 at 02:17 PM

I was in BOLA last october and there was a 60-70 foot yacht anchored in the bay, I asked Sammy Diaz about it and he said it was owned by Carlos Salim. Apparently he is the senior partner in an investment group that has purchased a large parcel of land that goes from about don Juan cove all the way around the back side of the bay to behind the town of BOLA. They plan to develop the land and build condos, hotels, and a casino. Sammy said they were already grading the lots for the condos. between this and the activities at Gonzaga it seems that some are banking on this region turning into the next Cabo...Its anybodys guess as to what is true or not and if any of this will ever become a reality but there is definetly sone serious cash behind it.

Sharksbaja - 2-12-2010 at 02:38 PM

Yeah, can't wait for the chain-link fences to go up.:(


Salim?? Is he a Saudi Mexican? That would be perfect!!! They know how to ruin a desert.:barf:

bajabum - 2-12-2010 at 02:53 PM

He is one of the richest guys in Mexico, right up there with gates and buffet so there is some serious cash behind the project and the clout to get what he wants with the govt

PabloS - 2-12-2010 at 05:05 PM

Rock walls north of Agua Verde too.

marv sherrill - 2-12-2010 at 05:34 PM

Problem number one - THERE IS NO WATER!!! IN ANIMAS OR La unica - aka Pescador - Unless a desalt plant goes in (which will fail due to lack of maintenance) you can grade all you want and just have flat land devoid of vegetation - remember the "next Cabo" started just north of the Airport in Bola years ago - scraped all the land laid out cool white rocks around each lot and - -nada - Next - Owner of Los Vientos Hotel bought up land around La Gringa for the "next Cabo" - now the hotel is going under and is for sale.
Money talks, but talk is cheap - anyone can have their own opinion, but not their own facts.

As for the wall - I'm sure it has historical value, I have seen the site many times. Let those that are interested research its origins, but for now - my opinion..- just let it be.

Barry A. - 2-12-2010 at 05:56 PM

Well, I have been to Animas at least 20 times, staying a week each time, and I never saw the "wall". I sure wish some NOMAD-type had told ME about it------I would have loved to have poked around there and speculated on what it was built for, and when. I thrive on stuff like that.

Maybe someday-------------

Barry

Sharksbaja - 2-13-2010 at 03:16 AM

It all leads me to believe Davids' thoughts are true. No one seems to give a darn and I guess haven't taken the initiative to prove the point one way or another save for Nomad Barry. Thanks Barry for involving your revelant friend.
I'm still waiting for his confirming report.

Davids determination seems based upon opinion rather than actual hard scientific evaluation however, hence my unrelenting diatribe.

No biggie, just another b-tchen' bahia I worry about is that so wrong????:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

mtgoat666 - 2-13-2010 at 08:33 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
It all leads me to believe Davids' thoughts are true. No one seems to give a darn and I guess haven't taken the initiative to prove the point one way or another save for Nomad Barry. Thanks Barry for involving your revelant friend.
I'm still waiting for his confirming report.

Davids determination seems based upon opinion rather than actual hard scientific evaluation however, hence my unrelenting diatribe.

No biggie, just another b-tchen' bahia I worry about is that so wrong????:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


now that dk has published location, looters are knowledgeable of location and will go and dig pits, pillage, etc.

this site is a good example of why you should not post site info if you care about site. if you let dk and others blog about it, well, it won't be a secret anymore, and carlos slim may come in his yacht and build a condo complex and resort on site :lol:

thanks for ruining BOLA, dk :(:(

David K - 2-13-2010 at 12:59 PM

Yah, that's me ruining BOLA? Just where is BO-LA anyway? :lol:

The rock wall is 35 miles from Bahia de los Angeles (L.A. Bay, I never say BOLA)... but you have never been off the pavement in a motorized vehicle anyway, you walk everywhere right?

wessongroup - 2-13-2010 at 01:24 PM

thanks, it is a good point.. and I don't usually agree with the goat..

David K - 2-13-2010 at 01:30 PM

So, only Baja Nomads are bad people and will wreck the site?... never mind all the other sites that have been damaged or could be stabilized, but aren't. This site is not unknown, it has been there for hundreds of years and has nothing to offer anyone... it is just interesting and with the Choral Pepper connection, was specially interesting to me and Desert Magazine fans... not the kind of folks that ruin thins in Baja!

bajaguy - 2-13-2010 at 01:31 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mtgoat666
.............thanks for ruining BOLA, dk :(:(





Now that a stretch of a real vivid imagination................

mtgoat666 - 2-13-2010 at 01:35 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Yah, that's me ruining BOLA? Just where is BO-LA anyway? :lol:

The rock wall is 35 miles from Bahia de los Angeles (L.A. Bay, I never say BOLA)... but you have never been off the pavement in a motorized vehicle anyway, you walk everywhere right?


i call that whole area bola. is not important what you, me or anyone calls it.

yes, i bike or hike when road ends. i am not into ruining desert...

dk, i don't expect you to appreciate preservation of artifacts or the desert,... fully expect you to rip/shred a new road and blog about it on facey-space :lol::lol:

Skipjack Joe - 2-13-2010 at 03:58 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by marv sherrill
Owner of Los Vientos Hotel bought up land around La Gringa for the "next Cabo" - now the hotel is going under and is for sale.


Well that is good news. That area is so beautiful. Almost as nice as Puerto Escondido had once been.

David K - 2-13-2010 at 06:45 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mtgoat666
Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Yah, that's me ruining BOLA? Just where is BO-LA anyway? :lol:

The rock wall is 35 miles from Bahia de los Angeles (L.A. Bay, I never say BOLA)... but you have never been off the pavement in a motorized vehicle anyway, you walk everywhere right?


i call that whole area bola. is not important what you, me or anyone calls it.

yes, i bike or hike when road ends. i am not into ruining desert...

dk, i don't expect you to appreciate preservation of artifacts or the desert,... fully expect you to rip/shred a new road and blog about it on facey-space :lol::lol:


You have no idea since you selectivly do not read about my trips... I never support cross country driving. Baja already has roads to everywhere. Take your beef to the Mexican people who open new roads across the desert... and 'ruin' it, as you say.

I do more to open awareness of important 'desert' locations and that have more chance of keeping someplace preserved than you ever will by all your coplaining on things you do not know. Don't take my word for it, experts on desert ecology like Barry A. and Jack Swords (my partner on the Baja Missions identification project) are the ones.

Your walking cross-country could do more harm than my driving on an established road, anyday! :light::yes:

Barry A. - 2-14-2010 at 09:56 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
It all leads me to believe Davids' thoughts are true. No one seems to give a darn and I guess haven't taken the initiative to prove the point one way or another save for Nomad Barry. Thanks Barry for involving your revelant friend.
I'm still waiting for his confirming report.

Davids determination seems based upon opinion rather than actual hard scientific evaluation however, hence my unrelenting diatribe.

No biggie, just another b-tchen' bahia I worry about is that so wrong????:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


Sharks------

In order for you to help put your mind at rest over this antiguities situation at Animas, I suggest you Google "Dr. Eric Ritter" to gain his personal e-mail address and telephone number, and then Google "Dr. Eric Ritter Baja California" in order for you to gain some understanding of his credentials in Baja CA archaeology.

Your concern over all this is understandable, and even admirable, but you don't seem to grant much credibility or trust in members of this NOMADS board (and that too is probably understandable!?!?!? :lol: )

Barry

David K - 2-14-2010 at 10:39 AM

As Corky and others know, it was Dr. Ritter who I called and discussed the site, if it was significant or not and if it could have a Jesuit connection. A great big thank you to Barry for connecting Eric Ritter and I together by phone! I don't think there is a better archeologist available on this area.

Just as reported in his papers, there are MANY such sites in that area, so it is not significant. He could not be sure if there was or was not a mission connection, but he did forward my photos and findings to Dr. Michael Mathes... considered the current leading mission expert on Baja California.

I also sent Dr. Mathes an email with the web page of the site http://vivabaja.com/109 and have not heard back from him in the past year since. Knowing Dr. Mathes' fealings about Choral Pepper's lost mission chapters, I believe he dismissed our Jesuit connection with the Las Animas site for Santa Maria Magdalena.

So, as for follow up on the site, I think I did as much as possible to be sure it wasn't soooo fragile that telling you Baja fans about what we saw there. We saw nothing fragile and the lead area archeologist was not alarmed or concerned about the site being published.

Case closed?:rolleyes:

Sharksbaja - 2-14-2010 at 03:53 PM

Ahhhhhh Soulpatch, not to worry please, David understands me I think.
I think we may get some closure here...

I know you you can't stand, as you see it, redundant posting on this subject. It certainly is, and my rhetoric remains the same until I feel safe that my discovery and subsequent trust in David to "do the right thing" and be prudent about disclosure.

That he did not do. He did however enlist the likes of a few and they, w/o going there, concluded similar findings.

I would think that would be his civic duty, or at least that is what I hoped for when I divulged the site to DK.

DK and his cronies have made it clear that they think the place historically irrelevant and insignificant. I question that however, mainly because investigating the how when and who of the walls and other old obviously man-made features nearby should take place and presidence before some overzealous dude on some forum without formal training or expertise may be incorrect as well as his supporters who haven't actually walked or studied the place and can make such conclusions. JMHO

David, you continue to claim the site unworthy of study. Frankly that does not seem to fit your motis operandi. You have stated coutless times how much of ahistorian and what a preservationist of Bajas' historical treasures you are.

Anyhoo, it confuses me that you won't persue the history of that site more vigorously, especially since you exploited it so well.

Give me the facts and resources that back up those claims David or STFU, or I will, is that fair enuff?

I never doubted any of your contact general authority and expertise. Now with all that said, I will just remain unconvinced until an actual (real) assessment is done. That way you may be proven correct.

Case unclosed. Have a nice day.

Barry A. - 2-14-2010 at 05:21 PM

Sharks, I repeat:

"Sharks------

In order for you to help put your mind at rest over this antiquities situation at Animas, I suggest you Google "Dr. Eric Ritter" to gain his personal e-mail address and telephone number, and then Google "Dr. Eric Ritter Baja California" in order for you to gain some understanding of his credentials in Baja CA archaeology."

If you want "closure" (which you don't appear to want) on this issue, why not contact the expert? Hopefully that would be the "documentation" and "reference" that you say you want.
(unless you just want to head-butt???------a more likely scenario)

Barry

mtgoat666 - 2-14-2010 at 06:20 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Barry A.
Sharks, I repeat:

"Sharks------

In order for you to help put your mind at rest over this antiquities situation at Animas, I suggest you Google "Dr. Eric Ritter" to gain his personal e-mail address and telephone number, and then Google "Dr. Eric Ritter Baja California" in order for you to gain some understanding of his credentials in Baja CA archaeology."

If you want "closure" (which you don't appear to want) on this issue, why not contact the expert? Hopefully that would be the "documentation" and "reference" that you say you want.
(unless you just want to head-butt???------a more likely scenario)

Barry


i googled him. based on id for a recent paper he appears to be a blm emplyee who teaches pt at shasta comm college. unclear if he has ever looked at site.
i have suspicion about competency of any govt employee. it's just that govt employment doesn't indicate above average intellect.

Barry A. - 2-14-2010 at 07:17 PM

The Goat did not go far enough on Google-------(no surprise there)

Dr. Eric Ritter was lead Archaeologist for the BLM California Desert Program from it's inception (early '70's), then transferred to Redding, CA as the Archaeologist for BLM Northern CA area after the CA Desert Plan reached it's implementation, and was thru with the research portion of the CA Desert Study, a program which took many years (about 10+ years, as I remember).

For many years simultaneously, he did much archaeological work throughout Baja CA, and to the best of my knowledge is still very active in Baja Historical and Archaeological work. (I have not kept up with him lately, tho he is a neighbor)

As for his creds, I think for starters his PHd should give a clue. In my day, 98% of the employees with CA-BLM were college grads. Can't say now. (retired for 14 years) All (100%) BLM Ranger's were College Grads, some with advanced degrees.

Barry

Paulina - 2-14-2010 at 07:32 PM

You guys are killing me. Marv answered the original question. The rest of you are talking about a completely different place.



We used to camp on Isla Pescador back in college days 1980s when nothing was there on the other shore other than shark shacks.

Fermin Smith owned that portion of the mainland, not the island. He built the place up from shark shacks to the rooms and main palapa.

Carlos Slim owns it now and has his own plans for the place.

Pescador is still a beautiful place with a little island and as of last summer we could still anchor our panga there and hang out.

Time will tell what happens with that area. The Pescador-Las Animas that was the original question, NOT the other Las Animas wall drama that has hijacked this thread.

If you all want to continue your b.s. it would be great if you started another thread, or found the one that has been run over too many times before and take it up once again there.

Thanks,

P<*)))>{

[Edited on 15-2-2010 by Paulina]

David K - 2-14-2010 at 08:23 PM

Corky, putting words in my mouth doesn't change the facts of the matter... I think it is a great site for us to investigate. There is nothing FRAGILE there that warrants some secret being kept about it. The archeologists have had over 30 years to investigate the well known (to them) site... and found the rock circles and graves closer to the bay more interesting. That is what Ritter's paper (published) is about.

Paulina... sorry this went south, but Corky (Sharks) just 'had' to throw in the dark comment about me in the beginnings of this conversation and twisting the facts requires clarity, IMO.

Corky, it is my duty as Baja Nomad trip reporter, travel writer and history researcher/ explorer to let fellow Baja fans know that there is more still out there... more reasons to keep looking and to keep visiting Baja. That is good for the people of Baja.

Give the fish a break and see what the early Baja travelers were doing! It is our nature to learn and see more of what's out there. If my old mission photos or rock walls up close bother you... then don't look at them. If your killing fish and carving them up to cook bothered me, would you stop???

Let's be friends and just enjoy what we can learn from shared experiences. The longer this goes the more it sounds like you set me up to harass me forever... You showed me a possible site. I drove 500 miles to check it out. You did not ask me to limit anything in my report before I wrote it. You even told me how you wanted to be credited (which I insisted on doing to honor you). Give me a break, please.

Sharksbaja - 2-15-2010 at 12:51 AM

Sheesh David I did not put words in your mouth. You have continuely downplayed any significance it might have.

I understand that Dr. Ritter is an expert in his field and there have been a number of field trips that have yielded historically important sites in the general area. Isn't that why the place is suspect?

That is exactly why I questioned your findings. Like I said before, I won't question his expertise. You showed him a few photos a talked to him. I want to know if he's actually checked the site out personally.

Can we agree that it is old? How old?

Was it built by the natives or ?

What was it's function?

What types of artifacts have been catalogued?


These are the questions that require a simple answer. I would think a prudent person would actually investigate than draw simple conclusions.

Since I did not involve Dr. Ritter I don't feel obliged to contact him. He is your source.

Barry please ask your friend if he went there and examined the place in person. If he did I will stop forever harrassing David over his ever-changing ideas and opinion about the place.

Fair nuff?:yes:


Thanks in advance

Sharksbaja - 2-15-2010 at 01:13 AM

David I have enjoyed many of your contributions. I have always been worried and also active in helping to protect sensitive areas, something you know all about.

I helped stave off development of a sensitive coastal area in SoCal. It was subsequently undeveloped for 20 more years until megalomaniac Donald Trump was somehow able to put f*cking golf course there.

Better than condos however. To this day because of my perserverance coastal access is available there to the chagrin of the company.

So you see David I feel partly guilty with the Animas site. You for one do know the importance of old and special places. I just want to be sure I did the right thang in confiding in you. Honestly, I would like to put this behind us, just need a bit mo info please.

cj5orion - 2-15-2010 at 08:17 AM

This is from the guy on BD!
Yes bajaairadventures is planning SOME upgrades to the existing yurts.nothing more nothing less.
Jus a better solar system,some water tanks,a desal unit,etc,stuff like that.No new structures

Quote:
Originally posted by OCEANUS
There have been some reports on the Bloody Decks website regarding an wealthy individual (telecommunications guy) who is using barges to transport construction supplies into Bahia de Las Animas to build a home/hotel.

Has anyone here heard of this?

If it is true...
1) Where is this person placing the structure?

2) Is the site near the yurts that claim to be in Las Animas, or is he actually building closer to the fish camps south of there?

3) Who actually owns the land that he is building on?

Thank you, any news would be appreciated

larryC - 2-15-2010 at 08:53 AM

Cj5
Welcome to Nomads. You are talking about a different place. Kevins yurts are on alacron beach and Pescador is the next beach towards the Bay of LA. Carlos Slim recently purchased it and is building some palpas on the beach. Not sure what the ultimate plans are, but I think Fermin Smith, before he sold it to Carlos, sold the development rights of the land to Pronatura, so supposedly the land can't be developed commercially. We'll see, but if there is anyplace in the world where money talks, Mexico is that place.
Larry

Barry A. - 2-15-2010 at 10:13 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
Sheesh David I did not put words in your mouth. You have continuely downplayed any significance it might have.

I understand that Dr. Ritter is an expert in his field and there have been a number of field trips that have yielded historically important sites in the general area. Isn't that why the place is suspect?

That is exactly why I questioned your findings. Like I said before, I won't question his expertise. You showed him a few photos a talked to him. I want to know if he's actually checked the site out personally.

Can we agree that it is old? How old?

Was it built by the natives or ?

What was it's function?

What types of artifacts have been catalogued?


These are the questions that require a simple answer. I would think a prudent person would actually investigate than draw simple conclusions.

Since I did not involve Dr. Ritter I don't feel obliged to contact him. He is your source.

Barry please ask your friend if he went there and examined the place in person. If he did I will stop forever harrassing David over his ever-changing ideas and opinion about the place.

Fair nuff?:yes:


Thanks in advance


Sharks------(this whole arguement is simply bazaar) You obviously are never going to be satisfied with what a "middle man" posts here, so NO, I will NOT pursue this with Dr. Ritter------it is YOUR issue-----YOU call him, and ask all your questions, and then, and only then, will you be satisfied (hopefully, but I doubt it)

I will give you this-------you certainly ARE A BULLDOG!!!! :lol:

------and for the point that somebody else made, this site that we are talking about IS near the beach of Bahia de las Animas, and IS very near the Carlos Slim site, tho a little south of it, but is right beside the access road to this entire area, thus it's relevance to this thread.

Barry

Barry

Mellower today! ATTENTION!: UPDATE

Sharksbaja - 2-15-2010 at 01:20 PM

For the purpose of continuity David deleted the post he made prior this reply, thanx:


Quote:

"Maybe it is so late and you have been slaving over a stove all night? You know better than to make a statement like that!"


Perhaps that comment was a little over the top, sorry. It's just that you are serious about those well documented places you report on. This whole thing seems oddly strange to me. The place is sooooo wierd!

Yes David we had an outstanding weekend and btw, we don't have a stove...or an oven....or a grill....or a fryer in our restaurant! Seriously!:biggrin:

Barry if I connect with him should I report back here? :wow:
That's right, being a middle-man and representative is awkward, no?
I prefer "Shark" to "Bulldog"!: More teeth! lol:

[Edited on 2-16-2010 by Sharksbaja]

Barry A. - 2-15-2010 at 01:28 PM

Shark-----------I guess I just assumed that you would report back on what you found out, so yes, I would appreciate it. So much is in the "interpretation" and perspective on what you hear, see, and believe that I think this is a hot-potato issue, maybe not resolvable???

We shall see. Thanks for your response.

Barry

David K - 2-15-2010 at 05:33 PM

Corky,I am sorry amigo... I read your statement as "do not know" not "do know". Iguess I was so used to you debating me, I read it as a negative.

Thank you and I have deleted that post just above... I was wrong... guess I was too tired... or just too tired of this debate.

I forgot that you are a 'steamer'... I heard about your restaurant from my amigos... Squarecircle, who drove all the way to Oregon just to eat your food... BajaRob has been there once, as well.

I think the only fear you need to have of ANY old man-made site in Baja is from developers and locals, and not us interested Baja Nomads who just want to see these sites before they are gone forever! That is why I think sharing the locations is vital to enhance their value. If nobody knows they are out there, then nobody will care when they are gone! Also, nobody will know what got taken from us!

Sharksbaja - 2-15-2010 at 07:54 PM

David I should just have held it back but I got steamed again, sensitive subject asyoukno.

You should head north some time David, all this rain would do ya good!! Untwist the panties.:lol:

Everythang is good. Especially on lesser traveled roads these days!:bounce::bounce:

Soulman......kumbaya again.......... or however tf you spell it!:biggrin:

Barry, I'll do it. I understand your position. Thanx.

[Edited on 2-16-2010 by Sharksbaja]

Thanks for the "welcome aboard" !

cj5orion - 2-16-2010 at 07:56 AM

Not sure about the exact location,but I;ll be there early March
to help with the install.lookin forward to the trip !

Where I'm getting my info from,,,is,,,,,Kevin at Bajaairadventures,he bought the stuff from my bud in Gonzaga Bay,(who is selling out due to "rafeals dust bowl")
We expect to deliver around early March.There will be a 'de-sal' unit installed,now wether or not its for bajaair exclusively or not,I dont know ? It is a 'de-sal' unit capable of
800 gals a day.

'Bajabum' made a comment about the 'development of Gonzaga',I can give ya 1 st hand info that the "development" is jus Rafeals "grandiose" plan to go "one up" on Alphosina's.He's built a terrible seawall that has no footings,no rebar,jus made of rock and poorly made mortar,a couple of high tides and it will be all over the beach ! By clearing "the back forty" of brush,he has created a dust bowl that even penetrates the fridge gaskets ! All he's really done is chase away the few year round palapa renters that he had ! Plus all this,,,the new road construction will be coming to a screaming halt soon,well short of reaching Gonzaga Bay untill new contracts are established !

Again,,Thanx for the welcome aboard ! look forward to it.


Quote:
Originally posted by larryC
Cj5
Welcome to Nomads. You are talking about a different place. Kevins yurts are on alacron beach and Pescador is the next beach towards the Bay of LA. Carlos Slim recently purchased it and is building some palpas on the beach. Not sure what the ultimate plans are, but I think Fermin Smith, before he sold it to Carlos, sold the development rights of the land to Pronatura, so supposedly the land can't be developed commercially. We'll see, but if there is anyplace in the world where money talks, Mexico is that place.
Larry


[Edited on 2-16-2010 by cj5orion]

Barry A. - 2-16-2010 at 09:48 AM

Wow, CJ, that's all really interesting information. Welcome to the NOMADS.

Is the new "de-sal" going in at (from north to south) Ensenada el Quemado, Ensenada el Pescador, Ensenada el Alarcran, or Bahia los Animas?? (Pescador is the one with the tiny island in the bay, and Alacran is the one with the kayak eco-touring development, I believe). Bahia los Animas does have sorta fresh water, but it is really brackish, and there does not appear to be much of it in the recent historic past (last 40 years). Up the wash to the SSW might be more water, but I have seen very little evidence of any in my visits. When I talked to the seasonsal inhabitants of Animas thru the years they have indicated to me that they haul their culinary water in by truck.

That entire coast between B of LA and Punta las Animas (and a little south) is one of the most beautiful and special places in all of Baja CA. I guess it is inevitable that others would agree, and try to develop it-----------(progress???) I just hope they don't mess it up, and then abandon it down the line.

Barry

Martyman - 2-16-2010 at 10:52 AM

Weeel... here is what is going on. I built those stone walls and circles back when the rocks were still soft. I used them there walls to contain my domesticated dinosaurs.

Doug/Vamonos - 2-18-2010 at 08:59 PM

I've been hanging out at the Bay for many years and I really enjoy the time I spend there, mostly to fish. But I will never understand why anyone would think that by building a hotel or condo development that all the sudden huge numbers of customers and vacationers will come there wanting to spend their valuable time, money, and vacation time in a freaking dry ass desert? I go to the Bay to fish or to work on my place or boat so it will be ready the next time I want to come down and fish some more. The Bay is unique for boaters because of the close by islands. It isn't the best fishing, nor is it the most pleasant weather at any time of the year. The water is cold half the year, the wind is howling, it is nearly unbearable in the summer. What does one of the world's richest men see that I don't? And don't tell me I don't understand the real Bahia. I see it for what it is. A very beautiful desert environment that can be very harsh throughout the year. Not the ideal tourist area.

[Edited on 2-19-2010 by Doug/Vamonos]

[Edited on 2-19-2010 by Doug/Vamonos]

David K - 2-19-2010 at 09:30 AM

Exactly... no infrustruture, no town with curio shops and taco stands, either! Closer to town, the Los Vientos hotel on the way to La Gringa is an example of money being thrown away.

David - says who?

capt. mike - 2-19-2010 at 03:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Exactly... no infrustruture, no town with curio shops and taco stands, either! Closer to town, the Los Vientos hotel on the way to La Gringa is an example of money being thrown away.


i don't think the owners would agree with you, they have plenty of capital and if that deal doesn't pencil out , they still have it to use for their own purposes, recreational or otherwise.
sometimes a buy and "hold" is the only RE play that makes sense.
they own most of the dirt over and around the airport i believe as well - from my last time talking with them.

Also - Kevin Warren is very credible and a huge success in eco tourism in Baja. i would trust what he has to say as he is well connected with Mexico entities.

David K - 2-19-2010 at 03:27 PM

Um, isn't it closed/ out of business... and they have been trying to sell off the rooms as condos? Marv Sherrill lives next door... he would know.

[Edited on 2-20-2010 by David K]

capt. mike - 2-19-2010 at 06:12 PM

interesting - i'd sure like to know what's going on.
maybe a trend some place.

airmech - 2-19-2010 at 11:12 PM

Looked over the area from Animas south and didn't see any dirtwork or new roads for the Slim development. We've seen his boats at La Bay the last few times down so we looked around for the rumored condo lots. nuthin yet.

Barry A. - 2-19-2010 at 11:16 PM

-----try looking north, from Animas to B of LA-------maybe something will show up------south of Animas the coast is really rough, mountainous terrain until you get down towards Boca Grande and San Rafael.

Barry

capt. mike - 2-20-2010 at 09:17 AM

Airmech - did you land at BOLA?
any problems?

airmech - 2-20-2010 at 09:37 AM

No problems at all. Only the airports of entry seem to care. We were one of four planes there.
I called Animas the place where Kevin has his yurts, probably incorrectly, but we didn't find anything between there and BOLA either.
PS also didn't find those fricken Jurel that Pompano keeps finding either. We bobbed in the waves a Wilburs hole without a bite.

capt. mike - 2-20-2010 at 09:51 AM

good report, thx.

as far as i know - only flown over, never on shore, but his resort is called Las Animas, the souls, and you can only get there by boat - part of the "romance" of his ops - 1st you fly there, get flown, in his planes - then you transfer to boats to get to the private all inclusive eco paradise on the beach.

frankly - for the $$ i'd rather be at Frambes place.
but he does well.....endorsements from customers nationwide. be a good corporate team build get away.
glad to read the airport "staff" seems to not care about usage....my kind of mexico, the laid back old way!:lol:

David K - 2-20-2010 at 09:52 AM

The eco campo is north of Las Animas proper... the fishing campo on the next big bay south (Bahia las Animas)