Originally posted by fishabductor
Quote: | Originally posted by Cardon Man
Quote: | Originally posted by fishabductor
If you fish you should have a license..period. shorefishing, kayak, boat, spearfishing..it don't matter.
yes...I know that shorefisherman don't need licenses, but that law was based on providing subsistenence for the locals... Buying a license helps fund
the authorities which are responsible to enforce the rules and regs such as making sure the nets are not used.
[Edited on 3-20-2011 by fishabductor] |
Couldn't agree any less on the shore fishing. Keep the license requirement off the backs of shore anglers. There is plenty of cash coming in from the
sale of licenses for boat bound anglers. I was told not long ago that license sales in Baja Sur amount to a monthly total in the many tens of
thousands of dollars. Yet there are still plenty of nets and very little if any enforcement. |
I fish that stretch everytime I put in and rarely see a net in the water, in fact I used to put in exclusively at tule. There are nets there for sure,
but the palo escopeta guys(tule) do have permits or at last did before the law changed.
I agree that there is zero enforcement. I have never been checked once in 8 yrs!!
10's of 1000's is nothing when you really think about it. A new super panga goes for about $30k plus judging on what I have seen used ones selling for
in barriles.
I agree that the locals should not be required to have a license to fish from shore, but us "rich" gringos can afford to buy a license for $50, the
fish belong to the mexican people. |