Originally posted by Bajahowodd
Quote: | Originally posted by David K
You answered my point very well... In the U.S. THERE IS: Chevron, Exxon Mobil, or Conoco Phillips... THAT is called competition, the free market, free
enterprise. We, the people choose where to buy and no one company is run by the government with all competition made illegal. In Mexico, you have
Pemex, Pemex, and Pemex to choose from... LOL!!!
|
You totally miss the point. Whether it is a state monopoly, as the goat notes, or some huge multi-national corporations, the bottom line is that
franchisees relinquish a great deal of their local autonomy just to get the franchise. At the end of the day, any franchiser would seem to welcome the
improvement of a franchise, if it meant selling more product.
Why would Pemex encourage filthy stations? Especially since there is significant tourist busniess, and in my experience, the newer Pemex stations have
employed up-to-date fixtures, and cleanliness standards.
Why do you think that Pemex should be singled-out versus the multi-nationals such as Chevron, Exxon Mobil or Conoco Phillips?
As a franchisee, there is virtually no difference. You are at the mercy of the contract you signed.
Your attempt to bring socialism into this conversation is totally lame. If you want to start a thread about free enterprise versus government control,
be my guest.
But, in my opinion, if Antonio is really not keeping his restrooms clean or cannot build improvements, I'd like to hear that from him.
Please give me some reasons why Pemex would prevent a franchisee from a) providing clean restrooms, and b) improving their property.
|