BajaNomad

Why some hates the incoming high tide.....

mcfez - 4-3-2013 at 06:05 PM

This picture was snapped by akshadow that I swiped from him from another website. It's a gang of poor fellows that got stuck WAY out there :-( in San Felipe. I believe that high water is something like 18 feet at that spot.

Just a good reason why one should not venture so far into the low tide with their car.

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by mcfez]

beached.jpg - 46kB

Ateo - 4-3-2013 at 06:14 PM

Good reminder. I'm very cautious of this stuff now after the small issue I almost had with an incoming tide down at Scorpion Bay.

David K - 4-3-2013 at 06:17 PM

Used to see a stuck 4x4 pretty regularly... People would see me camping on Shell Island, and try to drive across the (Percebu) lagoon to reach it.

Ken Cooke took some photos of us pulling out a Jeep Cherokee owned by a Mexicali policeman (I know have a name to drop if I have any problems there, lol).



Here was another who tried to come out to the island, the wrong way!



[Edited on 4-4-2013 by David K]

durrelllrobert - 4-3-2013 at 07:22 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
This picture was snapped by akshadow that I swiped from him from another website. It's a gang of poor fellows that got stuck WAY out there :-( in San Felipe. I believe that high water is something like 18 feet at that spot.

Just a good reason why one should not venture so far into the low tide with their car.

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by mcfez]
What ever happened to those really high vehicles with big tires that were used to take people out to the boats at low tide in San Felipe during the 60s -70s?

tripledigitken - 4-3-2013 at 07:26 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
This picture was snapped by akshadow that I swiped from him from another website....

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by mcfez]


Did you ask him first?

bajamedic - 4-3-2013 at 10:33 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by durrelllrobert
Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
This picture was snapped by akshadow that I swiped from him from another website. It's a gang of poor fellows that got stuck WAY out there :-( in San Felipe. I believe that high water is something like 18 feet at that spot.

Just a good reason why one should not venture so far into the low tide with their car.

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by mcfez]
What ever happened to those really high vehicles with big tires that were used to take people out to the boats at low tide in San Felipe during the 60s -70s?


Is this what your are refering to? I believe this one is from the mainland. JH
Photo by Rachel Pack

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by bajamedic]

durrelllrobert - 4-4-2013 at 09:57 AM

Kinda, sorta. I think the one I remember had very large tires and you could almost walk under it. Picked us up at our motel and drove out to boat on ground about 1/4 mile offshore. Could have been some sort of old military vehicle or one for moving logs between the wheels. Been about 50 years ago that I saw it in San Felipe.

mcfez - 4-4-2013 at 12:42 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
This picture was snapped by akshadow that I swiped from him from another website....

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by mcfez]


Did you ask him first?


Why would I that tripledigitken?

tripledigitken - 4-4-2013 at 12:49 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
This picture was snapped by akshadow that I swiped from him from another website....

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by mcfez]


Did you ask him first?


Why would I that tripledigitken?



Why would you do that?

Because photos posted on the internet are the property of the photographer that created them. Would akshadow mind, probably not, but it is common courtesy non the less. It is a huge problem for photographers that find their work being used for commercial purposes by others, or being claimed by others as being their creation.

http://webdesign.about.com/od/copyright/a/aa081700a.htm

Ken

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by tripledigitken]

mcfez - 4-4-2013 at 01:02 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
This picture was snapped by akshadow that I swiped from him from another website....

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by mcfez]


Did you ask him first?


Why would I that tripledigitken?



Why would you do that?

Because photos posted on the internet are the property of the photographer that created them. Would akshadow mind, probably not, but it is common courtesy non the less. It is a huge problem for photographers that find their work being used for commercial purposes by others, or being claimed by others as being their creation.

Ken


Hey Ken.....
READ the original topic again. It said:


This picture was snapped by akshadow

The author akshadow...of this picture... was clearly given credit. 99% here knows that when I said swiped......it was a joke. You seem to be that 1% that dropped off the end of the world.

Secondly Ken................
akshadow and I are best of friends in San Felipe. Fact is Ken....we even visited akshadow in Alaska a few years back.

Thirdly Ken........
Your trolling me is a bit tiring. Just because you cant handle it in the Off Topics....dont give you a license to play troll here in the general areas of the BN

Forth Ken........
How do you know...or NOT know...that I got permission from akshadow to use his photo?


Hey Ken....one more time so you comprehension kicks in:
READ the original topic again. It said:


This picture was snapped by akshadow











[Edited on 4-4-2013 by mcfez]

wessongroup - 4-4-2013 at 01:11 PM


mcfez - 4-4-2013 at 01:13 PM

Oh Willy! Now.......do you have permission to use this photo :o



Quote:
Originally posted by wessongroup

DENNIS - 4-4-2013 at 01:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
Because photos posted on the internet are the property of the photographer that created them. Would akshadow mind, probably not, but it is common courtesy non the less. It is a huge problem for photographers that find their work being used for commercial purposes by others, or being claimed by others as being their creation.



Watermark everything....even the watermark. Those who make no effort to protect their work, mainly from vanity, wanting everyone to see the work at it's best, only ask for trouble.
I think Ken Bondy has found some of his work in the wrong hands and it's like having your children kidnapped.
I would imagine that, since the internet came on the scene, stock photo agencies have taken a hard hit.

tripledigitken - 4-4-2013 at 01:17 PM

I don't know what your talking about me trolling you. What gave you that idea? You seem to have some thin skin if a simple question should generate this much anger.

My point is you said you swiped it from another. That statement means you didn't ask permission. Even posting his name does meet the letter of the law. My post is to clarify the issue of posting other persons photos without their permission, that's all. Many are not aware of this technicality.

Ken

tripledigitken - 4-4-2013 at 01:22 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by DENNIS
Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
Because photos posted on the internet are the property of the photographer that created them. Would akshadow mind, probably not, but it is common courtesy non the less. It is a huge problem for photographers that find their work being used for commercial purposes by others, or being claimed by others as being their creation.



Watermark everything....even the watermark. Those who make no effort to protect their work, mainly from vanity, wanting everyone to see the work at it's best, only ask for trouble.
I think Ken Bondy has found some of his work in the wrong hands and it's like having your children kidnapped.
I would imagine that, since the internet came on the scene, stock photo agencies have taken a hard hit.


I choose to not watermark them, as many photographers don't. My photo's are copyrighted in the file and can be proven in court with that metadata. Vanity has nothing to do with it Dennis, it's laziness to some extent. Photography is only a hobby for me as well.

Ken

mcfez - 4-4-2013 at 01:25 PM

Not anger Ken. None here. Irritated. I have never seen you retort with such a question to anyone.........yet there are thousands of pictures posted here. Why me Ken? Dont answer. it's all about you being upset with what happened to you in Off Topics several months ago.

Keep the BS there Ken.

Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
I don't know what your talking about me trolling you. What gave you that idea? You seem to have some thin skin if a simple question should generate this much anger.

My point is you said you swiped it from another. That statement means you didn't ask permission. Even posting his name does meet the letter of the law. My post is to clarify the issue of posting other persons photos without their permission, that's all. Many are not aware of this technicality.

Ken

tripledigitken - 4-4-2013 at 01:29 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
Quote:
Originally posted by DENNIS
Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
Because photos posted on the internet are the property of the photographer that created them. Would akshadow mind, probably not, but it is common courtesy non the less. It is a huge problem for photographers that find their work being used for commercial purposes by others, or being claimed by others as being their creation.



Watermark everything....even the watermark. Those who make no effort to protect their work, mainly from vanity, wanting everyone to see the work at it's best, only ask for trouble.
I think Ken Bondy has found some of his work in the wrong hands and it's like having your children kidnapped.
I would imagine that, since the internet came on the scene, stock photo agencies have taken a hard hit.


Perhaps Ken really dont care about anyone lifting his stuff off his website http://dunken.smugmug.com/ He doesnt have a single anti tool on it.
here Ken....from me to you.
http://www.webdevelopersnotes.com/how-do-i/stop-copying-pict...



Mcfez,

My Smugmug photos are all low res images not original size. the real value of photos are the high res versions. As I said to Dennis all my images have a copyright tag in the metadata, legally that isn't necessary. I have never refused permission to anyone that has asked to copy my work, by the way.

Ken

tripledigitken - 4-4-2013 at 01:31 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
....it's all about you being upset with what happened to you in Off Topics several months ago.



I'm not aware of that issue.

mcfez - 4-4-2013 at 01:39 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
Quote:
Originally posted by mcfez
Quote:
Originally posted by DENNIS
Quote:
Originally posted by tripledigitken
Because photos posted on the internet are the property of the photographer that created them. Would akshadow mind, probably not, but it is common courtesy non the less. It is a huge problem for photographers that find their work being used for commercial purposes by others, or being claimed by others as being their creation.



Watermark everything....even the watermark. Those who make no effort to protect their work, mainly from vanity, wanting everyone to see the work at it's best, only ask for trouble.
I think Ken Bondy has found some of his work in the wrong hands and it's like having your children kidnapped.
I would imagine that, since the internet came on the scene, stock photo agencies have taken a hard hit.


Perhaps Ken really dont care about anyone lifting his stuff off his website http://dunken.smugmug.com/ He doesnt have a single anti tool on it.
here Ken....from me to you.
http://www.webdevelopersnotes.com/how-do-i/stop-copying-pict...



Mcfez,

My Smugmug photos are all low res images not original size. the real value of photos are the high res versions. As I said to Dennis all my images have a copyright tag in the metadata, legally that isn't necessary. I have never refused permission to anyone that has asked to copy my work, by the way.

Ken



Well Ken.....That is nice.

What does it has to do with your "jumping the gun" post to me? Nothing. Fact is Ken........you did a fast read on my original post and the word "swiped" gave you tunnel vision. I advise you to really read any posts in it's whole content....and not just what you wish before jumping on someone.

Here you are...you made a mistake (or a bad troll) and you cant admit you messed up.

By the way Ken......there are four other posted pictures in this topic....why are you not questioning them about their permission to use the photos used ? :-) I see NO claims that said "I have permission to use this photograph" ......from any poster that responded here. So....all of these photos MUST BE copyright infringements. Right Ken? So balk at them too Ken.



So I thank you Ken for taking a cool topic I did....and turning it into a Off Topic garbage can.

[Edited on 4-4-2013 by mcfez]

wessongroup - 4-4-2013 at 03:29 PM

Gee, sorry ...... got it off the "net"

It was for humor at "high tide" ...... don't know who it belongs to and I'm not making anything off it, that I'm aware of .......

If someone posts a pic on the internet, without following what most suggest to do, prior to putting it up ...... no harm, no foul IMHO ....

FYI, please don't contact me, on any of MY photos ....... I really don't care who uses them ...... the "net" was supposed to be a free highway with a free exchange of data, information and a few other things ..... without regard for "ownership" of product ...... ya know ... like Linux

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux

Back to "high tide" ....... :):)