Originally posted by vgabndo
Quote: | Originally posted by Barry A.
Quote: | Originally posted by vgabndo
The sign says slower traffic keep right. A person who is driving just as fast as the law allows, pinned on 55, 65, or 70 depending on the law CAN NOT
BE SLOWER TRAFFIC assuming there is a speed law.
Anyone driving faster than the speed limit isn't "faster traffic" , they are simply outlaws who haven't at the moment been pulled over and cited by
the grownups.
I just drove a thousand miles through Oregon, Idaho and Nevada almost entirely on two lane roads, and the number of people who were obviously speeding
was absolutely minimal. I drove for hours in the company of the same vehicles all moving safely along at 55 MPH.
My travel time was almost exactly what the mapping program said it would be, and my fuel mileage was as good as it gets.
I have often fantasized about what I might say to a judge if I was ticketed for the "slower traffic" sign. It would take some explaining to get me to
understand why I was pulled over for inconveniencing a speeder when it would have been just as easy and lot less embarrassing to just ticket the
speeder. Probably a bigger fine too!
People driving slower than the posted speed limit should certainly use the right hand lanes where available; and I do. |
The law in CA says you WILL use the right hand lane on a 4 or more lane road unless passing another vehicle-----period!!! Those that cruize in the
left lane blocking others from passing them is one of the most dangerous drivers on the road as they are one of the chief instigators of serious ROAD
RAGE in other's. Road Rage is highly dangerous, and causes many very serious accidents, no matter how nutty and immature it is.
My personal feeling is that those that cruize in the left lane are just inviting trouble and death, and I think incredibly inconsiderate and
judgemental, at the least..
Barry |
Couple of questions Barry. What does the law say about people driving faster than the posted speed limit? My understanding is that there is a law
against that similar to the one against driving slower than the speed limit in the fast lane. It became illegal to drive slower than the speeders
because of the speeders, not because of law abiding citizens. BOTH are now VIOLATIONS.
Second question. What does it say about the mental/emotional stability of a person who goes into a "rage" when they encounter someone obeying the law?
Conversely, what does it say about a citizen who is observed being a team player and playing by the rules?
Third question. When did it become my responsibility to violate the speed limit, or be constantly inconvenienced by having to speed up, slow down, and
repeatedly change lanes in order to prevent nutty and immature" people from flying into a deadly rage?
You concluded:
My personal feeling is that those that cruize in the left lane are just inviting trouble and death, and I think incredibly inconsiderate and
judgemental, at the least..
EXACTLY!!!! This whole moral argument is about the people who cruise in the left lane; the VAST majority of whom are violating the law by speeding.
Speed is a factor in 1/3 of all highway deaths. Speeders have an excessive closing speed as they approach vehicles moving at a legal speed which
certainly invites trouble.
Clearly, people responding to this thread who routinely break the law are quite judgmental about people who don't.
Kgryfon says that he is above the law because he "wants" to be. He claims: But I don't plop my burro into the fast lane and try to regulate everyone
else's driving, either. Anyone who does is a control freak and an burro. JMHO.
You DO plop your arse in the fast lane, that is your point. You demand the exclusive use of that lane. You DO try to regulate everyone's driving by
trying to make them drive YOUR speed; faster than is legally allowed. You come off like a control freak, when you try to control (and change) my legal
driving habits, and your opinion (judgments) are anything but "humble" considering you are the speeder.
JMconsideredO This may be another one of those ACA vs amygdala things judging by what I know of the politics of the persons posting on each side.
That might be the most interesting part of the whole discussion. light: The thing that comes to mind is that I've never heard a liberal make fun of a
Prius. The Prius and Prius drivers being considered a negative thing comes from a different bunch of people. Maybe there is an enlightening
connection?
[Edited on 12-22-2013 by vgabndo] |