BajaNomad

Extranjeros in trouble with immigration in Todos santos

CaboSur - 1-30-2016 at 11:44 AM


Uh oh , us foreigners shall not protest

Copied from Colectivo Pericu

For umpteenth occasion, an investment project has turned out to be pressed for groups of persons who are opposed to the economic development of the state where invariably they have seen "peros" in the economic proposals and that have generated, certainly, suspense to invest in South Baja California. <br> <br> The case of Three Saints is the new goal of the opposing groups to the investment and where the matter has returned, somehow, in international attention since several North American citizens have turned out to be wrapped in the "peros" of these groups that they want to sabotage at all costs, without understanding reason, any attempt of investment in the area of All Saints.<br> <br> The case of the North American Peter Buck, musician of profession already withdrawn in the town of All Saints, together with other compatriots, they have taken part in the declarations of the opposing groups to the real estate development with thelogical reaction of the federal authorities who think that the foreigners, in accordance with the national laws, must not interfere in the national politics. Peter Buck called the Mexican politicians "corrupt" for what might apply to the musician to those who turn out to be responsible, the Article 33. In accordance with local journalistic versions, so much the musician in retirement and a city dweller of name Jamie Ivee Sechrist-Madrazo already left Mexico before the fear of being sanctioned by the authorities of migration.

rts551 - 1-30-2016 at 12:45 PM

Lesson here. Be careful how you involve yourself in local politics (even if you think you are right).

There has been a group of people, Many whom are from Canada or the USA, that have been protesting the development, Tres Santos, for a while now. This has involved protest marches, fund raisers, and as explained in the article, ultimately a statement by Peter Buck and a Todos Santos Concert.

Now there is Hacienda and INM roaming through the town asking questions. Wonder how many people do not have proper immigration and work documentation.

Ultimately, Peter Buck left town in a hurry when the INM was looking for him, and a female activist fled to Colorado when she heard the police were looking for her.

Be careful when you are a guest in Mexico. The government official is always right.

bajabuddha - 1-30-2016 at 05:28 PM

Jeez, I've met dozens of semi-well-to-do Norte Americanos who move to Baja, buy into a Gringolandia, and think since they live there they can change the place into a little replica of whence they came. They also usually carry the idea that if the locals are getting U.S. dollars, they should speak English too.

The term 'Kalifornication' is pretty universal all over almost every western State I've been in..... and involves politics especially. Live somewhere for 6 months, get involved in local politics, and try to change the status quo into again a version of where they just escaped from, and usually entails the instigator in some kind of wealth scheme, or a 'Ban Walmart' - type referendum. It's a never-ending cycle; in this case, I'm tickled to see 'em run with their tails between their legs. In the States it's legal, just a pain in the patootie.

David K - 1-30-2016 at 05:37 PM

I could never understand why you come to a different place because you like it.... and then try to change it to be like the place you left!!??

BIZARRO!

Not just rich gringos, but Muslims too! It's happening now all over Europe and America.

DianaT - 1-30-2016 at 05:39 PM

This particular issue has many sides to it and the only support or protest should be from the Mexican citizens and they seem rather divided over the situation.

There appeared to be a fair amount of "I have mine now, so don't mess it up" from the gringos involved. But as I said, it is multisided from an environmental standpoint.

The gringos were warned over and over that protesting could lead to problems. And they simply wanted to label the people who warned them as defenders of the development which was not the case. Mostly they were protesting the development, but didn't seem to want to understand that when it has to do with development, it has to do with politics. And referring to the government officials as corrupt does not sit well with those officials who have all the power.

As lencho said, right or wrong doesn't matter.

DK-- nice troll, but really not relevant. :(





[Edited on 1-31-2016 by DianaT]

bajaguy - 1-30-2016 at 05:42 PM

You may not like what is going on, however we are visitors in another country. If you are not a citizen, keep your mouth shut or suffer the consequences. Go back to the States or Canada and protest all you want

Lee - 1-31-2016 at 07:05 AM

You guys are as clueless as the opportunists scamming residents of Todos. Colorado money and greedy mexicans are selling a pipe dream to tourists. This area doesn't have the infrastructure to support anything close to what is being marketed.

What hasn't made the news lately is the pangueros have closed things down. A road block to the site for months keeps builders out for the moment. Developers have ruined the south end of Punta Lobos for fishermen and tourists.

Anyone else just drive down to the beach (non-workers allowed in) and see the blight. It really is a shame what money and corruption can do.

If you don't live here and see what's happening, you don't know.

Yeah, the government official is (always) right -- even when he's corrupt. Typical stuff: silence protest and objections to corruption. Just another day in paradise for the rest of you.




pacificobob - 1-31-2016 at 07:29 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
You guys are as clueless as the opportunists scamming residents of Todos. Colorado money and greedy mexicans are selling a pipe dream to tourists. This area doesn't have the infrastructure to support anything close to what is being marketed.

What hasn't made the news lately is the pangueros have closed things down. A road block to the site for months keeps builders out for the moment. Developers have ruined the south end of Punta Lobos for fishermen and tourists.

Anyone else just drive down to the beach (non-workers allowed in) and see the blight. It really is a shame what money and corruption can do.

If you don't live here and see what's happening, you don't know.

Yeah, the government official is (always) right -- even when he's corrupt. Typical stuff: silence protest and objections to corruption. Just another day in paradise for the rest of you.






spot on lee

Spread the word

bajaguy - 1-31-2016 at 07:30 AM

Here is your chance

The Denver Post newsroom - Email newsroom@denverpost.com or call 303-954-1201.

Boulder Daily Camera - http://pmpfb.com/machform/view.php?id=23

Denver NBC - newstips@9news.com

Denver ABC - http://www.thedenverchannel.com/about/contact-us

Denver FOX - http://kdvr.com/contact/

Denver CBS - http://denver.cbslocal.com/contact/


SFandH - 1-31-2016 at 08:06 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Lee  


What hasn't made the news lately is the pangueros have closed things down. A road block to the site for months keeps builders out for the moment.


Good to hear! Support these guys somehow. Quietly. ;)

[Edited on 1-31-2016 by SFandH]

Santiago - 1-31-2016 at 08:12 AM

CAn someone post a link to something so we can get up to speed on what the issues are? I'm totally in the dark on what this development is and the pros/cons. What does Colorado have to do with this?

SFandH - 1-31-2016 at 08:18 AM

https://tressantosbaja.com/

background - http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/18/when-mindfulness-goes...

http://truthsantos.org/

[Edited on 1-31-2016 by SFandH]

rts551 - 1-31-2016 at 08:55 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Santiago  
CAn someone post a link to something so we can get up to speed on what the issues are? I'm totally in the dark on what this development is and the pros/cons. What does Colorado have to do with this?


You will get all kinds of positions on this issue. The real fight has nothing to do with fisherman on the beach. The real fight is against a large development with the fisherman caught up in the battle. As people take sides they will put up web sites that (in many cases with a lot of mis-information) make their case. The development is Tres Santos. Google it. There is a lot on both sides....especially note the information coming out in the news (BCSNoticias).

The very vocal and fervent fight against the development, has landed some Gringos in hot water. They could not just voice their displeasure with a high-rise development in the area but actively fought against it and what the concluded were corrupt officials. Thus the topic of this thread.


Again Google TRES SANTOS and watch all the stuff come up. Then make up your mind....

DianaT - 1-31-2016 at 10:20 AM

Quote: Originally posted by bajaguy  
You may not like what is going on, however we are visitors in another country. If you are not a citizen, keep your mouth shut or suffer the consequences. Go back to the States or Canada and protest all you want


Yes, and there are other ways for visitors to protest behind the scenes, if that is what they want to do. Many donated to costa salvaje/Wild Coast to help fight against development at Cabo Pulmo, others donate to other organizations like Terra Peninsular to stop other development.

But to openly join protests, and be very vocal is just asking for trouble.


Flip Flop

8knots - 1-31-2016 at 10:48 AM


In an "historic turn of events," fishermen who before were opposed to the project near Todos Santos, now say that from the beginning their demands had been respected and complied with.

La Paz, Baja California Sur - "We have never presented nor sought problems with Tres Santos, they have understood us, and I am certain they have tried to help us. They have put us in a new location, they are helping us, they want to help us, they have never opposed the points we have asked for. There is a lot of confusing, and many people who meddle our affairs who have not allowed us fix things," said Juan José Peralta Torres, the president of the Punta Lobos fishing cooperative yesterday on the conflict with the tourist real estate development.

Accompanied by Jesús Salvatierra Cadena, president of the Vigilence Council, and Francisco Javier Orozco Domínguez, treasurer of the cooperative, in his interview, Peralta Torres gave a new spin to the presumed conflict between Punta Lobos fishermen - at playa Todos Santos, south of La Paz - the tourist development which, according to the first stories, affected fishing activities in the area. Now, the cooperative president said that Tres Santos has always supported and complied, and that "others" who have meddled have aggravated the conflict instead of resolving it.

Peralta Torres gave out the names of Guilermoa Trasviña, Jesús Cota (alias El Diablo) and John Moreno, as those who had intervened without representing the fishing sector. They have "enmeshed themselves with our people, they have made enemies of our own people," and we do not know how John Moreno is a legal representative. John Moreno "I don't know why he says he is, he has never been our legal representative, never, on the contrary he wants to represent us, but does not, John has nothing to do with the cooperative," and he described him as "a two-sided coin," who "wants power."

http://www.bcsnoticias.mx/pescadores-de-...=hootsuite

rts551 - 1-31-2016 at 11:11 AM

Quote: Originally posted by 8knots  

In an "historic turn of events," fishermen who before were opposed to the project near Todos Santos, now say that from the beginning their demands had been respected and complied with.

La Paz, Baja California Sur - "We have never presented nor sought problems with Tres Santos, they have understood us, and I am certain they have tried to help us. They have put us in a new location, they are helping us, they want to help us, they have never opposed the points we have asked for. There is a lot of confusing, and many people who meddle our affairs who have not allowed us fix things," said Juan José Peralta Torres, the president of the Punta Lobos fishing cooperative yesterday on the conflict with the tourist real estate development.

Accompanied by Jesús Salvatierra Cadena, president of the Vigilence Council, and Francisco Javier Orozco Domínguez, treasurer of the cooperative, in his interview, Peralta Torres gave a new spin to the presumed conflict between Punta Lobos fishermen - at playa Todos Santos, south of La Paz - the tourist development which, according to the first stories, affected fishing activities in the area. Now, the cooperative president said that Tres Santos has always supported and complied, and that "others" who have meddled have aggravated the conflict instead of resolving it.

Peralta Torres gave out the names of Guilermoa Trasviña, Jesús Cota (alias El Diablo) and John Moreno, as those who had intervened without representing the fishing sector. They have "enmeshed themselves with our people, they have made enemies of our own people," and we do not know how John Moreno is a legal representative. John Moreno "I don't know why he says he is, he has never been our legal representative, never, on the contrary he wants to represent us, but does not, John has nothing to do with the cooperative," and he described him as "a two-sided coin," who "wants power."

http://www.bcsnoticias.mx/pescadores-de-...=hootsuite



And then another twist.. After the agreement was signed...The coop split apart. Some dropped out and the leadership was ousted (kicked out). Now the remaining members are saying the will no longer honor the agreement. Whats interesting is there are two coops. This is the smaller of the two. The larger one supports the development. Like I said, this is not really about the coop...but about stopping the project all together. The most vocal group are environmentalists (they also protest mining in BCS) that refuse to acknowledge the prime cash crop for the coop are sharks, a species that most environmentalist argue should be protected.

rts551 - 1-31-2016 at 11:15 AM

There is so much going on in this fight, it is easy to stand back and not take sides. But beware, if you do, some are so fanatical about it they will assume you are spy for the other side. But at least you will not get deported and your property confiscated.

Terry28 - 1-31-2016 at 11:36 AM

" How to get deported in one easy lesson".......

elgatoloco - 1-31-2016 at 12:05 PM

Brings to mind one of my favorite Bowie lyrics:

"This is not America, sha la la la la"

RIP David Bowie

How about Joni:

"They paved paradise and put up a parking lot"

Where will they get all the water for Tres Santos? :o

Lee - 1-31-2016 at 12:41 PM

Quote: Originally posted by DianaT  

But to openly join protests, and be very vocal is just asking for trouble.


Agreed. Unless you're a citizen/national, deportation is a reality.

''The Todos Santos community has insufficient water resources to provide uninterrupted service for the current population, which is growing rapidly. Our water supply is totally dependent on rainfall; prolonged drought, a common phenomenon in Baja Sur, leads to feast or famine, something we have no control over. The conclusion here is obvious,- there is no available water for large scale development.

Given the above, Tres Santos will have to provide all the water for its projected development, in excess of 4,400 dwellings, not to mention an organic farm, and an estimated seven workers and support personnel per new dwelling. If this were to happen we would have over 30,000 new residents turning on the tap, seven times the current population. Tres Santos said they would not use town water and yet they now have concessions for the first 66 homes. How did that happen?

Tres Santos has promised to provide all the water needed for their development by constructing a desalinazation plant, yet to be constructed or permitted, which would have to produce a minimum of 2,000,000 gallons per day. This is a major undertaking in an environmentally sensitive area, that is strongly opposed by the local fishermen and many others.

We challenge Tres Santos Development to make all Permits public
as full ‘Transparency’ is stated as Tres Santos public relation policy.

– Water ‘applications/permits or concessions’ and all usage including SAPA, Ejido & CONAGUA and for Desal

– Where is Tres Santos obtaining water at the construction site?

– Where will they be obtaining water at the Beach and at CSU area?

– What water will the CSU Research Farm utilize, how will it be supplied?

– Waste water treatment, site, size, plan for treated water, costs to operate?

DeSal Issues:

DESAL PLANT DISASTER IN CABO. COULD IT HAPPEN IN TODOS SANTOS?

One of Tres Santos’ proposed solutions to the water crisis in Todos Santos is to build a desal plant.

In Cabo, more than 30 desal plants now operate. Almost all of them of them are privately run. Near the Diamante resort in Cabo (about 60KM south of Todos Santos), the water authority OOMSAPA runs a desal plant.

At this plant, ocean waves completely severed the plant’s outflow pipes that once discharged brine 600 meters out to sea. For more than three years, millions of gallons of briny water laden with salt and chemical by-products from the desal process have flowed across the sand. Kids play in the brine discharge. When turtles lay their eggs, the nests are often washed away by the outflows.
The pipe flows today, unprepared. Tres Santos has said that the design of it’s desal plant will be “different,” and avoid all these problems.

Considering the spectacular engineering failure of the Tres Santos hotel seawall at Punta Lobos, Truth Santos challenges the developer.

Make public the plans for your desal plant. Where will it be built? What kind of technology will it use? Who will the contractor be?
Show the citizens of Todos Santos the Environmental impact Reports, in English AND Spanish.

This link has factual information about when Cabo’s OOMSAPA desal plant was installed, chemicals used, quantity of population served, capacity, technology and other data.

Tres Santos made public their desal plant in July, 2015 – https://tressantosbaja.com/tres-santos-desalination-plant/
We are asking for all applications/permits/concessions for a DeSal Plant be for public disclosure.

– Is giving permission for a desal plant to Tres Santos ultimately depriving Todos Santos of having a desal plant because of the potential for restrictions to the number of desal plants in a given geographic area?

– Has ‘Tres Santos’ destroyed beach habitat and protected red mangrove to put in sea walls and platforms to build on without having a firm permit to build a desal plant?

– How much water will be provided for the 4,472 homes plus hotels and workers? How much is needed per day?

– What will it cost to build a plant, how much to operate the plant?

– What are the Environmental damage and loss of habitat issues?
(Marine life, Endangered Turtles, Whales, Bait fish, Sardines and Traditional Fishermen’s livelihoods, etc…) With south facing discharge?

– What size will they have to build to have a desal plant of sufficient capacity?

– Where will the electric power come from, and what pollution will that add to the environment?

– What is the financial resource to build and operate a desal plant for the thousands of people that would eventually live, work and visit at their development?

http://truthsantos.org/wateraqua/

rts551 - 1-31-2016 at 12:50 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
Quote: Originally posted by DianaT  

But to openly join protests, and be very vocal is just asking for trouble.


Agreed. Unless you're a citizen/national, deportation is a reality.

''The Todos Santos community has insufficient water resources to provide uninterrupted service for the current population, which is growing rapidly. Our water supply is totally dependent on rainfall; prolonged drought, a common phenomenon in Baja Sur, leads to feast or famine, something we have no control over. The conclusion here is obvious,- there is no available water for large scale development.

Given the above, Tres Santos will have to provide all the water for its projected development, in excess of 4,400 dwellings, not to mention an organic farm, and an estimated seven workers and support personnel per new dwelling. If this were to happen we would have over 30,000 new residents turning on the tap, seven times the current population. Tres Santos said they would not use town water and yet they now have concessions for the first 66 homes. How did that happen?

Tres Santos has promised to provide all the water needed for their development by constructing a desalinazation plant, yet to be constructed or permitted, which would have to produce a minimum of 2,000,000 gallons per day. This is a major undertaking in an environmentally sensitive area, that is strongly opposed by the local fishermen and many others.

We challenge Tres Santos Development to make all Permits public
as full ‘Transparency’ is stated as Tres Santos public relation policy.

– Water ‘applications/permits or concessions’ and all usage including SAPA, Ejido & CONAGUA and for Desal

– Where is Tres Santos obtaining water at the construction site?

– Where will they be obtaining water at the Beach and at CSU area?

– What water will the CSU Research Farm utilize, how will it be supplied?

– Waste water treatment, site, size, plan for treated water, costs to operate?

DeSal Issues:

DESAL PLANT DISASTER IN CABO. COULD IT HAPPEN IN TODOS SANTOS?

One of Tres Santos’ proposed solutions to the water crisis in Todos Santos is to build a desal plant.

In Cabo, more than 30 desal plants now operate. Almost all of them of them are privately run. Near the Diamante resort in Cabo (about 60KM south of Todos Santos), the water authority OOMSAPA runs a desal plant.

At this plant, ocean waves completely severed the plant’s outflow pipes that once discharged brine 600 meters out to sea. For more than three years, millions of gallons of briny water laden with salt and chemical by-products from the desal process have flowed across the sand. Kids play in the brine discharge. When turtles lay their eggs, the nests are often washed away by the outflows.
The pipe flows today, unprepared. Tres Santos has said that the design of it’s desal plant will be “different,” and avoid all these problems.

Considering the spectacular engineering failure of the Tres Santos hotel seawall at Punta Lobos, Truth Santos challenges the developer.

Make public the plans for your desal plant. Where will it be built? What kind of technology will it use? Who will the contractor be?
Show the citizens of Todos Santos the Environmental impact Reports, in English AND Spanish.

This link has factual information about when Cabo’s OOMSAPA desal plant was installed, chemicals used, quantity of population served, capacity, technology and other data.

Tres Santos made public their desal plant in July, 2015 – https://tressantosbaja.com/tres-santos-desalination-plant/
We are asking for all applications/permits/concessions for a DeSal Plant be for public disclosure.

– Is giving permission for a desal plant to Tres Santos ultimately depriving Todos Santos of having a desal plant because of the potential for restrictions to the number of desal plants in a given geographic area?

– Has ‘Tres Santos’ destroyed beach habitat and protected red mangrove to put in sea walls and platforms to build on without having a firm permit to build a desal plant?

– How much water will be provided for the 4,472 homes plus hotels and workers? How much is needed per day?

– What will it cost to build a plant, how much to operate the plant?

– What are the Environmental damage and loss of habitat issues?
(Marine life, Endangered Turtles, Whales, Bait fish, Sardines and Traditional Fishermen’s livelihoods, etc…) With south facing discharge?

– What size will they have to build to have a desal plant of sufficient capacity?

– Where will the electric power come from, and what pollution will that add to the environment?

– What is the financial resource to build and operate a desal plant for the thousands of people that would eventually live, work and visit at their development?

http://truthsantos.org/wateraqua/


All talking points from one side of the battle. and some good ones......to be fair there are responses....I won't bother to print them all out. And I am not a paid spy from MIRA.

https://www.facebook.com/TruthSantosLies/?fref=ts

DianaT - 1-31-2016 at 01:30 PM

Quote: Originally posted by rts551  
Quote: Originally posted by Lee  
Quote: Originally posted by DianaT  

But to openly join protests, and be very vocal is just asking for trouble.


Agreed. Unless you're a citizen/national, deportation is a reality.

''The Todos Santos community has insufficient water resources to provide uninterrupted service for the current population, which is growing rapidly. Our water supply is totally dependent on rainfall; prolonged drought, a common phenomenon in Baja Sur, leads to feast or famine, something we have no control over. The conclusion here is obvious,- there is no available water for large scale development.

Given the above, Tres Santos will have to provide all the water for its projected development, in excess of 4,400 dwellings, not to mention an organic farm, and an estimated seven workers and support personnel per new dwelling. If this were to happen we would have over 30,000 new residents turning on the tap, seven times the current population. Tres Santos said they would not use town water and yet they now have concessions for the first 66 homes. How did that happen?

Tres Santos has promised to provide all the water needed for their development by constructing a desalinazation plant, yet to be constructed or permitted, which would have to produce a minimum of 2,000,000 gallons per day. This is a major undertaking in an environmentally sensitive area, that is strongly opposed by the local fishermen and many others.

We challenge Tres Santos Development to make all Permits public
as full ‘Transparency’ is stated as Tres Santos public relation policy.

– Water ‘applications/permits or concessions’ and all usage including SAPA, Ejido & CONAGUA and for Desal

– Where is Tres Santos obtaining water at the construction site?

– Where will they be obtaining water at the Beach and at CSU area?

– What water will the CSU Research Farm utilize, how will it be supplied?

– Waste water treatment, site, size, plan for treated water, costs to operate?

DeSal Issues:

DESAL PLANT DISASTER IN CABO. COULD IT HAPPEN IN TODOS SANTOS?

One of Tres Santos’ proposed solutions to the water crisis in Todos Santos is to build a desal plant.

In Cabo, more than 30 desal plants now operate. Almost all of them of them are privately run. Near the Diamante resort in Cabo (about 60KM south of Todos Santos), the water authority OOMSAPA runs a desal plant.

At this plant, ocean waves completely severed the plant’s outflow pipes that once discharged brine 600 meters out to sea. For more than three years, millions of gallons of briny water laden with salt and chemical by-products from the desal process have flowed across the sand. Kids play in the brine discharge. When turtles lay their eggs, the nests are often washed away by the outflows.
The pipe flows today, unprepared. Tres Santos has said that the design of it’s desal plant will be “different,” and avoid all these problems.

Considering the spectacular engineering failure of the Tres Santos hotel seawall at Punta Lobos, Truth Santos challenges the developer.

Make public the plans for your desal plant. Where will it be built? What kind of technology will it use? Who will the contractor be?
Show the citizens of Todos Santos the Environmental impact Reports, in English AND Spanish.

This link has factual information about when Cabo’s OOMSAPA desal plant was installed, chemicals used, quantity of population served, capacity, technology and other data.

Tres Santos made public their desal plant in July, 2015 – https://tressantosbaja.com/tres-santos-desalination-plant/
We are asking for all applications/permits/concessions for a DeSal Plant be for public disclosure.

– Is giving permission for a desal plant to Tres Santos ultimately depriving Todos Santos of having a desal plant because of the potential for restrictions to the number of desal plants in a given geographic area?

– Has ‘Tres Santos’ destroyed beach habitat and protected red mangrove to put in sea walls and platforms to build on without having a firm permit to build a desal plant?

– How much water will be provided for the 4,472 homes plus hotels and workers? How much is needed per day?

– What will it cost to build a plant, how much to operate the plant?

– What are the Environmental damage and loss of habitat issues?
(Marine life, Endangered Turtles, Whales, Bait fish, Sardines and Traditional Fishermen’s livelihoods, etc…) With south facing discharge?

– What size will they have to build to have a desal plant of sufficient capacity?

– Where will the electric power come from, and what pollution will that add to the environment?

– What is the financial resource to build and operate a desal plant for the thousands of people that would eventually live, work and visit at their development?

http://truthsantos.org/wateraqua/


All talking points from one side of the battle. and some good ones......to be fair there are responses....I won't bother to print them all out. And I am not a paid spy from MIRA.

https://www.facebook.com/TruthSantosLies/?fref=ts


Yes, to even consider presenting the other side for consideration puts one in the position of the fanatics calling you evil, a spy and worse.

I agree, those are pretty much all the talking points, and I also lean toward supporting many of them, but the other side does need to be considered. And frankly, I think it is far more important what the local Mexicans have to say and that has been all over place.

But Lee, that is not the point. Some foreigners decided to jump in and encouraged others to do likewise. They expressed the feeling that since they were correct in their views, that there was no problem joining the protests. And when they were warned that they were putting their status in jeopardy, they once again called people evil, spies and worse.

It should be a warning to others --- if you choose to openly protest and get involved, you may not be in Mexico for long.

Shoot, we almost got in trouble on a vacation to Zacatecas when we went to a plaza to watch a teacher's strike protest gathering. We were not participating, just watching and when the state police approached us, we told them we thought it was just a fiesta. They made it very clear that we needed to leave.


willardguy - 1-31-2016 at 01:43 PM

I haven't been following too closely, did someone actually get booted?

rts551 - 1-31-2016 at 02:20 PM

Quote: Originally posted by willardguy  
I haven't been following too closely, did someone actually get booted?


2 people left in a hurry just ahead of officials. So they have posted anyway.

This was as of yesterday. It has been reported that Immigration and Hacienda are going through town. Immigration is usually pretty lenient (unless you violated article 33, and even then you are entitled to a hearing). Now if you have been working, or run a business without proper paperwork, hacienda could be involved and it is much worse.

pauldavidmena - 1-31-2016 at 03:07 PM

It might be splitting hairs, but it's worth pointing out that Peter Buck didn't call out Tres Santos or the mine by name, but basically urged locals to "take back their town." Pretty mild compared to the rhetoric we hear in the U.S. during election season, but it seems the local government takes exception to foreigners even implying corruption. Personally, methinks Mr. Buck may have had one too many margaritas and was letting off steam, but he may have temporarily forgotten that he was - and remains - a guest in Mexico and not a rock star in the eyes of municipal government.

As for his quick exit from town, I'm not sure if it was planned (I left on Sunday 1/24, one day after the concert finale due to work commitments back in MA) or strongly urged by impending circumstances. In any case, it's an interesting development because Buck's involvement with the Palapa Society has benefited the children of Todos Santos greatly. It would be a shame to see one of the pueblo's benefactors getting hassled or for the annual music festival to get derailed.

rts551 - 1-31-2016 at 06:41 PM

Maybe we need one of DavidK's signs. NO PROTESTING ALLOWED. He could add it to his recommendation on passports/tourist permits to the Mexican government.

BajaBlanca - 1-31-2016 at 07:52 PM

boy oh boy. looks ugly no matter which side you are on. for a coop to split up is sad.

gnukid - 1-31-2016 at 08:05 PM

As far as has been reported in the news, no extranjeros have been asked to leave. Peter Buck left before questions about his status and then it was discovered he had a valid fmm as reported in the news, so INM dropped it and there is nothing to pursue.

Denuncias may be filed by any legal resident accusing another person of a wrong, then the denuncia must be served to the individual (3 attempts) and the individual defendant may respond in a statement, then the process may proceed to be investigated--often with little outcome. As well government officials my investigate perceived wrongs on their own.

Peter Buck was apparently informally accused in the news of saying something to the affect of let's end corruption and make things better during a music set without identifying or targeting anyone. Other extranjeros are apparently accused of blocking access to the rightful owners of the development but no evidence exists apparently of tourists blocking access to developers/owners while they were supporting the fishermen with gifts of food. INM has backed down that they would be investigating anyone now except as it is their normal role only to ensure that people who are more than 30 days overdue should resolve their status formally.

And now the issue of all people's individual's rights that may not be restricted is a topic of news stories and the light is shining on the constitution with respect for all people's individual rights, for example, freedom from discrimination regardless of civil status, discussion of freedom of expression of culture, right to liberty, right to education and right to teach, right to survive, right to die etc... All in all the circumstances are calm, interesting, and it's a positive discussion. Much more calm the one sees NOB. And there are still whales jumping across sunsets...

So at the moment everyone is free to come and go as they please and everyone is free to speak up as they please. Let us recall the grand history and tradition of Professor Agundez of Todos Santos who was a great educator and promotor of respect for culture.

Here is an english translation of the mexican constitution, read the whole thing and article 33 in particular in light of article 1. http://www.juridicas.unam.mx/infjur/leg/constmex/pdf/constin...

CaboSur - 2-1-2016 at 06:54 AM

Video of the lady from Colorado. Appears to me maybe she got caught up in emotions and politics involving the fishermen and developers .. ....................
https://www.facebook.com/ezequiel.lizalde/videos/10154059669...


Also, Seems no one was going to be deported. From colectivopericu.net

The manager of Office of the National Institute of Migration (INM) in BCS, Édgar Fernando Castro Herrera, declared that he does not know what "authority" was the one that "intimidated" the resident foreigners in All Saints, since only it is up to them to do the cross-checks, and to invite the tourists to regularize its status in case they are in an illegal way in the country. <br> <br> “I do not know who were, yes I saw the video of the foreign woman, but we always walk with uniform and in official vehicles, and only we do the cross-check of which they have its current permission; if the person is not, we leave the notification to him […] When they come from tourists, they are 6 months old or 180 days of permission; once it is detected that the person has not left the country, he is visited and it is invited him to regularize, 30 days give it to themselves to do it, and they already decide to leave the country, or go out only to be regularized and to return with another 6 months like tourist”. <br> <br> On the case of the American guitarist, Peter Buck, the manager of Office of the organism of the Federal Government confirmed that they did the visit to its domicile, but he was already not in the country; on the other hand, he told that the INM does the cross-checks in the whole state, almost in a daily way or they come to do them because they received an anonymous denunciation of which there are foreigners working of illegal form.<br> <br> “Of the same way, in the topic of the guitarist, we went to verify its situation, but when we came, he either it was not, either it had gone away […] We do the cross-checks almost every day, very independently from what happened in All Saints; we come to the companies that have foreigners working or to the domiciles that they register; also, we do the cross-check when they do some anonymous denunciation of which some tourist is working in an illegal way, it is already done by Mexicans or for the same foreigners […] what more we find it are foreign that start teaching of surfeo or of diving”.<br> <br> Finally, Castro Herrera, mentioned that the foreigners who come from tourists to BCS, when its tourist's permission is conquered, yes are fulfilled to come to realize its regularization step.<br> <br> “When, to 30 days they are not regularized, he turns to visit them, and one gives them an office of exit, where it is indicated them that they have to go out of the country; in general, almost 100 % of the foreigners is fulfilled and yes they it do […] The Law of Migration he contemplates that they have the possibility of being regularized, it is more flexible; already, for a deportation, it is stronger and extreme, practically it would be applied when they were putting in danger the national security”.

norte - 2-1-2016 at 07:15 AM

Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  
As far as has been reported in the news, no extranjeros have been asked to leave. Peter Buck left before questions about his status and then it was discovered he had a valid fmm as reported in the news, so INM dropped it and there is nothing to pursue.

Denuncias may be filed by any legal resident accusing another person of a wrong, then the denuncia must be served to the individual (3 attempts) and the individual defendant may respond in a statement, then the process may proceed to be investigated--often with little outcome. As well government officials my investigate perceived wrongs on their own.

Peter Buck was apparently informally accused in the news of saying something to the affect of let's end corruption and make things better during a music set without identifying or targeting anyone. Other extranjeros are apparently accused of blocking access to the rightful owners of the development but no evidence exists apparently of tourists blocking access to developers/owners while they were supporting the fishermen with gifts of food. INM has backed down that they would be investigating anyone now except as it is their normal role only to ensure that people who are more than 30 days overdue should resolve their status formally.

And now the issue of all people's individual's rights that may not be restricted is a topic of news stories and the light is shining on the constitution with respect for all people's individual rights, for example, freedom from discrimination regardless of civil status, discussion of freedom of expression of culture, right to liberty, right to education and right to teach, right to survive, right to die etc... All in all the circumstances are calm, interesting, and it's a positive discussion. Much more calm the one sees NOB. And there are still whales jumping across sunsets...

So at the moment everyone is free to come and go as they please and everyone is free to speak up as they please. Let us recall the grand history and tradition of Professor Agundez of Todos Santos who was a great educator and promotor of respect for culture.

Here is an english translation of the mexican constitution, read the whole thing and article 33 in particular in light of article 1. http://www.juridicas.unam.mx/infjur/leg/constmex/pdf/constin...


Big words from a big mouth. I bet the lady above is not agreeing with you. She had legal advice from John Moreno, http://www.thebajalawyer.com/ . People can and do get deported. Somehow I don't think she would want you as a representative professor/abogado GNU.

norte - 2-1-2016 at 07:17 AM

Quote: Originally posted by CaboSur  
Video of the lady from Colorado. Appears to me maybe she got caught up in emotions and politics involving the fishermen and developers .. ....................
https://www.facebook.com/ezequiel.lizalde/videos/10154059669...


Also, Seems no one was going to be deported. From colectivopericu.net

The manager of Office of the National Institute of Migration (INM) in BCS, Édgar Fernando Castro Herrera, declared that he does not know what "authority" was the one that "intimidated" the resident foreigners in All Saints, since only it is up to them to do the cross-checks, and to invite the tourists to regularize its status in case they are in an illegal way in the country. <br> <br> “I do not know who were, yes I saw the video of the foreign woman, but we always walk with uniform and in official vehicles, and only we do the cross-check of which they have its current permission; if the person is not, we leave the notification to him […] When they come from tourists, they are 6 months old or 180 days of permission; once it is detected that the person has not left the country, he is visited and it is invited him to regularize, 30 days give it to themselves to do it, and they already decide to leave the country, or go out only to be regularized and to return with another 6 months like tourist”. <br> <br> On the case of the American guitarist, Peter Buck, the manager of Office of the organism of the Federal Government confirmed that they did the visit to its domicile, but he was already not in the country; on the other hand, he told that the INM does the cross-checks in the whole state, almost in a daily way or they come to do them because they received an anonymous denunciation of which there are foreigners working of illegal form.<br> <br> “Of the same way, in the topic of the guitarist, we went to verify its situation, but when we came, he either it was not, either it had gone away […] We do the cross-checks almost every day, very independently from what happened in All Saints; we come to the companies that have foreigners working or to the domiciles that they register; also, we do the cross-check when they do some anonymous denunciation of which some tourist is working in an illegal way, it is already done by Mexicans or for the same foreigners […] what more we find it are foreign that start teaching of surfeo or of diving”.<br> <br> Finally, Castro Herrera, mentioned that the foreigners who come from tourists to BCS, when its tourist's permission is conquered, yes are fulfilled to come to realize its regularization step.<br> <br> “When, to 30 days they are not regularized, he turns to visit them, and one gives them an office of exit, where it is indicated them that they have to go out of the country; in general, almost 100 % of the foreigners is fulfilled and yes they it do […] The Law of Migration he contemplates that they have the possibility of being regularized, it is more flexible; already, for a deportation, it is stronger and extreme, practically it would be applied when they were putting in danger the national security”.


This poor girl. She also says she got word the police were coming for her. No matter what INM is saying now, something scared her enough to scoot to Colorado in a hurry and leave her life and husband.


gnukid - 2-1-2016 at 08:20 AM

It is possible to be deported, I know of a few cases, one where a foreigner from Guatemala went to a rally for sub commandant Marcos in La Paz and was later discovered to not have a FMM and another case or two when people went to carnaval and got drunk and arrested and were discovered to not have an FMM. In each of these cases the people were welcomed back after leaving and returning.

In general foreign visitors come and go annually with the seasons so leaving and returning often is not uncommon.

Perhaps not unlike anywhere today, some people enjoy fanning the flames of racism and make broad statements with threats of deportation, however, that is not reality here.

People have the right to pursue clean food and water to survive, for the right to express themselves in their culture whether that be as an artist, singer, fisherman, and people should not fear persecution for studying, educating and working together to improve their regional culture while respecting other's culture.



norte - 2-1-2016 at 08:34 AM

Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  
It is possible to be deported, I know of a few cases, one where a foreigner from Guatemala went to a rally for sub commandant Marcos in La Paz and was later discovered to not have a FMM and another case or two when people went to carnaval and got drunk and arrested and were discovered to not have an FMM. In each of these cases the people were welcomed back after leaving and returning.

In general foreign visitors come and go annually with the seasons so leaving and returning often is not uncommon.

Perhaps not unlike anywhere today, some people enjoy fanning the flames of racism and make broad statements with threats of deportation, however, that is not reality here.

People have the right to pursue clean food and water to survive, for the right to express themselves in their culture whether that be as an artist, singer, fisherman, and people should not fear persecution for studying, educating and working together to improve their regional culture while respecting other's culture.




Talk about fanning the flames. Tell all your BS to the poor girl above. Easy to be an armchair protester on a tourist forum. When was the last time you protested or marched in support of "right to pursue clean food and water to survive, for the right to express themselves in their culture whether that be as an artist, singer, fisherman, and people should not fear persecution for studying, educating and working together to improve their regional culture while respecting other's culture." Local officials can and will do their own thing.


shari - 2-1-2016 at 08:35 AM

Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  

People have the right to pursue clean food and water to survive, for the right to express themselves in their culture whether that be as an artist, singer, fisherman, and people should not fear persecution for studying, educating and working together to improve their regional culture while respecting other's culture.


Indeed....and well....sometimes ya just do what you gotta do.

Cielomar - 2-1-2016 at 09:00 AM

The two environmental controversies in the Todos Santos area are Tres Santos and Los Cardones gold mine. Those interested can Google these two subjects and spend an afternoon shifting through the pros and cons. Commodity prices are down so it appears Los Cardones won't get built in the near future. Tres Santos is a fact on the ground. They took a really beautiful beach at Punto Lodos, built a huge pad too near the water and the beach has eroded away. Its really sickening to see what apparently either poor planning or poor execution and lax environmental oversight can do to our environment. This was done by a Colorado-based development company that advertised their stewardship of the environment as a core value. Poor Colorado State University, which has a campus in TS as part of the in-town phase of the development, is caught in the middle. I'd be surprised if they stick around after the destruction of the beach and conflicts with the local fishermen.

On another level I'm distressed to see people smugly cheering the problems that Peter Buck finds himself in for expressing his opinion on the Tres Santos issue. Peter, probably unaware of the Article 33 non-political involvement clause that he agreed to was coming off a very successful TS Music Festival- See the linked Rolling Stone article: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/peter-bucks-paradise-...
and perhaps enjoying Mexican beverages a bit too much expressed his opinion publicly, touched a raw nerve and peeed off some powerful people with his comments. This Article 33 issue must have been dreamed up by an attorney representing these interests as retaliation. I have to say in all my many years in Mexico I've never heard this Article invoked. Peter and his wife Chloe Johnson have put on this festival for five years out of their own pockets (spending something close to a half million USD) and have raised hundreds of thousands of USD for the Palapa Society which uses the money to send local kids to university and helped families recover from H. Odile. I don't see anyone else stepping up like they have and it would truly be sad to lose them and their positive contributions to our community!

SFandH - 2-1-2016 at 09:16 AM

Thanks ceilomar.

Colorado-based development company that advertised their stewardship of the environment as a core value.

If the environment was really important to these folks, they would be in a different business.

chippy - 2-1-2016 at 09:52 AM

Good riddance to that gal from colo. Mexico doesn`t need any more doped up misguided gringas.

ps put out the ciggy you lameO

rts551 - 2-1-2016 at 12:35 PM

Cielo...I do not think Buck is a newbie to Mexico.....from the article you quote. "Buck, who is based in Portland, Oregon, vacationed in Todos Santos for several years before buying a house in 2008." If He is not yet aware of the laws of Mexico, He had better learn fast.

On another level, I do not believe any one is "smugly cheering the problems". What I see more of is people cautioning those that are not aware, a disbelief in the ignorance of some others, and an amazement of the involvement of Gringo guests in the affairs of Mexico. Why so many Gringos screaming and so few Mexicans? Just my 2 cents.


Lee - 2-1-2016 at 12:57 PM

Quote: Originally posted by chippy  
Good riddance to that gal from colo. Mexico doesn`t need any more doped up misguided gringas.

ps put out the ciggy you lameO


If the only information you have about this gringa is from the video, you are truly off center.

I watched the video and thought she was scared, and had been intimidated by someone. And you're judging her on smoking, too?


Lee - 2-1-2016 at 01:31 PM


Quote: Originally posted by norte  

Big words from a big mouth.


Quote: Originally posted by norte  

Talk about fanning the flames. Tell all your BS to the poor girl above. Easy to be an armchair protester on a tourist forum. When was the last time you protested or marched....


Is all this directed at gnu kid? Reads like someone is looking for a fight.

Hey norte why don't you give it rest then write something civil. You're just coming across as a first class a**hole.