BajaNomad

GM going electric, IC engine is dead

mtgoat666 - 1-28-2021 at 07:03 PM

Todays news:
General Motors plans to completely phase out vehicles using internal combustion engines by 2035, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra announced Thursday. The automaker will go completely carbon neutral at all facilities worldwide by 2035.

Since nomads mostly drive toyotas and Suzukis (and 1%ers g-wagons), perhaps the GM plan is irrelevant for nomads, eh?

Still waiting for my cyber truck,....



PaulW - 1-28-2021 at 08:01 PM

Expect riots when the big V8s expire
Do you thing it will be liberals or conservatives that will participate in riots?
The die hards will reconstruct the dead old fashioned rigs until the petro fuel disappears.

AKgringo - 1-28-2021 at 08:01 PM

By 2035 I will be pushing 90, so I don't think it is going to have a huge impact on my driving habits!

By the way, that plan is for passenger vehicles and SUVs. There will still be medium duty trucks burning hydrocarbons.

[Edited on 1-29-2021 by AKgringo]

PaulW - 1-28-2021 at 08:12 PM

I just bought a jeep and wow they are progressing to EVs. So far it just Electric assist and plugins. Same thing that Ford is doing but much slower.

JZ - 1-28-2021 at 09:06 PM

Just getting ready to buy a boat that holds 300 gallons of gas.

Will try not to leave a wake so big it knocks you off your arm powered SUP.

medium Cool - 1-28-2021 at 09:19 PM

I mean, you can fight and prolong the enevitble, but another source of natural energy that is sustainable forever (sun ) is going to be implemented in the near future, if it's the answer than scienece will prevail.
In the meantime, of coarse we need oil and it should be havested and consumed wisely
For as much as things change, they basiccallt stay the same, don't be to cachinnating

mtgoat666 - 1-28-2021 at 09:46 PM

Quote: Originally posted by JZ  
Just getting ready to buy a boat that holds 300 gallons of gas.

Will try not to leave a wake so big it knocks you off your arm powered SUP.


If you weren’t short and pudgy, you could paddle more than 100 feet without getting winded.
Your new stink pot will just make you get fatter :P

[Edited on 1-29-2021 by mtgoat666]

motoged - 1-28-2021 at 11:02 PM

Yep, there is always going to be guys like that...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbv-_6T-yqk

PaulW - 1-29-2021 at 08:11 AM

Living in western USA far from big cities it is not understood how travel away from home would be possible what with a hour to recharge the car in a place with no other services like a place to eat or something else to do during the layover. These remote charging places have no security at all except for a chain link fence with a gate.
Surely a new style 5 minute battery has to happen pretty soon.

mtgoat666 - 1-29-2021 at 08:28 AM

Quote: Originally posted by PaulW  
Living in western USA far from big cities it is not understood how travel away from home would be possible what with a hour to recharge the car in a place with no other services like a place to eat or something else to do during the layover. These remote charging places have no security at all except for a chain link fence with a gate.
Surely a new style 5 minute battery has to happen pretty soon.


The technology changes every year,... be patient, grasshopper.

Swappable batteries would be fastest recharge method.... in/out of fuel stop in a matter of minutes.

ReTire - 1-29-2021 at 09:14 AM

Or perhaps a way to harvest some of that energy used to move and stop you for topping the batteries off.

I have confidence that by 2035 (Jeez, that’s only 14 years away!!) a lot of progress will be made.

David K - 1-29-2021 at 09:32 AM

Why can't the four rotating wheels (or other rotating parts) be made to double as generators to recharge the batteries while you are driving? A solar panel roof and hood can recharge while parked in daylight.

Until that or some other 'magic bean' system happens, it is not practical for traveling in the backcountry or multi-day Baja adventure trips, only daily commuting to work from home.

A hybrid that works like the Prius, where it has a engine for when the battery isn't enough, is a middle-ground solution.

Of course, the environmental harm from lithium mining and dead battery disposal is a real concern.

Skipjack Joe - 1-29-2021 at 10:28 AM

Quote: Originally posted by David K  
Why can't the four rotating wheels (or other rotating parts) be made to double as generators to recharge the batteries while you are driving?.


Because you can’t get more energy out of a system than you put in. It’s one of the laws of thermodynamics.

In your case you need energy to run the car and energy to replace the energy that enters the system. Another words replacing the electricity going in is full usage of energy, but you still need more to move the car. Where will that come from. It’s not like recharging a battery to start the car.

TMW - 1-29-2021 at 10:35 AM

It's 2035 now and in 2030 it'll be 2060 etc. When their sales start to fall they'll rethink their position. I think the IC engine is on the way out but it will be a while. Me I'll probably never buy another car or truck unless I wreck what I've got or come into a lot of money. I'm with AKgringo on this.

BajaTed - 1-29-2021 at 10:39 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Skipjack Joe  
Quote: Originally posted by David K  
Why can't the four rotating wheels (or other rotating parts) be made to double as generators to recharge the batteries while you are driving?.


Because you can’t get more energy out of a system than you put in. It’s one of the laws of thermodynamics.

In your case you need energy to run the car and energy to replace the energy that enters the system. Another words replacing the electricity going in is full usage of energy, but you still need more to move the car. Where will that come from. It’s not like recharging a battery to start the car.


Kinetic Energy Recovery System(s) (KERS) has been used in F1 race cars for years. Braking energy used to dynamically recharge engine battery.
The Porsche Taycan (my next car) has that feature

David K - 1-29-2021 at 10:57 AM

Thanks for the replies.
Igor, I suspected it was restricted by some mechanical law and that the weight of the magnets would negatively impact the system. However, I have faith that in the not too distant future there will be a discovery to solve the issue!

I have an idea!

AKgringo - 1-29-2021 at 11:26 AM

I have property with a forest that is in dire need of management to lessen the chances of a catastrophic fire. The standing dead, and downed trees plus some that are future problems, provide a huge source of fuel!

All I need to do is convert one of my utility trailers to a steam turbine generator and I could roll on down the road like a locomotive!

I will start checking old episodes of "The Red Green Show" to see if the good old boys at the Possum Lodge have solved the problem. :wow:

motoged - 1-29-2021 at 11:42 AM

Gary,
I have heard that Gorilla Tape is better than Duct tape.....just to keep a few loose things from jangling.

Skipjack Joe - 1-29-2021 at 02:02 PM

Quote: Originally posted by BajaTed  
Quote: Originally posted by Skipjack Joe  
Quote: Originally posted by David K  
Why can't the four rotating wheels (or other rotating parts) be made to double as generators to recharge the batteries while you are driving?.


Because you can’t get more energy out of a system than you put in. It’s one of the laws of thermodynamics.

In your case you need energy to run the car and energy to replace the energy that enters the system. Another words replacing the electricity going in is full usage of energy, but you still need more to move the car. Where will that come from. It’s not like recharging a battery to start the car.


Kinetic Energy Recovery System(s) (KERS) has been used in F1 race cars for years. Braking energy used to dynamically recharge engine battery.
The Porsche Taycan (my next car) has that feature


You can't recover enough energy to fully run the vehicle you're recovering from. That should be apparent. There are many systems to recover energy. Actually, they're not recovering anything. The energy 'recovered' is taken away from where it was being applied, the running of the vehicle.

There is an interesting story from the Tales of Baron Munhausen. As the story goes, he and his horse accidentally end up in a bog and are sinking rapidly. What to do? The clever Baron quickly comes to a solution. By pulling his hair on his head he lifts both himself and his horse out of the bog to safety.

A fully recoverable running engine is as logical as this story.

David K - 1-29-2021 at 02:12 PM

Quote: Originally posted by lencho  
Quote: Originally posted by David K  
Why can't the four rotating wheels (or other rotating parts) be made to double as generators to recharge the batteries while you are driving?
Similar to the reason drinking bleach isn't the solution to COVID. :cool: ;)


Sure it is... drink enough and you will NEVER die from Covid! :lol:

ReTire - 1-29-2021 at 02:12 PM

We will see what everyone thinks when the price of fuel is $15-25 a gallon in 2021 dollars.

TMW - 1-29-2021 at 03:40 PM

Quote: Originally posted by ReTire  
We will see what everyone thinks when the price of fuel is $15-25 a gallon in 2021 dollars.


Or they'll tax you 10 cents per mile to drive your electric car to pay for roads etc. That's what CA is considering in lieu of the gas tax.

mtgoat666 - 1-29-2021 at 04:53 PM

Quote: Originally posted by TMW  
Quote: Originally posted by ReTire  
We will see what everyone thinks when the price of fuel is $15-25 a gallon in 2021 dollars.


Or they'll tax you 10 cents per mile to drive your electric car to pay for roads etc. That's what CA is considering in lieu of the gas tax.


gotta have some way to pay for roads, eh?

Ateo - 1-29-2021 at 06:03 PM

As a guy who works in the gas station industry, I'd have to say this will kill my job as an Underground Storage Tank inspector in a few years....but it's for the better of the planet so I won't complain....I gotta start thinking about evolving into another line of work or something on the periphery. Guess selling my business in 15-20 years is no longer an option. HA HA.

Hook - 1-30-2021 at 08:00 AM

There is so much auto pollution produced by people running short errands within 10 miles of their home. Especially if it is surface streets.

My wife and I have outfitted our e-bikes with panniers. Big ones! We basically do all our food shopping, hardware store shopping, liquor store shopping, medical/dental appts.; basically ANY errand that we can think of, we consider the bike first. Both in the Boise, ID area AND in San Carlos, Sonora.

About the only thing we can't do is carry enough for a Costco run or carry a pizza home from Papa Murphy's (but they do make pizza racks for bikes!). And we wont take it into Guaymas for a Home Depot or Walmart run. Just too dangerous on surface streets in larger Mexican cities.

My point is, if people REALLY started to consider what they can do with an e-bike, it could replace TONS (LITERALLY!) of pollution put out by IC engines........... and they wouldn't have to be banned or forced into extinction. There will still be many transportation needs that an IC engine will do best, for many years to come. Their pollution could be reduced to where it is as acceptable as power plants or interstate trucking/railroads, for the capabilities they provide.

Plus, biking is SO MUCH MORE FUN AND RELAXING than driving a car. The Boise area allows bikes to "ignore" stop signs and stop lights, provided there is no oncoming traffic. They are emphasizing bikes lanes EVERYWHERE. I am so behind these efforts to re-design our cities and suburbs to make them bike friendly.

I really feel this e-bike movement could "save the planet" if more people would just give them a try. They are incredibly fun and good for the environment.

PaulW - 1-30-2021 at 08:21 AM

Hook, Very good
I have been a rider for many years and I found the more miles I rode on the bicycle the higher the risk. Turns out there are bad drivers and some with attitudes and it was not long before I was hit. Hard to avoid other people doing their thing that causes you harm.
My solution was avoid places where cars and pickups congregate - like grocery stores and fast food places- etc. But the real solution is less miles on the bike and careful choices of your route.
Enjoy your bikes.

mtgoat666 - 1-30-2021 at 09:46 AM

Quote: Originally posted by PaulW  
Expect riots when the big V8s expire
Do you thing it will be liberals or conservatives that will participate in riots?
The die hards will reconstruct the dead old fashioned rigs until the petro fuel disappears.


My father in law has a vcr and turntable. There will also be elderly luddites and quaint old cranks to keep IC engines going for a while

gnukid - 1-30-2021 at 10:01 AM

People don't seem to realize where how solar works, it requires petroleum products to make solar panels, cables, batteries, and batteries are among the most toxic products we produce. Electricity has a storage and transfer problem, while the earth produces petroleum as a natural by product which is a form of stored or sequestered energy. The earth is dependent on releasing sequestered carbon to fuel plant life that has a symbiotic relationship with animals.

While toxic pollution and wasteful production processes are problematic, carbon dioxide by itself is not a pultant nor is petroleum, while solar energy creates massive toxic waste and is inefficient.

Electric cars have huge batteries that fail in ten years producing expensive toxic waste. While, gas vehicles can last for much longer .

Worse, hybrid vehicles are over-engineered dual system heavy inefficient vehicles that create huge toxic waste.

Add on wind power which is extremely unreliable and damaging to the ecosystem and ambient environment.

Certainly people should have a personal choice, though mandating electric is simply virtue signal while adding costs, and transferring one source of transit to another on the road to total restriction of mobility with surveillance and control.

I have worked on building electric cars and have some, they have thousands of electronic computer parts that often fail and are far more costly to replace while also requiring precious metals all for some purpose outside of economy or ecology.

This electric vehicle "mandate" is a political play that will result in massive toxic waste, reduced mobility and exponential increase in cost.



[Edited on 1-30-2021 by gnukid]

BajaTed - 1-30-2021 at 10:35 AM

Here is the story:

https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-produc...

Millionaires will have boutique refineries for their IC car collections. They already have private race tracks. Find a one per center for a friend, trickle down @ its best.:bounce:
Kiss the ring as needed;)

mtgoat666 - 1-30-2021 at 10:36 AM

Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  


I have worked on building electric cars and have some,...


Lol :lol:

Paul, tinkering with graphics, text and code on a computer is not building “building electric cars.”

You are delusional or liar to claim to be an engineer, machinist or mechanic or anyone involved in any way with designing or manufacturing cars...

Owning an electric car does not make you an expert in anything....

Assembling a radio shack kit model does not make you an expert in anything other than how to solder a $3 9v motor

gnukid - 1-30-2021 at 11:27 AM

Goat

You continue to be misinformed not to mention delusional, my experience comes from working inside the top electric car team, while observing the broad industry, anyone can look up the information or make a google search alert for electric vehicle costs, self-driving electric vehicle crashes, electric vehicle automation, electric vehicle robotics and see the quagmire being created on lies.

The costs of an electric vehicle are astronomically higher and those costs are both subsidized by the individual and by the government which is in turn paid by the people in taxes, the purchase costs are 40% higher than traditional costs that do not account for the actual costs.

The purpose for all this is for automation otherwise known as The Great Reset to reduce people's independence, mobility and ability to do their own product transit while adding automation, self-driving vehicles for large scale product transportation like Amazon, while you are increasingly restricted, controlled, monitored.

A typical modern electric car will last 6 years, have an accident every 11,000 miles and then is obsolete. and can not be fixed by you or anyone else.

It is so complex there are thousands of computers, each uniquely designed for the application, no spares exists, no replacements once it breaks, it's over.

A battery is absolutely the holy grail of toxic waste and is not recyclable, not to mention is extremely high risk t be sitting next to such a high power electric grid. The purpose of a battery is to store energy in the most inefficient manner available versus other options, oil, hydrogen, nuclear, heat etc.

While solar and wind are fantastic they ultimately have a different complimentary role to petroleum to support the home and car. Majority of power will always come from petroleum, coal and nuclear, then sun and wind, all of which are naturally produced.

Oil is part of a natural process, a cycle, of carbon sequestration, decomposition and output. We benefit from the this process and use oil to increase our comfort and economy otherwise we would be living in freezing cold or too hot weather, unable to move.

Of course solar is dependent on the sun, duh! Many places don't have consistent sun, while in Baja we do, so Solar makes sense to power homes and vehicles in Baja for short distance, golf carts, simplified electric carts etc. but not for transiting the peninsula.

So take a look at the earth, if everyone lived nearer the equator in areas without clouds solar would be a benefit, but many live throughout the north and south for a variety of reasons where sun is often inaequate to maintain solar systems, so all that electricity is produced by coal and oil as are the solar products and nearly all the products a modern person uses.

Are people aware that Telsas super chargers stations are coal or oil powered or how much petroleum products are required to make a Tesla or how much toxic waste the battery creates or how many accidents and requests for assistance occur in electric vehicles versus traditional vehicles. Probably not, because you have a political belief in virtue signaling nonsense and could not do the math to compare the costs and risks of typical modern electric car versus a gas powered vehicle.

See you on the side of the road Goat virtue signaling.





[Edited on 1-30-2021 by gnukid]

mtgoat666 - 1-30-2021 at 11:38 AM

Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  
... my experience comes from working inside the top electric car team, ...


Paul,
Did the “top electric car team” fire your @ss because your are anti-electric car? Or did they fire you because you are a qanon lunatic?


gnukid - 1-30-2021 at 11:47 AM

Note that Goat has no substance, no data points, no actual experience but he loves to repeat memes.

Anyone, use a search engine and do a search on electric car safety risks, electric car crashes, electric car explosions, self driving car crashes. Simply use google and create a search alert and see how many stories come in everyday pointing out the fraud behind electric car promotion.

While yesterday I took a drive to a remote beach in a 1965 and met a nice gentlemen named Mr Gastalum in a 1964 Ford 100 we chatted both are cars get 30 miles to gallon and are in perfect condition, that is ecology!

To be clear solar power is awesome for home and small golf carts or scooters for bikes. But you will never replace the gas powered vehicle for individual transit over distance.


[Edited on 1-30-2021 by gnukid]

IMG_1518.jpeg - 252kB

Hook - 1-30-2021 at 11:56 AM

Quote: Originally posted by PaulW  
Hook, Very good
I have been a rider for many years and I found the more miles I rode on the bicycle the higher the risk. Turns out there are bad drivers and some with attitudes and it was not long before I was hit. Hard to avoid other people doing their thing that causes you harm.
My solution was avoid places where cars and pickups congregate - like grocery stores and fast food places- etc. But the real solution is less miles on the bike and careful choices of your route.
Enjoy your bikes.


Well. it's obviously not for you.

But if everyone uses your solution of less miles on the bike..........then that means more miles in the car. Which exacerbates the situation you are so trying to avoid.

Hey, I've been in CAR accidents that were the result of stupid drivers. What you gonna do? Sit in your house and order everything on line?

Not me.

I will continue to do my part to get more cars off suburban roads..........and enjoy the hell out of doing it!

mtgoat666 - 1-30-2021 at 12:02 PM

Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  

But you will never replace the gas powered vehicle for individual transit over distance.


You sound like the cranks that existed over a century ago who said autos would never replace horses.

Technology advances.

I am frankly amazed that when I started driving my cars were carbureted engines with not an inkling of computers, and now we are driving electric cars with almost-reliable self-driving. I find it astounding.
When I started driving I could tinker with everything under the hood and fix most anything on my car, with a simple manual. Now when I open the hood I don’t even want to know how to fix all those computerized gadgets that make my modern car tick.

Battery (or fuel cell) technology (or othervtechnology we can’t even imagine yet) will advance until zero emission vehicles will be autonomously carrying us on long distance trips.

Paul, don’t be a Luddite. Cars have totally changed in last 30 years. 30 years from now, you won’t be able to find an IC engine in new cars.

The day I fly down baja on hwy 1 in a self-driving car will be fabulous. Imagine how relaxing the drive will be :light:

gnukid - 1-30-2021 at 02:26 PM

It's fun for curmudgeon house bound Nomad viejitos to turn global ecology into a personal vendetta against practical minded Baja adventurers who actually Go Out.

Solar and electrical is awesome and allows for off grind living, unlimited daytime Air conditioning in the desert and near freezing beers in the boiling heat, though, nothing will replace the economy and reliability of the gas motor, though certainly, electric scooters and bikes and carts are great additions.

The idea of Zero Carbon Footprint, that electric doesn't use petroleum is misleading, solar/electrical use as much oil or more than pure gas powered systems and it's more expensive and higher maintenance but can provide more luxury while being wasteful, and apparently makes some people feel good too.

gnukid - 1-30-2021 at 02:29 PM

By the way, my approach is to take what I learned about efficiency in electrical and apply to gas, we rebuild motors, taking time to improve flow and tolerance and custom build ignition to improve performance, while I run a panel on the roof of the car and house for freezer and accessories. Let's see where it goes, just don't fall for Zero Carbon Footprint false ideals, solar/electrical is among the most highest polluting systems of power.

[Edited on 1-31-2021 by gnukid]

Goats are easily amazed ?

MrBillM - 1-31-2021 at 02:51 PM

The Devil Goat states that he was amazed that vehicles back when he began driving were "Carbureted" and not computer-controlled.

REALLY ?

Given the state of development in Fuel-Injection systems and (especially) computer technology, only a Goat would find it amazing. To the extent that a Goat might think, anyway.

Granted, I am assuming that he didn't wait until middle-aged to begin driving, BUT ................... Quien Sabe ? Some people are just slow.

Skipjack Joe - 1-31-2021 at 03:34 PM

Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  


Electricity has a storage and transfer problem, while the earth produces petroleum as a natural by product which is a form of stored or sequestered energy. The earth is dependent on releasing sequestered carbon to fuel plant life that has a symbiotic relationship with animals.


The earth doesn't produce petroleum. The sun produces it as well. Oil is just organic matter that was produced by the sun but not fully decomposed into inorganic matter.

Plants existed on this earth a long time before CO2 releasing animals appeared on this planet. Over twice as long if I remember correctly. The truth is that there is no symbiotic relationship between plants and animals. Plants us O2 in daylight hours during photosynthesis and release CO2 at night during respiration. Plants are independent of animals but not the other way around. They produce both gasses they use. That's why they appeared on this planet first and existed for a billion years on their own.

gnukid - 1-31-2021 at 07:43 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Skipjack Joe  
Quote: Originally posted by gnukid  


Electricity has a storage and transfer problem, while the earth produces petroleum as a natural by product which is a form of stored or sequestered energy. The earth is dependent on releasing sequestered carbon to fuel plant life that has a symbiotic relationship with animals.


The earth doesn't produce petroleum. The sun produces it as well. Oil is just organic matter that was produced by the sun but not fully decomposed into inorganic matter.

Plants existed on this earth a long time before CO2 releasing animals appeared on this planet. Over twice as long if I remember correctly. The truth is that there is no symbiotic relationship between plants and animals. Plants us O2 in daylight hours during photosynthesis and release CO2 at night during respiration. Plants are independent of animals but not the other way around. They produce both gasses they use. That's why they appeared on this planet first and existed for a billion years on their own.


Interesting and partially true, though, ignores the impactful symbiotic relationship of plants and animals that vastly increases diversity. Petroleum is an output of earth, certainly the earth is largely dependent on the Sun for energy. The Sun is 1.3 millions larger than the earth and is it's greatest source of test and energy.

Lobsterman - 2-1-2021 at 03:37 PM

Thanks Gnukid for having the balls to express your views on a subject that is counter to the views of BN "resident experts" on everything. Why these individuals have to disrespect ones opinion, call one nasty names and offer unsubstantiated lies about ones profession or person only shows their close-mindedness and lack of moral integrity. Joe taught them well how to communicate on this site as a bully and get away with it.

Hopefully, someday these site members will accept another's opinion as just that an opinion based on ones knowledge and life experiences without being called names and trolled. Until that happens this site will continue to be a bully's platform to express their one-sided view of an argument thus keeping one with an opposing opinion from expressing it.

Thanks again Gnukid for your knowledge of the subject and offering it here.


mtgoat666 - 2-2-2021 at 09:05 PM

In the near future, sales of IC-engine vehicles will begin declining, and as auto makers experience declining sales, the auto makers will stop developing new IC engine vehicles, new model updates each year.
Some of you have in past been excited seeing new models coming out each year,... within the decade, expect to see companies like Ford stop R&;D for IC engines.
Ford won’t be spending time and $$developing new F-150 model years if F-150 IC engine sales growth is negative year over year.
Any vehicle with declining sales gets canceled after a few years of continuous declining sales.

PaulW - 2-3-2021 at 08:33 AM

How true - ICs are doomed. Companies doing the conversion first will win the business. Its is all about timing and money.

I see the transition happening now. First they go to light duty hybrids then to plug in hybrids then to full EVs.
It appears that GM is ahead of others and Ford may not survive due to very slow implementation and continued development of their ICs. The import brands are even slower. Some are ignoring the change, of course with exceptions that are already selling full EVs although in low volume and high prices.

gnukid - 2-3-2021 at 04:09 PM

Problems with electric cars

Electric cars will fail
https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1114758_electric-cars-w...

Electric vehicles as an example of a market failure
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-electric-vehicles-failure.html

Why Electric Cars Will Fail...and Have Already Triumphed
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/why-electr...

Tesla's 2020 Profit Didn't Come From Selling Cars, But Regulatory Credits
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-s-2020-profit-didn-...

Morgan Stanley is wrong — electric cars aren’t going to take over
https://www.businessinsider.com/why-morgan-stanley-wrong-abo...

The Clock Is Ticking On Electric Car Batteries - And How Long They Will Last
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billroberson/2019/09/30/the-clo...

Electric cars and plug-in hybrids are a fail
https://www.zdnet.com/article/electric-cars-and-plug-in-hybr...

AAA confirms what Tesla, BMW, Nissan electric car owners suspected — cold weather saps EV range. Even turning on the car drains power
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/06/aaa-confirms-what-tesla-bmw-...

Extreme weather is sucking the life from your electric car
https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/10/18217041/electric-car-ev-...

Why do electric cars suck in cold weather?
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/173256-why-do-electric-c...

AKgringo - 2-3-2021 at 04:53 PM

I just heard part of a parody song based on Janis Joplin's prayer..........Oh Lord, won't you buy me, a cyber truck. My friends all drive diesels, and I must make amends!

Hook - 2-3-2021 at 05:35 PM

WTF does this have to do with Baja..........or Mexico?

The Goat channeling JJJ. :rolleyes: Political agenda is their life. Sad.

[Edited on 2-4-2021 by Hook]

Skipjack Joe - 2-3-2021 at 06:40 PM

Found this online which I thought fit this thread:

145798570_10225324501037943_4442759188001933682_n.jpg - 17kB

[Edited on 2-4-2021 by Skipjack Joe]

mtgoat666 - 2-3-2021 at 06:55 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Skipjack Joe  




Nice thing about e-vehicles like Tesla is they have e-motors with no clunky gears in a transmission, Teslas got no dinosaur transmissions, no dinosaur crankshafts, far fewer mechanical parts and far fewer things that break.

Shift away, shifting is for dinosaurs!

Salsa - 2-8-2021 at 12:05 PM

Not to stir up any more BS, but,,,

Where does the juice to fill up the batteries come from ???

Don
BSEE

mtgoat666 - 2-8-2021 at 12:28 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Salsa  
Not to stir up any more BS, but,,,

Where does the juice to fill up the batteries come from ???

Don
BSEE


2019 electric generation data for California utilities:
32% renewable
34% natural gas
9% nuclear
14% hydro

California's non-carbon dioxide emitting electric generation categories (nuclear, large hydroelectric, and renewables) accounted for 57 percent of its generation

Salsa - 2-16-2021 at 09:07 PM

And all of this time they were telling me that nuclear was BADDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don

RFClark - 2-17-2021 at 07:01 AM

I’m coming to this discussion late. What follows is some history to show that I’ve actually done some of this!

I’ve driven IC cars, trucks, boats and planes since I was 15 1/2! I’ve also lived off the grid a lot since the mid ‘70s. First with gasoline generators as the only source of electricity, then with propane as the source of backup electricity. Where we lived 2 years ago is still running on a big SCE diesel generator generator since the fires last year!

Currently we have a US grade electric house (12 years) in Mexico south of San Felipe that is primarily solar electric. We started out here with an RV gas generator 30 years ago. Solar Electric has come along way in the last 20 years.

Currently we are using li ion batteries for our primary electrical storage. All are recycled from other uses mostly cars. We still have a backup propane generator and 300 gal of propane. The house uses about 10KW of electricity per day this time of year. Heating is propane because the propane tank holds about 2.5MW of heat energy in the same space as 20KW of il ion batteries! That’s 100 times the storage density and propane never goes bad like batteries or gasoline!

Our water truck is a propane powered 1964 Dodge 4x4, we refill the tank about once a year! It only uses electricity to start and run the transistor ignition. I can maintain it myself, but can’t make the parts or fuel.

I built and can maintain the house, but can’t make the spare parts for that either. “Do you have a spare means that I probably can’t fix this one” comes to mind here!

On to electric cars! We have a Spark EV ($7K used) up in the states. It goes about 80 miles on 16KW of batteries. I can make electricity to charge it. I can’t make gas or propane! Our runabout truck in Mexico gets 40Mpg. On a full tank and two Jeep cans it will drive to La Paz! I still can’t make the gas! Electric will replace gas/propane for 75% of all driving over the next 20 yeas. It’s all about energy storage density!

The point is without spare parts and fuel eventually everything technical will stop working! It’s just a matter of when! The Spark EV will likely operate until the tires wear out (I can’t make those either!) I’d guess that’s about 4 years after all the gas and propane runs out!

I can’t make small arms or ammunition either so I keep lots in stock in the states! (Shelf life about 25 years)

Arguing about which sort of magic is better is stupid and if you can’t make it, it’s Magic!

At this point it’s necessary to mention “Murphy”! The quick green fix of the environment just met Murphy! 300 or in the Dakotas 1200 gals of propane(yes, you need to heat propane to use it in really cold weather!) is a real comfort when things go to chit! Make sure that your heater is non-electric with a gas pilot though!

Murphy is God’s appointed enforcer! Everything that can go wrong, will go wrong just when it will hurt you the most! Think snow on the Gulf of Mexico here!

white whale - 2-17-2021 at 12:50 PM

What a great thread.

For the OP though, whenever I see a statement of X will happen past three years from the present a large grain of salt is required. Gov'ts are famous for those plans, and its always a nice number , never 2044 or 61. Just 5's and zeros. Back of the napkin plans as they are referred to. ICE dead? No. Fading away slowly, definitely.
Much as I hate sending money to Saudi and ilk to use slaves to build malls in the desert they will make sure the ICE fade takes a long time.

Reminds me of the Simpsons episode at the local dump, all the VHS tapes in a huge pile and next to was a sign "reserved for DVD's". Maybe EV is just a stop gap the early tech adopters are having fun with now and some other technology , cheaper, faster safer etc... is coming to the market next.

Like everything else in the world, you vote with your wallet.

RFClark - 2-17-2021 at 01:12 PM

“ Like everything else in the world, you vote with your wallet.”

Yes, currently our EV turns a nice profit on the mileage deduction. That said a Hydrogen economy is probably the general direction to head towards. IC engines do run on hydrogen, but have problems with water getting into the oil! Fuel cells work too and you can make hydrogen at home! Super capacitors have made great progress and could replace batteries in some applications.

That said Futurists have a poor track record! Ridley Scott not Sid Mead designed the police cruisers in “Blade Runner”! Ridley saw the first cruiser and said “lots more lights”! Seen a police car lately? He also said “lots more neon” (no LED lights back then!) been to Vegas lately?

PaulW - 2-17-2021 at 02:50 PM

Of course there are not enough batteries to satisfy the GM plan let alone the industry plan. GM admits that a battery breakthrough must happen many years before they reach meaningful production rate.
Yes, new technology is in study and prototypes have been built. It is all about getting away from the limited supply of lithium to more common elements.
Hydrogen is another way that has no infrastructure planned.

My solution is backup fossil fuel which they have recently discovered for the electrical grid. Green energy does not work when it is cold and snowy when the power is needed the most.
Probably hybrid will have to do rather than EVs.

John Harper - 2-17-2021 at 03:06 PM

Quote: Originally posted by PaulW  

My solution is backup fossil fuel which they have recently discovered for the electrical grid. Green energy does not work when it is cold and snowy when the power is needed the most.


A reliable storage medium is the only thing needed to provide reliable power from wind and solar. Liquid salt and other technologies to store heat on a massive scale is one promising technology. Then, just turn that heat into power using steam turbines, just like nuclear power plants do.

In Texas, most of the conventional energy (oil/gas) valves and pipes froze as well, making that source of energy as useless as others. You really can't blame wind and solar power for unforeseen cold events. Maybe now we should design the energy grids for these potential freeze events happening in warmer climates? IDK.

John


PaulW - 2-17-2021 at 03:23 PM

Hey John Nuclear work and don't freeze and do not screw up the air so much.
Yes, salt storage works if the power source is not covered with snow or ice. Or at least if the storage is big enough to get past the weather cycle.

RFClark - 2-17-2021 at 04:36 PM

John,

Actually you can blame the solar and wind farm operators. Heaters and anti icing coatings cost $$$ and can use 20% of the output. They’re in it for the profit just like the gas companies!Remember Solyndra? Their sales pitch was the round tube their solar cells were in wouldn’t build up ice and snow! They cost more, produced less and took up extra space!

Actually, pumping water uphill when you have electricity and letting it flow back downhill when you need electricity is simpler, unlike molten salt you can drink the water. DWP in LA does that between castiac lake and pyramid lake. They used to have 3 very large megawatt pump/generators at castiac lake and were talking about adding more.

Difficult to do out in the great flatlands though. Australia and other flat places use megawatt sized storage batteries.

New Nuclear Technology works too!

Don Pisto - 2-17-2021 at 05:11 PM

new geothermal being studied.....

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-technology-could-tran...

PaulW - 2-17-2021 at 06:46 PM

Show us the energy balance for a power reactor. Do you really think heat is wasted? I guess the turbines do not us the heat?

RFClark - 2-17-2021 at 06:49 PM

lencho,

The NRC wouldn’t issue a permit to operate the sun cause it kills lots of people every year and emits lots of radiation too! Solar panels are wonderful we’ve lived off of them for over 12 years. But there’s that darn dark and cold problem! All the current solutions except Hydro emit CO2! Nuclear generates the same amount of heat true but no CO2! The problem with waste disposal are the NIMBYS who want the power but don’t want to see it generated!

By the way, solar electric is about 20% efficient, where do you imagine the other 80% of the sun’s energy goes to?

John Harper - 2-17-2021 at 07:21 PM

I never said any or all technologies are perfect. There are always tradeoffs. Sun and wind can be inconsistent. gravity is constant. But, hydro opportunities are limited or pretty much tapped out.

I have no problem with nuclear power, as long as the waste issue is solved, like with long promised fusion power. Like the flying car in my garage.

There's two dead "ta taas" just north of me to show me the risks of nuclear fission. The radioactive cores are still a problem to be solved. As are the fuel rods. IDK what the solution is, does anyone?

But, until then, why not pursue alternative paths of energy technology?

If they're a dead end, then so be it. We've subsidized gas and oil to the likely trillions of dollars by now (Iraq1 and Iraq2?). And it's seemingly forced us to pursue other options due to the risk of an increasingly unstable climate.

John




[Edited on 2-18-2021 by John Harper]

John Harper - 2-17-2021 at 07:52 PM

Quote: Originally posted by RFClark  
All the current solutions except Hydro emit CO2! Nuclear generates the same amount of heat true but no CO2! The problem with waste disposal are the NIMBYS who want the power but don’t want to see it generated!

By the way, solar electric is about 20% efficient, where do you imagine the other 80% of the sun’s energy goes to?


Where do you live? Why don't you and your neighbors volunteer to have nuclear waste dump in your neighborhood? Is there a problem with taking time with burying a poison that lasts hundreds of thousands of years?

Also, solar efficiency will obviously increase in the future. Most the sun's energy is just radiated out into space, and what hits the Earth is used just a bit more effectively. Move to Mars and tell us how you like it, even less solar energy.

John

pauldavidmena - 2-18-2021 at 11:22 AM

According to this article in the NY Times, Ford is now committing to phasing out gas-powered vehicles in Europe.

TMW - 2-18-2021 at 09:09 PM

I heard a guy on talk radio a couple of years ago say that all the nuclear waste in the US would fit in a 12x12 ft room if that's so why not put it in rockets and shoot it to the sun.

He also said that the US doesn't recycle the waste like other countries which would reduce the amount there is.

RFClark - 2-18-2021 at 09:37 PM

There has been a concerted effort to resist nuclear power in the US dating back to the early ‘50s. Those against nuclear power have used the waste reprocessing and disposal issue as a justification for not building or using nuclear power. They are th same people responsible for creating the disposal problem by opposing movement, repressing and off site storage of nuclear waste! The Northeast of the US buys electricity from Canada because they have a large number of nuclear power plants right across Lake Ontario from the US which can’t build those plants because of delays caused by NIMBYs!

mtgoat666 - 2-18-2021 at 09:57 PM

Quote: Originally posted by TMW  
I heard a guy on talk radio a couple of years ago say that all the nuclear waste in the US would fit in a 12x12 ft room if that's so why not put it in rockets and shoot it to the sun.


:lol:

Somebody pulling your leg.

The USA stockpile of highly enriched uranium alone is over 600 tons. World stockpile of HEU is probably over 2000 tons.

If you looks at all of the enriched fuels, and all of the associated contact-contaminated wastes, the volume is immense.

Regarding Low level wastes, there are many landfills with many 10,000 tons in each landfill....

Med wastes alone probably fill your 12x12 room each day....





mtgoat666 - 2-18-2021 at 10:01 PM

Quote: Originally posted by RFClark  
There has been a concerted effort to resist nuclear power in the US dating back to the early ‘50s. Those against nuclear power have used the waste reprocessing and disposal issue as a justification for not building or using nuclear power. They are th same people responsible for creating the disposal problem by opposing movement, repressing and off site storage of nuclear waste! The Northeast of the US buys electricity from Canada because they have a large number of nuclear power plants right across Lake Ontario from the US which can’t build those plants because of delays caused by NIMBYs!


I would never trust any government, let alone a corporation, to run a nuke facility in my neighborhood.
Can you Imagine trump or his thieving children (or any GOPer) being in charge of a nuke facility? Or corporate America where money trumps morals?
You can’t trust humans with doing the right thing, and long term waste problems require someone to do the right thing.

RFClark - 2-18-2021 at 10:17 PM

I’m sure that you don’t!

Probably don’t drink water with fluoride in it. Might not have had any vaccinations since you were 16. Do you drive a car? If you do where do you get the tires? One of the things about the US that used to be great was as long as you didn’t bother anyone else you could believe whatever you wanted to believe and live however you wanted to!

That’s coming to an end! It time to find another place to call home!

RFClark - 2-18-2021 at 11:02 PM

Mars beckons! Imagine the off-roading possibilities, a whole planet with no roads! That said there are people back here who will still be annoyed by what you do 11 light minutes away! Some of them post here!

PaulW - 5-19-2021 at 06:53 AM

Well -- I don't prefer Nuke, wind, petro, nat gas, or photovoltaic, but I do like hydro power. Unlimited power from water with anything over 2' of head.
The sea of Cortez has as much a 20' of water level change twice a day. A source of energy that is totally untapped.
The problem is it is intermittent just like other green sources.
So my suggestion only works with a source of power to maintain consistent power. From my list above we will be stuck with a polluting source for a long time.

PaulW - 5-19-2021 at 07:02 AM

Yup a bad political decision by all the car builders. At some point they will find out that there is a limited (large ?) market for a vehicle that requires a long wait to be refueled.
IMO they need to produce a mix if hybrid and EVs - not all EVs. The reason is not all folks need/want a commuter car. Some want a vehicle that does not have a limited range

Quote: Originally posted by mtgoat666  
Todays news:
General Motors plans to completely phase out vehicles using internal combustion engines by 2035, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra announced Thursday. The automaker will go completely carbon neutral at all facilities worldwide by 2035.

Since nomads mostly drive toyotas and Suzukis (and 1%ers g-wagons), perhaps the GM plan is irrelevant for nomads, eh?

Still waiting for my cyber truck,....



TMW - 5-19-2021 at 01:13 PM

From the Office of Nuclear Energy:

2. The U.S. generates about 2,000 metric tons of used fuel each year
This number may sound like a lot, but it’s actually quite small. In fact, the U.S. has produced roughly 83,000 metrics tons of used fuel since the 1950s—and all of it could fit on a single football field at a depth of less than 10 yards.

Goat is right it won't fit in a 12x12 room.

TMW - 5-19-2021 at 01:18 PM

Another Fact from the Office of Nuclear Energy:

5. Used fuel can be recycled
That’s right!

Used nuclear fuel can be recycled to make new fuel and byproducts.

More than 90% of its potential energy still remains in the fuel, even after five years of operation in a reactor.

The United States does not currently recycle used nuclear fuel but foreign countries, such as France, do.

There are also some advanced reactor designs in development that could consume or run on used nuclear fuel in the future.

Learn more about our work with spent nuclear fuel.

TMW - 5-19-2021 at 01:29 PM

Reusing Nuclear: A Way our Nuclear Output and Decrease Radioactive Waste
Angel Rubio
April 30, 2018
Submitted as coursework for PH241, Stanford University, Winter 2018
Introduction

Fig. 1: La Hague nuclear reprocessing plant in France. (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

While fracking and offshore drilling have substantially decreased the price of oil, it is in our best interest to move to a cleaner, fewer pollutant means of energy. One way of producing large amounts of energy with a low environmental impact is by harnessing nuclear energy. In using nuclear energy, we are splitting the nucleus of an atom in a process called fission. [1] This then creates heat, which boils water, creates steam, and spins a turbine in order to create electricity. [1] Basically, the process is identical to how coal power plants work but instead of burning coal, we are splitting the nucleus of an atom. Nuclear energy is sometimes perceived as creating significant air pollution, but this is not the case. [1] There also now exist ways to reuse nuclear waste that its environmental impact is minimized.

Reusing Nuclear Fuel

During World War II, the United States developed a way to chemically separate and recover fissionable Plutonium material from spent fuel rods. [2] However, because the high cost and also the fear that nuclear materials could end up in the wrong hands and be used to build nuclear weapons, President Carter chose to ban nuclear reprocessing. [2] As a result, the United States buries its spent nuclear fuel underground. [3]

The standard and a most widely used process is currently PUREX (Plutonium and Uranium Recovery by Extraction). [4] In this process, the spent fuel is divided into small pieces and then dissolved in nitric acid. [4] Using tributyl phosphate, a surfactant, the uranium and plutonium are taken up and separated from the rest of the waste. [4] This process leaves behind a smaller volume of radioactive waste - fission products and neutron-activated isotopes - that must be disposed of. In France and Japan, the nuclear material that is not reused is embedded in glass. [5]

In France Great Britain and Japan, the PUREX technology is greatly used. In addition, they have started to develop alternative versions of PUREX. In France, in particular, nuclear energy accounts for about 80% of the energy production. [6] A large amount of this nuclear energy comes from fuel that is reprocessed in plants such as the La Hague Reprocessing Plant shown in Fig. 1. In the end, repossession on a ton of nuclear waste is equivalent to saving 100,000 barrels of oil. [5]

Conclusion

In the United States, nuclear reprocessing was banned for the fear of nuclear proliferation. Additionally, twelve states have also banned nuclear plants completely, due to the fact that they produce radioactive waste. [7] If we were to lift the ban on nuclear reprocessing, we could reuse this waste and be now have the ability to create nuclear power plants in the United States without increasing the mass of waste produced. The example of other countries shows that nuclear proliferation is not as great a problem as once thought, as the nuclear fuel are highly guarded and nuclear materials can be transported safely. [7] In the end, nuclear reprocessing is a sure way to increase the amount of nuclear energy that our country produces while reducing the mass of nuclear waste.

© Angel Rubio. The author warrants that the work is the author's own and that Stanford University provided no input other than typesetting and referencing guidelines. The author grants permission to copy, distribute and display this work in unaltered form, with attribution to the author, for noncommercial purposes only. All other rights, including commercial rights, are reserved to the author.

References

[1] A. M. Weinberg, "Social Institutions and Nuclear Energy," Science 177, 27 (1972).

[2] A. Andrews, "Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing: U.S. Policy Development," Congressional Research Service, RS22542, March 2008.

[3] "Backgrounder on Dry Cask Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, October 2016.

[4] J. M. McKibben, "Chemistry of the Purex Process," Radiochim. Acta 36, 3 (1984).

[5] "What Is Nuclear Reprocessing?," BBC News, 19 Feb 00.

[6] "Heatwave Hits French Power Production.," The Guardian, 12 Aug 03.

[7] W. F. Shughart II, "Why Doesn't U.S. Recycle Nuclear Fuel?," Forbes, 1 Oct 14.