BajaNomad
Not logged in [Login - Register]

Go To Bottom
Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2    4
Author: Subject: new book on California missions
David K
Honored Nomad
*********


Avatar


Posts: 64848
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Offline

Mood: Have Baja Fever

[*] posted on 4-2-2015 at 02:06 PM


Quote a Native American source???

Native American alive during the Spanish occupation are NO LONGER ALIVE... and developed no books to document events that we can study 200-300+ years later. THEY were NOT YET ADVANCED to that point. Some cave art that dates back 500-10,000 years shows no advanced communication skills, just representations of ideas or events. Now elbeau has done some fascination interpretations of cave art, and I welcome them. I do not fear the truth if some revelation is found in them. I don't need the Catholics in Baja to be superior to the Indians for any opinion.

The Indians were stuck in caveman-like conditions without progress. Maybe they didn't need more out of life or maybe they were awaiting the arrival of other men from other shores to jump start their evolution. Sad that diseases decimated them so the history is not complete.

So, you can add all the opinions you want on how wonderful life was as a Californian before the evil Europeans arrived, but you have no documentation to back up those New Age ideas on their life.

I do not assign advanced or superior values to one group over another, I just report what was documented and on what I have observed at mission and Indian sites in Baja California. I prefer to discover the facts and then let other run with them, hopefully to make more discoveries and not just to further their political agenda.




"So Much Baja, So Little Time..."

See the NEW www.VivaBaja.com for maps, travel articles, links, trip photos, and more!
Baja Missions and History On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/bajamissions/
Camping, off-roading, Viva Baja discussion: https://www.facebook.com/groups/vivabaja


View user's profile Visit user's homepage
sargentodiaz
Nomad
**




Posts: 259
Registered: 2-20-2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-2-2015 at 02:20 PM


Quote: Originally posted by monoloco  
Quote: Originally posted by sargentodiaz  
I see no response to my last post.

Wonder why.
OK I'll bite. I doubt than anyone knows exactly to what degree Serra was culpable in mistreating the natives but it certainly seems, from his own writings, that he supported whippings and other punishments of the people whose land the padres claimed dominion over. Based on that alone, I really don't see how he could be considered a "saint". What exactly were the two miracles (a condition of sainthood) that he supposedly performed?


The ONE instance of "whipping" I've explained.

Like all adults of the time, parents looked upon "spanking" as a common way of trying to enforce the way of right and wrong.

In the case of the friars, the general rule was to put the culpable individual before the group (in itself a strong punishment as shame was, by far, the worst thing that could happen to the Indians) to explain exactly what the error was and what behavior was expected.

They would then be publicly "spanked" using a willow rod - the rule being NOT to bruise and definitely never to draw blood.

This Spare the Rod and Spoil the Child was common into the early to mid 20th Century. In fact, one friar was stripped of his license and forced to return to Mexico for harsh punishment of the converts of his mission.




Father Serra\'s Legacy @ http://msgdaleday.blogspot.com a History of California and the Franciscan missions.
View user's profile
rts551
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 6699
Registered: 9-5-2003
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-2-2015 at 02:22 PM


Quote: Originally posted by David K  

I do not assign advanced or superior values to one group over another, I just report what was documented and on what I have observed at mission and Indian sites in Baja California. I prefer to discover the facts and then let other run with them, hopefully to make more discoveries and not just to further their political agenda.


Then why not accept someone elses point of view?
View user's profile
sargentodiaz
Nomad
**




Posts: 259
Registered: 2-20-2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-2-2015 at 02:33 PM


Quote: Originally posted by David K  
Stop with the talking points and include the rest of my reply. To the natives the Spanish provided food without hunting. Built houses with roofs. Communicated with 'talking paper'. The natives were wowed and saw the Spanish as advanced and that was an attraction to join the missions.


And the Spanish showed them ways of avoiding famine - which often forced them to put their babies and elderly out in the wild to die - and to find protection from harsh and hazardous weather. They no longer had to depend upon hunting and encountering the dangerous Grizzly Bears that roamed everywhere and killed many of them.

As they had no healers, the friars used native herbs to create medicine to help heal injuries and some illnesses.

Most import - and probably least understood - was that the friars, in their teaching of Jesus dying so they might have a life after death, gave them something to look forward to in their life beyond the time of their death. It gave them hope - something that cannot be quantified




Father Serra\'s Legacy @ http://msgdaleday.blogspot.com a History of California and the Franciscan missions.
View user's profile
SFandH
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 7084
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-2-2015 at 02:47 PM


Interesting thread. Thanks to the informed nomads who made time to post a portion of what they know. It's appreciated.

Certainly two sides to this story. The side of the conquerors and the side of the conquered.

From a conqueror:

Archbishop Salvatore J. Cordileone of San Francisco, who credited Father Serra with bringing “Christianity to this part of the world,” said he understood why Indians were upset, acknowledging the whippings and coercive environment. But missionaries also taught school and farming, he said.

Throughout history, a more powerful civilization “will dominate and seek to transform the weaker one,” Archbishop Cordileone said. “European powers were going to discover this continent and settle here. Were the indigenous people better off with the missionaries or without the missionaries? I would say they were better off with the missionaries.”


From the conquered:

Mr. Medina was less forgiving. “Father Serra could have gone against the policy of the church and advocated for Indian people,” he said. Canonizing “the leader of the disastrous, genocidal California mission system is a way that the church further legitimizes the pain and suffering of Ohlone and countless other California Indians.” Canonization would only deepen the divide between Native Americans and the Roman Catholic Church, he said.

When he gives tours, Mr. Medina tells students to “imagine walking home from school, and people have taken the things you care about and make you change your name, your religion and your language.” He spares them the more brutal information, such as how girls and unmarried women were pulled from their families and forced to sleep in tight quarters until they were married off.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/us/to-some-indians-in-cali...


[Edited on 4-2-2015 by SFandH]
View user's profile
elbeau
Nomad
**




Posts: 256
Registered: 3-2-2011
Location: Austin, TX
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-2-2015 at 06:13 PM


A question that occurs to me is whether or not the Jesuit enterprise even had the potential to improve the life of the natives if it weren't for the epidemics.

Imagine the ideal scenario that Kino, Salvatierra, Piccolo, and the other early Jesuits probably hoped for. Imagine what would have happened if they had been successful in converting 100% of the Indians, teaching them to dress themselves, and teaching them to live in population centers and practice 15th and 16th century agriculture without any reduction in the native population.

Let's not pretend that the missions were ever self-sustaining. They required a constant flow of foreign provisions just to support the subset of Indians that resided there, despite aggressive attempts to grow enough food.

If the epidemics hadn't happened and all the Indians had chosen to live the teachings of the Padres, they would have starved to death in very short order.

Your point about the Indians not caring for the elderly is debatable, but I'll pretend like it's an established fact for the sake of this conversation. Do you think the Jesuits could have successfully taught the Indians to feed their elders in those circumstances? Do you think they could have given nursing mothers three times the rations as others (which is what they report doing to solve the abortion problem)?

You can't feed the elderly and feed nursing mothers without food.

Are you seeing the pattern here? You are claiming that the missionaries solved serious social problems by educating the Indians and by teaching them advanced technologies and skills...but that is not true.

Yes, the Jesuits showed up with beautiful robes, shiny armor, colorful beads, gorgeous textiles, powerful weapons, and strong tools...but none of those things helped the mission system become self-sustaining. None of these things solved any of the problems you're naming.

On the other hand, the Indians were found naked, uneducated (in the traditional European sense), and with comparatively little technology...but these "barbarians" were far more successful at scratching out a living in the peninsula than the Jesuits ever were.

The missions only appeared to succeed because the Indians kept living differently than the Europeans until epidemics reduced their numbers to a point that could be sustained by 16th-century agriculture at the missions.

The solutions to these problems that the Jesuits supposedly solved all revolve around the idea that the Jesuits replaced bad old traditions with good new traditions. That NEVER happened. The Indians didn't turn their bows into plow-shares, they turned their metate's into grave-markers. They didn't successfully adopt a European style of living (which, according to comments in this thread, is apparently defined as one free of abuse of the elderly, abortion, and war(citation needed)).

The Indians simply died off until mission agriculture could support their puny, leftover, cultureless population. It's true that once the native population reached this point, there might not have been a lot of elderly abuse, there might not have been many abortions, and there weren't any more tribal conflicts, but are we really going to pretend that these are remarkable social achievements?

I welcome other opinions, but I have a hard time seeing any significant benefits that the mission system brought to the Indians. That's not to say that I think the missionaries themselves were bad. I think that many of them were kind, well-intentioned people, but I'm not going to give much credit to their enterprise in general.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage
monoloco
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 6667
Registered: 7-13-2009
Location: Pescadero BCS
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-2-2015 at 06:25 PM


Well stated elbeau.



"The future ain't what it used to be"
View user's profile
David K
Honored Nomad
*********


Avatar


Posts: 64848
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Offline

Mood: Have Baja Fever

[*] posted on 4-3-2015 at 08:12 AM


That is excellent elbeau!

The conditions in Upper California were far better and the Franciscans under Serra were wise to give Lower California to the Dominicans, which was in decline and far worse terrain and climate for agriculture. The Dominicans received assistance from the Franciscans for the Baja missions when Spain reduced and stopped sending supply ships with the outbreak of the war for Mexico's independence (1810-1821).




"So Much Baja, So Little Time..."

See the NEW www.VivaBaja.com for maps, travel articles, links, trip photos, and more!
Baja Missions and History On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/bajamissions/
Camping, off-roading, Viva Baja discussion: https://www.facebook.com/groups/vivabaja


View user's profile Visit user's homepage
academicanarchist
Senior Nomad
***




Posts: 978
Registered: 9-7-2003
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-4-2015 at 05:58 AM


David. Oral history is an important swource of information that is as useful and valid as are written documents, and you are wrong when you say that there are no testimonies left by indigenous peoples who lived on the missions. One example is the text of Manuel Rojo that we discussed earlier. He interviewed and recorded the accounts of mission residents. THere are other examples as well from the California missions. In the late 19th century Alphonse Pinart, who was working with Bancroft at the time and happily stole documents from communities in Mexico, also recorded oral history accounts by indigenous and non'indigenous peoples. They are now housed in The Bancroft Library at my alma mater. One example is the account of Lorenzo Asisara, that provides important details regarding the assassination of Andres Quintana, O.F.M. at Santa Cruz misssion in 1812.

As regards other comments in the thread. Serra authorized the usee of corporal punishment. In one of his most objectionable publications, Francis Guest, O.F.M. made the same argument about corporal punishment, that it was equivalent to a parent spanking a child. Not so. The responses madee by a number of Franciscan missionaries to an 1812 questionnaire sent by the Spanish government documents the differnent forms of corpoiral punishment. And it is not so easy to dismiss the practice. Corporal punishment was not an element of indigenous culture, and was humiliating as well as painful. The Franciscans, people like GUest, have attempted to trivialize the practice. In one translation of a colonial'era source published by the Academy of American Franciscan History, the translation was changed from [beat[ to [spank,[ for obvious political reassons.

As regards other comments, Prior to the arrival of the Spanish, indigenous peoples had religious beliefs and a concept of the afterlife. The missionaries simply had a different one, When the natives at Sta Cruz assassinated the rather sadistic Quintana 'he had pieces of metal added to the whip he used to [spank[ the neophytes, he was castrated. The initial investigation of his death to not report this. The natives did this so that Quintana would be miserable in the afterlife. The natives also had healers who used different remedies that were no better than what the Spanish brought. Syphilis became a major problem among the native populations, and the missionaries used mercury pills to treat the ailment. One of the most interesting colonial era codices here in central Mexico is the Codex de la Cruz Badiano, created around 1540. It took the knowledge of a non-existent native healer on the different herbal remedies used in central Mexico, many still used here. The descriptions are accompanied by paintings of the plants.
View user's profile
güéribo
Nomad
**




Posts: 239
Registered: 10-17-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-4-2015 at 06:13 PM


Good contributions, academicanarchist and elbeau.
View user's profile
 Pages:  1  2    4

  Go To Top

 






All Content Copyright 1997- Q87 International; All Rights Reserved.
Powered by XMB; XMB Forum Software © 2001-2014 The XMB Group






"If it were lush and rich, one could understand the pull, but it is fierce and hostile and sullen. The stone mountains pile up to the sky and there is little fresh water. But we know we must go back if we live, and we don't know why." - Steinbeck, Log from the Sea of Cortez

 

"People don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care." - Theodore Roosevelt

 

"You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them or to them." - Malcolm Forbes

 

"Let others lead small lives, but not you. Let others argue over small things, but not you. Let others cry over small hurts, but not you. Let others leave their future in someone else's hands, but not you." - Jim Rohn

 

"The best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer." - Cunningham's Law







Thank you to Baja Bound Mexico Insurance Services for your long-term support of the BajaNomad.com Forums site.







Emergency Baja Contacts Include:

Desert Hawks; El Rosario-based ambulance transport; Emergency #: (616) 103-0262