Pages:
1
2 |
David K
Honored Nomad
Posts: 64844
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Offline
Mood: Have Baja Fever
|
|
I didn't make the map in question. Why not ask Harald why he used a different map then the one asked about to respond to the question?
|
|
4x4abc
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 4289
Registered: 4-24-2009
Location: La Paz, BCS
Member Is Offline
Mood: happy - always
|
|
the 1:250,000 map David used, has 100 meter contour intervals
Harald Pietschmann
|
|
David K
Honored Nomad
Posts: 64844
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Offline
Mood: Have Baja Fever
|
|
You are talking about the heavy lines and not the thin lines, yes?
The 750-meter labeled line can be followed up and down and around. There is one more heavy line (850 meter?) before San Francisco then 4 thin lines
(20 meters each?) giving us 930 meters for San Francisco (3,051'). As I said, my GPS said it was 3,640'... but GPS may not be dead on, either.
|
|
4x4abc
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 4289
Registered: 4-24-2009
Location: La Paz, BCS
Member Is Offline
Mood: happy - always
|
|
don't know the scale of the map you are using, David.
can you check on its index?
The 1:250,000 scale map I am using (889463532347_geo G1201 Santa Rosalia) has fat lines every 300 meters and 4 thin lines every 60 meters
so I was wrong with the 100 meter interval earlier quoted
San Francisco de la Sierra is at 1,141 meters
Harald Pietschmann
|
|
David K
Honored Nomad
Posts: 64844
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Offline
Mood: Have Baja Fever
|
|
1,141? That is pretty close to my GPS reading there, of 1,109 meters.
I will have to search for that map on Inegi as I didn't save it... just added it for Nomad interest.
|
|
Pages:
1
2 |