BajaNomad
Super Administrator
Posts: 4999
Registered: 8-1-2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Member Is Offline
Mood: INTP-A
|
|
High C-19 mortality rate among young maquiladora workers
--
A new report in Mexico has identified that young people who contract COVID-19 in Baja California are dying at a rate 25 times higher than the same
demographic just north of the border in San Diego County.
The same study discovered most of the young people who are dying live in border cities like Tijuana and had jobs or ties to maquiladoras, which are
assembly plants in Mexico operated by foreign interests including the United States.
... Most of the workers are young between 25-45 years of age.
Baja California, located just south of California, has close to a thousand of these factories.
Numbers show that at least 400 workers in Baja California working in these plants have gotten COVID-19 and at least 83 of them have died, according to
the state health secretary.
“The vast majority of infected people are factory workers,” said Sergio Moctezuma, the state labor secretary for Baja California.
According to stats released last week, death among people ages 40 to 49 is about 25 times higher in Baja California than it is in San Diego County,
which has a similarly sized population.
And for those age 50 to 59, the number of deaths is nearly 10 times higher.
Maquiladora leaders defend their industry saying workers could be infected anywhere.
“Coronavirus cases are high among maquiladora workers simply because they make up a high percentage of the general population,” said Kurt Honold,
who represents the maquiladora sector.
“Fifty percent of the people who work in Tijuana work in the maquiladora industry,” he said.
--
https://www.borderreport.com/regions/california/covid-19-kil...
When I was young, I admired clever people. Now that I am old, I admire kind people.
– Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel
We know we must go back if we live, and we don`t know why.
– John Steinbeck, Log from the Sea of Cortez
https://www.regionalinternet.com
Affordable Domain Name Registration/Management & cPanel Web Hosting - since 1999 |
|
|
SFandH
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7084
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
As Workers Fall Ill, U.S. Presses Mexico to Keep American-Owned Plants Open
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/30/world/americas/coronaviru...
------------------------
Gotta keep the TV factories open so Americans who get paid to stay home can watch TV.
|
|
|
SFandH
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7084
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by lencho  | | Quote: Originally posted by BajaNomad | | “Coronavirus cases are high among maquiladora workers simply because they make up a high percentage of the general population,”
|
That doesn't explain a 20% lethality rate among those infected. Something strange here...  |
The severity of illness is a function of how severely one is infected. Perhaps these workers were exposed to the virus day after day until they got
too sick to work, resulting in massive, lethal infections.
|
|
|
Alm
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 2729
Registered: 5-10-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
There was statistics from Canada that mortality was high not only in nursing homes (where most are aged 70+), but also in poor areas in buildings with
multigenerational families living under the same roof.
There is also the level of care in a typical Mexican hospital.
|
|
|
Alm
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 2729
Registered: 5-10-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
I understand that lethality is a mortality that is disease-specific. Though in clinical studies they often refer to this exactly as "disease-specific
death". When they "think" it was disease specific.
|
|
|
AKgringo
Elite Nomad
Posts: 6027
Registered: 9-20-2014
Location: Anchorage, AK (no mas!)
Member Is Offline
Mood: Retireded
|
|
How many workers?
Quote; "Numbers show that at least 400 workers in Baja California working in these plants have gotten COVID-19 and at least 83 of them have died,
according to the state health secretary."
Those numbers are pretty useless for figuring out a rate, or ratio of anything without knowing how many workers there are, and how many were tested?
If you are not living on the edge, you are taking up too much space!
"Could do better if he tried!" Report card comments from most of my grade school teachers. Sadly, still true!
|
|
|
SFandH
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7084
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
Here's an interesting write-up about the virus and death / mortality rate measurements:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-...
[Edited on 6-10-2020 by SFandH]
|
|
|
SFandH
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7084
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by lencho | I sure am confused. In that article,
and in a number of other places, they are using "mortality rate" as the number of deaths divided by the number of infected individuals, and for that
they would need to know the number of individuals infected.
But all the definitions that I have seen, define mortality rate as the ratio of deaths to the [complete] number of population.
https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/lesson3/section3.html
Those could be (hopefully) radically different numbers. |
I think as long as the group is specified, the phrase "mortality rate" can be used. IOW you can have a mortality rate that is the ratio of deaths to
infected or a mortality rate that is the ratio of deaths to the total population. The group, infected or total or ??, needs to be specified for the
phrase to be meaningful.
I want to know what the COVID-19 mortality rate is for all 70-year-old, handsome men. 
[Edited on 6-11-2020 by SFandH]
|
|
|
Alm
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 2729
Registered: 5-10-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
Definition or not, mortality (or lethality) per infected shows how serious the disease is, regardless of other factors. For Covid it is in single
digits across all age segments in most countries. The number of infected is taken from testing. It is assumed that everybody with symptoms gets tested
- which is unrealistic, but this measure is useful for comparison to other diseases or between different areas.
83 workers per 400 = 20% mortality per infected, way higher than average in Mexico. I agree with possible explanation of repeated infection from
working in the same anti-sanitary conditions day after day. More viruses in the body, less chance to fight it.
Mexico daily cases (however scarce the testing is) have not begun declining yet - see 2nd graph: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/mexico/.
An important measure is the number of patients in ICU and on ventilators - more important than daily cases, according to some - but such statistics is
not available for Mexico.
Btw, daily cases in the US have stopped declining for the last 4 weeks: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/.
|
|
|
Alm
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 2729
Registered: 5-10-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by lencho |
A lot of the time I see it used (without that context), and I don't know what they're actually talking about. Or whether they do.  |
Depends on the source quality. Studies published in Litcovid adhere to stricter standards and are usually clear as to what they mean. Articles in NYT
are "mostly" clear. Local sources covering the US/Mex border areas are low quality.
Knowing the total number of workers at those factories (in addition to the number of infected workers) would only reflect local transmission rate,
which in turn reflects local conditions of work - distancing, sanitary conditions and other things. It is also not productive making conclusions as
to the age-specific mortality when there is just one age segment - "most of the workers are young 25-45". Multivariate analysis is desirable.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xmbforum/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
