BajaNomad
Not logged in [Login - Register]

Go To Bottom
Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: Fideicomisos and Forms 3520/3520A--recent developments
bajajazz
Nomad
**




Posts: 386
Registered: 12-18-2006
Location: La Paz, BCS, Mexico
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 04:44 PM
WHY FIGHT IT?


Why fight it?

Because . . . creating a paper trail where none existed before is just begging to be hit up with demands for more paper . . . and more paper . . . and more paper . . . until your socalled "golden years" are spent doing nothing other than filling out forms and answering questions that are nobody's gddm business except your own. Paper generates paper. Answer enough of their nonsensical bureaucratic claptrap questions and sooner or later you're going to stick your head in a noose.

I checked this out with the trust officer at BaNorte . . . he agrees it's inapplicable nonsense and should be ignored.
View user's profile
k-rico
Super Nomad
****




Posts: 2079
Registered: 7-10-2008
Location: Playas de Tijuana
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 04:46 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by wessongroup
k-rico... see above


Hey, you're right!! It doesn't make any sense to file these forms. I agree. BUT, we know of one individual fighting this now, he has said it is costing him big bucks, and we know of another individual who had to hire an attorney who had to get IRS officials in DC to tell a local agent to back off on another case.

You're right, it doesn't make sense. It's easy for you to argue against filing, you don't have a fideicomiso.

I AGREE WITH YOU - OK?

But I'm still going to file the forms - just in case. The penalties are stiff, as are CPA/lawyer fees.

And if the IRS rules that fideicomisos are not foreign trusts I'll be expecting a "neener, neener, neener, I told you so" from you. :tumble:


[Edited on 9-21-2010 by k-rico]
View user's profile
k-rico
Super Nomad
****




Posts: 2079
Registered: 7-10-2008
Location: Playas de Tijuana
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 04:48 PM


bajajazz, you asked a Mexican banker about IRS laws and you would act upon his advice???????
View user's profile
longlegsinlapaz
Super Nomad
****




Posts: 1685
Registered: 11-18-2005
Location: La Paz
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 05:02 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by wessongroup

I believe a very, very import piece of information is found at the very top and clearly shows that this in fact does not apply to Americans when it comes to tax reporting on a Forgein Trust

The Form applies to "Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner

Who owns the Trust in Mexico, as it would appear that a U.S. person should not be considered the owner of the fideicomiso under IRC Section 679

Based on this point, one would not have to file the form based on the Forms Definition of who it applies too... owner of a Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner

As the bank becomes the legal owner of the property for the exclusive use of the buyer/beneficiary.

Now maybe that will make a bit more sense.... :saint::saint:


[Edited on 9-20-2010 by wessongroup]
I might follow your logic IF the bank was the named owner of the fideicomiso document, however, that's not the case....each & everyone of my fideicomisos have duly reflected "Longlegs In LaPaz" as the document owner....and it's inheritable by my chosen beneficiaries, not the banks....I can sell it, but the bank can't. ;)

Other than a cross-border reporting agreement which may or may not be complied with & which could be rescinded at any time, my name is the only name on the document that the IRS has any power over. Mexican banks cannot be expected to file US tax documents & even if they could, the net result to my taxable income would still be $0.00.
View user's profile
longlegsinlapaz
Super Nomad
****




Posts: 1685
Registered: 11-18-2005
Location: La Paz
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 05:12 PM


What k-rico said!!! The threat of the fines & penalties is outside the scope of my financial abilities.

I also agree with "bajajazz, you asked a Mexican banker about IRS laws and you would act upon his advice???????" But mostly because I personally know that bank individual! :tumble::lol:
View user's profile
dtbushpilot
Ultra Nomad
*****




Posts: 3294
Registered: 1-11-2007
Location: Buena Vista BCS
Member Is Offline

Mood: Tranquilo

[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 05:21 PM


If you got a new fideicomiso in 2009 when is the filing deadline for the forms? I seem to remember one of them being earlier than the other..



"Life is tough".....It's even tougher if you're stupid.....
View user's profile
maspacifico
Nomad
**




Posts: 317
Registered: 4-22-2008
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 05:46 PM


After looking at this thing for over a year now...I looked at filing myself and found that even though I am retired I don't have time for that kind of nonsense. I then remembered where all this is coming from, the Gringo Gazoot..... The guy is advertising there. Along with the South Dakota registration guy and the perpetual motion electricity saver guy. They advertise and they get an article. I don't have any income from my fideo's and neither do most of you. I am more than willing to pay my fair share of taxes on nothing, but I don't want to pay someone to file a bunch of needless forms.
That's why I make four copies of utility bills when I renew my FM2!!
View user's profile
longlegsinlapaz
Super Nomad
****




Posts: 1685
Registered: 11-18-2005
Location: La Paz
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 07:44 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by dtbushpilot
If you got a new fideicomiso in 2009 when is the filing deadline for the forms? I seem to remember one of them being earlier than the other..
Filing cutoff is April 15th for the reportable tax year. This is not one of the oddball date forms, it goes with your 1040.
View user's profile
oxxo
Banned





Posts: 2347
Registered: 5-17-2006
Location: Wherever I am, I'm there
Member Is Offline

Mood: If I was feeling any better, I'd be twins!

[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 07:58 PM


I talked to both my attorney and my accountant about these forms a couple of years ago. They both recommended that I file them. They both agree that the law is ambiguous. However, my accountant says it takes him 5 minutes to fill out the form and he doesn't charge me anything to do it. He said, let someone else with deep pockets fight the thing and get a ruling. Until then it costs me nothing to comply.

My accountant says that the IRS may indeed be interested in fideicomiso data because they want to get their share of any capital gains taxes when and if a property is sold. Please don't shoot me or my accountant, but I can see some political rants coming. Before I purchased my property in Mexico, my accountant told me that I would have to pay capital gain taxes in the US (as a US citizen) when the property is sold. I will get a credit toward my tax due based on the amount of Mexican capital gains taxes I pay. If the Mexican capital gains taxes is greater than or equal to my US capital gains tax, then I will owe nothing in the US. I went into this with eyes wide open.
View user's profile
bajajazz
Nomad
**




Posts: 386
Registered: 12-18-2006
Location: La Paz, BCS, Mexico
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-20-2010 at 11:00 PM


The IRS is interested in one thing and one thing only, the reporting of income. The function of a Fideicomiso is not that of an investment vehicle. Choosing to spend one's retirement years in a house in Mexico under the terms of a Fideicomiso is not an income-producing event.

The IRS is intentionally understaffed. The percentage of returns they audit is ludicrously low. Burying the bureau's agents under reams of unsolicited, unwanted and unnecessary paperwork is counterproductive to their mission.

And yes, I have followed the advice of my bank's trust officer since 1987, he's never burned me yet, and I have a lot more confidence in him than I do with the professional purveyors of rancid crap who publish their scare stories in the Gringo Gazette.
View user's profile
oxxo
Banned





Posts: 2347
Registered: 5-17-2006
Location: Wherever I am, I'm there
Member Is Offline

Mood: If I was feeling any better, I'd be twins!

[*] posted on 9-21-2010 at 05:01 AM


Quote:
Originally posted by bajajazz
The IRS is interested in one thing and one thing only, the reporting of income. The function of a Fideicomiso is not that of an investment vehicle. Choosing to spend one's retirement years in a house in Mexico under the terms of a Fideicomiso is not an income-producing event.


It could be (it hopefully is) if you make a profit when you sell your house. Any foreign income is a taxable event (possibly subject to taxes) in the eyes of the IRS.

Also, I know a number of people who own property in Mexico and rent it either part time or full time. The income is "under the table" and not reported in either Mexico or the US. I imagine that form 3520 is an effort by the IRS to put a stop to this practice.
View user's profile
wessongroup
Platinum Nomad
********




Posts: 21152
Registered: 8-9-2009
Location: Mission Viejo
Member Is Offline

Mood: Suicide Hot line ... please hold

[*] posted on 9-21-2010 at 06:22 AM


Quote:
Originally posted by k-rico
Quote:
Originally posted by wessongroup
k-rico... see above


Hey, you're right!! It doesn't make any sense to file these forms. I agree. BUT, we know of one individual fighting this now, he has said it is costing him big bucks, and we know of another individual who had to hire an attorney who had to get IRS officials in DC to tell a local agent to back off on another case.

You're right, it doesn't make sense. It's easy for you to argue against filing, you don't have a fideicomiso.

I AGREE WITH YOU - OK?

But I'm still going to file the forms - just in case. The penalties are stiff, as are CPA/lawyer fees.

And if the IRS rules that fideicomisos are not foreign trusts I'll be expecting a "neener, neener, neener, I told you so" from you. :tumble:


[Edited on 9-21-2010 by k-rico]


No way... like I said.. was just trying to help in my own way...

Will, just add this in as I was reading some others posts on the issues this morning with my coffee.. after this post.. I'm going looking for Russ's pictures.. and how he is doing with Bubba's new attachment to launch his boat.. and see where Pomp.. is this morning... with his super travelog.. I get to go a lot of places with that guy.. really super...

"As the bank becomes the legal owner of the property for the exclusive use of the buyer/beneficiary" you are not the owner of the property.

And the "description used for a document"... has no direct impact nor relevance with Trust law.. one could call the instrument.. Bajabutt, Wessongroup, Dancing with Wolves, the Terminator (the Bank I worked for City National was called the bank of the stars, and those names were the real names on Trust Documents create for real estate transactions for the people you associate with those movies (among others) and all property involved in a real estate transactions, (commercial or SFR were put into Trusts) the name of the Trust .. does not change the Law which the document are based on... with the law, in Mexico .. one does not own the property.. rather it is owned by the Bank and by means of a legal document, created by legislation in Mexico not the United States, which satisfies Mexican Law.. which allows you as a Foreign to live in the Federal Zone on property for 50 years, with renewal.... with other bells and whistles to encourage foreigners to invest in Mexican Real Estate for the development of the Mexican economy in Baja.. and is the primary reason the Baja real estate is really in the crapper about now.. no tourists, and no movement in Real Estate... the inventory continues to build, Fido or no...

In this case, the ability of a someone to live on a property in the Federal Zone, allowed through the legislation, with other conditions which must also be taken under consideration that relate to Mexico's Constitution giving the government control of land and the transfer of ownership rights of same.

On capital gains.. there are means around that issue also... just saying ......

And it does not really surprise me that CPA's and Lawyers.. would tell you to just fill them out... as they would incur liability in the event it went south, it's called CYA and the carry E&O Insurance for same...

I am not telling anyone what to do... rather, I did my own looking just about a year ago at this time.. and Legs helped me greatly in my own "due diligence" process on this topic among many others, as she always has her s**t wrapped tight... A very savvy Lady... and one who's opinion I respect in many areas .. and I don't mean to imply is incorrect rather perhaps some of the interpretation which have come down the line over the past 3-5 years may have been a bit colored and may need to be re-examined with a new "view".

Used to do Regulatory Affairs for Company's and had a business also doing same ... When a Law is past.. it takes at least 3-5 years to even get started on true implementation .. then there will be changes in Regulations to get the Law fine tuned.. based on a multitude of factors which will come up... like this..

As I think all know this Law was in fact going after the folks that were moving huge amounts of "loot" from the United States to other Countries by various means.. think the folks down in Baja living in retirement.. is a long way from the intent of the law which was passed... it just has to be broken out from the thinking of some that if falls under the United States attempt to get folks trying to CHEAT!! with moving assets offshore into Foreign Trusts to avoid paying taxes... not anyone I know hear... buy a long shot..

Its just never as direct as it would appear, with any Law and or Regulation from Fed's to States to Counties.. if so we would be living in a different place..

I don't like Government controlling our lives.. worked in it all my working days.. and have found it is always how the question is asked...

In this case, the question to be asked, does the Mexican Bank become the legal own the property, under current Mexican law ..... it does.. it is the law.. you can not own property in the Federal Zone... also Mexico's Constitution gives the government control of land and the transfer of ownership rights.. this is a long ways from a Trust which one owns in the United States..

Now go from there....

A really good thread, and to me it's no different that picking up a family who's car broke down on the way from Ensenada to Rosarito and I told them all to get into my Crow Vic and I took them to their house.. so they got home with the little baby and three small children and were able to get their friends and go back down and get their car.. .

All can read the law and regulations... and get a little insight from some who have worked with Government to derive favorable interpretations on Law and regulations governing various issues.. and perhaps see and/or hear something that helps them in their decision making on this an other issues...

It all helps...

[Edited on 9-21-2010 by wessongroup]

[Edited on 9-21-2010 by wessongroup]




View user's profile
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top

 






All Content Copyright 1997- Q87 International; All Rights Reserved.
Powered by XMB; XMB Forum Software © 2001-2014 The XMB Group






"If it were lush and rich, one could understand the pull, but it is fierce and hostile and sullen. The stone mountains pile up to the sky and there is little fresh water. But we know we must go back if we live, and we don't know why." - Steinbeck, Log from the Sea of Cortez

 

"People don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care." - Theodore Roosevelt

 

"You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them or to them." - Malcolm Forbes

 

"Let others lead small lives, but not you. Let others argue over small things, but not you. Let others cry over small hurts, but not you. Let others leave their future in someone else's hands, but not you." - Jim Rohn

 

"The best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer." - Cunningham's Law







Thank you to Baja Bound Mexico Insurance Services for your long-term support of the BajaNomad.com Forums site.







Emergency Baja Contacts Include:

Desert Hawks; El Rosario-based ambulance transport; Emergency #: (616) 103-0262