BajaNews
Super Moderator
Posts: 1439
Registered: 12-11-2005
Member Is Offline
|
|
Mexican lawmakers revive watered-down version of drug decriminalization bill
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2007/02/13/news/nation/15_41...
February 12, 2007
By: MARK STEVENSON
MEXICO CITY -- Mexican senators said on Monday they are reintroducing a watered-down version of a 2006 drug-reform bill criticized by the United
States because it would have decriminalized amounts of marijuana and other drugs.
The new bill, to be presented in a joint Senate committee Wednesday, drops the previous proposal for a blanket decriminalization covering all drug
"consumers," and drastically reduces amounts of drugs that can be considered possession for personal use.
"An error was made, unfortunately, in the lower house, adding the (exemption for) consumers," said Sen. Alejandro Gonzalez Alcocer, president of the
Senate Judiciary committee, which will formally present the proposed bill on Wednesday
"That really betrayed the spirit of the reforms, by increasing (personal use) quantities, and that's why we're paying attention to the criticisms and
making changes," he noted.
The new bill exempts from criminal prosecution only Indians who use traditional hallucinogens as part of their rituals; addicts who can prove they are
undergoing treatment for the problem, and first-time offenders.
The exemption for addicts and first offenders caught with drugs for "personal use" already exist in current law, but the definitions of an addict or
personal-use amounts are unclear. The thrust of the new bill is to clarify distinctions between drug users and traffickers, and allow local police to
act against small-time dealers.
The 2006 bill would have gone much further, exempting just about anyone from criminal prosecution for possession of five grams of marijuana (an amount
equivalent to 4 or 5 cigarettes).
The new bill reduces that limit to one gram, or a single joint and first offenders caught with that single joint would be subjected to a fine, but
could be prosecuted for a second offense.
The legal definition of maximum "personal use" amounts for other drugs mentioned in the original bill -- such as cocaine, heroin and methamphetamines
-- would also be reduced to a "single dose" basis under the new proposal, senators said.
"The defects that this law had several months ago have been fixed," said Sen. Ernesto Saro Boardman, president of the Senate Health Commission. "The
(drug) quantities are significantly less than in the original version."
The original bill passed both houses of Congress, but was vetoed by then-president Vicente Fox in May 2006 after U.S. officials expressed their
opposition to decriminalization and "urged Mexican representatives to review the legislation urgently, to avoid the perception that drug use would be
tolerated in Mexico."
The new bill would actually make it tougher for people to escape prosecution by claiming to be drug addicts, one of the legal loopholes frequently
used at present in Mexico, where very few small-time dealers ever go to jail.
Those caught with drugs under the new bill would have to prove they were undergoing treatment at a hospital, rehabilitation center or under a doctors'
care.
"There was no clear definition of who was an addict and who was engaging in drug possession," Saro Boardman noted
The most important aspect of the proposal, legislators stressed, was that it would allow state and local police to get involved in combatting
street-level drug dealing, currently considered a federal crime.
"This is going to help our cities like in Baja California. This is something we've been fighting for a long time, because drugs have proliferated
here," said Gonzalez Alcocer, whose home state of Baja California has been beset by drugs and drug-fueled crime, especially in border cities like
Tijuana.
At least one of the largest "personal use" allowances included in the old law will remain in the new bill: the decriminalization for use by Indian
groups of up to one kilogram (2.2. lbs) of peyote, the hallucinogenic cactus eaten during traditional rituals.
"It looks like an excessively large amount, but in reality, it's an attempt to decriminalize this for people who carry or bring it to rituals," said
Gonzalez Alcocer, referring to Indian healers or leaders from groups like the Huichol Indians.
"In the past, they've been caught with such large amounts, they were jailed," he said. The clause would apparently only apply to certain Indian
groups.
|
|
|
Packoderm
Super Nomad
Posts: 2116
Registered: 11-7-2002
Member Is Offline
|
|
I wonder if tourists are included as possible first time offenders? I'd patten the reform in the model of the current Netherlands policies. I'd err on
the side of letting people having fun. It would be interesting to see what would happen if some marijuana and peyote cafes open up. I wouldn't want to
include meth, heroin, or anything like that in the reform however. Alcohol would probably rank somewhere on top as one of the most toxic drugs as
well.
|
|
|
Don Alley
Super Nomad
Posts: 1997
Registered: 12-4-2003
Location: Loreto
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Packoderm
I wonder if tourists are included as possible first time offenders? I'd patten the reform in the model of the current Netherlands policies. I'd err on
the side of letting people having fun. It would be interesting to see what would happen if some marijuana and peyote cafes open up. I wouldn't want to
include meth, heroin, or anything like that in the reform however. Alcohol would probably rank somewhere on top as one of the most toxic drugs as
well. |
The article says they can still fine first time offenders. I wouldn't be surprised if they could also send them packing, deported with no return
allowed.
|
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xmbforum/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
