BajaNomad
Not logged in [Login - Register]

Go To Bottom
Printable Version  
Author: Subject: New Proposed Border Crossing
SUNDOG
Nomad
**




Posts: 176
Registered: 8-9-2006
Location: Baja
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-3-2007 at 08:41 AM
New Proposed Border Crossing


New Proposed Border Crossing

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/mexico/tijuana/20071003-9...
View user's profile Visit user's homepage
bajajudy
Elite Nomad
******


Avatar


Posts: 6886
Registered: 10-4-2004
Location: San Jose del Cabo,BCS
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-3-2007 at 09:12 AM


2012 seems like a long way off. By then they will probably need yet another crossing



View user's profile
Baja&Back
Senior Nomad
***




Posts: 549
Registered: 9-10-2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada / todo de Baja
Member Is Offline

Mood: Rarin' to go South!

[*] posted on 10-3-2007 at 09:56 AM


I dunno. Would be so much cheaper & quicker to widen the main drag in Imperial Beach and remove the beach fence at Playas de TJ so Ken & his buddies can 4 wheel across without hassle.

A Porta-John with windows & a pensioner with a Lee Enfield - what would that cost for Homeland Security???




Barry & Vanda
Baja and Back RV Tours
Vancouver BC Canada / Baja
http://bajaandback.com
View user's profile Visit user's homepage
David K
Honored Nomad
*********


Avatar


Posts: 64855
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Offline

Mood: Have Baja Fever

[*] posted on 10-3-2007 at 09:59 AM


I agree, the new crossing should be in Playas de Tijuana so all the people coming north from points south can drive right to the U.S. without going into Tijuana or going even further east!



"So Much Baja, So Little Time..."

See the NEW www.VivaBaja.com for maps, travel articles, links, trip photos, and more!
Baja Missions and History On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/bajamissions/
Camping, off-roading, Viva Baja discussion: https://www.facebook.com/groups/vivabaja


View user's profile Visit user's homepage
Hook
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 9010
Registered: 3-13-2004
Location: Sonora
Member Is Offline

Mood: Inquisitive

[*] posted on 10-3-2007 at 10:08 AM


Quote:
Originally posted by David K
I agree, the new crossing should be in Playas de Tijuana so all the people coming north from points south can drive right to the U.S. without going into Tijuana or going even further east!


Environmentalists would scream bloody murder at disrupting the "pristine" wetlands on the US side.

What happened to the plan to add another layer of inspection booths behind the existing ones at San Ysidro? This would effectively double the capacity of SY at a fraction of the cost of building a new crossing and the freeway to service it?

Could be done at Otay, too.




View user's profile
DENNIS
Platinum Nomad
********




Posts: 29510
Registered: 9-2-2006
Location: Punta Banda
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-3-2007 at 01:10 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by Hook
[
What happened to the plan to add another layer of inspection booths behind the existing ones at San Ysidro? This would effectively double the capacity of SY at a fraction of the cost of building a new crossing and the freeway to service it?


It would only double the capacity if they were synchronized. They would have to take in and release the cars at the same time. Do you think that's possible? I don't.
View user's profile
DENNIS
Platinum Nomad
********




Posts: 29510
Registered: 9-2-2006
Location: Punta Banda
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-3-2007 at 01:13 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by bajajudy
2012 seems like a long way off. By then they will probably need yet another crossing

Yeah, you're right, Judy. They won't start building a freeway until it's obsolete either.
View user's profile
tjvagabundo
Junior Nomad
*




Posts: 31
Registered: 6-10-2006
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-4-2007 at 12:51 AM


Quote:
Originally posted by Hook
What happened to the plan to add another layer of inspection booths behind the existing ones at San Ysidro? This would effectively double the capacity of SY at a fraction of the cost of building a new crossing and the freeway to service it?

Could be done at Otay, too.


Building a new port of entry East of Otay is not going to reduce wait times in SY. I think that adding another layer of inspection booths would be the best option rather than wasting money on a new crossing East of Otay or in Playas. Streamlining the inspection process, especially secondary, and adding more manpower at peak times for primary inspections would also help to decrease the wait times.

A new crossing in this location might be necessary in future years as TJ expands Eastward but not now. Besides the cost to build the port of entry this crossing would also require constructing a new 3-4 mile stretch of highway to connect to the 905 that would take years to complete.
View user's profile

  Go To Top

 






All Content Copyright 1997- Q87 International; All Rights Reserved.
Powered by XMB; XMB Forum Software © 2001-2014 The XMB Group






"If it were lush and rich, one could understand the pull, but it is fierce and hostile and sullen. The stone mountains pile up to the sky and there is little fresh water. But we know we must go back if we live, and we don't know why." - Steinbeck, Log from the Sea of Cortez

 

"People don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care." - Theodore Roosevelt

 

"You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them or to them." - Malcolm Forbes

 

"Let others lead small lives, but not you. Let others argue over small things, but not you. Let others cry over small hurts, but not you. Let others leave their future in someone else's hands, but not you." - Jim Rohn

 

"The best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer." - Cunningham's Law







Thank you to Baja Bound Mexico Insurance Services for your long-term support of the BajaNomad.com Forums site.







Emergency Baja Contacts Include:

Desert Hawks; El Rosario-based ambulance transport; Emergency #: (616) 103-0262