| Pages:
1
2 |
DENNIS
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 29510
Registered: 9-2-2006
Location: Punta Banda
Member Is Offline
|
|
ARE THE CARTELS AND THE GOVERNMENT GOING TO JOIN FORCES?
This is a Mexidata article:
----
Monday, February 1, 2010
Are Mexican Officials Negotiating with Narco Kingpins?
By Samuel Logan
Mexican Federal Police arrested four members of the Sinaloa Federation, killing a fifth, in a shootout on 27 January after anonymous informants tipped
the police to armed men seen entering and exiting a house in the state of Chihuahua. Such sporadic shootouts and arrests are now commonplace in
Mexico, but the arrest of members of the Sinaloa Federation, it seems, remains a rare event.
According to analysts, Mexican authorities have made 53,174 drug-related arrests, with only 941 of those arrests — some 1.7 percent — pertaining to
the Sinaloa Federation, believed to still be under the control of one man: Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman.
Mexican security analyst and economist Edgardo Buscaglia took these numbers a step further in a 7 January interview with The Economist, noting that,
"the government's strategy is to focus on the weakest groups, so that the organized crime market will consolidate itself around Sinaloa."
He also added an interesting twist: "[The government] is hoping to negotiate a decrease in violence with that one group."
The idea of the Mexican government negotiating with organized crime is certainly not new. From 1929 to 2000, a long succession of Mexican leaders
maintained a wink-and-nod arrangement with the country's drug trafficking elite, who were allowed to smuggle contraband into the US as long as they
didn't shed blood on Mexican streets.
Mexican President Felipe Calderon's hard-nosed strategy has obviously shattered this historical arrangement, so the idea that his administration would
even consider talking to a man like El Chapo seems far-fetched, easily dismissed out of hand.
Yet the arrest statistics support Buscaglia's theory. And with limited resources stretched across a large country, a focus on the Arellano-Felix
organization and the Gulf Cartel, both weakened by the successive loss of influential leaders, seems to be a pragmatic strategy.
The Sinaloa Federation represents the strongest drug trafficking syndicate operating today in Mexico. Men under El Chapo's direct control may control
as much as 45 percent of the Mexican drug trade, leaving roughly half the narco pie spilt among a number of groups, including Los Zetas, which is
arguably the most powerful organized criminal group in Mexico in terms of paramilitary effectiveness.
If Buscaglia is right, then the state of Sinaloa, and the city of Culiacan, would be off limits to the Calderon administration. So far, the Mexican
president has focused on Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, where in the latter he expedited the removal of the military from the streets in January,
replacing them with a new cadre of federal police.
The maneuver appears to be a litmus test for a new strategy, one that sees removing the military from the day-to-day patrol duty of hotspots to a more
narrow focus on one-off ‘decapitation’ operations, much like the assault that killed Arturo Beltran Leyva.
With a little under three years left in office, Calderon is certainly considering his end game, and it is not one where he will be able to deconstruct
all of Mexico's drug trafficking organizations. He will likely succeed at removing two — perhaps the Beltran Leyva organization and the Arellano Felix
organization — but within the amount of time he has left, he will not remove Los Zetas and the Sinaloa Federation by force alone. It will require a
significant amount of cunning and help, and as long as Calderon stays out of Sinaloa and does not arrest El Chapo's men, many will now have to at
least consider that the idea of a truce could be on the table.
——————————
This article was originally published at ISN Security Watch (02/01/09). The International Relations and Security Network (ISN) is a free public
service that provides a wide range of high-quality and comprehensive products and resources to encourage the exchange of information among
international relations and security professionals worldwide. Reprinted with permission from ISN.
Samuel Logan is an investigative journalist who has reported on security, energy, politics, economics, organized crime, terrorism and black markets in
Latin America since 1999. He is a senior writer for ISN Security Watch, and editor of Southern Pulse – Networked Intelligence. He is the author of
This is for the Mara Salvatrucha: Inside the MS-13, America's Most Violent Gang, (released by Hyperion in summer 2009). For issues related
publications go to http://www.samuellogan.com/publications.html.
|
|
|
JESSE
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3370
Registered: 11-5-2002
Member Is Offline
|
|
I think the Calderon goverment originally had this plan in mind, and perhaps, its still trying to implement it. In reality, i think its a plan that's
impossible to carry out. Calderon controls only a limited amount of law enforcement capabilities. The rest, is in the control of the state and local
goverments. While the feds might try to eliminate one cartel in a certain area, leaving the turf in the control of the other competing cartel (in this
case, the sinaloa). The task will be daunting if the state and local cops protect the home team.
Ciudad Juarez for example, is what many say the epicenter of the goverments policy for leaving one cartel in charge. The result? the most violent city
in the world. And the local cartel is still operating and defending its turf.
Now try to wipe out all the other cartels, and you will see how impossible this plan was (is).
|
|
|
ELINVESTIG8R
Select Nomad
Posts: 15882
Registered: 11-20-2007
Location: Southern California
Member Is Offline
|
|
If Mexico does what is suggested in this news report then Mexico as a nation is doomed and will forever more be overrun by killers. Now that they have
some of the cartels on the run they need to keep up the pressure and get even more aggressive. Killers need to be caught and incarcerated for the rest
of their lives or legally be put to death or killed in the shootouts. These killers have killed and killed and killed and it is inconceivable they can
be rehabilitated. Their consciences no longer have the “No, No Factor" in it and have conditioned themselves to kill without any thought of remorse.
You don’t change that mentality because they actually like to kill people.
[Edited on 2-3-2010 by ELINVESTIG8R]
|
|
|
Bajahowodd
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9274
Registered: 12-15-2008
Location: Disneyland Adjacent and anywhere in Baja
Member Is Offline
|
|
Unless the government becomes the last cartel standing.
|
|
|
Donjulio
Nomad
Posts: 376
Registered: 5-19-2009
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by ELINVESTIG8R
If Mexico does what is suggested in this news report then Mexico as a nation is doomed and will forever more be overrun by killers. Now that they have
some of the cartels on the run they need to keep up the pressure and get even more aggressive. Killers need to be caught and incarcerated for the rest
of their lives or legally be put to death or killed in the shootouts. These killers have killed and killed and killed and it is inconceivable they can
be rehabilitated. Their consciences no longer have the “No, No Factor" in it and have conditioned themselves to kill without any thought of remorse.
You don’t change that mentality because they actually like to kill people.
[Edited on 2-3-2010 by ELINVESTIG8R] |
We are all pitching in and getting you some tranquilizers. Two or three and a little tequila should mellow you right out.
|
|
|
ELINVESTIG8R
Select Nomad
Posts: 15882
Registered: 11-20-2007
Location: Southern California
Member Is Offline
|
|
Another one for the Taser Hall of Fame!
Here DonJulio let me help you now after you helped me with the tranquilizers and tequila. I always like to repay kindness done to me.  
I hope this was a help to get you business guys out of your anesthetized state of mind!
|
|
|
toneart
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 4901
Registered: 7-23-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: Skeptical
|
|
You may remember that I was the first one to suggest this as a solution to curtail the violence. Of course it is a radical idea and would be morally
wrong but it is a possible solution. My ideas are radical and usually go over like lead turds here on the BajaNomad, but they often come to be. War on
anything doesn't work. It just supports unfriendly industries and makes nasty billionaires richer. The rest of you who buy the status quo are stuck in
your own prison. Escape! Think out of the box.
Shame on me? Well...right back at you.
|
|
|
DENNIS
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 29510
Registered: 9-2-2006
Location: Punta Banda
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by toneart
You may remember that I was the first one to suggest this as a solution to curtail the violence. |
Jeeeezo, Tony.....Do you really believe there is any positive value at all in having a government policy that gives tacit approval to drug dealing?
Mexico would have as much world respect as Afghanistan and the poppy growers.
The only way they could pull it off would be to legalize, without condition, all drugs in Mexico.
I further believe a policy such as this could start a war.
|
|
|
BajaGringo
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3922
Registered: 8-24-2006
Location: La Chorera
Member Is Offline
Mood: Let's have a BBQ!
|
|
A war with who?
And would it be any worse than now???
[Edited on 2-4-2010 by BajaGringo]
|
|
|
ELINVESTIG8R
Select Nomad
Posts: 15882
Registered: 11-20-2007
Location: Southern California
Member Is Offline
|
|
Tony, I can tell you and I definitely think outside of the box because we are friends here in Baja Nomad. And we all know I am your favorite
Conservative Republican Turd....!
Now where did I put my taser!
|
|
|
DENNIS
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 29510
Registered: 9-2-2006
Location: Punta Banda
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by BajaGringo
A war with who?
|
Who? Are you kidding?
|
|
|
toneart
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 4901
Registered: 7-23-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: Skeptical
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by DENNIS
| Quote: | Originally posted by toneart
You may remember that I was the first one to suggest this as a solution to curtail the violence. |
Jeeeezo, Tony.....Do you really believe there is any positive value at all in having a government policy that gives tacit approval to drug dealing?
Mexico would have as much world respect as Afghanistan and the poppy growers.
The only way they could pull it off would be to legalize, without condition, all drugs in Mexico.
I further believe a policy such as this could start a war. |
Dennis,
No! i don't think there is any positive value other than a deal to curtail the violence. To me that is the most important thing, and to let
innocent citizens return to some kind of normal life without fear.
Your idea is a better one, which I have also been touting for years. That implies working within the rule of law to legislate. Mexico is more
comfortable and experienced in underhanded dealing though. It is all about power and money.
|
|
|
ELINVESTIG8R
Select Nomad
Posts: 15882
Registered: 11-20-2007
Location: Southern California
Member Is Offline
|
|
I personally would like to see the USA roll full force into Mexico (With Mexico's approval of course) with all the troops and equipment we take out of
Iraq so we can help the Mexican Government out with killing these murderous drug cartel killing machines, searching City-by-City, House-to-House,
Building-by-Building, Rancho-by-Rancho and underneath every rock. Is this thinking too far out of the box? What do you think?
|
|
|
DENNIS
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 29510
Registered: 9-2-2006
Location: Punta Banda
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by toneart
No! i don't think there is any positive value other than a deal to curtail the violence. |
I don't know, Tony. Surrender by any other name is still surrender. There has to be a better way and, of course, there is. Seperate the product from
the consumer.
|
|
|
BajaGringo
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3922
Registered: 8-24-2006
Location: La Chorera
Member Is Offline
Mood: Let's have a BBQ!
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by DENNIS
| Quote: | Originally posted by BajaGringo
A war with who?
|
Who? Are you kidding? |
I said that tongue in cheek to make the point that there already is a narco war. I don't see it getting worse by legalizing drugs...
|
|
|
Dave
Elite Nomad
Posts: 6005
Registered: 11-5-2002
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by BajaGringo
A war with who?
|
Basically thumbing your nose at U.S. drug policy wouldn't sit well.
While I doubt it would be a shooting war it would be economic suicide for Mexico.
And probably the U.S. as well. 
|
|
|
Bajahowodd
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9274
Registered: 12-15-2008
Location: Disneyland Adjacent and anywhere in Baja
Member Is Offline
|
|
The US and Mexico have almost $300 billion in combined trade annually, trailing only Canada and China, and well ahead of Japan. So economic suicide is
correct.
|
|
|
ELINVESTIG8R
Select Nomad
Posts: 15882
Registered: 11-20-2007
Location: Southern California
Member Is Offline
|
|
Larry it was said somewhat tongue-in-cheek and was not the ranting of some “Crazy Guy.” I just forgot to add the laughing bobble head. Ohh, wait a
minute, I just may be crazy.
|
|
|
BajaGringo
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3922
Registered: 8-24-2006
Location: La Chorera
Member Is Offline
Mood: Let's have a BBQ!
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Bajahowodd
The US and Mexico have almost $300 billion in combined trade annually, trailing only Canada and China, and well ahead of Japan. So economic suicide is
correct. |
Counting the drug traffic?
|
|
|
Dave
Elite Nomad
Posts: 6005
Registered: 11-5-2002
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by BajaGringo
Counting the drug traffic? |
Saw some program the other night where someone estimated 20% U.S. and 60% Mexico. While I doubt the validity of these figures no doubt it
is substantial.
I doubt the U.S. would stand for Mexico legalizing and Mexico knows this. The first thing that the U.S. could do is simply prohibit
all tourist travel to Mexico.
Legalization just ain't gonna happen.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xmbforum/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
