Pages:
1
2
3
4 |
Santiago
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3512
Registered: 8-27-2003
Member Is Offline
|
|
A request for those who post photos using Photobucket etc
Please resize the photo to no bigger than "Large" or about 640X480 pixies. When a photo larger than this gets used, it widens out all the responses
and other posts. Unless one has a huge monitor, you have to scroll side-to-side to read anything.
Thanks
|
|
David K
Honored Nomad
Posts: 64855
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Offline
Mood: Have Baja Fever
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Santiago
Please resize the photo to no bigger than "Large" or about 640X480 pixies. When a photo larger than this gets used, it widens out all the responses
and other posts. Unless one has a huge monitor, you have to scroll side-to-side to read anything.
Thanks |
YES! PLEASE!
Us poor Nomads with the standard 15" monitors have the page distorted wide to the side if one person in a thread posts a photo greater than 800
pixels....
Below where you click to upload photos (on Photobucket) is some small blue print that reads: "Customize your upload options". Click on that!
The pop up will give you several size options...
these are the lowest half of size options:
100x75
160x120
320x240
640x480
800x600
The 640x480 give 'Large' photos to post on Nomad.
Do not pick bigger than 800x600... I generally only do that size now for the maps, for detail... It fills the Nomad page, but doesn't stretch it.
[Edited on 11-30-2010 by David K]
|
|
willyAirstream
Super Nomad
Posts: 1786
Registered: 1-1-2010
Member Is Offline
|
|
Just to clarify - monitor size has nothing to do with your page size. It is the screen resolution. Even A 42'' monitor with a 800 x 600 screen
resolution will require horiz scroll on large pics. Monitors made in the last 3 or 4 years use a resolution of 1024 x768 or higher. Right click
anywhere on your desktop >properties or screen resolution to check your settings. Most web sites are designed at 800 px wide to accommodate the
lowest denominator ( 15% of uses) or 1024 px wide which can be viewed by most. That said, Higher resolutions will make your text smaller.
I do agree that pics should be 800 px max width for those still using 800 x 600 on older systems, ipads, notebooks and web books.
|
|
Skipjack Joe
Elite Nomad
Posts: 8084
Registered: 7-12-2004
Location: Bahia Asuncion
Member Is Offline
|
|
What's wrong with stretching the nomad layout? A 640X480 image looks puny on most modern screens. It has zero impact on the viewer. Most photographers
in the gallery forum don't want to look at images that small.
|
|
Natalie Ann
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 2819
Registered: 8-22-2003
Location: Berkeley
Member Is Offline
|
|
I agree with Igor on this.
A good photograph demands its size and space in order to be enjoyed by the viewer.
If for some that size is too large for their monitor, I suggest you follow Willy's suggestion for changing monitor resolution. It's easy to set up a
little click-it that comes up upon start-up, allows you to toggle back/forth between two resolutions for easy text/picture viewing.
If a short person goes to an art gallery,
he wouldn't ask that the pictures be moved lower so as to be at his eye level.
nena
Be yourself, everyone else is already taken.
.....Oscar Wilde
|
|
mcfez
Elite Nomad
Posts: 8678
Registered: 12-2-2009
Location: aka BN yankeeirishman
Member Is Offline
|
|
Unfortunately ....a few of our members here don't have a clue as to what what you guys are talking about! Some folks are plain simply to
say...computer frighten.
In the case you do have computer frights or just cant understand all this stuff about posting pictures.....send your pictures to me and I will resize
and all that stuff... for you the same day. Piece of cake to do.
You'll see my email address in my profiles.
Old people are like the old cars, made of some tough stuff. May show a little rust, but good as gold on the inside.
|
|
Sweetwater
Senior Nomad
Posts: 915
Registered: 11-26-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: chilly today hot tomale
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Natalie Ann
I agree with Igor on this.
A good photograph demands its size and space in order to be enjoyed by the viewer.
If for some that size is too large for their monitor, I suggest you follow Willy's suggestion for changing monitor resolution. It's easy to set up a
little click-it that comes up upon start-up, allows you to toggle back/forth between two resolutions for easy text/picture viewing.
If a short person goes to an art gallery,
he wouldn't ask that the pictures be moved lower so as to be at his eye level.
nena |
I'm new to this forum and have just posted a few times with 2 photos. Hello to everyone. I looked for a waving smilee but no such luck here.
I post to multiple forums with a common Photobucket account and agree whole heartedly with the above comments. I can't resize just to post here when
those photos go out to my Facebook, AdvRider, ThumperTalk, Gmail and several other sites. All my family and friends have never complained about pic
sizing and I've understood that they appreciate the increased visibility and impact of the larger formats. In fact, my photographer son wants the 10+
megpixel RAW format or he isn't satisfied....
I would hope that those who have computer disabilities would look at improving their resolutions rather than handicapping everyone else........
Everbody\'s preachin\' at me that we all wanna git to heaven, trouble is, nobody wants to die to git there.-BB King
Reality is what does not go away when you stop believing in it. -Philip K Dick
Nothing is worse than active ignorance. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe(1749-1832, German writer, artist and politician)
When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I\'ve never tried before. - Mae West
Experience is what keeps a man who makes the same mistake twice from admitting it the third time around.
|
|
Santiago
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3512
Registered: 8-27-2003
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Natalie Ann
If a short person goes to an art gallery,
he wouldn't ask that the pictures be moved lower so as to be at his eye level.
nena |
Now that's a good one, right there. There's a class-action lawsuit if anyone wants it.
A compromise maybe?:
When posting in the Photo Forum, make 'em a s big as you want - that's the point of that place. But if you want to post a photo of a bunch of dead
fish on the beach with a couple of overweight drunk gringos behind them with the pangero (who likely did all the damn work anyway) cut off at the neck
and follow it up with 3 paragraphs of scintillating prose describing just how you managed to fool all those fish; MAKE THE PICTURE SMALLER. 'k?
|
|
Santiago
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3512
Registered: 8-27-2003
Member Is Offline
|
|
See what I mean??? Now the whole damn thread is screwed up.
edit to show nena that just because I'm only 4'-9" I should be able to go to the deYoung and enjoy myself.
[Edited on 11-30-2010 by Santiago]
[Edited on 12-1-2010 by BajaNomad]
|
|
Skipjack Joe
Elite Nomad
Posts: 8084
Registered: 7-12-2004
Location: Bahia Asuncion
Member Is Offline
|
|
Two possible answers:
1. Now that picture I would like smaller
or
2. Keep that Jack Daniels out of that man's reach
your choice.
|
|
vandenberg
Elite Nomad
Posts: 5118
Registered: 6-21-2005
Location: Nopolo
Member Is Offline
Mood: mellow
|
|
Didn't screw up my screen, just filled the whole one.
|
|
DianaT
Select Nomad
Posts: 10020
Registered: 12-17-2004
Member Is Offline
|
|
Heck, that size picture made that Jack Daniels bottle jump right off the screen---smaller picture, might have missed it.
|
|
mtgoat666
Select Nomad
Posts: 18390
Registered: 9-16-2006
Location: San Diego
Member Is Offline
Mood: Hot n spicy
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Santiago
See what I mean??? Now the whole damn thread is screwed up.
edit to show nena that just because I'm only 4'-9" I should be able to go to the deYoung and enjoy myself.
[Edited on 11-30-2010 by Santiago] |
that's a PERFECT picture size. LOOKS GREAT on my monitor that happens to be set at 1280x1024 display size.
keep up the great work, santiago
[Edited on 12-1-2010 by BajaNomad]
|
|
Santiago
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3512
Registered: 8-27-2003
Member Is Offline
|
|
Tough crowd.
I am at 1280x1024 also on a 19" flat screen, maybe a year old. Still messed up.
[Edited on 11-30-2010 by Santiago]
|
|
tripledigitken
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 4848
Registered: 9-27-2006
Member Is Offline
|
|
Love it!
Looks like the ratio of alcohol to food stuffs is just about right.
|
|
Santiago
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3512
Registered: 8-27-2003
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by tripledigitken
Love it!
Looks like the ratio of alcohol to food stuffs is just about right.
|
Yup - we passed amateur status long ago....
The 'pantry', such as it is, is behind the picture taker. Chock full of canned goods that we never open.
|
|
tripledigitken
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 4848
Registered: 9-27-2006
Member Is Offline
|
|
you're a good sport Santiago
|
|
willyAirstream
Super Nomad
Posts: 1786
Registered: 1-1-2010
Member Is Offline
|
|
We could make them all vertical
|
|
Cypress
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7641
Registered: 3-12-2006
Location: on the bayou
Member Is Offline
Mood: undecided
|
|
Black Jack!! Oh Yea!
|
|
David K
Honored Nomad
Posts: 64855
Registered: 8-30-2002
Location: San Diego County
Member Is Offline
Mood: Have Baja Fever
|
|
You guys against keeping them under 800 pixels are overlooking one IMPORTANT thing... Baja Nomad RULES for posting photos.. I guess you haven't
read??? How about playing nice in Doug's playground... A photo over the 800x600 pixel limit HE posted will cause the TEXT to go OFF the screen,
requiring left/ right scrolling of the entire page full of posts, not just to view the one over-sized photo.
Photos on the Internet look great at 600 pixels... You can provide a link to the origial size where ever it is hosted if you want to show off the
giant size image...
Until we all get new equipment and Doug changes the rules... lets be considerate of him and those who have 15" monitors at the standard settings. Okay
amigos?
|
|
Pages:
1
2
3
4 |