Pages:
1
2 |
woody with a view
PITA Nomad
Posts: 15939
Registered: 11-8-2004
Location: Looking at the Coronado Islands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Everchangin'
|
|
Breaking News: Calderon concedes it's 'impossible' to halt drugs
ENDING the consumption and the trafficking of illegal drugs is “impossible”, according to Felipe Calderón, Mexico’s outgoing president. In an
interview with The Economist Mr Calderón, whose battle with organised crime has come to define his six years in office, said that countries whose
citizens consume drugs should find "market mechanisms" to prevent their money from getting into the hands of criminals in Latin America.
In an interview recorded last month for this week’s special report on Mexico, Mr Calderón said: "Are there still drugs in Juárez [a violent northern
border city]? Well of course, but it has never been the objective…of the public-security strategy to end something that it is impossible to end,
namely the consumption of drugs or their trafficking…
"[E]ither the United States and its society, its government and its congress decide to drastically reduce their consumption of drugs, or if they are
not going to reduce it they at least have the moral responsibility to reduce the flow of money towards Mexico, which goes into the hands of criminals.
They have to explore even market mechanisms to see if that can allow the flow of money to reduce.
"If they want to take all the drugs they want, as far as I’m concerned let them take them. I don’t agree with it but it’s their decision, as consumers
and as a society. What I do not accept is that they continue passing their money to the hands of killers."
Not so long ago these comments would have been unthinkable. Cast your mind back to 1998, when the UN Drug Control Programme (since absorbed by the UN
Office on Drugs and Crime, or UNODC) held a session on the “world drug problem” entitled: “A Drug-Free World: We Can Do It”. Since then it has become
painfully clear that, so far at least, We Cannot Do It. Since 1998 global consumption of both cannabis and cocaine has risen by about 50% and opiate
consumption has nearly trebled, according to the UNODC’s own figures.
Mr Calderón’s comments sum up what seems to be a growing consensus: stopping or even seriously reducing drug consumption has so far proved impossible,
so it is time to focus on ways of making that consumption less harmful. That sort of thinking has been fashionable for a long time on the demand side,
with innovations such as needle exchanges and methadone replacement now common in many rich countries. The next step is to explore legal ways of
managing the supply side, as Colorado and Washington have recently voted to do.
Sitting presidents such as Juan Manuel Santos of Colombia and Otto Pérez Molina of Guatemala are pushing for a rethink. As a result of this agitation
the Organisation of American States, a regional body, is compiling a report on drug policy which is expected to explore alternatives to the current
regime. It will be interesting to see if Mr Calderón, who is widely expected to take up a post at Harvard after leaving the presidency in December,
gets bolder still in his retirement.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/americasview/2012/11/drugs-bu...
|
|
Leo
Senior Nomad
Posts: 518
Registered: 9-23-2004
Location: Todos Santos
Member Is Offline
Mood: could be better
|
|
Someone is finallyt seeing the light.
De-criminalize the stuff, sell it legal and TAX it in the US is the only answer.
The grass is always greener....
and so, there is always a better spot in Baja
|
|
mtgoat666
Select Nomad
Posts: 18400
Registered: 9-16-2006
Location: San Diego
Member Is Offline
Mood: Hot n spicy
|
|
he fails to mention that while US demand originally led to rise of drug lords, the past decade or more has seen dramatic rise in Mexican drug abuse,
and today the drug wars are fueled as much by domestic (Mexican) consumption as international (US) consumption....
|
|
woody with a view
PITA Nomad
Posts: 15939
Registered: 11-8-2004
Location: Looking at the Coronado Islands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Everchangin'
|
|
also, if we stopped all of the outflow/remissions of our dollars back to Mexico there would be a second revolution so he can't have it both ways.
maybe this story is the follow on to Obama's stopping the flow of guns heading south?
|
|
bajaguy
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9247
Registered: 9-16-2003
Location: Carson City, NV/Ensenada - Baja Country Club
Member Is Offline
Mood: must be 5 O'clock somewhere in Baja
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Leo
Someone is finallyt seeing the light.
De-criminalize the stuff, sell it legal and TAX it in the US is the only answer. |
Yeah, that will solve all of the problems.........
|
|
DENNIS
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 29510
Registered: 9-2-2006
Location: Punta Banda
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by mtgoat666
he fails to mention that while US demand originally led to rise of drug lords, |
Bullcrap. That is the lame cop out that Mexico uses to ignore responsibility for the growth of the cartels.
Although it is certain that demand fuels supply, there would be no demand for a product that didn't exist in the first place.
|
|
durrelllrobert
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7393
Registered: 11-22-2007
Location: Punta Banda BC
Member Is Offline
Mood: thriving in Baja
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by bajaguy
Quote: | Originally posted by Leo
Someone is finallyt seeing the light.
De-criminalize the stuff, sell it legal and TAX it in the US is the only answer. |
Yeah, that will solve all of the problems......... | Like the repeal of prohibition did?
Bob Durrell
|
|
woody with a view
PITA Nomad
Posts: 15939
Registered: 11-8-2004
Location: Looking at the Coronado Islands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Everchangin'
|
|
i don't understand how the prices have dropped but the cartels have grown. hasn't there been a demand for 40-50 years now? the growth rate of the
number of users doesn't seem like it would be the determining factor. must just be the number of cartel guys trying to grab a piece of the pie?
|
|
Cypress
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7641
Registered: 3-12-2006
Location: on the bayou
Member Is Offline
Mood: undecided
|
|
WA and CO legalized pot. Might as well legalize it in all states. Keeping pot illegal is a "cash cow" to lawyers, cartels, and law enforcement
agencies. A waste!
|
|
monoloco
Elite Nomad
Posts: 6667
Registered: 7-13-2009
Location: Pescadero BCS
Member Is Offline
|
|
There's always the Singapore model.
|
|
MsTerieus
Nomad
Posts: 462
Registered: 6-8-2010
Location: Punta Banda, Ensenada, Baja California
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Cypress
WA and CO legalized pot. Might as well legalize it in all states. Keeping pot illegal is a "cash cow" to lawyers, cartels, and law enforcement
agencies. A waste! |
It is not legal in any of the United States.
|
|
Cypress
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7641
Registered: 3-12-2006
Location: on the bayou
Member Is Offline
Mood: undecided
|
|
MsTerieus, If it isn't against the law it's legal.
|
|
vandenberg
Elite Nomad
Posts: 5118
Registered: 6-21-2005
Location: Nopolo
Member Is Offline
Mood: mellow
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by monoloco
There's always the Singapore model. |
Can be done in a country that size, but nearly impossible in a country the size of the USA, with all the different state laws.
|
|
DENNIS
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 29510
Registered: 9-2-2006
Location: Punta Banda
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Cypress
MsTerieus, If it isn't against the law it's legal.
|
I don't think state law trumps federal law. This whole issue is becoming so convoluted , one would think it's happening in Mexico.
|
|
vandenberg
Elite Nomad
Posts: 5118
Registered: 6-21-2005
Location: Nopolo
Member Is Offline
Mood: mellow
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by DENNIS
I don't think state law trumps federal law. This whole issue is becoming so convoluted , one would think it's happening in Mexico.
|
Correct Dennis.
I think the Feds are not acting to see how this is going to work out.
|
|
durrelllrobert
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7393
Registered: 11-22-2007
Location: Punta Banda BC
Member Is Offline
Mood: thriving in Baja
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by DENNIS
Quote: | Originally posted by Cypress
MsTerieus, If it isn't against the law it's legal.
|
I don't think state law trumps federal law. This whole issue is becoming so convoluted , one would think it's happening in Mexico.
|
Current states' rights issues include the death penalty, assisted suicide, gay marriage and the medicinal use of marijuana, the last of which
is in violation of federal law.
In Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the federal government, permitting the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to arrest
medical marijuana patients and caregivers.
In Gonzales v. Oregon, the Supreme court ruled the practice of physician-assisted suicide in Oregon is legal.
Bob Durrell
|
|
MsTerieus
Nomad
Posts: 462
Registered: 6-8-2010
Location: Punta Banda, Ensenada, Baja California
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Cypress
MsTerieus, If it isn't against the law it's legal.
|
Cypress, It's against the law.
|
|
bajaguy
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9247
Registered: 9-16-2003
Location: Carson City, NV/Ensenada - Baja Country Club
Member Is Offline
Mood: must be 5 O'clock somewhere in Baja
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by vandenberg
Can be done in a country that size, but nearly impossible in a country the size of the USA, with all the different state laws.
|
Oh, we can eradicate the illicit drug problem in the USA, we just don't have the will or the stomach to do what is necessary/needed.
|
|
vgabndo
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3461
Registered: 12-8-2003
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Checking-off my bucket list.
|
|
Bajaguy, given your signatures, I'd be interested in knowing what you think it would look like IF we had the stomach to do what was necessary to
ERADICATE the problem of inappropriate use of drugs in this country.
It is illicit for me to take my WIFE'S pain pill when I hit MY thumb with a hammer. It begins there.
What do you have the stomach to do to me to eradicate that behavior.
Here's one thing that I project people like you have already laid on me with your prohibition consciousness. When I got cancer, and wound up in stage
III renal failure, I got a Compassionate Use recommendation from my MD to use cannabis in my recovery. Those records go to the County, doubtlessly to
the State, and are surely available to the Feds. Since Cannabis is a schedule one drug with NO KNOWN MEDICAL USE to the
Federal Government, and because anyone known to use a schedule 1 narcotic is prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law, I am not allowed
to possess anything to defend myself in one of the most revolutionary, heavily armed, militia infested Counties in the USA.
I invite you to provide evidence that contradicts the mountains of evidence for the positive medicinal use of the substance. I'd welcome the debate. I
suggest that it is long past time to demand that the government provide evidence to support their claims that Cannabis is more dangerous than alcohol
or tobacco, neither of which is a schedule 1 drug since both have been found to be medically effective.
Undoubtedly, there are people who cannot afford to give the anchor of sanity even the slightest tug. Sam Harris
"The situation is far too dire for pessimism."
Bill Kauth
Carl Sagan said, "We are a way for the cosmos to know itself."
PEACE, LOVE AND FISH TACOS
|
|
Lee
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3508
Registered: 10-2-2006
Location: High in the Colorado Rockies
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by DENNIS
I don't think state law trumps federal law. This whole issue is becoming so convoluted , one would think it's happening in Mexico.
|
Med dispensaries on every block in Boulder, CO. Breckinridge Colorado top cop says he will not enforce laws against pot. Pot smokers have the
blessing of the Colorado State health department. Feds are being told to back off.
Think this might be viewed as a trump to some.
|
|
Pages:
1
2 |